So, step one is shut up then ?
I look forward to seeing how well this new policy gets implemented ! ;-)
19019 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
One-dimensional is a mathematical construction used for theorizing.
As Mike61 pointed out, there is nothing one-dimensional in the real world. Paper may only be a hundredth of a an inch thick, but one- and two-dimensional mathematical figures have NO thickness whatsoever - thus they can only exist in mathematical constructions.
Of course, something that is only a few nanometers thick is probably the best real-life approximation of one-dimensional we'll ever get, but by the way they pasted the nano-battery material on the paper, I doubt that the material is that thin.
Our sex clearly defines our abilities as far as child-rearing functions are concerned. Women bear children and feed them, men spread their DNA and provide for their offspring.
Period.
Any reference to drug-induced man boobs is naught without proper referencing and links to prove it, so I'm sorry Tony72, but your post is not valid, funny though it may be.
We all know exactly what the Microsoft Spirit is made of : Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.
Nice fluffy words of intention with corresponding PR bunnies in reasonable attire will not change that.
Silverlight is nothing but Microsofts' attempt to borgify yet another area in which they started too late. Any pretense of "openness" is nothing but lip-service to the idea, paid in order to keep the gullible in line.
The Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition has 731 million transistors and 4 cores, which boils down to 183 million transistors per core.
This baby has 1.3 billion transistors and 48 cores, which means a hairs' more than 27 million per core. That kind of count throws us back to AMD K7 territory (1999).
Just a thought.
I don't remember the exact figures, but I clearly remember reading that in a majority of cases of child abuse, the child personally knows/is related to the abuser.
I find therefor extremely ironic that vetting the adults that frequently ferry friends' children to school/hobby has been struck down by public outrage. It seems to me to that that is exactly the situation that puts children in danger.
Of course, I totally agree that it is an unacceptable breach of people's lives and entirely impractical from any point of view, but it kind of radically guts the whole reason for the database in the first place. Not that I'd accept having to be vetted just to bring my neighbor's kids to school once a week.
Silly me. The reason doesn't have anything to do with catching criminals and everything to do with putting the whole population under surveillance.
I'll crawl back into my shell now.
It is of public record that France Telecom has regularly contributed "voluntarily" to state coffers in the past. The setup used to be as follows :
- FT has monopoly over national comms and sets prices with great freedom
- This generates billions in revenue for FT, which does not lower prices, citing investment provisions
- State exempts FT of taxes more or less
- Whenever the State requires a windfall, it takes it from FT coffers with a smile
So really, FT has always been the fat pig propping up the French treasury. I fail to see why this fine is relevant. It was just how we were doing business at the time.
"Poisk arrived at the ISS carrying about 189 jubs of equipment that includes water supply gear, crew hygiene supplies, medical equipment, personal items, and spare parts. The module weighs about 864 jubs and is about 28,3 linguine long (0,43 double-deckers) and 17,4 linguine in diameter at its widest point, according to RegNASA."
Dealing with being bullied is not something that can be taught. A keyboard game is not going to help you when you have your back against a fence and the threat of a fist looking at you squarely in the eye.
There might be a beneficial group effect in the game, but bullies do not go after groups, they always go after weaker individuals (sometimes in groups, by the way).
I do not think that this game will actually have any lasting positive effect. The only good thing to do is detect the bullies and put them in treatment. Find out why they bully and correct that.
That needs a psychiatrist, not a game.
I do not particularly appreciate the tone of the remark, but hey, if you get into an argument, you are setting yourself up for being insulted. And if you can't stand the heat . . .
No, what I really do not appreciate is that this kind of argument is happening every day all over the forums. That is sad enough, but do we hear about it ? Nope, because it does not concern political figures.
Normal people take it and get on with their lives. They don't appreciate it, but they deal with it.
Here we have a political figure that is clearly taking advantage of her status to take it out on somebody who said nasty things to her son. I don't like that.
I will be interested in hearing the result of the court case, though.
"that vile trade" says it all.
Of course, I can understand that a woman does not appreciate the concept of prostitution. I don't think I've ever met a woman who does (never having met a prostitute, that is).
