"If you're continuously updating & releasing code"
Then your application is not ready for production.
Take it offline, finish the bloody thing, THEN put it into production and survey the security of the app.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Let us not forget to make things secure.
I do not want this stuff at all until I have reasonably good proof that my neighbors kid (who thinks he's a hacker) will not be able to turn my lights on or off at his leisure (because he'll have the time to try and the temptation will certainly be much too great).
And even when I have this kind of proof, I'm likely to not buy into it anyway.
I like manual controls.
Tracing the bribery is exactly what it is all about.
Personally, after having heard some stand-up comic say that politicians should have sponsor stickers on their vests so we know why they say what they do, I wholeheartedly support this kind of move.
As long as we don't know who pays who, we are not living in a true democracy.
On the other hand, human nature is such that I very much doubt the lobbying waters are going to get clearer any time soon. Changing anything in politics via normal, legal routes is just a heavy, slow freight train taking forever to reach its destination - time during which the hyenas can leisurely plan how to route around this new legislation to continue their back alley ways.
Doing things the right way can be so frustrating...
They have just published their findings. That does not necessarily mean they have just noticed it. The fact that the article continues to state "It has long been speculated ..." might be a clue in that regard. Scientists have been looking for quite a while.
People need to stop considering Science reporting like sports or people reporting. In Science one does not notice something and immediately start broadcasting the fact. In Science, one notices something, checks it, rechecks it to be sure, talks to someone of confidence who checks it independently, THEN, when it has been determined that it is something worth reporting, one publishes the information expecting other people to check it as well.
When one is doing Science, that is.
Well I don't know about Bitcoin mining, but somebody has made a calculator, and you can find loads of various hard drive projects, so I'd say it's only a question of time until we get a Bitcoin miner on a mining game.
I think that 2020 is too soon for that. WinXP lasted more than a decade because it was good enough. Windows 7 is good enough, and familiar.
Companies have other things to do than constantly upgrade their workstations - the Vista fiasco was a wake-up call, and Win8 was the confirmation that they do not have to.
Since WinXP was only retired when it could no longer run current hardware, there is no reason to think that Win7 will be retired before that point either. Corporations will stick with it as long as it works.
Microsoft can make as many new failures of Windows as it wants in the interval.
Um, if I'm not mistaken mining takes place on the GPU, and GPU usage during gaming is largely pegged at 100%, so mining is going to take a chunk out of the FPS if it runs during the game.
If the virus writer is at all intelligent, he will know that gamers tend to notice when their game doesn't run smoothly, and will have written his virus to use the GPU when no game is running - in other words, the rest of the time.
And given that it is a virus, it only requires the game to be launched to get itself installed. Once it is installed, it shouldn't need the game anymore, so it can very well run when the PC starts.
Consoles were good when they could not be updated. Back then, there was a clear argument for consoles over PCs because the games had to run and could not be updated, while PCs were notorious for system incompatibilities and driver nuisances.
Then they went and fucked it all up with a hard disk. Ever since then, a console is nothing more than a locked-down PC in a walled garden with update issues.
Thank you, but I prefer Steam on PC any day over those kind of nuisances. Plus my PC is more powerful than any console.
But we have given up.
The governments of all the countries that use to fight against the Axis Of Evil in WWII have gone and adopted whole sections of the very things that they were telling our fathers to fight against, and we have sat and taken it as the price of our TV programs and the choice in our supermarkets.
We have not stood up for Freedom because we, as a population, are much more interested in Facebook, Twitter and the latest results of our favourite sports club. But as long as we have those, the government can force ID cards and "biometric" passports down our throats and we don't complain because we don't travel all that often.
And we will continue to sit and let our freedoms be eroded because they are less important to us than seeing the latest nude pic of some twit that will be forgotten in three months.
We get the country we deserve.
It's not about the authorities being able to find you, it's about the authorities banging on your door demanding to know why you spent 35 minutes last week in the same general space-time vicinity as some guy they decided yesterday was a terrrist and you never even knew existed.
What is this "accountability" that you refer to ?
I understand "responsible", it means a CxO gets a big paycheck. But "accountable" ? Nobody has ever held a CxO accountable for anything since before Y2K.
As for the "there is no way out", that is plain wishful thinking. Of course there is a way out : it's called a Golden Parachute.
I will now hang back up my cynical hat and retire for the evening with a glass of single malt.
"Windows 8 [...] racked up plenty of sales"
Technically that may be true, but we all know how Microsoft gets to count its "sales". If Windows was not the de facto universal OS pre-installed on every PC, but had to be bought in addition to the PC, then those sales numbers would be drastically inferior.
