I would think we are past questioning his judgement at this point in time.
We know his judgement is bad.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
AKA : they don't get it the way we do.
Yeah, well I'm not disappointed in the least. The only cloud service I trust in gaming is Steam, and nobody else, neither Borkzilla nor Activision, is up to Steam's level in the matter.
Which is a basic truth anyone who ever had to write a user manual has known for ages.
What this "episode" really illustrates is that, when making a product that uses an encryption key, make sure that right at the beginning the product does not start when using the default key and make an error message that makes it clear that it won't start until said default key has been changed.
Kudos to Shamir for getting things back to Earth where quantum computing is concerned.
Indeed, most of us have nothing to fear from having our lunch meetings decrypted - which is also why all the hoopla around child abuse is a very poor excuse for backdooring encryption.
That said, I don't think quantum computers decrypting messages will be useless, it's just that those who have one will be using it on messages coming from very specific sources.
Moscow will try to capture and decrypt everything it can from the US embassy, the NSA will do the same to Russia and China, and China will be throwing massive numbers of quantum computers to get a hold on as much embassy traffic as it can.
Qauntum computing is still very much a threat to encrypted messages, it's just that the sphere where it will apply has now been publicly restricted to very high levels only.
I respectfully disagree.
In my own house I can do whatever I want, including calling my dishwasher a Hoover if I so wish.
As a commercial outfit, however, I'm pretty sure that I would most definitely get in trouble if I sold dishwashers with Hoover as a model name.
Just like I have always and always will tell you to go google something. GoogleTM doesn't like it ? I'm waiting for their lawsuit, me and a billion other people.
To date, maybe, but that is just an estimate.
And I still can't find the definitive amount of stars in our Milky Way. Even on scientific channels on YouTube, quotes are in the 100 to 400 billion range, which is quite a range IMO.
On top of that, they only pulled an estimate after sampling less than 300,000 stars. I know you only need to poll 2000 people to get a statistically significant result, but still, 300,000 out of 100 to 400,000,000,000 seems a bit light to take that as an accurate figure.
But okay, it's the best we have for now. I can accept that.
Sorry ?
This scheme is supposed to get "personal" PCs into the business place and Borkzilla thinks that that means fewer PCs ?
Hey Nadella, you do realize that, since COVID, everybody who's actually going to use a personal computer has one now ? And you want people to buy your handwaving argument that cloud PCs are less expensive ?
Do you really think nobody else is writing or reading about the green cost of datacenters and Internet usage in general ?
Pull the other one, it has bells on it.
Look, we know what's going on now. You're not thinking of the children. Child abuse is a terrible thing and should rightly be stamped down as soon as it appears, but you do not need the power to invade everyone's privacy to safeguard the children, and that's not what you're fighting for.
You're fighting for the power to invade anyone's privacy on whatever pretext suits the meal of the day. In itself, if only the government institutions could do that, it might eventually be acceptable, but the NSA has amply demonstrated that it will abuse whatever the hell it wants with or without permission, so by "eventually acceptable" we need to read "absolutely not acceptable".
And then there's the whole problem of if the encryption can be intercepted, it will end up being intercepted by the "wrong" people (and any value of wrong can suffice here).
Finally, I'll accept this possible invasion of my private life and correspondance if and only if all government officials use the same technology for their top-secret communications.
Hey, if it's good enough, then it's good enough for everyone.
Sure. The only question is : how many more tests before getting something reliable ?
Not knocking it, SpaceX has largely been the most open and honest companies there is. It admits failure when failure happens, and I'm sure there are many valuable minds working the problem.
Musk not having a say in it more than likely has a lot to do with its existing success.
But hey, a bit of gentle ribbing can't hurt, now can it ?
So, carry on !
You are easily impressed.
What is currently abusively called "AI" is nothing but a statistical inference machine. It is only as good as the guy who programmed it understands statistics.
It has nothing to do with AI, can be easily confused with brightly colored clothes, and couldn't tell you what a mammal is if its electricity depended on it.
And the statistics expert can't even prove why it produced its conclusions.
So it's the closest thing we have to vastly overrated 8 ball.
I totally believe it.
I'm expecting to see this revolutionary communist top-of-the-line, bleeding edge tech any time now. Because surely, if they've announced it, it has to be true, right ? I mean, nobody has ever taken the risk of publicly announcing something that was factually incorrect, right ? Naahh.
Totally believe it.
And it's opposite day today.
It wouldn't be so effectve if programmers stopped downloading code to production servers without any good reason.
Saving bandwidth is less important than ensuring security. And if you think that getting the latest updates is worth compromising security, I'm sure nork hackers have you on their Employee of the Month portraits.
Why ? They'll be selling the heat, won't they ? So, there's profit to be made and, if you want to make money, you have to start by paying money. They've already done the hard part anyway : the heating process is up and running already.
