Posts by Pascal Monett 18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Roving bands of hooligans are trashing the infrastructure in preparation of the apocalypse ?
Is it safe to walk the streets in the daytime ?
Do I risk getting burned when walking by a manhole that suddenly belches flames ?
So many questions . . .
Isn't that fun ?
When I go to a hotel, I reasonably expect privacy everywhere.
I do not expect my face to show up on the hotel's Facebook page of reservations. Nor do I expect that I be found on the hotel's Facebook restaurant guest page.
I am willing to accept that there be a security cam in the garage, but that will be the extent of my understanding.
If you so much as show a pic of me wandering around in your garden, I will sue your ass off.
And he could count his blessings that day, because today there would have been a response, quickly, and then things would have escalated from there.
A massive semiconductor company, eh ? Not based in Taiwan, eh ? Sounds like Intel. Looks like Intel participated in the learning IT security paradigm.
You don't give interns superuser access to anything.
Now they know why.
Um, yeah, you can pretty much say the same about the USA.
Why is nobody remembering National Security Letters on newsdesks these days ?
Yes, Beijing can perfectly well ransack a Chinese company's data. The White House can do the same to any US-based company. I'm convinced the same is true for just about any country.
This is a pot meet kettle argument. Stop using it.
But I'm not going to go dissing on hospital stuff. I'm very happy that we have hospitals, insecure as they are. The people who are there want to help, they really do. You have to want to help when you're paid so little for saving people's lives, or even just making them slightly better. As I am getting on in age (60 is an asteroid that is looming ever larger on my horizon), I think that, if push comes to shove, I will gladly accept an insecure pump or whatever if it gives me more years to be with my family.
Yes, I would definitely prefer that medical thingamajigs be secure, it would certainly be reassuring, but I think I can stand the insecurity if my life is on the line.
But in my house ? Never.
I can get my fat ass of the couch and go for the dumb, stupid, secure switch.
I note that you haven't mentioned your weekly printing load. You just say that you use it every week.
That may be enough, but I have had years of headaches and ink loss with Epson inkjets until I finally decided to go laser, and I have never regretted that choice.
I print less than five pages a month. Laser is the only choice for that volume, inkjets will always dry up and be a nuisance.
That's a fact.
I came to this article thinking I was going to learn about someone having hacked a font, like others have hacked jpg images. What I actually learn is that there are tools to manage fonts, and it is one of those that is hackable. That is not the same thing.
Then there is the fact that the article evokes three vulnerabilities, but only describes one even though the way the article is written made me believe that I would get a description of all three.
I'm a bit miffed.
The app has nothing to do on any government's devices.
I note that we haven't heard about banks banning it on their platforms, because banks wouldn't allow users to install it in the first place. When you're working in a bank, you puny little cog do not have the right to install anything without approval from your department manager. And your department manager won't approve anything that is not for your work.
Why are governments not doing the same ? Oh, of course, IT costs money and people in government - especially politicians and their aides - don't have time to be subject to actual IT security.
Why are more employees relying on a beta service that makes stuff up ?
The only thing they're really doing is giving their time and data for free to a service which, once declared in production, will gouge them for their own work on a monthly subscriptoin basis.
It would be vastly more costly to lug a nuke to the Moon instead of parking it in Earth orbit (probably not LEO either, but much higher up).
And it's not just getting it to the Moon, it's all the infrastructure that would need to exist on-site to make it launcheable. Which means landing a whole lot of stuff beforehand that is specifically destined to launch a nuke. The kind of thing that would be quite visible, what with all the telescopes we have on Earth and in orbit, for any expert that would care to check out the installation. Which would lead to diplomatic issues that would likely make the Cuban missile crisis look like a stroll in the park in summer.
Not going to happen, is what I'm saying.
A contract is a binding agreement between both parties.
Oracle can drum up all the changes it wants, none of them are valid if nothing is allowing them in the existing contract.