Unfortunately, speaking in her official capacity, Ms Jowell should remind herself that her personal opinions are not to be brought up in official speech.
Prostitution, like it or not, is as old as Humanity and is not going away any time soon.
Deal with it.
Not in this lifetime it won't be. Iraq will be a tourist destination when the worst a tourist can suffer will be inflated prices from local merchants.
Until then, Iraq is a place when you can be knifed, shot, kidnapped for ransom, blown to bits by various methods, and other such joyful pastimes. I like my tourism without such happenings, and without military escort either.
I also find the people going on these thrill rides to be extremely obnoxious, flaunting their wealth and ignorance in the face of an oppressed population. Doesn't strike me as decent to be a tourist in Iraq now.
I'd like to know why my language preference is reset two or three times a month. I live in France, but I like my Internet in English, so I set Google to display in English. And at least twice a month, when I call up a Google page, I have to go to my preferences and reset it because the page is displaying in French.
I don't know what Google is doing to its cookies, but I'm quite sure that it does things more often than every nine months.
Not that I know any specifics, but it seems to me that Apple is refusing some apps and approving others. Storm8 is obviously scum, but I wonder if Apple is not going to be tainted by this scandal since only Apple-approved apps are available on the Iphone-store-thingy.
If I've understood the situation correctly, that is.
I suspect that this whole thing is dealt with in a manner that will make people believe that the cleaning has been thorough, whereas it will actually be carefully done so as to not impact any of the much bigger operations that are most certainly in progress right now.
Ah, the Old Mates Club is still controlling things, just like always. And, like always, for the benefit of the few.
Everything I need to do works under XP just fine.
Win 7 is just Vista with a makeover, and I haven't heard that that makeover included removing the DRM issues. For that reason alone, I will stay with XP as long as I can.
I'm sick of all these things that are being sold with control over what the user can or cannot do. It's MY PC dammit, it should be doing what I want it to, not what someone else lets it do.
For the life of me I cannot imagine any justification to using such an "application" in a business environment.
Unless you're a house constructor or salesman, in which case it could be nice to have virtual models of what you sell for potential customers to check out before going on location to eyeball things in person - saves time and is carbon-friendly.
For the rest, get typing into your spreadsheet or whatever and get us out of the economic rut we're in instead of wasting time fooling around with potentially furry things !
Now that is very interesting indeed.
Either the end customer is going to see an effect in said breaks (meaning lower prices), or the tax breaks are going to line the pockets of the CEO and board buddies, along with maybe some investors.
In the second case, this is just a disguised form of government pork, and the deal is already done even if the ink hasn't yet dried.
In the first case, if the tax breaks that are requested are made to lower the prices of games, well then what do you know ? Maybe what gamers have been clamoring for since the last decade has finally made its snail-paced way to the neuron that controls reason in the labyrinthine maze that is a game company CEO's brain these days.
Of course, I realize that under no condition will the game companies actually lower their own prices. Gotta get that new model Mercedes for next week's wife replacement. No, it is much better to complain about how taxes are punishing them so severely that they cannot compete. Meaning, "if you don't lower our taxes, we'll have to lay off some people in these hard times". I imagine that was said with a sly grin over a glass of fine Chianti in some hundred-pound-a-plate-of-noodles restaurant.
But even so, if this manipulation results in actual lowered game prices, then the consumer organizations should take that ball and drive it right back down the game company CEO's collective throats. See ! Lowered prices sell more games. SO LOWER YOUR FRAKKIN' PRICES ALREADY !
Whether it is in China or in any other country that already has an extensive legal library to deal with publishing issues, I simply cannot understand why the fact that a publication is online makes so much difference that entirely new laws need to be written.
I can understand that some laws may need to be amended, and maybe some explanation added to some other laws, but entirely new laws ? That would be like making new rules for road security because of TipTronic gear-changing.
Any time I hear of a law being specifically written to control publication on the Internet, I hear of a law that is redundant, not thought through, unnecessarily restrictive, incompetently worded, much too focussed in its action and most probably misses some major point.
