"putting not thoroughly tested BIOS upgrades online"
I'm sorry, HP is just using Redmond's modus operandi : let the user test it . . .
19014 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Amen to that.
Industry standards bow to industry imperatives. The Internet has long forgotten about open and free. I guess we can thank all those newspapers who did their level best to destroy URLs and forget that the Internet meant viewing the page as far as your window would allow.
No, for all those so-called newspapers, that was not allowed. You had to view their "paper" online just like you would have seen it on actual dead tree format.
Ironically, now we have "adaptive" formatting for mobile phones, so screw the three-column format, but also screw our freedom.
Hey, it's the future, ain't it ?
The guy convicted for not doing his job calls for people to do the job.
Look, I'm glad he has seen the light and walked the path of redemption, but maybe we can avoid making a media darling out of him ?
What's the possibility that he damn well knows he's never going to get another job like that, so he's just milking the media circuit for all he can ?
Next stop : his book on How I Found Security, complete with multiple seminars where he explains the pain he's been through and how you absolutely should buy his book.
Along with talk shows and conventions where he is "invited" (with a large check) to talk about his "experience".
What ? Me ? Cynical ? Why do you ask ?
Holy shit. One of the most complicated, consultant-heavy, difficult-to-configure application sthat has ever been invented and marketed to the clueless CEOs is now touting AI as ahmm, benefit ?
Yeah. Sure. Companies who have paid through the nose for a never-ending "configuration process" are now supposed to believe that "AI" is going to make everything work ?
So they can get rid of those SAP consultants who have been leeching their bloodline since forever ?
Methinks this strategy is a bit of the gun-meet-foot variety.
I've always loved the supposed paranoia around Beijing being able to order a company to give up data.
Curiously, nobody ever mentions that the White House has the National Security Letter which can do the exact same thing.
I'm pretty sure my own country is not going to think twice about sending a legal order to a French company to hand over data.
But obviously The Yellow Threat is the current push to make people worried and obedient, so . . .
A free service that was useful, accurate and regularly updated. And now it is shut down without so much as a warning.
Proofpoint may have managed its existence properly, but it botched its ending. You tell people you're going to shutter a service like that. You give them time to adapt. You don't just pull the plug and then say "Yeah, we can't be bothered no more".
Bad doggie. No cookie.
"management encouraged employees to use annual leave on this day"
Sorry ? Why use annual leave on a national holiday ? How fucking bonkers do you have to be to tell your employees to use up the few holiday days they have on a day when you'll be closing because it's the NATIONAL HOLIDAY ?
That is insane.
I cannot fathom why a sane person would state that nothing had changed when they know that they made a change.
You can screw something up without knowing you did bad. It's in the Constitution or something. So, instead of a blatant lie that will be caught, buy yourself a pair and say : "I touched this for that reason and now I think I screwed something else up. Could you help ?".
Why are people so cowardly ? Why does it take brass balls to admit that you might have made a mistake ?
Babies try standing up for weeks before getting it right, but it would seem that, as soon as a boy makes it upright, he loses the courage to stand by his actions.
Pff.
And get off my lawn !
<wanders off muttering>
Funny how so many companies are talking AI, but hardly any are talking fusion. Must be because the budget is an order of magnitude higher for fusion and it's harder to bullshit your way through.
Meanwhile, ITER is progressing. We will get there, apparently, but there is no billionnaire to thank for that. It would appear that space is an easier frontier for their low attention spans.
Gosh, might it have anything to do with the fact that Swedish government actually gives a fuck about its citizens ?
As in, allocating funds where they are useful, and not just filling the pockets of some MP's nephew ?
Just wondering.
And besides, what is a private company in charge of comms complaining about the state of something it is in charge of ?
You don't like the state of things ? Put your money where your - oh, silly me. BT does not exist to serve customers, it exists to serve its investors.
Agreed. Even with humans, there are many silent forms of expression that no AI can pick up through language. I mean, just ask any married man who feels the need to ask his wife if everything is okay.
Animals have a multitude of physical options to express themselves as well. A cat doesn't need to hiss at you to make you understand that you're unwelcome.
But, this is a start. However ridiculous it might seem at first glance, it might provide a few clues that can be built upon in the coming years. I say go for it. Nobody knows what we might find out in the long run.
I was going to ask when our closest bit of toxic waste would be used for such things, but the good doctor has already borged the problem.
So, heartbeat detectors are just an app away then ? Oh, silly me, they're already a dime a dozen.
Well, it seems the Terminators won't have much trouble finding targets . . .
While I agree with you, we both must admit that either methodology has lost the primary aspect in both cases : talking with the customer.
I was doing Agile before it had a name. I'm a Notes developer (silence at the rear). The first thing I learned when becoming a consultant was : the customer doesn't really know what he actually wants. My job, as I learned it, was not only to listen to the hierarchy and document its needs, but get the view from the groundpounders (the ones who will actually use the product) and learn what their needs are and how to best fullfill them while placating the management.
I don't care what methodology you call that. What I see is that I have now spent 25 years of a career where I can say that my successes have vastly overweighed my failures. I have helped people do their jobs better and more easily, and I am rather proud of that.
Oh dear, there might be a country in the world that has its own chip industry and Intel won't be able to run roughshod over everything and reap all the rewards.
Sorry, Pat, but it's going to get worse. Sanctions and economic pressure has already taught Beijing that China must become independant.
Guess what ? With over a billion citizens, China has the manpower. China has universities. China has industry, because it has been producing everything we use since the last five decades.
It's a bit late to complain about sanctions now. US industry should have thought about that five decades ago when they decided it was a good idea to shove all production down south because it was less expensive.
You reap what you sow.
I hope you enjoyed your bonuses.
Letting the user.
You mean the idiot who can't think unless he has his smartphone telling him what he thinks.
You mean all those users who have now gotten used to Windows Search telling them where their applications were.
I'm sure those people will be eminently capable of understanding what all those screenshots mean . . .
So what is this ? Sloppy engineering, bad procurement or just bad luck ?
I can understand that a power supply fails, but if the power supply fails and the redundant power supply does not activate, it seems to be that there is a whiff of bad engineering floating about.
A match made in corporate heaven. Why am I not surprised ? Broadcom is starting to notice that its near-termination of VMWare is not going down well, and Borkzilla certainly has the might to pressure Broadcom's board into understanding Redmond's best interests.
In hindsight, this was inevitable. If Broadcom hadn't agreed, Borkzilla would have just bought it and be done with it.
Unfortunate, but in a project with this level of complexity, I can understand.
The important thing is that they have corrected the goof, and published the problem without pressure from some hacker threatening to go public.
Yes, I know, that's normal you say. Sure. But "normal" these days, at the corporate level, doesn't have the same meaning any more . . .
So, let's patch and move on.
What you say is absolutely true, people are willing to dive into conspiracy theories.
The fact that the CIA has been responsible for many fuck-ups that they covered up and then got caught out for doesn't help.
When your government is responsible for MK Ultra, the deliberate non-treatment of black men who had syphilis, the military poisoning of an entire city to "see what happens" . . . well let's just say that conspiracy theories are unfortunately not entirely unjustified.
When you pollute the waters of truth at the highest level, you reap the harvest for apparently a long time.
I hope not.
Zero-Gee science is indispensible for furthering our knowledge of metals and biotechnology. At least, I'm convinced it is. So we need to have a permanent base in orbit, so as to do Science (yes, with a capital S), as well as serve as a launchpad for missions that go beyond low orbit - which we need for our knowledge of the Universe.
So I do hope that there will be a successor to the ISS - one not managed and owned by China, for example.
But I can only hope.