"a chemical reaction provoked by fertilisers "
Sounds more like food poisoning to me.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Sorry to contradict you, but Bronze badges are awarded after 1000 upvotes, not a number of posts in a year.
And to all those saying "Money can't buy happiness", I will reply "but it can sure as heck prevent misery".
Money is not all ? Not when you have enough of it. If you don't have any, it becomes pretty much your biggest problem.
Rarely needed that may be, but it's implemented almost everywhere and a fucking nuisance most of the time.
It's come to a point where Java/Javascript is used over HTML in some websites. I guess that some website owners think that killing URL references and destroying easy bookmarking is an acceptable price to pay to prevent . . what? Page scraping ?
I use Firefox with AdBlocker and NoScript. Never been to Yahoo! except when forcefully redirected there.
Now I have another reason not to go there.
Interesting. They know exactly how much illegal stuff was produced, despite the fact that illegal should also be unrecorded.
We can find how much illegal meth was sold during a time period, but I doubt we can know how much was produced.
Not without having an inside line on the meth production industry, that is.
So how do they know how much rare earth was produced illegally ? Are they just totalling the bribes and inferring from there ?
"It is, on the other hand, quite reassuring if you think that the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary are composed of men and women who, on average, are not greatly different from the population mean in most ways."
Sorry, but I am hardly reassured to think that my privacy and security are being handled by people like that numbskull at the other end of my street.
And I am to understand that that would be a bad thing ?
How would that keep white-hat searchers from finding bugs ?
I think that the more eyes are watching the more secure the product will be (except if those eyes belong to the NSA, obviously).
Here's a tip : hardened criminal psychopath escapes prison with nothing to lose and two weeks to kill before everyone dies. What do think his party will be like ?
Do you really think he's going to stop at just going after people who have "wronged" him ?
I understand that a lot of people think that we will not be told. If I were in a position of power, I would most likely take exactly that decision. I also think that we'll find out anyway, because someone who knows will make a mistake and text/tweet/FBpost something that gives away the secret.
Governments are good at keeping secrets. People are terrible at it.
Even if they try, someone will veto it.
And since the UN must pass all of its resolutions without any veto, it will be buried.
And that is why the UN is powerless : it is not the fact that it is the UN, it is the fact that there will always be someone to step up and veto something someone else doesn't want.
If the UN had existed in 1939, it would have pressed for a motion to condemn Hitler for invading Poland - but Russia would have vetoed it (or Italy, or Japan, or whoever).
It is not the UN that is powerless - it is our own damn incapability to work for higher goals instead of working for personal interests.
Yup. Those work in 99.9% of the stores that sell stuff.
The fact that russian gangsters have some as well is just proof that it is good. They are professionals, after all. They won't go after something that has bad returns on investment.
So call me when a russian mobster is hoarding Bitcoins - that's when I'll believe it has value.
And clicking on an icon instead of making actual contact to just say "I don't know to say" is better ?
I lost my mother to cancer in 2010. I can tell you that I much prefer the people who called and said exactly that to people who would have clicked a fucking button and done nothing else.
But I don't have a Facebook account anyway, so my friends actually do make the effort to phone and talk to me.
Well if a billion people see something as perfectly OK, then I guess it should be.
The media industry has only itself to blame for this situation. It has been dragged screaming, kicking and resisting all the way into the digital age, and since it did absolutely nothing to adapt, the only thing it can do now is rear-guard harassment.
Do you honestly think that I am going to think about copyright when I download a torrent of a film that I have already paid for in order to get a proper digital-friendly copy that I can put on my personal media store ? No, I don't and I won't.
You can throw any legal argument at me that you wish to, the fact remains that I have paid my lifetime license to own a the right to view a film in my house. From that point on, how I view said film is my business and mine only. And if I want to have my video library on a handy personal NAS hooked up to my TV, then nobody has a pipsqueak to say about it.
So, in your view having copyrighted material in one's possession is proof of piracy ?
