"all you guys are very important to the cause"
All us guys have been against using someone else's server since the beginning of this cloudy nonsense.
You're late to the party, but any help is welcome.
19485 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
SAP : clouding itself into irrelevance.
Cloud is risk. And it's riskier than on-prem, given all the cloudy data hacks that have happened in the last year.
When you're on-prem, you may not know every little tidbit on how to defend your network, but apparently you're better off than depending on someone else's admin who may or may not answer your questions in the next 48 hours . . .
I agree with what you say, but it is a fact that making a new model that totally ignored compatibility with the previous model was a big mistake that cost a lot of companies their existence.
Of course, we know that today, but what could Commodore have become if it had stayed compatible with previous versions ? Would Microsoft even exist ?
Ah, power supplies.
Even today, when upgrading a PC I systematically search for a PSU that is at least 50% more powerful than the load I expect to have.
I have long since learned that, if a PSU is rated for 600W, it will give you 500W without too much trouble, in a pinch, for a while, but if you load it more, you will end up with a dead PSU sooner or later.
I beg to differ.
Space missions have one of two outcomes : either they fail spectacularly before getting into orbit (or reaching their destination), or they successfully get to where they were supposed to go and then they outperform all expectations until they a) run out of fuel, or b) run out of energy.
It's only on good ol' Earth that projects fail all the time and get endlessly rescued (eh, UK Government IT ?).
Why ?
Because on Earth, you can send a peon you pay peanuts to do a minor (or even a major) repair, and it costs less than a Learjet trip over the Atlantic. Or maybe a Learjet, who's counting ?
But, to repair things in space, it costs at least a 737 Max.
And that is why we'll never have space-rated technology on Earth.
It costs too damn much.
Count my gast flabbered.
Now I have one question : women being able to chose cars driven by women, is that not going to kind of end up making sure that women only drive cars of other women, and men are left with cars only driven by men ?
Yes, I know that men don't have the choice, but this is China. There will be so many women prioritizing their choice that men won't have much of a choice left.
No !
You update that thing until there aren't any more on the market.
It's not a car, it's software. And even for cars, automakers are supposed to supply spare parts for more than a decade if I'm not mistaken.
So you can bloody well update your software for at least a decade.
This sell-and-forget civilization we're living in is really grating my nerves these days. Gotta refill my dried frog pills, I guess.
That will only be green if the hydrogen is produced by nuclear reactors (Thorium being my preference), and delivered by battery-powered trucks (no, not CyberTruck).
But, in the absolute, good idea. We need power-production alternatives that don't use coal or fossil fuels.
Xi might be getting a call soon, reminding him that Beijing and Moscow are basically on the (ahem) same side.
You're not supposed to overtly undermine your ally, now are you ?
Then again, the rules are always changing in international politics . . .