"longtime information security employees at Twitter intervened"
And that's why they were fired.
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Yeah, that's just what the workplace needs. More noise in open-space areas, what with marketing in the corner that just can't shut up, your cubicle neigbor who can't stop talking about his favorite sport and everyone else on the (smart)phone talking to God only knows who.
And they want us to come back to the office ?
Fuck that.
"he has made a number of trades in the Company's shares that had not been disclosed to the Company or the market in compliance with the PDMR disclosure requirements"
Even in London, that doesn't sound like he's going to have a good time with the authorities. At the very least he's going to have explain why he didn't disclose those trades and I don't think that those will be very comfortable discussions.
After all, he's not a politician, so he does not benefit from the Boris Johnson aura of invulnerability . . .
Consultants at £1000/day ? Par for the course. If you want to fail spectacularly, you need those kind of guys and, especially, you need to not listen to them.
It's all well and good to blame the consultants, but when you've ignored the red flags, you can only blame yourself for the shambles that ensues.
All that administrative overhead is now going to be doubled, then. With Intel HQ sitting on top.
More minions running around, more manglement looking to seem important, and all that for a project that won't start bearing fruit before the end of this decade.
Well, can't say Gelsinger isn't boldly going forward, at the least.
Intel to be leading foundry in the West ? Why not ? We need something like that, at the very least.
Is that model capable of ensuring that beta updates do not spill over to the production line ?
The arrogance of Redmond is limitless. Hey, Nadella, why don't you just mandate everybody hand over their credit card details and organize a weekly stipend for yourself ?
No problem, with the D5-P5336, an SSD that will be able to hold 61TB a pop, you can bring 4 of them in a RAID 5 config and you should have enough for storage.
Of course, the damage one single cosmic ray is going to do to that array is probably going to be epic, not to mention all that effort will likely be trashed when Putin decides to nuke Earth's lower orbit, but hey, it's the military, right ? What could possibly go wrong ?
I mean I can perfectly understand how Italy is so mind-boggingly large that it needs storage in space for its military to be able to easily communicate over those vast distances that lay between the pub and the opera.
Comply just enough to placate the commission, or just pretend to comply, dither and dally, and wait for things to simmer down ?
Because Beijing is not going to retreat on its intent of perverting Europe's youth, now will it ?
Interesting point. Maybe it would be possible to harness this tool as an addendum to security checks. You set up your network, make sure you've done your best, the let loose the AI to find out what you missed and/or what you need to check.
Of course, this would mean that said AI was not on the Internet, available to all. It would have to be brought on-prem, thus deployed by contract, and only used in-house. All of which will never happen.
So it's the miscreants that are going to have fun with it.
And don't come with the "only incremental abilities" argument. It's an LLM, it's supposed to learn, isn't it ?
Could this be the true beginning of Skynet ?
Agreed. Making noise on the Internet is easy, finding a new job is very much less easy. On top of that, you'll need to find a new job in your skillset at a company that is not mandating RTO and, apparently, those are getting fewer by the week.
The ultimate irony, of course, would be actually finding a new job with WFH, resigning, and being told RTO a few months later . . .
Can we, once and for all, lay to rest the illusion that Musk is a business genius ?
He isn't even a capable business manager.
This whole affair is because Musk is stupid. He thinks the law does not apply to him and he can do and say what he wants.
This time, I hope he finds out that he really can't, and realizes what big doodoo he got himself in.
History repeats itself, albeit rather more quickly this time. Instead of crowing about massive sales, then hearing a year later that nobody is buying any more and people are just meh about it, we now have massive sales, and a growing number of people who are meh and return it during the grace period.
Bad sign for the future of the product.
Indeed. The fruit cart is not there to work, it's there to rake in the dough.
And rake in the dough it does, by the cargo ship load.
What it will take for Apple to actually commit to this architecture is for Android to start making a killing with it and for Apple to lose market share because of that. That would make things move.
But it will never happen, because people who buy Apple don't change, they stay Apple.
Um, I think there are still plenty of XP machines out there, chugging away (not connected to Internet, hopefully). I'm sure there are also a large amount of Win 7 machines happily doing their jobs.
It's not because Borkzilla says an OS is over that it is over.
Better to stop connecting to the Internet after a while, for sure, but current Windows 10 machines will no doubt be able to function quite well for years to come.
You might want to add a good 3rd-party antivirus, though. Good luck finding one.
What it actually means is that the whole acquisition was a big mistake that Twilio never should have made.
The case study was not properly made and they found themselves with something they couldn't actually make any money from.
This is a big win for the guys who sold Authy and are now swimming in dosh, and a very poor showing for Twilio management who bought, and now killed, something people apparently needed because Twilio management did not properly take into account the requirements of making Authy work.
Not impressed at all.
So they have for at least four more months of stuff to install, and then what ? You think they're just going to start buying again ?
What is wrong with these people ? Companies are going to use the kit they bought, and they'll use it for a while before needing to buy more.
This problem has hardly gone away. Only new installations are going to fuel immediate growth for Cisco, so it had better pray that a wave of datacenters are being built right now, otherwise Cisco will just sit on its hands waiting for new orders.
It can talk about upholding whatever it wants, it has done nothing but undermine the very idea of patents since the beginning of the 20th century.
By never verifying prior art and letting the judicial system take care of issues, the USPTO is just a rubber stamp for multi-billion-dollar behemoths and serves no longer the ideal of the individual inventor getting recognized for an idea.
On top of that, the USPTo has long forgotten the idea that a patent could only be granted to an idea that was functionally described in full, thus, when the patent expired, others coulld pick up the idea and make use of it. Today, patents are granted on simple ideas (round corners, anyone?), and their functionality is no longer a subject of examination.
I fully expect to read in the coming months about how yet another disastrous IT failure has happened, and that Borkzilla has now joined the ranks of Crapita and Fujitsu in never-ending contract awards that bring nothing but failure.
And, if that is indeed the case, it might be time to ask a question : if it doesn't matter who the provider is to obtain an IT project disaster, maybe the problem is not the provider ?