I have bought over 1000 books (dead tree prints, not PDFs), and they're all copyrighted.
I have a video library of over 500 DVDs bought in stores - all copyrighted. And most of them impose upon me that wonderful anti-piracy video. I hear that, when you actually pirate a film, you're not bothered with that and you get to see the film directly.
I have a games library also in the two hundreds. Store bought, every one of them.
Damn, I must be a 1st-class pirate with all that copyrighted material lying around.
I wonder when I'll be getting that endorphin rush you mention ? That's going to be one hell of a ride.
Forget about tanks. A swarm of lethal needle-carrying flying drones the size of a dragonfly is all you need to overcome anything that is not already fully armored.
Once you've done away with the unarmored grunts, you can pick off the armored stuff easily with your own army of grunts, who can then hold the territory.
That's easy : nil. Nowhere. None. There is nothing done in software which justifies a patent. A copyright, sure, but not a patent.
And as for non-practicing entities, they can fuck right off out of the tribunal. If they're not practicing, they have no right to burden the economy with lawsuits.
My solution to patent trolls is simple : what they stand to gain should be based directly on how much money they lost in sales. Not selling anything ? No loss, get out.
And do not pass Go.
Sorry but bollocks. You're talking about the children of the 60's generation who saw computers invade their lives without them knowing either what they could do (the computers) or what they should do about it (the people).
Everyone I know that talks about computers only talks about the one or two programs they know. Most of the time, it's Outlook and Word, plus maybe this one web site (obviously Facebook).
They don't know computers, they manage to putter around in one or two programs. And as soon as something goes wrong, they're lost like a babe in the woods.
Youngsters fare not much better, actually. The only difference is that they know 10 or more programs, and are much less reluctant at clicking here or there to find something out. Good on them, but they still don't know about computers, they just barely know how to use them.
It's not going to get better, by the way. Tablets and smartphones are placing the computer squarely in the consumer (aka idiot) space, meaning that soon, nobody will know what a backup even is, let alone how to go about doing it.
At that point, I'm no longer telling anyone I'm a programmer. I'll tell them I work in a sewage treatment plant. That should ensure that I never get any questions about my job, or about computers.
I'm quite sure that the suits are being adequately impressive about this technology. Redundancy and availability are sprinkled all over this.
But privacy and security ?
Absent, pure and simple.
Welcome to the future, where you can truly be shafted in multiple ways at the same time. Or asynchronously, if you prefer !
And to think that my bank has a declaration on its home page saying that they will never ask you for your banking details either by phone or by mail. It must be the only one, I guess.
Not to mention the fact that the body of the mail may have been properly engineered to resemble an official mail, but I'm pretty sure that a quick check of the replyTo address would/should have raised some red flags.
There is a disturbingly high need for mail training these days.
Aluminum casing makes some sense on a laptop since it improves the heat exchange between the laptop's innards and the exterior. So better cooling than plastic. There is, therefor, a technically justified reason to adopt aluminum.
Keyboard keys have always been black on laptops.
Those are not enough to claim any sort of resemblance.
I was with you right up to that sentence.
Solar power is not the future of Humanity, fusion is. Solar power is, in the best of cases, limited to the amount of energy that reaches the surface of the Earth. That is measured in KW per square meter. It will not increase.
Todays nuclear reactors have outputs that reach the MW range on a surface that would take a solar farm half a continent to replicate. Tomorrow's fusion reactors will do even better. And, with more energy available, we might discover new methods of energy generation, leading to even more energy available, leading to God only knows what (interstellar travel within a human lifetime, maybe ?).
What matters is that Humanity is in need of much, much more energy than Solar, Wind or Hydro can possibly give. Fusion is the future.
Mandatory Franklin quote : "They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Yup, the USA has forgotten the lessons of its Founding Fathers, ignored the warnings of President Eisenhower and will soon be a totalitarian government.
And to think that I took Person of Interest for a fiction...