There has always been enormous effort deployed in trying to find out which OSes are actually used, and that gives us market share of IE figures and such.
Yet we are still given sales figures in any piece that tries to expound on how important the latest version of Windows is. That is not the proper reference, and we should only hear about it when reading about Microsoft share price.
Ah, but our feline lords are already pretty much untraceable. They don't come when you call them, they couldn't care less that you're looking for them and they sleep anytime and anywhere they damn well please - including the clothes basket (but only the washed clothes, not the dirty ones).
The only time you're pretty sure to see them is feeding time, because they KNOW what time that is and they're ALWAYS on time for that.
How would you get that done with skiddies in other countries, pray tell ?
Not to rain on your parade, I would dearly like to see such an initiative, but the fact remains that it is currently impossible to legally attain a miscreant if he is not operating in your own country - and that is not typically the case since it would appear that about 75% of such activity is managed either from the US or from China (I'm sure you can throw Russia in the pot too).
So you'll be doing all that hard detective work and, nine times out of ten, you'll hit the brick wall of "oh, he's operating from outside the country, well that's it then, next case...".
It's quite discouraging, really.
Um, if you don't want to ruin your diesel engine by pouring in regular gas, or vice-versa, then you pretty damn well need to know what gas to put in your car.
You need to climb down and take a breather, the air you breath seems pretty thin there.
What a load of cobblers. Either the servers are yours and maintained, secured and backed up by you, or you're in the Cloud, at the mercy of a DDOS you're not even aware of, a server maintenance schedule that falls right smack at the wrong time (if you've even been notified), a random twitch of finger over the wrong setting by a an admin you'll never meet, haven't vetted and know nothing about, or the NSA firing a National Security (hah!) letter that may or may not target you but they'll still reap your data "just to be sure". Not to mention any network update that shouldn't really have had anything to do with you, but just happened to bork your Cloudy provider over half a continent.
The IT industry has spent the last 30 years creating an entire army of highly-qualified sysadmins (ok, some are not that qualified, but still). Does anyone really think that companies are going to sack them and rush to a platform that has so many gaping security holes it's not even funny any more (not that it ever has been) ?
The NSA is one tanker-sized hole that is more than difficult to ignore, the fact that US judges are apparently of the opinion that even foreign subsidiaries are fair game for data plundering is another. The fact that not a single non-US cloud provider is saying anything about securing your data against US-government meddling is highly significant. The fact that none of them is even muttering about protection from local government is too.
Company data is sacred. Once upon a time, you couldn't even take a customer list out without the heavy hand of the Law falling on you if you were found out. That's a hard habit to break, and I've seen nothing for the moment that justifies trying to break it.
Go store your personal backups on the Cloud if you want, it's your risk. Companies are thinking twice about it ? Good. Let them think a third time. And a fourth.
Um, far be it from me to cast the eminent Professor's words in a disparaging light, but I do believe that his words should be amended to read:
"A particle accelerator that reaches 100bn GeV would be larger than Earth, with current technology"
Indeed, fusion reactors will exist, and nobody knows what performance fusion reactors will attain, so this declaration must be bound by the current limitations in energy generation, notwithstanding future improvements.
Sorry, Professor.
Let's make one thing clear : if your employees are not the ones who do the thinking, your company is up Shit Creek without a paddle.
For fuck's sake enough with the Magical Computer thing. Computers do NOT fix problems, they are not a substitute for people who know what they are doing.
Please take a cluebat to all idiots who think that a computer can think for them.
Especially managers.
Um, the business world already knows that any data that is held by a US company or any of its subsidiaries is fair game to the US government, and that has not lost Silicon Valley any sales yet.
Confirmation from Snowden in front of a Swiss court would not change that fact.
Said by a man who definitely knows what he's talking about.
An expert in the matter, if you will.
The fact is that Wales does not know how to manage a discussion. He confuses the money he is managing with the feeling of importance it brings him, acts like Wiki editors are his to command, and then is all surprised and wounded when they don't really feel like he is their boss.
He's not, of course. He is nobody but a figurehead to attract donations. That is something he does well, apparently, and good on him for it. But he would do good to remember that Wikipedia may have been his creation, now it is a creature of itself, leading its own life.
And Wikipedia's life depends on its editors, not on Wales, so he really should be tuned out and just keep to the charity floor.
He won't, of course, so all this is just another notch in his personal downward journey to irrelevance.
The fact that the engineers paid by their employer are required to work with company tools is perfectly normal. Those engineers are not editors, they're the people who try to make the software that the Illustrious Leader is thinking of.
It is the unpaid editors who create the wealth of Wikipedia who are the ones who refuse to work with subpar software, and nobody is saying they are wrong to do so (well, nobody except Wales).