
Re: Jira is the single source of suckage
That is an excellent link.
I'm keeping that.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
You're the captain of a 100,000 ton cargo ship and your only focus is getting a signal for your smartphone. So, without knowing the waters you are in or going to, without the slightest inkling that maybe you should check, you just change course straight into catastrophe.
At this point, the whisky is an anecdote. It is literally irrelevant. The big issue is changing course without checking anything. That's like driving along a road, closing your eyes and then deciding when to take a left turn. I would have thought that naval school would have taught him the necessity of knowing where you're going when captaining a vessel of any kind, let alone an enormous cargo ship.
Who decided to give him command and how much experience did he have beforehand ? Was this his first command ? I cannot believe he was a seasoned captain. I would think that cargo companies prefer having their ships commanded by someone with experience, but this dude acted like a frat boy on party night.
Well, in any case, that'll be his last command. I don't feel sorry for him.
And that is what happens when you are CEO of a multi-billion dollar company that you founded.
There is no Board telling him what to do. There are no "activist investors" clamoring for layoffs to line their pockets.
He is in control, he decides and the company executes. And the decisions he makes are carefully considered to grow his company, not his investor's portfolio.
An example to follow, apparently.
So I understand that it is not a judge that acquitted him because, in Texas, criminal Senators are brought to trial before other Senators.
Truly a jury of his peers, then. And they acquitted him.
What a surprise.
And that in the land that boasts having the best justice system money can buy.
It would appear that some criminals don't need money to go scott free.
And it has started.
I've already said that the responsible is the entity who hosts the thingamabob. Something goes wrong ? Sue them. They don't appreciate ? They sue the maker of the thingamabob. That can drag out in court for decades, consumers are not affected.
There is one basic rule in the French judicial system : if someone is harmed, then the entity responsible for the harm pays. If that entity can find another entity to blame, fine, it pays the someone, then gets reperation in court from the other entity. And so on and so forth. But the consumer gets compensated.
I've already said this, and I stated that companies would be dragging their feet.
Well, it has started already.
Didn't need a Palantir to see that coming.
Of course they are. Hiring is for upper management. Firing is for peons.
That said, I can't find who for the moment, but that reminds me of an Welsh comedian commenting on Alexa. I'll always remember this :
<in a heavy Welsh accent> "Alexa, what time does Marks & Spencer open on a Sunday ?"
<Alexa> "I'm sorry, I didn't understand."
Yeah, I know, it's not funny like that, but the audio is awesome. If anyone can find that, it would be a blessing.
That doesn't mean that the action is wrong.
It actually means that the government is reacting to new elements in the world. In a democratic country, that is supposed to be a good thing, no ? Besides, the action is hardly unprecedented. I do believe the government has never been friends with defeat devices of any kind.
In a future where Meta actually becomes a thing, if we find out that kiddie porn is on that platform, I'd think that everyone would be okay with the government stepping in to quash that particularly horrible thing, right ?
The action would still be unprecedented, as far as Meta is concerned.
Not an argument.
100,000 parts, oooh.
3,000 cables, aaaah !
40,000 bolts and more than a mile of hosing - OMG !!!
Sorry, Intel, have you checked out ITER ?
You are so outclassed it's not even funny.
Surprising ? Really ?
When you know that the USA is the country where every telco is buggering its customers, preventing true coverage from being known and doing as little as possible to upgrade the network to something useable, I don't really find this study surprising on that point.
Maybe so , but how do you propose we get an idea of what's going on ?
Of cours the data is skewed. The only question is, how is it skewed, and is it consistently skewed in the same way ?
If you have multiple years of skewed data and you know how it is skewed and you know that it is consistently skewed in the same way, then that data is still representative of reality.
It must be very difficult to juggle between what the public wants, what the country needs and what the big players do to extract maximum attention from their users.
I think this is a good move, one that should be replicated elsewhere. After all, Big Phone was broken for anti-monopoly reasons (even though that didn't really work out in the end), and today's "platforms" are basically trying to do the same thing, be everything.
They shouldn't.
I'm sorry, what other red flag do you need in order to understand that these fuckers are scum ?
Honestly, I'm starting to believe that funny money only took off because of the sheer number of abysmally stupid idiots that were willing to believe that everyone could win the lottery.
I fear that any effort to push it out will only delay the inevitable reentry.
Unless you're thinking of pushing it entirely out of Earth's gravity well and on to it's own trajectory in space, which would have to basically end up in the Sun. That might be significantly costlier than just dismantling it and letting the rest burn up.
And that is the entire problem with Borkzilla completely described.
I don't want Borkzilla's "decisions". You take me for a developer ? Fuck that. I've used Windows since Windows 286 (yes, I'm that old). If you think I don't know how to configure my Windows the way I want it, I have a number of "colorful" metaphores for where you can shove your head. I'll help you gladly.
You have the gall to shove your usual shit on what you call "developers" ? Hint : they'll restraint your bullshit like they've done for the past three decades without your help, thank you very much.
I'm not surprised that Japan wishes to splurge on chip tech, it's mainstream these days. I am a bit sceptical about where they'll build a plant, though.
Japan is small, and heavily populated. Any new build is going to have be outside of residential space and what little agricultural space there is. To me, that basically leaves the mountainside.
