"what will a SimBoss make of a SimCV?"
Simple, he'll hire and pay in Simoleons.
18863 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
There's wayyy too much marketing muscle and bedazzled managers about to not have it happen and, with mobile computing, there is a strong argument for it.
Of course, you also have the all those fingers looking for a new pie (mobile operators, handset vendors, tablet makers, etc).
It's the security aspect of the cloud that intelligent people are worried about, not its usefulness.
And given the amount of importance the security element has had in the evolution of Facebook, I wouldn't bet the farm on the cloud being any more secure than that.
But for the Facebook-sharing mobile tweeters, the cloud will be just peachy.
Bollocks, my good sir.
The only "very convenient" medium I need is email, and I don't need any "social network" for that.
My real, actual friends have my email and my phone number. The rest I don't need to talk to anyway outside of polite social recognition in public areas.
Facebook is a social network only for those who don't have a network and can't be arsed to make one. Which obviously makes for a LOT of people.
As brilliantly demonstrated by the iPhone holding fiasco.
And the melting iMac issues, not to mention fading colors once the bright and shiny had worn off and been exposed to sunlight for a while.
We could finally have some objective assessment of Apple as a whole, admitting that the company has had some bright ideas and deserves some recognition, but is far from the perfect idevice-maker that sooo many people insist it is, but I suppose we won't finally bury this stupid Apple reality distortion field any time soon.
Could we stop being subject to useless, baseless factoids please ?
Where companies are concerned, there is only one important fact : market share. All the rest is hoopla and shenanigans.
People "like" HP less ? From what I've read over the past five years, nobody likes HP anymore, yet it is still in the top five and, more importantly, it still has market share.
People think that public image is important. It should be, but is it really ? How exactly ? Which "celebrity" got blackballed from magazines for drug use, or spouse abuse ? Which company got boycotted for slave wages, environmental disasters, or simply disrespecting the consumer ?
Sony is still around, and it has single-handedly found just about every possible way to antagonize and insult its user base (DRM fiascoes one after another, Java on set tops and Blu-Ray . . no, I won't even go there).
The only image that is important is our own, and almost only towards our employers. I've known a few people blackballed in my line of work because of attitude and behavioral mistakes. One or two were a-holes, okay, but none of them spilled millions of gallons of crude in pristine ecological environments, yet they had to move to find a job, whereas BP and all the rest are sitting pretty on billions in profits.
So I'm finding it difficult to grant any sort of importance to this "survey". Feels like paparazzi material to me.
(Disclaimer : I'm not a treehugger or greenie or environutjob in any way, I'd just like to see irresponsible companies actually foot the bill for once)
I went back to re-read the article to make sure, and nowhere is it stated that optical interconnects "do away" with latency and/or bottlenecks.
What the article states is that photons go faster in fibre than electrons do in a wire, therefor optical interconnects are going to minimize latency, not erase them.
And unless quantum entanglement gets even crazier than it is now, you'll always have one absolute physical latency : the distance between RAM and CPU. It cannot go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, after all.
Personally I think it's a bloody good thing that a country leader not waste his time on a PC - he's got underlings for that sort of thing and he's not got time to waste on Minesweeper.
I expect my President to be spending his time in talks and negotiations with any and everyone that can influence my country, not mucking about with Facebook and a crackable web connection.
Just think of the humongous amount of egg-on-face if a country leader had his PC hacked and data stolen !
I don't think any President could survive that, especially if top-secret strategic data were to be found stolen.
Hunks of steel tumbling around my wash/dryer and making a racket such as one has not heard since the good ol' days of next-door metallurgy, your neighbors must just love you.
Not to mention the joy of finding metal shavings all over my clothes and clogging the filter - brilliant.
No thank you, I prefer sorting my socks in peace and quiet.
It may be clumsy next to a nice set of wheels, but it comes in handy when said wheels are flat, or the terrain is totally impractical.
This speed test is certainly useful, although I personally agree that it's a lot easier to reach that speed with all the power and hydraulics removed from the beast itself.
Nevertheless, it's all about the little steps. One small success at a time, and one day we will see robot cheetahs walking all around, breaking into a run, chasing down suspects and then tearing them to shreds with their unyielding steel maws of bloody death.
The only question is, when that day arrives, who will be controlling them ?
No it is not. Anyone can code a program, compile it and release the compiled executable for free, without having to reveal the code.
For example, [url=http://www.getpaint.net/]Paint.net[/url] is a free photo/image editor that isn't bad at all - and that's an understatement - but you will not find the source code anywhere.
I am aware of threats and I know perfectly well that no platform, anywhere, anytime, is immune against problems.
I also have a brain and use it every time I click on a link.
That said, since I have started using Firefox with AdBlock and NoScript all those years ago, I have not once been infected by anything. That is fact, not smug, and if you don't like it I don't care.
I will continue to use Firefox/NoScript whilst keeping up-to-date about its issues and keeping it up-to-date as well because I trust it and it has never failed my trust yet.
But that does not mean I will click blindly on any link that I see or get sent to my mail.
The day IE has NoScript, I might take it for a whirl outside the very small list of URLs I let it see at this time, but until then, my general surfing will be done on Firefox, because it works.
If using a tool because it works is being smug, then so be it, I'm smug.
