Re: Over 25 years of rot
And Boeing has lost it.
It would seem existing entrenched corporate culture means they'll never get it back.
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I disagree. First, the Tribunal des Prud'Hommes is basically free. I know, I've been there on occasion and I've never had to pay a dime.
Second, as soon as the employee brings up the offending clause, the judges (the three of them) waive it away on basis of illegality. The employer has no argument to bring.
Case closed. The whole affair takes 30 minutes max, and the employer is made to to back off and maybe pay reperations if called for.
But of course, I'm talking about what happens in France. I agree that, in the Land of the Free with Justice for All, there will be lawyers involved and those guys up the costs by, lately, $300K/hour.
So yeah, expensive.
Interesting.
In French law, any illegal clause in a business contract is automatically deemed invalid by any tribunal. As a consequence, SpaceX France would have no leg to stand on in front of the Tribunal des Prud'Hommes, where employee/employer litigation takes place.
You don't see endless articles in French newspapers outlining what is illegal in employment contracts.
Why is it necessary for the US Labor watchdog to remind US companies of the law ? Isn't the law supposed to be known ?
Or are there business lawyers who still think that, just because someone signed a contract, the clause that says that the employee's firstborn's soul belongs to the company is valid ?
It is thoroughy thrilling to see that the US Government is suddenly very keen on finding out how personal data is used in the US, but doesn't give a flying fig about how everyone else's data in the world is being slurped and abused by US companies.
I'll be waiting for the day when the US is going to enshrine in law how US citizens' data is supposed to be protected, then watch as the rest of the world says "and what about us ?".
Okay, my turn.
Intelligence is the ability to learn by experience. I do believe that is the first requirement.
However, don't talk to me about LLMs or other AI bullshit. Those machines can only define statistical conclusions after having ingested massive amounts of data. A baby learns to talk by listening to its parents. There are no terabytes of data involved.
You can teach a human being to play chess. You can teach a computer to play chess. Computers today play chess very well. Take the same chess-playing computer and start playing poker and it will fall on its face. Take a human chess player and teach him to play poker, and he'll play.
Intelligence is also versatility. Adaptability. Computers, even with the AI moniker, are not adaptable. They do what their database has taught them. And if you teach them to recognise pictures of cats, then teach them poker, I shudder to imagine what bullshit will ensue when you ask them to qualify if a picture concerns cats, cats playing poker, or a game of poker.
Computers are constrained by what data they have on hand. Humans can infer things from their experience. A human being will be able to determine that is preferable to be nice to other people if one is to live in peace - a computer will have to have that data in its memory banks.Computers do not infer.
I don't know how to define intelligence. I do not have the arrogance to think that I can.
But I can tell when something is not intelligent.
Today's pseudo-AI is not intelligent.
Oh yes, please, argue semantics. I'm glad to see that you're so knowledgeable, except that I'm not seeing you define Intelligence.
The fact that Intelligence has not been defined does not invalidate the fact that what is called "AI" today has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence.
Go read Asimov and tell me what AI is.
Well, given that we still don't have AI, it would seem that he was.
The statistical analysis machines we have today are not AI, not by a long shot.
Now, by some miracle we might blunder into AI by mistake in the next ten years, but that is the only way he wouldn't be "out by many years".
That said, I doubt very much we'll blunder our way to such a success and, if perchance we do, we might not notice before dismantling the hardware.
Not a problem, really.
When hotels will be infested with people sleeping nights without paying because they hacked their way in, then hotel owners will pay attnetion because, obviously, lost revenue.
But if this is only a "theoretical" issue, nah, we'll upgrade when we can. Besides, nobody is interested in hacking a Formula One room. It's not like you're going to find a bag full of money, right ?
Formerly known as who gives a fuck ?
Argue about it 'till you're blue in the face, it's still just Borkzilla's artificial barrier to entry - one that only lasts until the next update. Or until the next regional, or world-wide complete, fail.
I wouldn't hold my breath over it, it's doomed to fall over some day anyway.
Have fun picking up the pieces.
Sure, they need to eat like everyone else. No argument there.
But I thought they were contributing code on their free time, meaning they already had a job.
It would appear that I was mistaken. These devs are coding Open-Source full-time and expect to be paid for it.
That wasn't how Open Source started. Maybe it's time to go back to the roots ?
