By now ?
Zero.
And they still manage to fail.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
When I look at the graph provided, I see that it is "significantly" higher than 2011 revenues, which were apparently around $11 billion.
So quit your whining and get back to work.
Oh, yeah , I forgot. This is the finance market - if you don't do 110% every month, you're a useless piece of dung. Even when you still made $3 more than your lowest 5-year figure.
If only financial analysts were treated the same way.
Yep. Focus on not putting any money in it any more, and reaping as much rewards as possible off the money other people put in it.
Hey, don't knock the plan. If I were an Evil Genius (C) I'd try it too.
Edit :
OMG OMG OMG !!! I just realized I didn't need to relog into Channel in order to post from El Reg !
Finally !
Job well done mates. Have one on me.
Probably because it's effing freezing over there, and you have to drill down to the crust through all that ice (which is probably less easy than it sounds) and then you have to lower into the hole the thingy that will take the temperature of the Earth's crust without being influenced by all the freezing (and compressed) ice in the immediate vicinity.
Then you have the fact that this is a scientific mission, ergo not sexy and not a vote-winner whatever the greenies may think, so less inclined to be pushed by ambitious politicians. Other types of politicians (if there are any) might lend a hand in return for some form of kickback, but I have no idea what kind of kickback a scientist can offer that will convince a politician to invest in drilling a hole in a place he'll never be seen in on TV (free Subway sandwich card ?).
Then, of course, <tinfoil hat:ON> you have the very real possibility that some oil company has decided that additional FUD measures are required to drive the debate away from AGW, and has accordingly infused the necessary cash via roundabout financial plays in order to get the ball rolling <tinfoil hat: OFF>.
In any case, I note two things that are worthy of remark. First, this is the first measurement taken of the local temperature. Surprise is practically required at this point.
Second : no wonder there is unexpected surface warming. Have you seen all those rocket boosters on that place in the into image ?
That price tag, if I read correctly, was just for cleaning up the mess.
The price of the initial system was in the billions, as are all government IT projects.
And, like all government IT projects (especially in the UK it seems) all those billions are spent on something that never actually works.
Meanwhile, you can order a sandwich online with an app that has better security than some banking portals and must have cost a piddling 10 grand to make.
Edit :
I was wrong. After spending a few minutes searching El Reg for the actual price tag of the system, it would appear that it is indeed £131 million.
So rejoice ! You've gotten failure for an order of magnitude less than you could have paid !
Interesting. When anything happens that is described with the word "nuclear" in it, all of Greenpeace goes ballistic, railway transport gets shut down in Germany due to greeny protesters and Facebook/Twitter drown in anti-nuclear prose.
If, Heaven forbid, an actual accident takes place then you have literally months of people sagely telling you that we absolutely have to shut down those nuclear plants and stop irradiating the planet willy-nilly, opinion transmitted by all media known to Mankind and put on loop on every newscast for weeks.
And that despite the fact that, as you yourself acknowledge, the nuclear industry is one of the most heavily safety-regulated.
Then, apparently, you put on your tinfoil hat and go into full-out conspiracy mode to say that it's all a ploy to keep Geldoff from powering Africa.
Hats off to you, sir. That is by far the most wacky consideration I have read on these pages in a long time.
Yeah, let's make nuclear safety less stringent. Let's have nuclear power stations institute a regular radiation release schedule, to balance reactor pressure or something like that. And let's have illegal spent uranium dumping sites while we're at it.
All that would certainly allow Geldoff to power Africa. I'd bet he'd rather live there at that point as well.
Not quite.
The article quotes : Westerngren says certificate pinning and signature verification are laudable goals for application developers but will only "slightly impede" reverse engineering
That means that it is not difficult to pick the app apart, which is rather logical. It is, however, more difficult to tamper with the app without said app noticing it, and the pic in the middle of the article clearly shows that you don't get away with it easily.
I'm talking about the fact that when I copy/pasted the NASA Mars Trek URL into Google Chrome, I had to fight through a full-screen popup thingy that was trying to get me anywhere but where I wanted to go.
Then again, not long ago I installed an update to Java and a new version of Smart Defrag, so maybe that has something to do with something.
In any case, for me the issue is solved. Goodby Chrome, now I'll just stick with Firefox/AdBlock/Noscript - the best browser ever.
Good for them.
I just tried NASA Mars Trek on Google Chrome (because it says nicely that it is not compatible with IE - good on them).
It took me three whole minutes to get through all the ads they stuffed on the screen before I could get to the actual site.
Then I uninstalled Chrome.
That nails it for me.
I got 2 180GB SSDs in my system, along with 3 2TB HDDs.
The HDDs are used for data storage, the SSDs are used for the Windows OS - one to boot on, the other with the pagefile and one game that takes ages to load.
Ever since I installed them, I experience very fast boot-up time (once a day, so don't really care) and nice general performance from my Windows system.
That one game also benefits immensely from being housed on an SSD since map switching times are divided by ten compared to what they used to be.
That kind of performance is worth every penny to me.
Very ambitious project indeed. Tunnels are delicate enough to do right and railway over or under water is of the same order of magnitude. It has been done before - on the same continent.
Building such a project over multiple continents means taking continental drift into account. Continental drift is apparently an inch a year. A railway has a precision of ±0·5mm, which is about 200 times smaller than the drift.
That means that somebody is going to have to come up with a way to make what is a fixed structure float over the places where the continents drift - in opposite directions. And that solution is going to have to allow for high-speed travel and decades of use.
If they do pull it off, it will be a major engineering feat that will eclipse everything that has been built up to now.
So, basically, the mad dog is barking in the shed, just ignore it.
