Absolutely.
Can we have an Enforcement Team go in with cluebats to make sure they get it ?
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Just this morning I got a call telling me that one of my clients is going for Office 365 and retiring its existing IT department. The heavy paychecks got caught by the Microsoft sirens and are steaming ahead to the magical land of IT will cost us nothing.
Yeah, sure.
Well I guess it's the price to pay to demonstrate to all those supposedly intelligent people what IT actually means and what the Cloud can actually give. Maybe when a few hundred companies have gone out of business due to cloud mishaps the industry will take a step back and start thinking about just how much a beancounters' opinion should matter in strategic decisions.
But first there must be blood.
Nope, not here there isn't.
And saying that just after what happened to Code Spaces is unfortunate timing at its best.
The Cloud is still an unsecure, unreliable thing over which even paying customers have very little control and even less guarantee.
Sorry, but no cigar.
Easier response : let the trolls have their patents and lawsuits, but index the damages on the amount of income the patent-holder makes from selling objects that use said patent.
In that scenario, patent trolls which make nothing and sell nothing will see that any court action will result in zero rewards, since they do not make anything. And if they don't sell much, meaning they are not in the business of actually making money from the patent, then they don't get much either.
Sorry, I must have missed something there. Are you saying that CIOs won't need to manage a fleet of Windows machines anymore once every app is in the cloud ?
Of course not, people still need them to access said apps, so the fleet of machines isn't going anywhere. The fleet of Windows licenses might be, though, because once all apps are in the Cloud and accessible via Web interface, why pay Microsoft ? You'll be able to install a different OS that costs less (no I will not say the name) and users will only need to know how to launch the browser. Heck, you can even auto-launch said browser when the user logs on.
I get the license management improvement, that is a given. But for the rest, sorry, the Cloud is not going to lessen the PC nightmare at all for CIOs. And when the Cloud goes titsup, which it does for numerous reasons, then if you have put everything in there, you have instantly reduced your fleet of PCs to deadweights until the situation is resolved.
That's the kind of thing that gets a CIO fired.
Yeah, but guns come with license backed by government law and if you don't respect that you go to jail, whereas cloud comes with marketing spiel and beancounter approval and if you don't listen to them you lose your job.
Now we know that if you do listen to them you can lose your company, or at least your data.
The conclusion is : never listen to a non-technical person on technical issues if you can help it.
I doubt that there are that many accounts of disgruntled employees destroying their company when they leave. That is a criminal act and you go to jail for it.
And once you have a criminal record, you can say good-bye to any position higher than flipping burgers.
That's a high price to pay for a bit of disgruntling. There may be many people wishing that they could, but I really don't think there are that many who actually do it.
What if the uranium tubes are vaporised in the explosion ? In that case, you're not getting tubes dropping in to the ocean, you're getting yet another radioactive cloud in the atmosphere which will cause widespread panic and give a good excuse to cut nuclear reactors back another few decades.
The principle of precaution is at work here, as it should be. If only industries and politicians took it into account our world would be better off.
Don't worry, as soon as that mesh is in place, someone will be wanting to control it. And they will find a way.
No, the answer never is in doing away with the existing to create something new that will fail in the same way.
The answer always is in fighting the rot and making sure the rot does not take over. In this case, the indie labels should band together and create their own service. Yes, it is complicated, yes it will cost them, but they're shafted anyway so might pay for the right thing.
Bearing in mind that the unlocker is probably supposed to be a tool that can execute from a web page, it seems logical to use the programming language that can do that, which is Java.
Microsoft C may be another possibility, but that does not mean that choosing Java is a bad choice in and of itself.
The real issue us that, whatever the language used, some criminal will come out with a web page looking like the one to unlock Simplocker, but actually uses Cryptolocker to nail the phone down permanently. The usual crop of inattentive/clueless users will get caught and mayhem will ensue.
These encouragements are handed out at the moment to incite people to buy electric cars. If and when people start buying them en masse, you can be sure that the government will cut the funding and attendant favors.
