
Re: If the government can get so jumped up about tik-tok
Yeah but Tik-Tok is Chinese.
Get with the program.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That argument is only valid if every citizen has the choice between every ISP.
I very much doubt that that is the case anywhere, let alone in the Land of Monopoly that is the USA.
Anyone using that argument is just a humongous hypocrite.
It's only big because there are no subdivisions. Somebody is obviously a control freak and cannot stand the idea that his local empire be divided and his "power" be diminished.
So there's just one big blob of incompetence at the top, instead of spreading the risk and maybe finding someone competent somewhere else.
Of course they aren't.
They're not investors, they're gamblers. They want their fix, NOW (or soon, at the very least).
An investor is a person who wants to participate in a project, and is willing to put funds in it to bring it fruition, not to get a return in two years.
If the project is important, it could take ten years. A true investor knows that and is willing to take the risk because he believes in the project.
Today's "investors" are just selfish man-children who want their next lollipop for snack time. Long-term thinking ? Not their strong suit.
"one of the reasons the Land of the Free has the highest per capita incarceration rate in the world"
That is not the reason.
The reason is that prisons are private companies who have primed the law to send them people that other countries would use rehabilitation programs to get back on track.
The War on Drugs is just one good excuse to condemn users to jail instead of going after dealers - there's more of the former.
Then you have police entrapment with "hookers" who are just there to entice men to commit, then get cuffed.
That is why the Land of the Free has the highest incarceration rate. It's a business.
"The neural network is unable to generalize from what it has 'learned' ”
And I'm going to keep this article's URL to be able to show it to anyone who starts spouting off about how computers are now "intelligent".
Unless they're in marketing. Then it would just be a waste of time.
For a bank to be forbidden from adding new accounts, that is just . . mind boggling.
I've seen some bank departments where some people were seriously out of touch, but that was just the one person here or there. For the entire bank to not know what it's doing with 40+ million customers ?
How can that happen ?
Yeah, I know, India. But this is a bank. We're not talking some online store, this is supposed to be men in suits with serious boardroom power.
I just cannot fathom what the hell is going on over there.
Oh of course. I'm sure many proud owners of a car that costs at least $35K will be overjoyed at the opportunity of having Random Joe Schmuck climb drunkenly in the back seat and vomit over everything during the trip.
And that is supposing that Full Self-Driving actually works, which I seriously doubt Musk will ever get to.
"tech companies should respect the rule of law and the order of a court, or independent judicial authority, and provide that information"
Obey the rule of law, no problem. Obey the order of a court, obviously. But just what exactly is an "independant judicial authority" ? Is that your nephew's office with a nice sign on the door saying "Warrant Delivery" and no questions asked ?
Because I would not agree with that. Get yourself a proper warrant from a proper judge and stop trying to use children as an excuse yet again.
I fully support EVs with 10-minute charge times and 1,200km in range that don't spontaneously catch fire and can last 20 years. Once you guys have licked those issues, how about tackling the issue of your EV being sent to the scrapyard after a collision ?
Because I've heard that that is a thing.
There is no "We" with Musk. It's what he believes that count.
And he can go promise yet more awesome and outstanding improvements for his death wagon. I'm pretty sure we'll be hearing more accounts of latest-model Teslas plowing into something or another under Full Self-Hallucinating.
Good.
I fail to see what benefit the making of entirely fabricated content can bring. If I want to read something that has a chance of being interesting, I want it to have been produced by a human, under human oversight.
Sure, throw in an image made by Leonardo. That's not a problem because it will be the human that has decided that the image was relevant. If said human had asked another human to create the image, the result would have been the same. Leonardo is just destroying the livelyhood of actual human content creators. If everyone is OK with that, then let's do that.
But I refuse to read a book that has been generated by pseudo-AI. I refuse to read entire articles generated by a machine. I do not see how they can possibly be engaging and interesting.
GenAI can drown. It's no loss to me.
And what, pray tell, may be a "reasonable exception" to your government selling your private data to, not only a 3rd party, but a 3rd party that's not even in your own country ?
No. Just NO.
When I deal with a government portal, I fully expect that everything that happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.
I'm paying for that portal. I'm paying for the people managing that portal. I'm paying for the hardware that that portal is working on. That fucking portal does not need more revenue.
But hey, if you find normal that your own government whores your data out to anyone, well that's your choice . . .
Oh, so just like a human then ?
If that is the case, then what's the point in automated vehicles ?
You're supposed to do better. You're supposed to have the means to detect issues dozens of times per second. You're not supposed to get distracted.
If you can't do better than a human, you're useless.
No problem.
Huawei just needs to demonstrate that its OS isn't phoning everything to Beijing.
How I would like to be able to say : "like Android". Unfortunately, Android is already as bad as Beijing, so, again, why not ?
It's not like we are living in a civilization that respects our individual privacy. So, one more, one less . . .
Declan's lucky day was because Borkzilla couldn't be arsed to do a proper CPU version, and couldn't be arsed to make emulation work properly either.
So, a sigh of relief, a restart of the VMs (or similar) and the problem is over.
One of the rare cases where Redmond incompetence saved the day.
They're not releasing it yet.
They will, in some form or other.
Besides, you're right : it's only a matter of time before someone else does the same and releases it. On the one hand, there's a lot of fun to be had. Upload your favorite clip and dub everyone in Darth Vader's voice. Could be a hoot. Unfortunately, the possibilities for mischief are literally boundless.
That won't stop 'em from releasing it though.
I can only encourage you to read them. You will learn that the authors thought things through way more than could be shown on TV.
Simple example : in the books, you learn that, when fighting on spaceships, the guns use bullets made of plastic so as to not punch holes through the ship hulls.
They thought of that, and of many other things besides.
It really is an awesome story.
Ah, The Expanse.
I was so enamoured by the TV series that I bought the books - and read all of them.
I understand now why the TV series stopped when it did. It still gave a positive message, but eschewed the following 50-year plotline that the rest of the books described.
The book series is awesome, to be sure, but trying to get everything after the Slow Zone was colonized would be a mind-breaker for production and for most viewers.
Some things are best left in print.
Agreed. I remember playing WCIII, it was fun.
But X-Wing was the game that finally decided me to buy a joystick. And Alliance was just everything a Star Wars fan could want at the time.
Awesome games, awesome gameplay, fun and engaging. Terms that more than few modern so-called blockbusters have utterly forgotten.
Then, when the next breach occurs, further work will "be underway".
Sometimes it would be so nice to be able to just stand those idiots in a line and slap all of them in one fell swoop.
I don't care that security is hard. You know that the database is critical. Get yourselves an $800 million dollar budget and secure the damn thing.
This train wreck keeps on derailing, apparently. That's exactly how it was programmed from the start.
Now, all those people who didn't want anything to do with 'em are going to have the joy of watching the technician come back and do it all over again.
Planned obsolescence at its finest.
You mean, the abundance you did not put into securing your network and training your people ?
And I see that you have found the boilerplate yada yada for failling to ensure the security of the data in your care. Well done. It sounds just as reliable now as it has the last million times we've already heard it.
You might want to actually put some millions behind your words soon, because it has cost some other health company $800+ million just to clean up.
You have that kind of money ? If so, carry on mouthing your platitudes.