
It was a useful option, therefor I'm pretty sure it has been removed.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
So he was operating on faulty assumptions. I don't want to be harsh, but it seems that an admin should always check that what he's doing is the right thing, otherwise mayhem might ensue.
He didn't make sure, and he paid the price (one lost XMas evening).
I'm not necessarily saying that an admin should consult the manual every time, but I would have thought that, just before sending a command that should reconfigure the entire network (not something you do every day, I guess), it might be a good thing to double-check and be sure.
Oh well, he's learned his lesson.
Yes and no. The majority of failures are about getting to LEO in the first place. Either the rocket blows up, or its engines fail to provide the necessary thrust for the required amount of time, or something goes haywire with the guidance system . . . The possibilities of failure are almost endless.
If the rocket manages to get to LEO, you've arguably done the hard part. The rest all depends on how rigourous the programming was, how complete the tests were and how prepared the whole project was. Sending the probe depends on Newtonian physics. There are no surprises there.
Getting to LEO is a roll of the dice. After that, it's mostly your fault if something fails.
Only created by AI ?
I don't know, check this out : https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en.
Yes, a lot of faces can be spotted as fake, but some are very convincing.
And you'll never see the same face twice.
So, the project is eight years overdue and current hardware will be obsolete in five.
They forecasted a major emergency comms project to only work for less than fifteen years before requiring everything to be replaced ?
Golly, with planning like that, who needs catastrophes ?
Tell you what, guys, I'll do you a favor : give me £15 billion now and I'll have something working by next year, promise. I don't know what yet, but for £15 billion I'll wrack my brain and get it to work.
Yes, apparently VMware is a lame duck. Utterly incapable of ensuring healthy competition. Lacking vision. Etc.
With all those compliments, it's lucky Broadcom is being nice. I shudder to think of what they would be writing if they decided to get nasty.
And apparently the blame is being laid at marketing's doorstep. That should be a strong hint for the salesdrones at VMWare to polish their CV and start finding employement elsewhere.
Then again, they're salesdrones. They always have their CV ready to go elsewhere.
You mean this guy ?
This "Celsius Network Roni" ? Pro tip : if the name you use at work is not the name on your birth certificate, you're either an actor, a porn star or a criminal. You most certainly are not a professional businessman, even if you do wear a suit and a tie.
So he "assists in the development of sales strategies and the identification of a variety of difficulties and obstacles" at Celcius ? Seems like he mainly worked to find ways to cheat the law, maximize sucker income and sing the siren tune of unbelievable interest rates (because they were not real).
And now, like the cockroach sent scurrying from the light, he is running from Justice. I'm guessing he may be smart enough to go to a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the USA (not guaranteed, but still possible) - which are, for the most part, poor, 3rd-world countries. I'm also guessing the FBI have his accounts frozen, so I hope he had the foresight to stash some funny money into an account that he can still access from whatever straw-thatched hut he's living in now.
In any case, I'm sure he'll be living la vida loca for $2/day for the foreseeable future, unless he's stupid enough to get himself caught for something (not impossible either). Fugitive from justice sure gives you time to reflect on how not smart you actually were when you decided that scamming people with false claims and newfangled non-tech was a good idea. Of course, it gives you time, but the intelligence to recognize that doesn't come giftwrapped with it.
And it has forever been so. The only thing is, back in the glorious days of VHS, you could take one look at that FBI warning, snicker and press Fast Forward to get of it and all the useless previews that followed. These days ? Put the disk in and go prepare your snack/dinner/whatever, because you've got at least five minute of unskippable shit occupying your screen before you can actually watch the movie you intended to.
Pirates ? They've got the same movie on a USB key or NAS and, when they want to watch it, they prepare their snacks beforehand because when they press PLAY, the movie starts.
I'm starting to think the pirates may not be entirely wrong . . .
Her contract can be as solid as granite, Elon has history in not respecting contracts (at least, at Twitter).
He's already not paying rent, not paying cloud bills and likely many other bills. What makes you think he's going to pay her golden parachute ?
She's lucky if she's being paid her salary, at this point.
Funny that. On all PCs that I control there is the persistent ubiquity of NoScript and UBlock Origin.
I wonder why . . .
That being said, this report is entirely from Democrats (and Bernie). I expect a flurry of Republicans to jump to the defense of poor little Google any minute now.
Why would those obligations be so onerous if Amazon isn't flinging ads ?