At that point, you'll be back here complaining that car parking is expensive again, that you have to drive with everybody else again, that you no longer have reserved spaces, etc... and car dealers will be whining that the government is crimping their sales because no more subsidies.
The wheel turns slowly, but nothing stops the complaining.
Keep us updated as to how well that works for you. I'm interested in your experience.
That said, I doubt your solar panels will be doing much recharging outside of weekends. If you take that car to work, then you're back by evening, so not much influence from solar.
But still, I'm interested in how well solar panels work up north, so do keep us informed please.
Will have Microsoft and everybody else banging on their door with Vuitton bags of shares worth billions.
Come on, Microsoft will not invent this, it'll just buy out whoever does.
And if whoever does doesn't sell because they're intelligent enough to not sell out, then Microsoft will finally have to publicly bow before the new king of computing and resort to its usual FUD tactics to try and keep people buying its stuff.
It really is very dangerous, in these days where the Internet can be used to instantly verify any claim, to state things like that.
Indeed, only one kind of pterodactyl had an 11-meter wingspan : the Quetzalcoatlus. The other kinds of pterodactyls all had wingspans that were smaller, some of them much smaller.
But of course, when one spouts bullshit at the rate you do, it is not surprising that you neither provide links to back up your "claims", nor take into account anything as mundane as "facts" when they get in your way.
A word of caution : when you take a moniker like yours, Faux Science Slayer, you would do well to not post things that can be so easily proven false.
Because at the moment, you are not worthy of the name you login with.
Well I'd also collaborate with a thief holding a gun to my daughter's head.
Now, far be it from me to defend Microsoft (or any of them, actually), but you do have to acknowledge that the NSA didn't just phone the majors and ask politely. They came to the door with a legal document saying basically "drop your pants now, 'cause you're shafted anyway".
That being said, some companies may have been more enthusiastic in their cooperation than others, but still, they didn't really have a choice.
Let's make one thing clear : anything that takes your eyes off the road for any amount of time is a risk; the faster you drive, the higher the risk.
So, if by "interacting" with a phone you mean connecting a call or hanging up, then I will grudgingly admit that that should be fine, in a cradle or Bluetooth mode.
But as far as anything else is concerned, I'm sorry, your hands are supposed to be on the wheel and your eyes on the road at all times. If you can slip in texting or anything else than checking a GPS screen for your position, you're not doing it right.
Bah, soon The Google will be driving us all around anyways. We will thus be free to happily provide all of our movement details to the infinitely-tentacle data slurper in exchange for being able to HEY! I'M TXTING IN A CAR!
I'm not tight-fisted. However I am getting more and more paranoid about how much personal information people can leech out of those marvellous gadgets that I am surrounded with.
So, given that we have all heard the reports about how PIN code VISA is broken but remains steadfastly in use (because nothing else and too expensive to replace), I am very wary of a technology that actively broadcasts my "secure" banking data to the immediate surroundings.
And don't give me tosh about how the range is vanishingly small or whatnot - we've read right here about how supposedly secure ATMs were subverted from the inside to phone home credit card details.
If they can do that on a supposedly secure ATM machine, then they can stick a customized Raspberry PI on the backside of the card machine and none will be the wiser for weeks, if not months. Meanwhile, the crims will reap the rewards.
So no to NFC anything until I have a technological guarantee that it is unsubversible.
Obviously not since we've read his words here.
That said, I would counter that same argument by stating that the computer I use to post on Internet forums is not the one I use for work.
And I can actually agree with that kind of separation, to the point where I do believe that the military should not have ANY computer attached to the WWW.
But if you're using Chrome, you really shouldn't be surprised that it phones home to The Google To Which All Data Belongs.
The Board is being "honest" : it is declaring the equity program and it is public about it. That is the definition of honesty : say what you do, do what you say. I doubt very much that the complainant will get any traction against that in Court - it is in General Assemblies that such a point should be raised.
Honesty has nothing to do with morals, though, and this case outlines it brilliantly. The Board at Facebook is giving itself three times the payback compared to other companies with similar capital, I can understand that a shareholder doesn't like that. Said shareholder would probably expect the "excess" wealth to go into his pocket and, given that he is a shareholder, I can understand that as well.
