Congratulations, Broadcom
If your objective is to price yourselves out of the market, you're doing a great job.
19429 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Those are not adjectives that I would like to describe my driving experience.
I'll keep my ICE car until the industry delivers to me a car that doesn't have a steering wheel, where I can just give the destination and take a nap, or read a book.
Until then, as long as I am responsible, I'm the one driving, thank you.
“This is a meritless lawsuit. Android device makers are free to take their own steps to keep their users safe and secure”
Hold on, Google. Aren't you the same company that lost in court to Epic's claim that you were garden-walling your app store to ensure insane revenue ?
And now, because you lost, you are saying that phone makers are free ?
I note that you did not say that phone makers can accept any app store. No. You just said they're free to ensure their user's safety.
Somehow, I feel that that is a strawman argument.
"The investor Fidelity was recently reported to have cut the valuation of its stake in X to $4.19 million, down from the $19.66 million it had initially invested"
So, from 20 to 4. A fivefold reduction.
He's already pissed off advertisers (and whined about it), but pissing off investors is going to hurt a lot more in the long run. Not only because X is going to have trouble finding more money, but investors of the caliber of Fidelity are going to think twice, nay thrice, before investing in any other project he might dream up.
By the way, Elon, how's that Hyperloop going ?
And once again, the old song about capitalism regulating itself flies out the window.
I have trouble believing that, in this day and age, there are still utter morons who prefer to wait for a catastrophe to do something about the security of their IT infrastructure.
Today, as soon as you are connected to the Internet, you are a possible target for a legion of very savvy, dedicated miscreants who would like nothing more than to bring your company to its knees in exchange for money. And then more money. And the bigger the company, the bigger the target.
If that's not enough to get your finger out and start securing your network, then you deserve the cost that is coming to you.
Now that we have Starlink, like it or not, I wish China good luck in getting its firewall on there.
It is now possible, maybe, for a Chinese citizen to have a direct link to the world without Beijing's oversight. And there will be more constellations that China will not control.
The door is opening, Xi. You're going to have to deal with that some day.
Oh, right, I've heard of it in the £2B ballsup at the perennially failing Europe's biggest council.
And yet they get another £700 million (which, as we all know, will balloon to over a billion) to play with.
If I screw up at a customer site, they'll never invite me over again, let alone sign over a paltry €70K.
Too big to fail, hmm ?
If I'm not mistaken, that's over a petabyte of storage needed par month. The biggest HDDs you can get is apparently 16TB, so that's 3 disks a day, 21 per week. I hope they get a good price, because otherwise it's a budget that can reach over €5000 per week.
I checked SSD prices and capacity, but that would be insanely expensive at such a volume.
I'd like to see that storage room.
No, no. You don't get it. Apple is committed to human rights as long as it doesn't harm its bottom line.
There is no company that will actively go against a dictatorship. Apple is in China, right ? What more proof do you need ?
Money is everything to The Board. If slavery was still acceptable, you can be sure that Apple would have slave drivers.
And they wouldn't be alone.
Of course. Since OpenAI is a company, it obviously will define its actions on the best legal basis possible. No company actually does things it thinks are illegal. They all take the shady to the limit.
The tribunal is there to find out if OpenAI is right.
"large tech companies 'enjoy a remarkable degree of freedom from regulation and accountability for their activities and the content they carry' "
Yup. And, in my opinion, it's because the Internet has never been considered as something important by governments across the world.
But that is changing. All you need to do is look at how many governments have officials with their personal social media page when they should be talking through official government channels. Or look at how many governments actively control, at sometimes forbid, Internet activity. Oh sure, the ones that do that now cannot be counted as democracies, but the day is coming when Internet regulations will be decided upon and enforced.
Acts count.
And $600 million is obviously not something a company is going to ignore.
So good on Fujitsu for having once again put its snout into the trough. Bad on UK government officials for allowing that.
Oh well, it's just pissing another $600 million into the wind. It's not like that has any consequence, right ?
Borkzilla is heading for a wall of its own making.
It promised that Windows 1 0 would be the last ever version, and now it has proven that you can't trust its words.
Nobody cares about upgrading a PC that is still working satisfactorily. 5 year old equipment is good for the trash ? I don't think so. Come back in six years and we'll talk about that again.
Face it : the least capable, lowest-cost laptop is fine for surfing the Web and doing mail. Companies have equipment that is much more powerful and will last a decade or more.
The renewal treadmill is over, Borkzilla. Deal with it.
Yes, building a foundry is costly. Yes, it will take years, maybe a decade before said foundry actually makes a return on investment.
Guess what ?
Some things take time to be realized and, if you can't wait, you won't reap the benefits.
Too bad for you.
The discussion is still open on that point. Maybe when the Sun goes into its red giant phase it will indeed swallow our planet, or maybe the Earth's orbit will have changed because the Sun's gravitational pull will have weakened.
Either way, Humanity will have to have evacuated long before, or it will already be extinct and the fate of Planet Earth will no longer be a problem.
The enemy hardly needs biological weapons. A space-faring civilization capable of spanning the mind-boggling distances between stars will just chuck a 20km-wide asteroid at our planet and wait two (twenty ?) years for the fallout to wipe eveything out.
Then they can colonize and mine our planet for whatever it is they think they're looking for, or just use the planet as another host for their ever-growing population.
I must agree with you. The answer to the question "Why does software require so many urgent patches?" is that the security landscape is continually changing.
Okay, that does not give a free pass to not sanitizing inputs - that should be punishable by a dozen lashings - but you can build a product with care and attention, making sure to protect against all known vulnerabilities, and then bam! A month later, a new type of vulnerability appears and you have to correct for it by patching.
That is the truth, but it should not hide the lazy programming many products are guilty of.