Agreed. One should not forget that, if The Zuck is doing this, it is not in order to make Meta more user-friendly - that is just a side effect.
It is to get Meta's claws and tendrils into everything else, hopefully to the point where Meta will be the one dictating the rules.
Because when you dictate the rules, you dictate how the money flows, eh, Google ?
Obviously, anything that gets in the way of US companies is something to be overturned if it cannot be ignored. No surprise there.
That the Indian government found reason to take a step back is a bit surprising, but if the current conditions make the move harmful, that has to mean that, once the conditions have changed, the bill will return and USTR be damned.
You might as well get ready for it. India is growing, and it has already proven it can make its own decisions. The days where the white man could have his way over the southern continents are over.
This is the pure evil of capitalism. Broadcom bought VMware to kill it. Everyone said so, everyone feared it, and now it's happening.
All of this because they have every legal right to do this. One might argue that VMware sold out, but as a public company, Broadcom could have initiated a hostile takeover. Much more expensive, but possible.
Maybe the Board at VMware should have thought things through a bit more - or paid less attention to the brown envelopes.
And now, we're here. A product essential to many is being summarily beheaded because some suits deem it is in their interest. Interest which I do not understand, by the way. What good is it to kill the product you spent billions to acquire and is working fine ? The revenue is yours now. Just milk that particular cow and be happy. But no, the guillotine it is.
It's not fair. It's not moral. It's legal.
Enter government meddling, as every True Capitalist calls it, and right now those people are either strangely silent, or adding their voices to the chorus of cries for governmental help.
So it seems that rampant capitalism is not actually a good thing after all . . .
Why ?
She writes recipies about garlic chicken containing no garlic.
Sorry, that's bullshit. I'm not going to excuse my language. Either you pony up a recipe with garlic, or you invent a fancy title about how your chicken tastes like it has garlic but doesn't.
I'm French. You say the recipe is about garlic chicken, you damn well better have garlic in your recipe.
All you high-falutin' business execs who swear on Sun Tzu, explain to me why :
1) you are willing to not only give your internal company workings to a competitor (Borkzilla is nobody's friend), but are willing to pay for the privilege
2) you have apparently no qualms to hand over such data to a company you cannot trust to either not benefit from it, or not sell that data or use it somewhere else
Is it because, when Borkzilla starts a new branch that does what your company does, you're hoping to get hired as branch manager ?
Good luck with that.
Well, the inquest is not finished. One can only hope that accomplices will be found during interrogation of everyone they have. The victims will be only too happy to describe the people who beat them, and the nine arrested will certainly be taught that it is in their best interest to cooperate fully.
I am hopeful that more perpetrators will be brought to justice, but let us not kid ourselves : the top level who put the money in this operation will never be bothered.
That annoys me immensely.
I really think Infosec the hardest area one can work in in IT. You need to juggle with the needs and demands of users and management, while stitching together the failures of the products you didn't choose to use to try and ensure that miscreants inside and out won't make a total dog's breakfast of the whole network.
And every time Borkzilla posts a new update, I'm guessing you just cringe and hope for the best . . .
Meant to be helpful, yes. Stupid, no.
I have trouble understanding how this is supposed to work. Every company I work for has a helpdesk, obviously. The phone number is internal. It is not posted on the Internet. Yes, it is accessible from outside once you know it, but you won't find it in the phone book. Curiously, companies I deal with do not post their Helpdesk number in the Yellow Pages - I wonder why.
Second point, most organizations I work with do not allow users administrative access to their computers. You might manage to get control, by a miracle and a magic wand, but you're still stuck in user space. You can't install anything. The few companies I deal with that leave me a computer with an admin account are companies I cannot work with remotely, and the helpdesk drone knows me by face and name. Someone tries to pose as me by phone ? I wish him good luck.
In short, this whole story stinks of incompetence and lack of proper procedures at the highest levels. There are none of my clients - and I don't work for Fortune 1000 companies - that appear to me to be subject to this kind of shenanigans.
Because The CloudTM, obviously.
It is impossible today to handle things locally. That's just not how business is done now. You have to have your ordering system, your procurement system and your payroll in The CloudTM.
So, when The CloudTM fucks up, you're out of business.
Personally, I rather like this result.
Yeah, just like a driver who got caught red-handed running a red light is going to recognize that he ran the red light.