Laws like that get struck down as soon as reason once again prevails.
I'm sure the El Reg legal department will welcome with wry smiles (and raised glasses) any attempt at likening the expression "apples to oranges" with any well-known (or not so well-known) maker of reassuringly expensive toys.
I'm equally sure that they'll have all the living shit that is required to smother the ill-advised lawyers who would be daft enough to make such an attempt, and some to spare.
Please do not let the Jobs Touch (c) extend beyond the reach of IT. The Jobsian Reality Distortion Field (c) does not have any effect in the courtroom.
Not yet.
And what, pray tell, is the use of such a tool ?
If I phone for help, I want it pretty damn sharp whether or not I'm going to die.
Up to now I have only had to phone for help twice - once for my mother, once for my daughter. In both cases, I was counting on the ambulance getting there as fast as humanly possible.
In both cases, the computer would have indicated that I'm not about to die. Would the ambulance have been slowed down by that ?
"Hey guys, you gotta get to this address, but take it easy, the victim's not dying, she's just in terrible pain."
"Gotcha Joe, I'll finish my coffee and be on my way."
No thanks, really. I prefer the method without death detection.
This is where being a religious person could be an embarrassment. Witches and satanic sacrifices ? Come on. There may be a bunch of nutters who think they are seriously trying to invoke the spirit of Belial or whatever is rad at the moment in those circles, but if invoking spirits was something that worked the world would be awash with angry protoplasms doing ugly things.
If there really is blood spilled in large quantities somewhere, I would prefer someone contact the police and leave the matter to the professionals. If there has been grievous bodily harm done, the victim is entitled to justice, not some ridiculous "spiritual assault" ceremony.
Not only is the idea cool, but I observe that people in the video had a marked tendency to use the stairs instead of the escalator - even the older ones.
So it encourages people to take the stairs, which is healthy exercise.
Now I wonder what kind of racket that thing made during rush hour . . .
Although I got the feeling that he will soon regret being so forward in his communication. Telling people how you "almost" got caught by a phish is like telling people you had an uncontrolled bowel movement that made you run to the bathroom to clean up - it's embarrassing, not educative.
I can't help but love it when ape-brained lowlifes get theirs.
On the other hand, I must say that that video really does justice to the CCTV debate - half the action takes place behind a mass of twigs and leaves. Thankfully, the "good" part is indeed visible. And good it is !
Well done to the "ladies", and a bloody swift encounter it was ! They knew just where to hit to stop the fight without permanently damaging anyone - thus respecting their adversaries on top of it all !
Impressive, by any account. As is Ms Bee. Not often I get to learn a new word. I'll be bouncing that one around my head for a day or two just to get used to it. Thanks !
And all hail the Moderatrix and her BOOTnotes !
"how is this different to running your service"
Well, one might think that an internal service inside a company would not be accessible from the Internet, or only through VPN. Like, um, 99% of company servers at this point in time.
Any serious company knows that work is done on internal servers, and you never, ever, put an internal server in direct contact with the Internet.
That is also why companies need sysadmins and network admins and firewalls and all that jazz. When the data is important enough, the cost is secondary.
The only possible advantage to cloud computing is a provider putting up a bullet-proof environment and using the same structure for multiple clients, thus saving on scale. But I'll bet the cost of that is way above whatever is offered now.
More big failings like this one will be required for companies to notice the real issues and act on them, just like this company has now tasted the true cloud experience and will react.
Of course, since they are still going for cloudy stuff, they haven't really had a hard enough lesson, but they will.
Of course this is not yet on WhakyPedia - the editors are all busy doing important stuff like inserting goatses in articles about the latest star of whatever TV show was on yesterday. Either that, or they're forbidding such edits to the articles of their own favorite subject.
In any case, this is wayyyy too intellectual for the WhackyP clan - it'll come when a proper scientist has time to do the edit.
And you've barely just finished installing it that you're already waxing lyrical about how stable and "refined" it is. People's expectations have really been lowered, I guess.
How about actually using it for a while before deciding if it is really all that good ?
And by "a while", I mean a few weeks, like six or so.