This reflex of not wanting to pay in order to get something has to stop. It's not because you're a corporation that you have the right to government handouts and tax breaks.
25% of 725 million is 181 million.
$181 million is way too much for someone who has not been impacted by the issue that they are now involved in.
It is wrong. Just wrong.
An attorney is paid by the hour. If he's a good attorney, he gets to bill an outrageous sum, but he shouldn't get his fingers in a pie he doesn't deserve.
And if he was impacted by the issue, then he gets to submit a claim, just like everyone else.
It is time to put a stop to this nonsense.
I understand that racist web content should not be used in training data. I'm a bit less sure about pornographic web content, but I'll give that one a pass.
Now, if web content is neither racist nor pornographic, how exactly is it "problematic". What is the definition of "problematic" in that context ?
Could someone enlighten me ?
Correction : freedom of speech is paramount, except if you're dissing the Great Twitler.
What Musk still doesn't understand (and probably never will) is that your actions still have to correspond to your words in order to be credible.
Making exceptions to your own general rules and your credibility goes down. Make those exceptions to favor yourself and your close friends, and your credibility disappears.
His credibility has disappeared.
That is especially tru of encryption, which is why RSA encryption is so successful.
However, when a private company that has never published production code is hacked and its code is stolen, that is a rather serious blow against the security of its code because now the miscreants can find out how the whole thing was put together, which makes it easier to find loopholes and create code that simply hacks the result.
If I knew the code to Bing, I could write a patch that could finally redirect any call to Bing to whatever browser I preferred.
Damn, now I'm getting my hopes up . . .
Let's not forget that that vulnerability was of our own doing, with every "industry captain" hell-bent on having everything made in poor countries instead of building industry in Europe.
Between COVID and China, it looks like some sense has been knocked into a few decision-making heads.
Oh, of course there's the fact that, in order to sell product, you have to have it available - which is a tad more difficult when your production line is a continent away, out of your control, and has suddenly developed a severe case of notavailabilitis.
It would seem that, just like The CloudTM, it appears that local control is once again in favor. And the wheel turns . . .
The right to fee speech does not include the right to threaten others and never has.
Swatting should be illegal if isn't already, and the consequence should be hard time for the scum responsible. I fail to see what new law is needed to make that happen, I'm sure there are enough existing laws for that.
Online threats should bring legal action, with subpoena to the provider to reveal the origin. And death threats should be acted upon by the FBI or corresponding law enforcement without fail and without mercy.
Free speech is not an excuse. You can hate anyone you want, you have no right to threaten them.
Well good luck to them. I think Red Hat, of all companies, will recognize the customer's right to decide for himself, and not foist a cloud environment on people who have no use for it.
We're talking Linux here. I hope that that means that customers are intelligent enough to not go for cloud simply because everyone else is.
Then again, we're also talking human beings - worse, managers - so I'll accept that I might be disappointed.
Sounds like a beginner who couldn't be arsed to find out exactly how many loops were necessary so go for 16K, it'll surely be enough.
Not to mention that auto-appending to the cron job sounds like it should be anathema to me. Not a Linux admin (or an admin of any other OS), but I'm convinced that a job is supposed to be put in the cron list by an actual human who knows what he's doing, not as an auto-insert by some coder who looks like he's half-assing his way to the next paycheck.
Yes, I know that semiconductor fabs are immensely expensive and that we now have to ensure that when China invades Taiwan it will not cut us off from our silicon perfusion.
With that in mind, it still seems to me that money attracts money. None of those billions are going to go to a chip fab startup. It'll all be Intel, TSMC etc, in other words, it'll all go to companies who are already valued in the hundreds of billions.
You want to take advantage of this opportunity to start in the semiconductor business ? We like your gusto, kid. Why don't you start with a hot dog stand in New York ? Call us back in 20 years, we'll see what we can do.
Where public communications are concerned, it is my position that nothing should come before security.
The fact that security is not the number one concern when implementing a new layer of communication that is supposed to be open by design is a promise that, when things will go wrong (and they will, we all know that), it will be much more expensive and time-consuming to correct.
And frankly, telling me that an open infrastructure does not need to be hardened against Russian/Chinese/Nork hackers is just begging for trouble.
Um, no. The guy can find any religion he wants, posting classified documents on a Minecraft-associated server is not whistleblowing.
If you want to be a whistleblower, you send the documents to Wikileaks, or a reputable journal, along with a text stating your intentions and why those documents prove your act.
Leaking classified military documents to impress your buddies is not that in any way, shape or form.
This guy is going down.
Apparently you have it in for BPS (no, I've checked your comment history, don't even try to deny it). Would you mind providing a citation that might justify your online war against them ?
Not that I particularly care for either of them, but when I mount an argument against someone, I source my argument.
Please show us your source(s), otherwise you are just ranting gratuitiously.