Sorry, that does not instill any measure of leniency in my mind.
Let him be extradited to the US after he's done his time in a Canadian jail.
The only place they should exist is in the tiny safes of cheap hotel rooms, for the occupant to throw his valuables and pray that nobody is going to try anything on the obvious target within the day or three that said occupant is there.
Anywhere else, an electronic lock is a no-go proposal because, if you actually have the need for a safe to put stuff in, the last thing you want is a power outage to keep you from accessing said stuff when you need it. Mechanical locks have made a lot of progress since the days of the Wild West, and there are numerous ways of protecting a safe beyond just the lock on the safe itself.
If your "valuables" (whatever they may be) are worthy of a safe, the go the whole hog. Camera surveillance, multiple locked doors, access via airgapped sas, etc.
Just chucking a safe in a corner of the office isn't secure anyway.
And there we have it. Citrix is not interested in serving its customers, it is interested in getting fixed revenue every month for life.
You're in business, Citrix. Uncertainty is what you live with.
Deal with it, or get a government job.
I don't know what is going on on social media, I don't have any account. But, here in France, there is a platform called LeBonCoin (the Good Corner) that allows people to sell stuff they don't want any more. It's basically a nation-wide garage sale. Prices are reasonable because it's not Ebay, so people who want to gouge find their offerings languguishing.
But the important part is since LBC integrated a secure payment system. It's not secure as far as banks are concerned (well, not any more than elsewhere), it's secure as far as the user is concerned. When I purchase an item on LBC, I can use its payment system or I can pay directly. If I choose LBC's system, I pay the money to LBC. LBC then notifies the seller that the money has been paid and the seller can send the item. When I receive the item, I notify LBC which then releases the money to the seller.
If I'm the one selling, the system works in reverse, of course.
There is obviously the case where the buyer lies about receiving the item, I don't know what LBC does about that but, when I am selling via LBC, I am specifically encouraged to send the item with postal trace - so I'm guessing if the buyer tries to stiff me, LBC will contact La Poste and get the record of that item.
In any case, I've never heard of wiespread problems or scams on LBC. I think the payment system has a lot to do with it. Maybe that sort of system should be widely copied on other platforms ?
Sorry, why ?
We have been repeatedly told that the quantum computer resolves all possible values in one go. I am aware that modern GPUs have more than a million transistors, but I am not aware that anybody has yet drawn an equivalence between how many transistors are needed to equal a qubit.
Now, all of a sudden, a million physical qubits are needed to equal a single Nvidia GPU ?
When the best anyone can do at the moment in a lab are 1000 qubit computers, it looks like quantum cumputing is looking weaker by the year.
The NSA would do well to set up a 1000-GPU system to crack encryption, rather than wait for quantum.
Sure.
Here's a warning to Microsoft : you do not dictate how millions of your customers work.
You've already tried and failed before. I expect you will fail again, big time. Millions of companies have processes that depend on COM + Outlook. You pull that rug out from beneath them and you're looking for massive pain in the PR department, and, who knows ? That just might be the drop that pushes a fair portion to other solutions. Mail + COM is not entirely unfeasible in the Open Source area. there's going to be a lot of upheaval by 2029.
You keep on acting as if you dictate the terms. You have erected this wall for no good reason. I'm looking forward to seeing you crashing head-first into it.
In Firefox it didn't want to go. Said "can't find MIME format" or somesuch.
Tried in Brave, no cigar. Seamonkey didn't like it either.
So I copied the URL to my work PC and tried with Chrome. Still no go.
What format are you people using for even Chrome to not agree ?
P.S. : all my browsers are up to date and have no trouble viewing videos on YouTube or elsewhere, like this one.
With my i9 10980XE, my 64GB of DDR4, my 8TB of HDDs and my GeForce RTX 4080 Panther, it would seem, from your experience, that I have a machine that can run a chatbot.
Now if you could just convince me why I would need one. I already have a wife and a cat if I wish to talk with someone, and even the cat has more brains than a chatbot.
Sorry ?
Trump, who has been bleating about how Beijing is our enemy, imposing a ridiculous trade war and blaming China for everything he can't blame Mexica for, has used a Chinese firm for one of his shady deals ?
Wow. I would say somebody alert MAGA, but they'd have to have a brain to understand.