Not bad, but something is still missing
I see no explanation concerning security against NSA snooping and National Security Letters for non-US companies.
So, Microsoft, care to clarify on that point ?
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I said that satire is a modern affliction. I did not say that it didn't exist before 1950.
I am well aware of satire used as social commentary in ancient Greece, although I do thank you for providing that link, and I've learned something about the scribes of Ancient Egypt.
However, your comment basically does not contradict my intent, which is to say that it is only today that everything is satire and that religions in those days hardly knew the meaning of the word.
Not to mention the dangers of being a Court Jester.
The book never made the claim to December. I think the word didn't even exist when the book was written.
It is the Roman Catholic Church which took to parasiting local customs to replace them with Vatican-approved versions that made that decision. So the RCC was the first organization to uphold the Embrace, Extend, Extinguish method that another modern company made so prevalent.
As for Adam & Eve, you're the one inferring that they found wives outside. The Bible never says that, so it infers implicitly to huge amounts of incest. And, if Mitochondrial Eve is anything to go by, well, there just may be a grain of truth to it.
The big difference with today is that today we have the Internet and 99% of the population knows how to read. That is rather the reverse of those times where the Internet was the passing minstrel and less than 1% of the population knew how to read.
Jesus was a Jewish Arab. He did not call himself Christian, obviously. Christianity was brought about in the following 300+ years after his death. I think that, for a movement that started so long ago, it's history is pretty well documented - mainly the fact the early Christians were basically considered a splinter sect from the Jews.
If we keep our Internet intact, I think that, 2,000 years from know we'll still be able to look up Scientology and Christianity and anyone with a brain will see that there is a very, very big difference between the two.
In any case, satire is a modern affliction. No religious movement of the time was started for the sake of satire, I'm pretty sure of that.
I thought that abusive contractual clauses were always struck down by a judge.
That clause is clearly abusive and in contradiction with Free Speech (enjoy it while you still have it), so I doubt very much that Atlantis Computing would have a snowball's proverbial to win such a case.
And there is precedent on this kind of manoeuver, those wacky voting machine nutcases at Diebold were shot down for exactly that, if I'm not mistaken.
Of course, it does mean going to trial, which companies have a general tendency to not like (except Microsoft), unless the judge throws the case out altogether before accepting the case. I think they can do that, can they ?
You get genuine resilience if you can manage the nightmare of getting two different Cloud providers to handle the same data without bungling things.
Apparently, Cloud is hard enough as it is with ONE provider. Put another one the mix and you just might become the poster child for a How Not To Do Cloud article.
But yeah, in theory redundancy is based on two of a thing.
ICANN is specialized in pretending that nothing anyone else decides concerns it, has relevance, is pertinent or conforms to its internal decisions.
Any external attempt to influence it has forever been met with "Nope, not required" or "Well, we'll give it a thought", whilst ICANN continues on its merry way to do whatever it wants.
I seriously see no hope for change until the entire Board is thrown directly into the slammer and a new one brought in that is determined to set things right.
How dare you bring reality to the debate ! You informed anarchist, you !
This is not about particular occurences, this is about furthering the domination of Government over The People by using handwaving, strawman arguments and religiously chanting the magic password (ie terrism).
You're ruining everything they're fighting for !
Kudos to you for doing the one thing that is really necessary in this case : showing your politician that his aides and yes-men are out of touch with his political base.
Because nothing sends a politician scurrying the other way like the perspective of losing votes. Remember Minister Hacker ? "You're not asking me to make a courageous decision, are you ?"
Make sure that hack knows the decision is courageous.
VR is immersive, yeah, I think I got that. And it is on its way, I definitely got that. Even here people are talking about it like it's inevitable. But what can you do with it now ?
Well, on Steam for the past month I've been presented with an endless list of games and stuff that purport to be VR-friendly. What kind of things have I seen ? Well just last night there was a VR browsing application, where you surf the 2D Internet without removing your precious, eye-destroying facehugger. I found that one particularly ironic.
Otherwise, there's a boatload of Frogger-quality gamelets, it seems that everyone and his brother are dragging out the 80s and chucking it in a VR world. Wonderful, we're going to have a bunch of fugly immersive games to justify $1000 of expense.
There is not a single VR title on Steam that would even slightly incite me to go to the trouble of finding out if it is actually worth it. There isn't a single attempt to create even a lowly Minecraft clone that works in VR (not yet anyway), and that would be worth a look.
But hey, by the time something worthwhile does come out, I'm sure the hardware will be dirt cheap.
Sounds like a Good Thing (tm) to me, especially when it apparently fails to properly account for Ombudsman authority, fails to give the Ombudsman the tools to do his work, and fails to mention massive data hovering in any way.
Talk about a lipstick operation. This Swiss-Cheese Shield was basically a copy of the previous version with a few cogs bolted on the side to make it look better.
Well it doesn't look better. Go back and do something worthy of the name of the bill.
The number of fails in this single project is amazing. From declaring the use of a methodology in order to get the project finished quicker, then not using said methodology, to totally forgetting that there might be risks to the proper safeguarding of data - the list goes on and on.
