
"Oracle completely destroyed their reputation this time"
Because there was something left to destroy ?
That's news . . .
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Well, with Redmond's stupid decision to limit Windows 11 to the latest hardware, I'm guessing Windows 1 0 (previously known as The Last Windows) will be sticking around longer than XP.
Borkzilla.
How demented do you have to be to torpedo your own "next" version ?
I've said it before : there is nothing in windows 11 that couldn't be just updated in 1 0, and there is certainly nothing that justifies replacing hardware. In the 90s, I was replacing my motherboard, CPU and graphics card every year, because it was worth it.
In 2015 I upgraded my home PC to an Intel Core-i7 6700.
I kept that computer config until 2021, when I decided to finally upgrade for Core i9-10980XE.
If I count correctly, that's 6 years with the same config. And I'm a gamer. I need the best FPS I can get.
For most people, I'm betting that their PC/laptop that they bought ten years ago is still just fine for Youtube and reading their email. Maybe writing a letter or two per year.
Borkzilla : your days of forcing upgrades are over.
Deal with it.
In this day and age, if you allow anyone to make code to add to your product, you are unfortunately guaranteed to have a proportion of people who are going to submit code for their own selfish, nefarious purposes.
It may be a bit too much to ask for, but might it be possible to review submitted code before making the extension available ?
The POTUS is only a fan of the POTUS, and if you're not, you're less than dung.
If you are, however, it would appear that you can do no wrong and, contrary to Hillary, you will never be locked up even if you actually divulge confidential info on military operations.
What else do you expect when you have a convicted felon at the head of a country ?
Come on, you can dream up a moonbase, get a few A-listers involved, have Samuel L Fucking Jackson as NASA director trying to avoid the catastrophe, and have the most glorious scientifically-accurate asteroid impact that just so happens to directly hit the moonbase.
Just how low can IBM go ?
I'm starting to get the feeling that IBM is just inches away from hiring hitmen to whack the people it wants to get rid of instead of firing them.
I'm guessing that the Board has evaluated the question and decide that the fees might be higher than the cost of the lawsuits for firing people, so they have postponed the decision until the hitman market has become more favorable.
That's how the Russians got the tech to make the Bomb.
That's how the Chinese are milking every tech they aren't given on purpose to make our stuff that we buy for cheap and then complain about.
The data is old ? Russian scientists are intelligent, they can extrapolate. If you point them in the right direction, they will attain a result.
You're saying that on-time passwords don't need to be supplied for the hackers to gain access to the account ?
Then what the fuck is the use of them ?
I thought that the definition of two-factor authentication was that, if one point was lacking, authentication was refused.
Could someone explain ?
Sure.
I'm absolutely convinced that the military personnel involved in the operation will be thrilled to know that they were thrown into the meat grinder with their objective's full knowledge.
Every idiot that was part of that chat should be, hey, what's the term already ? Oh, right : Lock Them Up !
Oh cry me a river.
Rigid traffic rules are repressing Ferrari owners from fully using their powerful cars. Rigid home security (locks and alarm systems) are repressing thieves from gaining loot. Uber is being repressed in many cities from being able to transform people into Uber-slaves where Uber gets the money and the slaves take all the risks.
Copyright rules are in place for good reason and, if you find that they are repressive, you can thank Disney in a large part.
So, be good little boys and tell your investors that some of the billions they give you will have to go to pay for the data your multi-billion datacenter will be analyzing.
After all, nothing is free in this world, so why should you be the exception ?
I have to admit I have trouble with this "huge demand in water" story.
Make a reservoir, fill it and you're done.
It's not like you're watering a plant. You collect the vapor and drip it back into the reservoir.
Why can't that be done ?
We're not taking about making new chip wafers, we're talking about cooling. Cooling doesn't need fresh water, it just needs cold water.
A nice reservoir should do that just fine.