That is why contract amendments are made. They add to and change the initial contract, and both parties must agree to them before they can be implemented.
And that is the essential difference between an actual contract and web site Ts & Cs. The web site can change them at any time and if you don't like it, your only choice is not to use said web site any more. You cannot argue that you wish stay on the pre-change version.
Ts & Cs are not a contract.
Kudos to Grab for a momentous job, and special points if they do open-source their app sizer. I'm sure many other developers will find that extremely useful.
But there is one thing I don't understand : the multiple font issue. Why does it even exist ? Why didn't Grab specify the working font at the beginning of its project, and stick to it ?
I would have thought brand identity would be a consideration, but apparently Grab has multiple teams and each team made its own UI decisions.
That doesn't strike me as a good idea.
Doctors. You used to have the village doctor, an aged, experienced man who knew everybody and treated everyone with equal care and attention.
Now, you have young wolves who are more interested in the number of patients they see per hour than actually solving problems.
I live in a small French village. My doctor of reference (because, in France, you now have to declare your preferred doctor - viva la Revoluçion) retired during COVID, handing her patient record over to a young male doctor. I recently learned that she had taken back her practice, and was, once again, treating patients, although she kept herself to patients that already had on record.
I can understand that. She's over 70. She doesn't need more stress.
In any case, I recently had occasion to reserve a time slot (an interview ? an exam ?) with my old preferred doctor. I returned to her as soon as I knew she was once again consulting. She knows me, she knows everything about me, and I trust her.
That's more than I can say about her "replacement".
And when I got to her practice, a quarter of an hour early - as usual, I got another confirmation of how right I was. There was a young man waiting (disclaimer : I'm 58 this year - he was no more than 30). We exchanged some polite pleasantries, and he said that he much preferrend waiting an hour in her waiting room rather than going to her younger replacement.
He told me that her replacement had given him a stay in hospital for his lack of proper diagnostic, and he would never see that one again.
I fear the loss of the the village doctor's experience. The doctor who could accurately predict the date of birth of a pregnant woman. The doctor who never failed to visit at 11 P.M. in case of emergency. The doctor who always seemed wise and reassuring, and whose prescriptions were bound to help you.
I fear we have collectively lost that to the commercialization of health care. To doctors who care more about seeing as many patients in an hour as they can, rather that the doctor who actually wants to get to know you, and better prescribe what you need.
I don't know what the solution is.
Yeah. Well, making the Founding Fathers black is really going to rock the boat on that score.
The real question is : how much other information is going to be biased and transformed with Google AI ?
After all, bias can go both ways. Either you show the truth, or you don't.
And if you don't, you can't be trusted. Cleopatra wasn't black, however much some people in Hollywood would like to think.
They are a species that is in dire need of becoming endangered.
So you spent a few hundred hours preparing and presenting a case ? That does not justify $300K/hour in any way, shape or form. You did your fucking job, and for that you should be paid no more than your already exorbitant $1000/hour fee.
This is ambulance chasing at its finest. I certainly do not support His Muskiness in any way, but these scum need to be put down. Period.
I really wonder how that will work reliably. I imagine that some kind of watermark will be visible on the video, likely not in the middle. So, if it is at the bottom or along a side, anyone who cares can just crop the watermark out and republish the video without it. If the watermark is on the top, that would likely risk cropping the person's head and that would rather severely impact the efficiency of the deepfake, so maybe the watermark should be on the top.
But, given that I have no idea what the identifiers are supposed to be, I might just be spouting nonsense.
"Les Services BETA peuvent être modifiés, suspendus ou définitivement interrompus par SCALEWAY sans préavis et sans que ceci ne donne le droit au Client à une quelconque indemnité."
Meaning the service can be suspended or cancelled without warning and without penality for Scaleway.
So you've got it only as long as Scaleway can be arsed to let you have it, and if it fails, it's your problem.
And to think that there are numpties who will really think they're getting a good deal for their production environment.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
