"This person is threatening to expose something bad about you"
Uh, it's Twitter. People do not threaten to expose, they just damn well go ahead and expose.
Failure as far as intimidation is concerned.
18911 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That should not be all that difficult. It's the Internet - all we need to do is create country nodes and manage continental communications independently.
The USA has no responsibility for the work we do not do ourselves. The Internet is open, it was built that way and nothing can change that. Therefor, to keep NSA away from our comms, we just have to pay the price to keep our comms away from american shores.
I don't like the NSA listening in, but in this particular case, it's our fault for sending them the traffic in the first place.
The Cloud has absolved itself of all responsibility, so market forces are stepping in to provide some measure of guarantee.
I dare say the abject failure of Azure was probably a wake-up call for those new companies. I just hope for their sake that they managed a proper risk evaluation, or else they are going down.
In any case, I can't help but feel that this is the true nature of the Cloud - pay to access your data, and pay again to recover it in case of trouble.
I wonder how many more paying steps will become involved in all this nebulous business before bean counters finally wake up and smell the coffee ?
My S II now runs 4.1.2, and although I can express support at a number of UI improvements, I find that my battery life has taken a shot in the leg - and not in a good way.
To prevent my need for recharging during the day, I have had to implement power saving measures. This may be temporary, at least until I find what is causing this drain and shut it off, but in the meantime I am seriously hampered by having my phone at 14% battery every morning.
Oh, and I do not really appreciate having had to redefine my entire workspace. Why did they have to trash my icon settings ?
At least they didn't pull a Facebook and managed to keep my essential settings instead of resetting them.
Yes it is. That is probably the reason why, at one of my client sites not long ago, they had - I kid you not - a Work Without Email day, specifically touting the advantages of talking (gasp) to people (GASP) IN PERSON (<faint>).
Besides, do YOU want the full-on sweat effect of an unwashed user speeding towards you at full waddle ? With his coffee-stained maw wide open yelling for you to stop so you can see the lettuce on the rear molars ?
I prefer the email, thanks.
The Mainframe computers of the olden days were models of reliability. Connections to them were via proprietary cables. To program for them required a gaggle of highly-paid PhDs in engineering and mathematics, and projects took years to painstakingly realize. Code was written instruction by punch-code instruction. When projects were finished, users took what they were given and didn't complain, because it was all brand-new and nobody had any reference point.
The Cloud has nothing to do with a mainframe in any aspect, except that data is remotely accessed, which places it at the mercy of ISP reliability on top of Cloud Provider reliability.
You need to check out Real Humans (http://en.wikipedia.ord/wiki/Real_Humans), a Swedish TV series about how sentient robots are trying to make themselves a place among humans.
Not a bad series at all. It also takes a good look at how robots can deal with concepts such as morality and empathy.
P.S. : where'd the bloody link function go to ?
The reliability of your missile defense system has never been properly evaluated in the first place, and is obviously made of complete porkies at the moment.
Which is not a problem, really, since nobody is going to lob any missiles at you in the forseeable future.
All that nonsense about employees wanting corporate access on their personal phones/laptops is, in my opinion, bollocks. I don't know ANYONE who wants to recieve application alerts on their phone during off hours or, worse, weekends.
Furthermore, I fail to see just how it is sooo important to have one's work mail on one's personal phone when employees are generally sitting in front of a PC with all required access during the day.
Also, I really don't see how management is going to trust the people on the bottom rungs of the latter with corporate-sensitive data on their personal equipment when they barely have access to it on their PCs.
Now, of course, if we are not talking about the 99% of drones but of the few high-flyers who are intent on building their careers and impressing the management, in other words, those with high-level diplomas and overbearing personalities who simply cannot live an instant without total and complete access to eveything they need to impress the upper echelon, then yes, I totally can see BYOD being an indispensable part of the landscape. For the chosen few.
Which still means that it's just another status symbol.
For the rest of us, we couldn't care less that our work PC is lagging like a dead horse. On the contrary, it gives us the perfect excuse when things start piling up and we're asked "why is this not finished yet ?".
Personally, I would be quite miffed if my work PC were more powerful than my personal PC. I'm quite happy that it is not.
Finally, that reference to the cloud - "it is far better not to have the data on the device in the first place, nor on someone else’s servers, let alone something as nebulous as the cloud" - well sorry but that just about clinches it. The cloud is just as much a fad right now than BYOD is. Everybody has a cloud, every cloud wants you to climb on board, the cloud is computing paradise (that is what we hear).