Let's say that one of the rules is : ensure that all 3rd-party ads conform to regulation.
Check ads in company : no 3rd-party ads.
Rule is met. End of story.
So where's the onerous ?
If Amazon is adamant that it is not a VLOP, then it shouldn't have much trouble ticking off the list in the same manner. Its management is creative enough, it can surely manage. Okay, they'll have to actually work a bit instead of yelling at the peons, but hey, consider it a welcome change of pace.
So, pigs are flying now ?
I have absolutely no confidence that the NSA is not going to get its grubby hands on all that delicious data. The only way to limit the USA's access to EU citizens data is to not send it over in the first place.
But hey, diplomats will be diplomats.
So now, when if ever we find out that the USA has not kept its word, what's Plan B ?
Somehow, I doubt that a discussion with any Chinese diplomat is going to be substantive, much less direct.
However, I do believe that the Chinese diplomat will definitely try to give that impression, while privately smirking at the gwai loh's credulity.
Yeah. May.
Frankly, this eternal tiptoeing around sensitive issues is starting to grate on my nerves. Stop cushing the blow already. Take the guns out and just say what you mean : Amazon, if you don't play fair, we'll gut you and leave your entrails to the vultures.
All this namby-pamby niceness just makes the suits in multinational behemoths believe that they are untouchable.
Well, except if they live in China. Those guys know just how touchable they are.
Sometimes I don't find that such a bad idea.
It will fuck up its own employees just as readily as it will fuck up its customers and their employees.
That said, its About page needs to be updated. As usual, after such an event followed by months of silence, any blurb mentioning honesty and transparency needs to be followed by an asterisk sending to a paragraph stating "As much as our legal and marketing departments are okay with that".
Which won't really be a problem given that there will not be enough nuclear energy generation to supply them all anyway.
Anyone who believes that the tens of millions of ICEs rolling around today will all be replaced by EVs in the next six and a half years needs to come and see this bridge I have for sale . . .
Not to mentiont that the overall green credentials of EVs are still to be demonstrated.
Are those batteries really 100% recyclable ?
And how many more are going to die in the cobalt mines just to make another hipster happy ?
"The document found ministers made untrue statements and abused their power, and that senior public servants knew the scheme was flawed and/or illegal but did not act to stop it."
So, bumbling idiots with a mandate and high-ranking position holders not wanting to rock the boat. Mix in a hefty dose of badly-thought-out financial rules and apply blindly via Computer Says No and you get the almost invitable : human suffering and death.
A little knowledge may be a bad thing, but a bit more knowledge, and somebody with a pair, would have been a better thing in this case.
Funny thing : as soon as I read the heading I immediately thought of that Yes Minister episode, and the great example of government and private sector collaboration.
If there was any intelligence at all, it would be awesome, but there isn't. Not a iota.
What there is is a whole lot of electronics hardware with a hefty load of software written by very intelligent people, no doubt, but that does not, in itself, create intelligence.
What it does create is a monstrous machine that is so complicated in its workings that it baffles our spongy little brains, so we dub it "superintelligent".
Instead of creating the proper log environment in the code so we can trace back how it reaches its conclusions . . .
Ah, Sharepoint.
Well, I guess that's what you get for throwing everything including the kitchen sink into whatever stupid idea the boss's nephew had.
That said, it may be able to wreak havoc, but there is a difference : it is highly traceable. Anybody pulling those shenanigans on a corporate network will be able to do it once, then will logically have their account banned.
At least, I would hope so.
Citation please ?
The EU enacted the rules that were in place. You might want to remember that the UK specifically made some of those rules you are considering as "punishment".
Then again, you might prefer to ignore that. Much more comfortable that way.
So, carry on !
An EV supercar. If there ever was a class of objects that do not need electrification, I would have definitely put Lamborghini and Ferrari in there.
They already have stupendous acceleration. High-end EVs have, apparently, similar levels of acceleration, but they absolutely lack the autonomy to take advantage of it over time. You can definitely ramp up the odometer in an EV, but you're trading that for distance at a perilous rate.
A gas-guzzling supercar isn't economic, but you can floor the gas pedal without immediately checking how many minutes you have left.
Plus, with either brand, the point is kinda the noise the engine makes. If you're telling me that those Lambos are now going to coast out of parking lot silently, well, like what's the point of having one ?
Very few people buy that kind of car to go around unnoticed.