So, Intel will be first
Of course it will. Until it isn't.
Intel hasn't been first since a while. I wish Gelsinger all the luck, but Intel's build performance has been lackluster for more than a few years now.
Wait and see.
18991 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
You're telling me that, if I get a Windows AI PC, I will be using Borkzilla's cloudy thingy whether I want to or not. Okay, got it.
Now, tell me that I will not be paying for the privilege with a monthly subscription, because I don't think that Borkzilla is going to plan to serve up all that cloudy goodness I never asked for for nothing.
"It further recommends that the designated facility be as close to the San Francisco - Bay Area as possible"
Well I recommend that the facility be as close to the North Pole as possible.
I fail to see where the imprisonement takes place has anything to do with it, and if you specifically want him to benefit from California temperatures, I would personally see to it that he gets as close to Siberia as possible.
I thought NK was practically completely isolated from the rest of the world.
Yes, I know Bhina has "graciously" provided the worst leader of the world with Internet connectivity, and closes a blind eye to all the crime that NK is perpetrating thanks to that.
But how does anyone transfer money to a NK bank account ? Is this another case of funny money shenanigans ?
In any case, somebody should cut that line. Nothing good is coming of it.
It is apparently useless to rail against devs pushing external, unverified code to their production servers. This stupidity is now ingrained into force of habit, and everyone smiles in beatitude at the practice.
So, what is it going to take for companies to put the brakes on this ?
If pseudo-AI and miscreants work together to smash through that wall and make companies understand that you do not run unverified code on a production server, then I'm almost ready to welcome the mayhem that will ensue.
For the 1%, that is.
A country that can't manage its healthcare properly, can't be arsed to manage its procurement or salaries at a county level, keeps spaffing billions to foreign companies for useless IT projects, can't offer a proper administrative portal that actually handles things for the plebs, has endless amounts of Prime Ministers who don't give a fuck and yet, it still manages to support a withering, useless monarchy and pretend that it still has an empire.
Way to go ?
What are they expecting ? Yes, there was a time when the next Intel CPU and Windows version was a must-have, because the result was obvious on screen. It was visibly faster, it performed better, everyone was happier.
It's been at least a decade (or two) since that was true. Today, the least-performing phablet/laptop will allow you to YouTube/Tik Tok/Facebook/Xitter to your heart's content. When that satisfies the need of 90% of the population, and COVID has forced almost everyone to purchase current equipment, it means that nobody actually needs a new computer for the next six/ten years at least.
So yeah, sales will be sluggish for the foreseeable future. Why can't you see that ?
I tried Leonardo after an article here on El Reg mentioned it. It's fun to fool around with, but apparently asking Leonardo to put Star Destroyers in the sky above Earth is still subject to some sort of copyright (because I fail to see how it can be a lack of reference material) - the spaceships are triangular, but Star Destroyers they ain't.
That said, I understand - and subscribe to - the notion that AI-generated blurbs on shows published by the BBC should never happen.
Unfortunately, I am also aware that this is reality, and in our current reality, there is nothing AI will not be applied to, whether successful or not.
Live with the times . . .
Good, but how did the ice get there in the first place ?
Granted, we're talking about a few nanometers of it. Probably means that somewhere, someone/something ever so slightly fouled up when it came time to prepare the satellite for space. A few too many molecules of water were left inside.
Now my question is : is that humidity gone, or will it redepose itself somewhere and, if so, will anywhere but the mirrors be a problem ?
I disagree. First, the Tribunal des Prud'Hommes is basically free. I know, I've been there on occasion and I've never had to pay a dime.
Second, as soon as the employee brings up the offending clause, the judges (the three of them) waive it away on basis of illegality. The employer has no argument to bring.
Case closed. The whole affair takes 30 minutes max, and the employer is made to to back off and maybe pay reperations if called for.
But of course, I'm talking about what happens in France. I agree that, in the Land of the Free with Justice for All, there will be lawyers involved and those guys up the costs by, lately, $300K/hour.
So yeah, expensive.
Interesting.
In French law, any illegal clause in a business contract is automatically deemed invalid by any tribunal. As a consequence, SpaceX France would have no leg to stand on in front of the Tribunal des Prud'Hommes, where employee/employer litigation takes place.
You don't see endless articles in French newspapers outlining what is illegal in employment contracts.
Why is it necessary for the US Labor watchdog to remind US companies of the law ? Isn't the law supposed to be known ?
Or are there business lawyers who still think that, just because someone signed a contract, the clause that says that the employee's firstborn's soul belongs to the company is valid ?
It is thoroughy thrilling to see that the US Government is suddenly very keen on finding out how personal data is used in the US, but doesn't give a flying fig about how everyone else's data in the world is being slurped and abused by US companies.
I'll be waiting for the day when the US is going to enshrine in law how US citizens' data is supposed to be protected, then watch as the rest of the world says "and what about us ?".
Okay, my turn.
Intelligence is the ability to learn by experience. I do believe that is the first requirement.
However, don't talk to me about LLMs or other AI bullshit. Those machines can only define statistical conclusions after having ingested massive amounts of data. A baby learns to talk by listening to its parents. There are no terabytes of data involved.
You can teach a human being to play chess. You can teach a computer to play chess. Computers today play chess very well. Take the same chess-playing computer and start playing poker and it will fall on its face. Take a human chess player and teach him to play poker, and he'll play.
Intelligence is also versatility. Adaptability. Computers, even with the AI moniker, are not adaptable. They do what their database has taught them. And if you teach them to recognise pictures of cats, then teach them poker, I shudder to imagine what bullshit will ensue when you ask them to qualify if a picture concerns cats, cats playing poker, or a game of poker.