Now, the interesting thing is that a chip fab in the mountains shouldn't have too much trouble with water supply, so there's that. But it will be a lot more expensive to build than a fab on the flats of Arizona (where there is little water). Of course, there's always the possibility of creating an artificial island, but then there's the pure water issue . . .
In any case, I wish good luck to that fab and I hope that the used water treatment process will ensure that no contaminants get to the water table.
I would certainly be awed by such an achievement. However, I refuse to believe that our current technology can give rise to AI.
Granted, Asimov did not show the rise of AI and how we got to the positronic brain, but he definitely considered that his robots were intelligent, feeling beings that could accurately analyse context and meaning.
What marketing is calling AI these days might be getting better at analysing context, but it has no grasp of meaning and I don't see that there's any magic code that can make a program think.
Those statistical analysis machines don't think. They obey their code, just like all computers do today. It's not because we can't explain how they get to their conclusions that they are thinking. They're not, and there's no amount of handwaving that will change that in ten years.
Even if the hand belongs to Carmack.
Seems a bit sloppy to me. It's not like the guys who created this system weren't familiar with how the phone ring works.
Looks like they just decided to pipe the mp3 to speaker and not bother with cutting it off because, obviously, who would configure a 90-second ringtone ?
And that's where we get the difference between what a system is made to do, and what it can do.
Also known as : we want to keep our snout in the trough.
And, since Lockheed is the one making the planes, it's rather easy to stay put. The trough is now an Olympic swimming pool, and Lockheed is on a floating long chair, dipping in as it pleases.
And since Russia is no longer a military threat, and China is way off, the situation really is a day at the beach for Lockheed.
A loooong day.
Everyone above the age of 40 should just walk out.
In the same month.
When the fallout settles, IBM will have gaggles of kids running everything (over the cliff).
How is it that IBM still exists ? Why give money to IBM ? All of their good consultants are gone, on going to be let go. There's no experience left in there.
Just leave IBM to die in its corner. The husk is all that's left anyway.
So, the EU is going to find a few more billions to get that quantum computer that can make the quantum encryption, I take it.
Because at this point in time, quantum computers are still lab creatures, you can't buy one on Amazon.
So I look forward to hearing about how all those pesky quantum computer issues have been solved by 2024 to make this possible.
Not holding my breath though.
What on Earth was the point ? It was a mini. Put it on the surface and snake a cable down to wherever to put a terminal at the bottom.
That's about as stupid as putting backup power generators in the basement of a building that might get flooded. No, you put them on the roof.
Once again, first-world short-sightedness comes back to bite us in the rear. Ah, the days when top-level executives gave themselves massive bonuses for having outsourced a chip fab to China . . good times, eh ?
Well now here we are, restricting China from exporting the production from the tools we put in their hands. And when we put those tools in their hands, China was already the despotic regime it is now.
Ah yes, but money. Money now, worry about the consequences later.
There's a lesson here, somewhere. I wonder who will learn it ?
Only one possible answer : the entity whose name is on the document. If it's a website, the owner of the website.
Stop splitting hairs in two. If a company builds a false-facts-spewing tool and makes it available, the company is responsible for the fallout. If I buy a second-hand vehicle and cause an accident, I can't go say it's the previous owner's fault. Companies that build these hallucinating tools should be responsible for the hallucinations.
Maybe, once the company has been dragged to court and found guilty, it can then turn and slap a lawsuit on the company that built the drunken slob for it, but it's the company that is using the tool that is responsible.
What about someone who uses such a tool to make legal documents for personal situations ? Well don't, first of all. Go get a lawyer to do the job. Second, the individual used a website, so he can attack the owner of the website.
Responsibility is simple in this case. Except for the obvious fact that companies will be dragging their feet as hard as they can, and lobbying like mad to get out of paying for any damages - as they have always done. But that doesn't last. Even the tobacco industry has had to bow in the end. Bil Oil will too, some day. Let's not start messing around with Big AI without laying down the ground rules firmly.
I would have liked to by a fly on the wall of the meeting that decided to go get pirated material to use as training data.
Mgr - "Okay, guys, we have this ginormous potential waiting on training data. Where can we get that ? Ideas ?"
Mkting - "Well, we could strike deals with the Project Gutenberg website, they've got plenty of free books. I'm sure they'd be willing to help."
Mgr - "How much would that cost ?"
Mkting - "It's free for the customer, but we'd need a deal where we can get stuff in bulk. Shouldn't cost more than a couple thousand."
Mgr - "How long would that take ?"
Mkting - "I guess a month or two to negociate the deal and have a contract written up."
Mgr - "Too long. We need to move forward now. Any other ideas ?"
Dev - "Well, I know this site where we can get just about everything. All I'd need to do is write a script to automate the downloads."
Mgr - "What about the contract ?"
Dev - "Um, well, there isn't any. It's BitTorrent-like, you just go choose and it drops in."
Mgr - "And we can get recent stuff, no problem ?"
Dev - "Well yeah. Pirates love recent stuff."
Mgr - "Pirated ? So no contract and no money ?"
Dev - "Nope. And it's untraceable."
Mgr - "Go for it !"