Re: spacesuits won’t be ready for Moon landing
Not to worry, the funding will have disappeared long before the spacesuits will be required.
19394 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
We thought we could get away with the general consensus that global data slurping is fine.
We did not realize that "global" meant global for us only.
With our hands on our stone hearts, we give you our heartfelt fuck yous as we revert to in-the-back data slurping like everyone else.
Sorry, but this is yet another proof that 1) the rules don't work anymore, and 2) the big names in business can't be trusted.
This company boasts an annual revenue of $173.6 billion.
How is it that any government functionary thought that it needed a subsidy of a paltry $77 million ? They're making upwards of $450 million a day.
They've already got enough money. The shareholders don't need more.
Why bother ?
Nothing will be done because Big Business requires subsidies.
I am still waiting for an explanation for why taxpayers should be subsidizing multi-billion-dollar behemoths, but I'm guessing that report will be filed, as we say in French, la semaine des quatre jeudis.
And that is the big problem with democraties - they are led by individuals who mostly don't care about what the previous incumbent thought was a good idea, which means wasted effort and money until, all of a sudden, it becomes a National Priority in which case there's even more wasted effort and money to Get Things Done in haste.
I don't have a solution for that, any more than I have a solution for preventing a country from being under the control a fucking moron, so I won't say more.
Yeah, because it has been shoved down everyone's throat like nobody's business.
The Personal Computer (emphasis on Personal ) ? It took twenty years and a major blunder by IBM (who thought it was not significant enough to protect by copyright - thanks whatever MBA thought that up) to allow people to attain the technology in sufficient numbers through economies of industrial scale production.
The Internet took off around Y2K because the infrastructure started gearing up around that time.
Saying that pseudo-AI had a record reach is like saying that a new flavor of chips just took over 53% of the population because it suddenly became available in supermarkets.
It's not a surprise.
And what approach does your self-described "3rd-rate university" degree suggest ?
I would think that, given today's absolutely marketing-driven baffling interest in AI, this would be a perfectly reasonable test and its results would be telling, one way or the other.
Irrelevant.
Linux is Open Source.
Putin could contribute if he was able, I don't care. If it's good, it should be used.
Of course, there's one caveat : Torvalds is supervising the project, not El Zuck or any other billionaire-boggled mind.
When/if that changes . . .
Not sure I agree.
In the end, the drive had already failed, but that would only have been discovered a long time down the line - which means the customer would have ate the cost and thought nothing of it.
Here, the laudable actions of the IT jockey brought to light an existing failure condition and the supplier bore the cost of a new disk.
Not all bad in my view.
"Stopping AI in its present form begins at the ballot box"
No. Even in the USA, it begins with Congress doing its fucking job. Good luck on that happening in the US or elsewhere, given the real fuckers that so-called lawmakers have become these days in most "democratic" countries.
"people who are not professional writers may be thrilled to have a tool that does something they don't enjoy"
If they don't enjoy writing, they have nothing to do with writing with AI and should go fishing (or do anything else). Do what the politicians do and hire a ghostwriter to do the job, or become an "influencer" on some social media and slack your thirst for fame there.
"Vibe coding hasn't worked out for everyone"
Yeah, especially not for actual, professional programmers. That should be a clue for you.
"The commodification of basic app creation has been underway for years"
Yes. It's called GitHub. You still have to have a clue about what you're doing.
* * * * * * * *
Programming is not producing a video. Just ten minutes ago a friend of mine passed by my office and showed me his new website he made for promoting his songs. He did not Vibe-code it, but he did use AI to make the videos. He composes the songs and performs them in what seems to me a be real music studio - insofar as I've never been in a "real" music studio. His videos are fun to watch, and AI is making great strides in producing that kind of stuff.
If this Vibe-coding fad endures, I'm sure some non-proficient people might be able to learn from it. But, to analyze code and even more, to be able to debug, requires intelligence, not statistical analysis, and that is something that no AI will ever possess for the foreseeable future.
Redmond is not a reliable business partner. It creates a new tool, gets everyone all worked up about it, and terminates it within ten years.
Business processes don't like being forced to change because some besuited idiot with an MBA at Redmond thinks he's got a better idea.
If Redmond was forced to pay for the cost of upheaval, it would be much more careful in what it suggests should be done.
Those who are paying attention are desperately trying to drown their dispair in barrels of whisky.
This situation demonstrates the limits of democracy. What recourse do you have when a demented bonespur wreaks havoc while Congress just sits by and does nothing ?
Checks and balances ? They're not working right now. Who is the responsible for that ?
Every single elected official in Congress.
I agree totally.
You can always add more clothes if required.
The other way around, there comes a point where, even if you ignore basic social etiquette, there comes a point where you can't take any more off.
The only solution at that point is the wet T-shirt - again, not something that most workplaces will be tolerating.
Those who are lucky enough to be able to work remotely will enjoy.
HUMINT has always been essential.
It has only been eclipsed by SIGINT because politicians like the idea of having a picture taken from space in their hands. It must seem more real than a boring verbal or text report about how agent XYZ overheard a conversation in a bar that indicated that country so-and-so was progressing in its uranium refining.
Zuckerberg is the poster child for corporate don't-give-a-fuck. This alien construct doesn't have children and will never know what it is to care for anyone except itself.
The only thing El Zuck is interested in is increasing its stock value, because numbers are all it understands.
Human emotions ? That's still in alpha stage for El Zuck.
Well said.
That being said, the FCC, and politicians in general, are not there for the benefit of The PeopleTM any more.
They are there to convince you, with utmost earnestness and conviction, that they are indeed working for your benefit and selflessly tiring away to secure more funding for their next election campaign your security.
And if, in the past, they had to travel to Epstein's island, it was purely for business purposes, Scout's honor.
Ah but the mainstream media is no longer there to report The TruthTM, my friend.
It is there to spread the ideology of the multi-billionnaire mogul who bought the station (through a dozen untraceable holdings and front companies because, somehow, they don't want their name associated with it - how curious).
Well, that is, for a given definition of "normal".
I'm 60 this year. I say that to establish that I have had the time to make friends and watch them evolve (no, I am not wearing a lab coat right now ;).
It is actually frightening me when I realize that, of the four score people that I have shared friendly dinners with over my years, there are no less than four that, since retiring, have gone off the deep end.
I'm not saying they're in a psychiatric hotel, I'm saying that there is no more meaningful conversation to be had with them. It's all about them. Their little lives (or what's left of them), posting their meals on Instagram (spoiler alert : nobody gives a flying one), and complaining about how they hurt here or there. Oh, nothing serious. No cancer, but something that gives them an excuse to talk about themselves and get attention.
Because somehow that's all they've got left in their own mind. Themselves.
Oh they'll ask how're you doing, sure, but right after they'll speed on to tell about their latest ache.
This AI attachment thing ? No surprise here. If they were proficient enough with computers, they'd already be mind-jacked into the system, lying on a bed with the implant, drooling from one side of the mouth.
The real issue is that this is not impacting retirees, but young people.
On the other hand, if The GovernmentTM is reading this article, they must be creaming their underwear . . .
I would like the name of that bank to ensure that I never have anything to do with it in the future.
Putting an API on a webpage is not done by mistake and I'm willing to bet that there were no "rogue engineers" involved.
This bank needs to be named and shamed.