Computers are constrained by what data they have on hand. Humans can infer things from their experience. A human being will be able to determine that is preferable to be nice to other people if one is to live in peace - a computer will have to have that data in its memory banks.Computers do not infer.
I don't know how to define intelligence. I do not have the arrogance to think that I can.
But I can tell when something is not intelligent.
Today's pseudo-AI is not intelligent.
Oh yes, please, argue semantics. I'm glad to see that you're so knowledgeable, except that I'm not seeing you define Intelligence.
The fact that Intelligence has not been defined does not invalidate the fact that what is called "AI" today has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence.
Go read Asimov and tell me what AI is.
Well, given that we still don't have AI, it would seem that he was.
The statistical analysis machines we have today are not AI, not by a long shot.
Now, by some miracle we might blunder into AI by mistake in the next ten years, but that is the only way he wouldn't be "out by many years".
That said, I doubt very much we'll blunder our way to such a success and, if perchance we do, we might not notice before dismantling the hardware.
Not a problem, really.
When hotels will be infested with people sleeping nights without paying because they hacked their way in, then hotel owners will pay attnetion because, obviously, lost revenue.
But if this is only a "theoretical" issue, nah, we'll upgrade when we can. Besides, nobody is interested in hacking a Formula One room. It's not like you're going to find a bag full of money, right ?
Formerly known as who gives a fuck ?
Argue about it 'till you're blue in the face, it's still just Borkzilla's artificial barrier to entry - one that only lasts until the next update. Or until the next regional, or world-wide complete, fail.
I wouldn't hold my breath over it, it's doomed to fall over some day anyway.
Have fun picking up the pieces.
Sure, they need to eat like everyone else. No argument there.
But I thought they were contributing code on their free time, meaning they already had a job.
It would appear that I was mistaken. These devs are coding Open-Source full-time and expect to be paid for it.
That wasn't how Open Source started. Maybe it's time to go back to the roots ?
Agreed. One should not forget that, if The Zuck is doing this, it is not in order to make Meta more user-friendly - that is just a side effect.
It is to get Meta's claws and tendrils into everything else, hopefully to the point where Meta will be the one dictating the rules.
Because when you dictate the rules, you dictate how the money flows, eh, Google ?
Obviously, anything that gets in the way of US companies is something to be overturned if it cannot be ignored. No surprise there.
That the Indian government found reason to take a step back is a bit surprising, but if the current conditions make the move harmful, that has to mean that, once the conditions have changed, the bill will return and USTR be damned.
You might as well get ready for it. India is growing, and it has already proven it can make its own decisions. The days where the white man could have his way over the southern continents are over.
This is the pure evil of capitalism. Broadcom bought VMware to kill it. Everyone said so, everyone feared it, and now it's happening.
All of this because they have every legal right to do this. One might argue that VMware sold out, but as a public company, Broadcom could have initiated a hostile takeover. Much more expensive, but possible.
Maybe the Board at VMware should have thought things through a bit more - or paid less attention to the brown envelopes.
And now, we're here. A product essential to many is being summarily beheaded because some suits deem it is in their interest. Interest which I do not understand, by the way. What good is it to kill the product you spent billions to acquire and is working fine ? The revenue is yours now. Just milk that particular cow and be happy. But no, the guillotine it is.
It's not fair. It's not moral. It's legal.
Enter government meddling, as every True Capitalist calls it, and right now those people are either strangely silent, or adding their voices to the chorus of cries for governmental help.
So it seems that rampant capitalism is not actually a good thing after all . . .
Why ?
She writes recipies about garlic chicken containing no garlic.
Sorry, that's bullshit. I'm not going to excuse my language. Either you pony up a recipe with garlic, or you invent a fancy title about how your chicken tastes like it has garlic but doesn't.
I'm French. You say the recipe is about garlic chicken, you damn well better have garlic in your recipe.
All you high-falutin' business execs who swear on Sun Tzu, explain to me why :
1) you are willing to not only give your internal company workings to a competitor (Borkzilla is nobody's friend), but are willing to pay for the privilege
2) you have apparently no qualms to hand over such data to a company you cannot trust to either not benefit from it, or not sell that data or use it somewhere else
Is it because, when Borkzilla starts a new branch that does what your company does, you're hoping to get hired as branch manager ?
Good luck with that.
Well, the inquest is not finished. One can only hope that accomplices will be found during interrogation of everyone they have. The victims will be only too happy to describe the people who beat them, and the nine arrested will certainly be taught that it is in their best interest to cooperate fully.
I am hopeful that more perpetrators will be brought to justice, but let us not kid ourselves : the top level who put the money in this operation will never be bothered.
That annoys me immensely.
I really think Infosec the hardest area one can work in in IT. You need to juggle with the needs and demands of users and management, while stitching together the failures of the products you didn't choose to use to try and ensure that miscreants inside and out won't make a total dog's breakfast of the whole network.
And every time Borkzilla posts a new update, I'm guessing you just cringe and hope for the best . . .
Meant to be helpful, yes. Stupid, no.
I have trouble understanding how this is supposed to work. Every company I work for has a helpdesk, obviously. The phone number is internal. It is not posted on the Internet. Yes, it is accessible from outside once you know it, but you won't find it in the phone book. Curiously, companies I deal with do not post their Helpdesk number in the Yellow Pages - I wonder why.
Second point, most organizations I work with do not allow users administrative access to their computers. You might manage to get control, by a miracle and a magic wand, but you're still stuck in user space. You can't install anything. The few companies I deal with that leave me a computer with an admin account are companies I cannot work with remotely, and the helpdesk drone knows me by face and name. Someone tries to pose as me by phone ? I wish him good luck.
In short, this whole story stinks of incompetence and lack of proper procedures at the highest levels. There are none of my clients - and I don't work for Fortune 1000 companies - that appear to me to be subject to this kind of shenanigans.