I generally give programming courses to beginner programmers. They need to learn everything : variables, variable types, functions and procedures, passing variables to said functions and procedures, etc.
One time, however, I got a group of expet JAVA dwevelopers. So, to break into their mindset was rather challenging and, for them, I pretty sure the absence of any method controlling garbage colletion was anatheama to them.So I coded a seconde node where I created a smal collection of docuements and a script that would loop through the collection.
Once the code had loaded the next document, I used the keyword DELETE to remove the previous document from RAM.
The thing is, I had never used that keyword before. I didn't even know if it would work.
Thankfully, it did, and I avoided making a total fool of myself, but it could have easily gone the other way . . .
“The coin shaped batteries are easily caught in the oesophagus, and when stuck start to cause damage immediately and can erode through the oesophagus wall very quickly (within 2 hours) ”
Well that was news to me. I'll have to make sure that my batteries are stored in places where a six-year old cannot easily get its grubby little hands on them.
Obviously, I'll name no names, but at a previous workplace I was often called on by an almost-manager (who totally behaved liked a manager) for "special tasks" (entirely professional, I can assure you).
While most of those tasks fell logically under my programming purview, the day he asked me to write documetation about an EU directive that he was supposed to be the expert on, I politely declined and indicated that I did not have the necessary expertise in that area.
Funnily enough, he didn't ask much from me after that, but I didn't mind because he was the kind of guy who took credit for everthing he asked everyone else to do.
In an ideal world, my answer would be no, here's my resignation.
Then I would join a company called American Business Machines, which should logically have a much harder time offshoring jobs to anywhere.
But hey, let's be realistic : IBM has been shooting itself in the foot for so long it's surprising that it still has a knee.
Well Vista certainly wasn't it.
Windows 1 0 is not an entire failure, but 11 is certainly going in that direction.
The thing, XP (SP3) is certainly the last Windows OS that considered that it was "your" PC it was running on.
Everything since considers that it is Borkzilla's PC, and Borkzilla can do as it pleases.
I can't wait for the day when I can retire, erase all that shit and install Mint and once again have a "Personal" computer.
I predict it will soon declare that it has discovered how to create a warp drive.
You'll just have to go through 10,000 pages that will basically be all of Scotty's Star Trek declarations with a mix of Star Wars hyperdrive description and maybe some Babylon 5 or The Expanse for good measure.
Good luck building an actual warp drive with that.
I listen to music to disengage, to calm myself, to create an audio universe in which I can lose myself.
Actively engaging myself, with added "gamification", sounds like this pseudo-idea is targeted towards teenagers who will be asked to click on a specific icon at a specific time during whatever is playing to get some stupid "bonus points" which will do who cares what.
Not interested. As far as I'm concerned, they have already failed.
That kind of declaration should automatically be followed by the immediate incarceration of the CEO for blatant lying.
If you didn't do anything wrong, why are you paying millions in settlement ? To avoid the expense of a lawsuit that will demonstrate publicly that you did do wrong and cost you more ?
Bullshit.
Really ?
That is being asked of companies who have almost universally decided that post-COVID working from home was over ?
I really feel that is going to go over very well, especially when the CEO explains to shareholders that they've been paying their staff 20% more than necessary . . .
Had there been a second substation built ten years years ago, I'll bet anything that four (or six) years ago somebody would have complained that it was useless and its maintenance costs would be cut.
And we'd be right here again today.
NASA (and ESA/JAXA/etc) are the only ones who understand the true utility of redundancy and who are ready to support the cost of it, because when your probe is a billion miles away, you'd better hope that you have a functional backup plan if something goes wrong.
All of these are just excuses to continue downloading untested software to production servers.
You want to stop supply chain attacks ? Simple : have a copy of your production environment, download the new code there and test it. If you find a problem, don't move it over to the production version.
That used to be standard practice before the kids took over with the "move fast and break it" attitude.
It might be time to backpedal on that a bit.
Just sayin'.