It says something about our society when we create these watchdogs positions to ease our conscience yet specifically prevent them doing anything about that which they are charged with overseeing.
It's like the financial auditors of a government. They can point out every single overspend, underline every murky deal and paint a target on every useless expense as much as they want, nothing they ever say changes anything.
So what's the point ? A good conscience ? That's about as useful as the overweight guy sitting in front of his TV stuffing his face with Cheetos and Coke and thinking "I'll do some exercise tomorrow".
Give the ombudsman power to put someone in jail. That's the only thing that focuses the mind.
Let me make a bit of a parallel here.
Once upon a time, there was this thing called a console. It had no Internet connection, it had a defined hardware list and games were made for it and sold on the open market. No recall was possible, the game had to work from the shelf. There was no patching.
During those heady days, console gamers made much fun of PC gamers, with their constant updates and struggling framerates and constant need of upgrades.
Then the console got a hard disk and an Internet connection. Where is the console today ? Waiting for updates, struggling for framerates, and no game works as advertised on day 1.
Meanwhile, PC gamers have better equipment and actually less issues these days because they are not beholden to the proprietary portals imposed on consoles, nor do they risk DDOS of their only provider because if one game server doesn't work, there are other games to play. On a console, whatever the game, there is in practice only one server.
Please do not repeat this mistake with cars.
Um, because it is Open Source and your kernel backdoor will not only have to be approved by the kernel coders but will also have to remain invisible to all the intelligent people who are looking at the code ?
Kernel backdoors can only exist when a restricted number of people know about them. That's something proprietary code allows because then you only have a small group of people with the right to check the code. Open Source means ANYBODY can find it as soon as they look in the right place.
And do not mistake Open Source kernel developers for nitwits. I'm sure that many of them know the entire kernel they work on inside out and will be quick to spot anything that seems out of place.
Um, if I remember correctly, that seems to be the case for almost every app I have ever installed on my phone, so no, that doesn't reveal anything in itself.
But kudos for monitoring the app's activity and nailing its nefarious nature.
Now find the authors and flog them good. Maybe that'll give them some incentive to not do that kind of thing again.
Have an email system where sysadmins can assign user rights to clicking on links.
For Lusers, no rights. They get mail where links are stripped from the body.
Once a Luser has eventually proven a certain degree of intelligence (yeah, I know, but for the sake of argument, okay ?), his status can be upgraded to Under Suspicion. Links he receives are stripped and non-clickable, but he can copy/paste them manually into a browser.
If Luser Under Suspicion manages to not completely bollox everything for six months, he gets upgraded to Luser Under Surveillance. His mails get the links clickable. If he mucks up at any point, he his slapped back down to Luser Under Suspicion and now has to wait a year - oh, who am I kidding, he'll never get upgraded again.
Obvously, no Luser is ever above suspicion.
A possible variant of this scenario is links are clickable, but anything under Surveillance automatically gets a 404 in return. Gosh, the Internet is so unreliable these days. . .
But hey, as they say : the market is self-regulating, right ?
Right.
So that means that, if the industry is not willing to be regulated, the onus is on us to regulate it : by not buying their products.
I'm sure that, when (if?) a company brings out a product that is guaranteed to respect our security and privacy and the other companies see their market share melt like an ice cream cone on a New York sidewalk in July, then there will be changes.
The bottom line, people. Never forget the bottom line. It's up to us to bottom theirs.
In other words, a lost cause.
I rechecked my whitelist options and no, nothing Google is in there anywhere.
Whenever I do install NoScript, by default I remove the existing whitelist. There is no such thing as security if you don't know what you're allowing.
NoScript is a tool, not a solution. Use it correctly and you're golden.
Microsoft has created a function where it slurps your passwords and stores them on its servers to pass them out to anyone who is listed as your friend when you designate them as such, and again to anyone they have as friends when they designate them as such.
If i remember correctly, we are all but 6 links away from anyone else in particular. Therefor that means that this new function makes your passwords available to practically everyone. Way to go, Microsoft !
Just an idea, though : maybe you could disable sharing passwords that you acquired by being shared them ? In other words, my friends get my password, but not their friends ?
Oh, and passwords stored on the Microsoft cloud. What could possible go wrong ?
Well that's pretty much any time he's flying above 10,000 feet. There are no trees, deer crossings or sudden turns at that altitude, so he can obviously concentrate on his radar or whatever else needs his eyeball attention. Whatever obstacle is coming his way is another plane, and his radar will "see" it before he does.
On the road, the first rule is Keep Your Eyes On The Road. The second rule is Respect The First Rule.
Jets may be a lot faster than cars, but cars have obstacles all around them at practically all times and one second of inattention can get you to meet one brutally.
Let's remember that the dashboard has two functions : to tell the driver how the car is doing and, if necessary, indicate what is wrong. The driver has enough to deal with what with paying attention to road conditions that can change suddenly without warning. Adding any other data to that information is putting the driver in danger of information overload.
That said, I dearly like the idea of night driving with IR-enhanced HUD display showing me the road as if it were broad daylight. But no arrows or tokens please, just the road as it is.
We know.
At installation, it will race along and we will find it marvelous (those that have drunk the Cool-Aid, anyway). Over time, it will get slower, bloated and unstable. Patches will get bigger and bigger, and we'll need a terabyte disk just for the Windows folder.
We know Windows, Nadella. We've been using it since the 90's, and you've been polishing the same turd since.
But yeah, Win7/64 is the best version by far. And it's MINE. It does what I WANT. And YOU can't keep me from using it.
You can keep your "service". I will not be your cash cow.