Dissing the cloud while touting BYOD is the mark of pure marketing drivel.
We can absolutely trust them to send regular summaries to the NSA, and fork over everything any time the NSA so much as twitches its pinky.
Funny how, when it comes to our privacy and personal life, companies fall over themselves to obey gubbermint spooks, but when it comes to paying taxes, no spook can seem to find them anymore to bring in the dollars.
Leaves me baffled, I must say.
Hey, that rings a bell. Wasn't there some big hoopla way back when about something similar ? Wasn't some US President impeached about it ? It was reaaaallly big, back in those days, wasn't it ?
More recently we had a biiiig hoopla about some cigar or something, with public explanations, tears and apologies and no impeachment, but while the US media went hog-wild about it all the rest of the world politely stopped turning for about six months until they got over it.
Now we just get "how shocking" articles from international newspapers.
Progress ?
You need to update your conspiracy database, my good man. The NSA (or whatever its name at the time) has had a direct line into all UK government operations since the Cold War what with the secret MI-5/CIA "agreements" that have been instituted since that time. We even have one of those spy documentaries (I believe they call it the "Bond" series) that practically says so.
The MoD could have Linux installed and locked down tighter than a gnat's arse, the task that generates the daily "elements of interest" reports would still send it all in proper Word format to the NSA bods for their perusal.
"If Apple was using words from this list in combination with a four digit number (which multiples the range of possible combinations by 10,000) then they were using a range of just 52 million possible passphrases."
I have a problem here. For me, 52,000 x 10,000 = 520,000,000, not 52,000,000
Anyone care to double-check ?
It is fitting that you take WWII as a reference for US history, because that is indeed when the US discovered that it was a World Power, and started flexing its muscles as such.
And, just like a bodybuilder, it started taking steroids to flex better and further, thus leading it to its current condition which is that of a geriatric bodybuilder that used to be sculpted and fit but has become used and paranoid even towards its own children.
But do not take my post as a rebuttal. Instead, please direct your attention to this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWiIYW_fBfY.
I am aware that this speech was pronounced in 1961, but that may serve to "push historical ignorance" in a different direction this time.
Personally, I find frightful just how visionary that man was.
And that is how it should have been from the start.
All this hoopla/zealotry around Win8 and that stupid Start button is because Microsoft was fucking incapable of giving customers the CHOICE of whether they wanted the not-Metro interface or the Start button they were used to.
And if a simple $5 add-on is enough to solve the issue then it's not an enormous technical problem with unforeseen consequences, it's just that Microsoft's hubris is getting bigger than its customer base.
True, but Jason Bourne was a remorseless one-man murder team of great efficiency, with the added benefit that his murders were covered by Hollywood Anonymity.
Snowdon may be a tad less keen on showing his mad murder skillz, assuming that he has any to speak of, since Hollywood has a lot less importance with Interpol and the International Court of Justice than they hint at in their films.
They're marketing people. With them, the rule is simple : every next month must do better than before, else the performance is "disappointing".
Since the S4 started at 30 million units, the fact that the next quarter "only" does 20 million is perceived as bad.
Which also means that a bunch of Samsung marketroids are going to miss their quarterly targets, and some just might be fired for it, because marketroids have the same quarterly requirements - to do better and better every month.
Of course, for marketroids it is simple : if you cannot follow the ever-increasing rise of your targets, you end up fired and replaced by a junior marketroid with the same target you had when you started. Then the target gets raised and junion embarks on the same treadmill that will lead to his identical demise.
Sorry, but I disagree.
For that, they should be thrown in jail. One year for each mention.
And if they start doing it again when they get out, then back into the slammer they go. This time, with Bubba. Maybe then they'll learn that you don't hijack someone's death to falsely make you look good.
Sorry, but that won't happen until the smallest PC available will be able to render full-size triple HHHHD over any screen resolution with an infinite amount of objects, in real-time.
When we get to that level of computing power, we might pause for a week or two before considering just what we could start thinking about (double the 200k x 160k screen size ! Twice the amount of objects to render ! Half the power requirements ! ...) to improve our computing power even more.
Maybe.
Uh, you might want to re-read his claim ? And the fact that he posted some half-dozen links to support it ?
His claim is that disasters have happened before. Nothing to do with climate, nothing to do with skepticism.
You, on the other hand, obviously revel in strawman attacks. As for pulling things out of your butt, well if that rocks your world good for you.