My PC is virus-free too.
Frankly, I'm beginning to think that Firefox and noScript should become mandatory by law.
If that ever did happen though, then this almost-perfect shield would become the hard target for all the miscreants and issues would be found.
So let the rabble continue with IE and zero protection. I'll just glide by, blissfully oblivious to the carnage until an article like this wakes me up to the fact that there are still people who don't know how to surf securely.
<disclaimer>this post concerns private use of Internet only - I am very well aware that professionals have a different set of problems, mainly that of not being able to choose their work platform</disclaimer>
Yup, right before destroying your data.
Seriously, I love how out-of-touch these high-level management types can appear to be. Listen to their spiel and you think the cloud is all fluffy and comfy, without delays or implementation issues of any kind. They are akin to Greek gods in Olympus, gliding miles above the issues and only seeing what they want to see.
Meanwhile, on the ground, the grunts deal with the nitty-gritty of reality, such as service response times, availability levels, bandwidth and backup, and that is before sorting out which applications and data can be put "in the cloud" and which can't, for whatever corporate reason.
And then we get to the nightmare of daily usage, when the inevitable failure occurs and the only thing the IT department can do is repeatedly dial a phone number that doesn't answer, despite all the service-level agreements and contractual obligations, until it does answer - only to hear that their data and apps have crashed and been restored to a status that was useful 3 months ago. Oh, and maybe they'll manage to get back to the current state, but God only knows if and when.
But yeah, viewed from space, Earth seems to be a pristine planet too - you don't see the oil spills, the rampant deforestation, or the clouds of pollution. From space, Earth is beautiful.
Earth to cloud, Earth to cloud, get down from your fluffy place and come meet the daily grind for a change.
So it's obvious, reveals its presence, cannot survive a restart, cannot run on basic Mountain Lion settings and probably doesn't know how to phone home either.
Well all that should be reassuring, except that this is obviously just a first stage attempt from the miscreants. They're going to correct the bugs and make a more efficient version, one that will serve their purposes better.
In any case, however ridiculous this piece of failed malware may be, it is nonetheless a warning sign : the crooks are targeting Apple machines. Time to batten down the hatches in iLand.
If they get caught doing something, they're still going to deny it.
Whatever they do, they will deny until they have their face shoved into the proof that they did it, then they will try and make everyone believe that it was "a mistake" or "a feature in beta" or whatever else passes for an excuse in la-la-land.
The point is to not impress children's minds with the fact that such language is the preferable way to speak, even if it is unfortunately heading that way.
As for children swearing in school, of course they do and so did we all. But children do it to appear cool to their friends, not because they think it is normal. They know it is not, that it is forbidden, and that is why they do it.
And that is also precisely why watershed is necessary. PVR is under someone's personal initiative, they had to program the thing, they know what they're getting. Just blindly stumbling into profanity, sexual intercourse and suggestive nudity - not to mention bloody violence - is not something that should happen when children are supposed to be awake.
Of course, nowadays that parents no longer know when the proper hours are for children of a given age, watershed is probably still moot, but one has to at least make the effort.
Education is not just for dogs.
I bought Hellgate: London, a Microsoft Games For Windows thingy from EA.
Since then, EA has pulled the plug on the multiplayer servers, forcing me to play only the single-player part.
Microsoft and EA were behind this game, yet I have lost 50% of what I paid for back in the day.
Last I checked, neither Microsoft nor EA Games have declared bankruptcy, yet I can no longer play multiplayer on that game.
How's that for cloud reliability ?
Have you taken a look at [url=http://www.quakelive.com/#!home]Quake Live[/url] ?
Of course, not all games can be done like that, but Quake pretty much defined hardcore gaming, and its fluidity is nothing less than astonishing. I used to play Quake III on my PC - and I had to upgrade its essential components to get proper framerate and nice visuals.
With Quake Live, okay, the tech is old, but heck, I'm playing that monster in a browser ! Without installing anything !!
Beats me how they do it, but they did it.
Let's see what the consequences are :
- for MS, which has soooo much dirt accumulated in its history, this is but another shell on the pile of waste in the back room
- for Ziedman, well I can only say I hope the money was good, because paid or not, his credibility is no longer worth the bag you use to clean up after the dog
If they're that hugely advanced, they might be bright enough to not use an investigative method that is (highly) susceptible to inducing changes into what they want to investigate ?
At least not until they get the results back and discover Justin Bieber, in which case a zap with a CEO-salary-sized laser is a perfectly understandable next step.
If you can prove that in court, isn't it attempted murder ?
The Court does not need to believe, it just needs to record that she used something she believed would have that effect, so attempted murder.
At which point, of course, she goes all hysterical and says, on camera, "but it's all just nonsense !", or something to that effect.
Capture, post on YouTube and educate the masses.
She gets fined for contempt of court.
Everyone wins.
I know next to nothing of the news industry, but it seems to me that, once upon a time, they had people called "reporters" that went out into the wide world to get stories, then went to the nearest phone to report their finds.
Some of these people actually proved bravery far in excess of what any boss could expect, bringing back incredible tales. Some actually died for their efforts.
I suspect that things are somewhat different today if reporters are just paid interns watching blog feeds, or categorizing press releases.