However, I contend that to compare Board revenue with other companies is, by definition, approving the way the other Boards are doing business and allocating resources. I don't agree with the way Disney does business (I certainly disagree with its stranglehold on copyright laws) and I wouldn't use that as a reference for anything.
Besides, didn't anybody tell him ? Facebook is The Zuck's baby. You don't like his decisions, then don't invest in it, bitch.
I am relieved that the efforts to secure our privacy from the ever-increasing might of online surveillance are continuing by virtue of intelligent people devoting their time to the (complex) issue.
And anything that secures more of my privacy from the grubby mitts of Google & Big Brother Inc is a plus in my book.
From the extract in the article itself, the Turing Test makes no mention that the subject tested is supposed to be anything but an adult.
But hey, you gotta start somewhere. Personally, I would have failed it straightaway. 13-year-olds use way to much l33tsp35k for me to understand them. This one wrote complete sentences. That, in my book, is a dead giveaway that it can't be a human child.
I don't get it either.
I am pretty sure though, that DARPA employs people that are actually intelligent. I am convinced that they have their case covered and are ready.
I will be waiting for the report of a bug (or security hole) in the programs that are being "game-tested". That, in my mind, will prove whether or not this method has merit.
I was going to dispute that, but it turns out you are perfectly right.
Thank you for educating me.
I can't help but imagine such a road at night in the rain. Headlights and raindrops and showers of sparks illuminating everything.
Beautiful.
But of course someone is going to come along and painstakingly explain that it won't happen because <technobabble>. And I'm sure the person will be right.
But I prefer my vision . . .
Funny, that reminds me of something. Something from those WWII films in Paris. Something about vehicles.
Ah, yes. Diesel engines.
Maybe there's a parallel there ? Diesel engines used to be cranky things to get started too (like me in the morning). Now they're very efficient and will be beating gasoline engines in market penetration at some point in the future.
Might something similar happen for these solid oxide cells ?
I do think that, if proven, that kind of hijinks lands you right in jail territory.
Given the difficulty of game publishers, I don't think that that is the kind of problem they wish to pile on themselves intentionally.
Now, maybe one disgruntled cubicle programmer who got keyboard rage after one to many weeks of crunch time . . possible. But as a corporate strategy ? No.
Thou speakest thruthfully, and nary a voice could say nay to that.
But pirates being hoisted by miscreants . . . I just can't bring myself to get all hot and bothered by it either.
On the other hand, if miscreants are now actively targeting pirated software, well let's say that that could be a much greater incentive to walk the Straight & Narrow than anything the police could pull.
And that makes me even more unlikely to get up in arms about this.
Because I pay for my games.
Ah, the Rise of China, the Red Tide, etc. etc.
China will rise, no doubt about it, it's happening now. They manufacture nearly everything, they are making their own models and doing their own engineering, and they're even on their way to the Moon. Nobody can say the Chinese industry is a just bunch of copycats anymore.
But to say that their culture is much more interesting is wrong, their culture is different. It is the difference that makes it interesting to us. They have Leshan Park, the US has Mount Rushmore. China has the Great Wall, and that has been a World Marvel since it was built, but the US has the Grand Canyon, which is totally naturally awesome, so tie.
As for native cuisine, I don't much outside of what I find in Chinese restaurants around here, but I have heard of the 100-year egg nest. I can't image that being actually healthy. On the other hand, I can see unhealthy American food every time I go to the supermarket or pass a fast food outlet, so ok, I'll leave you that point there.
But "Women treat their men better" ? Really ? What agenda are you pushing there ? What misogynistic point does that make ? The US has actually made the term "wifebeater" into a proper name for an element of clothing, so I just can't see where you're going with that.
ANYONE could have guessed indeed, but proving it is another thing entirely.
Everybody knew, deep down inside, that the Government could do shady things in order to ensure Order and Peace. We all knew, but had no proof and no way of getting any. Nor did we really have an issue with it.
But Snowden pulled the curtain and now we know what kind of ugly is sitting behind. And it is fearsomely ugly.
That is worth a frig in my book.