Re: He seems to have tore the lid off a huge can of worms
More importantly, it is now obvious that he was indeed right to do so.
18911 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
And that is the whole issue. We have no way of knowing what tools the NSA may have, or just how that might make their contributions a weakness.
Which means that now, someone (or, more likely, several someones) will have to go over the whole thing again with a fine-toothed comb and a spirit of paranoia, in order to vet once again the work that has already been done.
And even when that is done, there is no being sure that nothing was missed, because we don't know what the NSA can do.
This is probably the worst possible fallout of the whole NSA debacle. Trust is gone, and with it, our security and peace of mind.
To make it short : ignorance really is bliss.
I believe that the term "modern humans" refers to something more in the line of this.
As for using tools, the linked article clearly states that "Homo erectus and Homo ergaster were the first of the hominina 1.3 to 1.8 million years ago. It is believed that these species were the first to use fire and complex tools", so not three million years, just two.
But hey, what's a million years between friends ?
Um, actually I think that publicly advocating murder is more along the lines of totally illegal. As in get-arrested-and-risk-jail illegal.
On the books anyway, and IANAL, of course, but if he got a "courtesy" visit from the local Sheriff accompanied by a night in the cooler, he could only have himself to blame.
Not that I mind a good shouty rant from this guy. He has a way of cutting through civilized behavior like a surgeon that I like reading about.
But actually suggesting that people go out and create deadly accident conditions ? Sorry, Torvalds, you've largely overstepped your (considerable) notoriety this time. Stick to calling people names and comparing them to cockroaches or something.
No Apple is not. Apple has chosen suppliers to create its goods, those suppliers do not become part of Apple and remain free to do whatever they see fit to perform to the clauses of the contract that has been signed.
If the suppliers and their sub-contractors employ students that they do not pay, bring in scantily-clad ladies for the nightshifts and host regular cock-fighting sessions to boost morale, Apple is not responsible for that.
Apple is, however, responsible for continuing to use said supplier under such conditions. And I'm sorry, but paying students less than regular workers is a time-honored practice in many parts of the world.
It is also somewhat less important in my view than the subject of child labor.
I'm sorry, but the PC is dead, from a market point of view.
The PC is dead because people no longer need it to do 90% of what they generally do, which is send messages, surf the web, watch Youtube and dick around on Facebook. You do these things on tablets and smartphones these days, and they are much easier to manage than a PC.
I do agree that PCs are for the heavy lifting, absolutely. CAD, programming, video editing, gaming (for some types of games), these are things are done best on a PC. And typing a letter/report is best done with a keyboard.
But PC-centric things are not home-user activity, and it is the home-user that has driven the PC market up to now. The home user is now using tablets and smartphones that are more and more powerful every year, which makes choosing a PC less and less interesting as time goes by.
What it means is that the PC is going back to what it was : an engineers tool, a specialist tool. The general public is going to forget about them in the next ten years.
The PC is finally dead. That is not FUD, it's evolution.
Indeed. And how did that get screwed up ?
Because Gates (at the time) was adamant that there was only one Windows, and wanted the tablets to run the full Windows OS. Which, of course, the hardware of the time had no chance of doing.
There were people in Microsoft at the time who thought of making a smaller, more nimble OS that could run the tablets and still be called Windows something-or-another, but His Gateness overruled, with the result that today, tablets have made a comeback and they are called Ipads.
The UI debacle of Windows 8 demonstrates that MS is incapable of learning from its own history. The not-Metro interface is not an issue on a tablet, it is on a desktop. Why impose it on a desktop ? Because MS doesn't learn from its own past.
I think Nokiasoft is going to be a failure. An 800-pound gorilla failure. And the taller they are . . .
Um, could someone explain to me what that sentence means ?
I mean, isn't it in the best interest of a small ISV to expose its apps to as many people as it possible can ? Isn't that exactly the reason why all these app stores are so important ? And why developers are always incensed when their app is banned for some obscure reason ?
Exposition is key. If I spend six months developing something, I sure as hell hope to be able to sell it to as many people as I can. I really don't see how not exposing my app "to the whole world" is supposed to benefit me.