I have another solution : don't use it.
Instead, there is the old-school method. It's called bookmarks. In my browser bar, I have a Youtube folder. All the channels I follow are in that folder. At the bottom of the bookmark bar folder, there is an option "Open All in Tabs" (at least, there is in any proper browser). So, when I feel like exploring my channels, all I have to do is go to my bookmark folder, open everything I have chosen, and wait for the refresh (on a 1Gbps fiber line, it's okay).
YouTube recommendations ? I don't need stinkin' YouTube recommendations. If one of the hosts on a channel I follow recommend that I go look at another channel, then I go check it out.
Bah, humbug.
I'm thrilled that server farms are cooling their equipment more efficiently. That is obviously a Good ThingTM.
However, I do have one question : the amount of heat that needs evacuating does not depend on the manner in which the cooling is done. So, how is it that I am reading about economies ?
Granted, air cooling requires noisy fans and proper airflow, which is not always obvious to ensure. Liquid cooling is easier since the heat is leaving through a pipe, not just through the rules of thermodynamics, so it's a sight easier to know what you're doing, but in the end, there is still a fan pushing (or pulling) air through a grill, and that's where the cooling is happening.
Far be it from me to knock liquid cooling. I have been an active proponent of it for almost two decades (aka, before it became common), but the amount of heat to evacuate does not change, even the operating comfort does.
When I adopted liquid cooling for my first AMD Thunderbird, it made a world of difference. My home office was silent. The only noise left was the soft whirr of a pair of hard disks. It was astonishing, and I never went back to pure aircooling.
Nowadays, my home rig has watercooling on the motherboard, on the graphics card and, of course, I bought a CPU cooling kit with a ginormous radiator. So I have a 3-fan radiator for my GPU (which, in all honesty, never makes a sound) and a two-fan radiator for the CPU (which makes more noise, annoyingly), in addition to the chassis and PSU radiators. Still, I will never go back to pure aircooling.
But the heat is still there. It still needs to be taken away. The only advantage of watercooling (apart from reduced noise levels) is that you don't have to rely on iffy air thermodynamics. I do not see any other gains.
Hey, genius, if you had read the terms you could have avoided signing a contract that locked you in.
Instead, you just signed it and then tried to use your name as an excuse when it all went pear-shaped. At the rarified level of your circle, that is simply not excusable.
No pity here. Pay attention next time.
If there is a next time.
One day, one happy day, business is going to return to prioritizing stability over convenience.
I suppose that won't happen until all current CxOs have kicked the bucket and their noxious influence die with them.
But one day, we will return to a world where uptime is king, and change for the sake of change is anathema.
The golden rule is : if it works, don't fix it.
Very little is gained by adding a dark theme. Just my two cents . . .
As much as that may be justified, it still feels like a cop-out for legitimate journalistic inquiry.
With that kind of excuse, actualy journalists might as well just follow Twitter for the news (and I don't think that that is a good thing).
Let's imagine for a second that they actually are.
That still doesn't give them the right to enforce Chinese law outside of China. Not without a treaty between the USA and China and, these days, I really don't think that kind of treaty has any chance of becoming reality.
Someone can very well show up at my doorstep in France and claim to be from the FBI. He can even show me his card. He is not the law in France and any menace will be met with a curt "Out !" and that will be the end of the story for me.
It will be followed by a call to actual French police to warn them that there is a guy impersonating US FBI agents and going around threatening people, so that might not be the end of the story for him, but that's no longer my problem.
Of course, I have no more family in the USA to be threatened with, so there's that.
Even if China is actually sending proper law enforcement officers to try and get Chinese criminals to go back, that's not the way you do things. You negociate and extradition treaty and, once signed, you then submit extradition requests via the proper channels. But of course, that would mean China plays by international law, which is something it has a very hard time doing as soon as said law is not in its percieved immediate interest. That is how we get a nation acting like a schoolyard bully. And that including toward its own people.
But, my good sir, that is not part of the criteria.
You must be :
- expensive
- buzzword-savvy
- with plenty of (beginner) consultants
- and a legal contract that requires a legal department full of permanent lawyers to draft
- oh, and have an employee who is vaguely related to someone in government helps (a lot)
Having something that works is neither here nor there.
. . . but it's no big deal actually.
Sure, Borkzilla, it's not your data that is at risk, so "no big deal".
But your created a security environment which "could be abused".
Tell me, did you ever think of pitting your security against an official Red Team ? No ?
Of course not, silly me. That's what customers are for.
Oh really ?
So now on-prem is attractive again ?
Does that mean that all those C-suits are no longer basing their bonuses on moving everything and its dog to The CloudTM ?
Because I seem to recall a not-so-distant time when The CloudTM was the cheapest, most reliable way to go.
Looks like the beancounters have brought a cluebat to the board's meeting room.
About time too.