But in the end, it probably doesn't matter anyway. Microsoft is quite obviously playing the pouting child in the corner. Except that this child is a notorious bully, and nobody is going to come hold its hand.
It concerns how American "scientists" have found new excuses to get funding while demonizing smoking and drinking.
Come on guys, snap out of it. I think we're pretty much aware now that smoking can cause lung cancer, throat cancer and some other kinds of unpleasant things. Every time I see a pack of cigs or a pouch of tobacco, it has a big ugly "THIS CAN KILL YOU" sign on it. So could you stop flogging that (very) dead horse now and find something useful to study ?
P.S. : I wonder how long it will take before they digitize Casablanca and edit out all evidence of smoking to produce a "pure" version ? Maybe they'll CGI the white cigs into red licorice or something ?
What is that you say ?
People are actually PAYING for Yahoo!'s Shitty! New! Interface! and they're being ignored on top of it ?
Dear me. You'd think that a company making users pay for using its forums would perhaps, in some way, let them participate in any major redesign that would touch a paying customer's usage habits.
Instead of just doing something, foisting it upon them without any beta feedback and then announcing that it could not be undone.
Unless, of course, Yahoo! did a Microsoft and did do a round of beta, but just ignored the feedback anyway. In which case, reap what you sow, Marissa.
Citation please ?
Because I doubt that you as an individual have any rights over things you post on a public forum online, any more than you have rights over what you say in a bar or shopping mall.
But I'm not a lawyer, so please correct me.
I basically agree with practically everything you say.
I would just like to point out that Microsoft is in a much worse situation than Google, because Google doesn't really care what platform you use its products with, whereas Microsoft is currently in the process of cannibalizing its Office product to set its presence in "the cloud".
That's all fine and dandy, but even if MS does manage to cloudify Office, sooner or later it will have to open it up to other platforms, meaning it will have enormous market pressure to make its Office 365 available to Android platforms.
That day MS Windows is dead as a dodo. Not because its Windows, but because people don't use PCs all that much at home anymore. Home computing is with tablets and smartphones because they are simple to use. PCs are the tech specialists tool, the platform for heavy computing (programming, CAD, video editing etc).
I'm not saying PCs will disappear, nor am I saying Microsoft will, just that until today, people only had PCs to surf the web, go on YouTube and write their emails/tweets/sms. Now they have many more choices, most of which are a lot easier to come to grips with. So, IMHO, MS is inevitably going to lose this war against Google, whatever happens.
Government can do whatever the hell it decides to do right up to the point when the population it governs decides that enough is enough.
As for freedom of speech, if I remember correctly nobody has ever been arrested for posting something on a blog in our First World countries (with the exception of the English guy who blew his stack on Twitter and ended up making an unfortunate comment that was interpreted as a bomb threat - and that is still not something that impacts freedom of speech in a general sense).
Unfortunately, since Snowden absolutely every tin-foil-hat wearer considers himself vindicated in his beliefs.
Even more unfortunately, what was once considered ludicrous and over-the-top as far as government surveillance is concerned is now a baseline for realistic expectations.
So, to be paranoid today requires even worse expectations than the worst-case scenario of just a year ago.
So this time it's vulnerable children's details posted online. I'm sure the kids needed that.
Last year, it was Moccasin Creek.
Trouble was brewing before though, and some local citizen tried to do something about it in 2011. Maybe she was unhappy about this.
But hey, no problem really. After all, £100,000 is just 9 days of bus lane penalty fines, apparently.
If you have to go to the same place with any regularity, it will be most difficult to "randomize their routes".
Fiction is all it is meant to be, but in the real world I think that spies rely more on acting like normal people with daily routines. Someone who actually does randomize his travel routes every time is going to be easy to suspect of being a spy.
And having a (plastic) dummy drive the car is rather dangerous, not to mention terribly conspicuous.
I love it when companies adopt the burnt bridges style of public relations.
Then they get all surprised when the bridges are not burnt in their favor.
This is the Internet. You might have a billion accounts now, but you're not Google and you're not doing something someone else can't set up just as well.
And when that happens, your boat will leak faster than a sieve.