Had this monstrosity gone live, the personal data of tens of thousands would have been freely available to any hacker who would have a passing interest and five minutes to spare.
Those who have their names on this shame of a shambles should lose their position and their pension and be either fired or degraded to serving tea with the corresponding salary.
Really ? If that were the case I would expect that faults in Secondary Logon would have been found and corrected last decade. It was introduced with 98, if I'm not mistaken, it's about time they ironed out the issues there.
Seriously, I have the impression that I've been reading more or less the same patch notes since Y2K. A "remote execution vulnerability" in IE and Edge, wow, what a surprise. The exact same wording in two different patches on the same day for both Microsoft browsers - thank goodness Edge does not support ActiveX, I might have been made to think that Edge is just a rebadge of IE.
It's nice that MS is patching obviously, but it would be nicer if I didn't have the impression that, whatever the version, they're always patching the same issues from last decade.
We've already had this discussion, and it was said at the time that most of a nukes' force in space is dissipated via radiation because there is no atmosphere to push around. It is our atmosphere that gives a nuke it's deadly, destructive power.
Even the slop trap Armageddon made the misfits drill into the asteroid in order to explain why the nuke would work.
I am therefor sceptical when reading that shooting off a few nukes to have them blow up on a large asteroid's surface would "turn most of the asteroid into liquid and gas". What have they changed in their simulations to get this result ? Or is this the result of our newfound knowledge on asteroids in general ?
Can someone please take that turkey behind the shed and finally shoot it ?
We are told by literally everyone that Win 1 0 runs better than Win7/Vista/8.x - if that is the case, PC sales will absolutely not be impacted by Win 1 0 "upgrades" because businesses, and everyone else, are going to install it on an existing computer, not a new one.
Except the businesses that have a global maintenance contract that includes machine replacement, obviously - but the OS version has no impact on that. Businesses can perfectly state they want the new machine with Win7 if they want, it would make no difference on the number of PCs sold.
Gartner : copy/pasting last decade's reasons into next year's report without ever checking that reality has changed in between. There's an economic crisis going on Gartner, you might want to factor that in some time.
Another great piece of computing history has gone to the dogs.
Oh well, Seamonkey and PaleMoon will replace it.
That's the nice thing about the Internet - there's always someone willing to cut through the bull who has the skills and determination to make it happen for the rest of us.
Yikes. Tried looking into that and now I feel a headache coming on.
Nevertheless,it is fascinating to see how our global available knowledge is bubbling every which way. It is even more fascinating to see how we are capable of describing in excruciating detail how matter is defined by the way its atoms are structured, yet we still don't have room-temperature superconductors. So there are still things we don't know, even though what we do know already fills entire collections of books.
2 problems with your thinking :
1) Clues on the screen ? Please, we're talking about Joe User here, if he had a clue he wouldn't have clicked that attachment in the first place. Press ESC ? My God man, you're actually attributing a thought process to a user ? Tsk, tsk.
2) Malware is made based on things users are used to. Now that Microsoft has included this functionality, malware authors can take advantage of it. It would be pretty stupid of them to go and put in an unknown, highly-visible tag with no prior user experience for it. Doing that would only make it easy for everyone and their dog to say "See that QR code ? That means its a trap." and only the truly clueless would get caught. Now that Microsoft is including it, it becomes a viable target.
Oh, and congratulations, Microsoft, you have clearly outdone yourself this time. For 20 years we have been battling the insecurities and baffling decisions of your swiss-cheese platform, and you have just gone and added a whole new attack vector for criminals to take advantage of. Way to go to keep the AV vendors afloat.
What exactly can you do with a USB drive you find if not plug it in to find out who lost and return if to the person ?
The issue is not really that people are going to plug them in - of course they are. Curiosity is human nature.
The real issue is that people can only plug them into their PC/laptop, which is generally woefully under-prepared for such a task.
What we should have is a peripheral, a USB Sanitizer, something into which you can plug in a stick you found and be sure that nothing evil is on it.
With that peripheral, you can then bang on about how users are 1D10Ts and should plug it into the sanitizer first. But until we have such a tool for Joe Public, the problem will persist.
That path is rather well-trodden if I'm not mistaken.
The only newsworthy part about it is that they got caught which, given that we're talking about malware, is not all that surprising since legitimate users would logically complain about an app that does dodgy things and that complaint would be handled by people other than the guy (or two) responsible for getting it on the store in the first place.
So it was kind of a stupid idea in the first place ; the kind of idea a low-level hacker incapable of defeating the AV would think of. Then again, it takes real smarts to defeat a proper AV system these days (when they're not shooting themselves in the foot that is), so I guess I'm not throwing him the book, just a handful of gravel.
Agreed.
Production data is quite difficult to mimic. Although I applaud anyone who can generate a proper set of test data, in practice I find that test data only works for testing what has been specified. Production data includes all the errors, quick fixes and workarounds users employ to "get work done" and that represents scenarios that, by definition, cannot be reproduced in test data.
So, by all means, put some production data in to the test system to fully validate the application.
But if you allow Internet access to/from the dev environment, I will fire your ass in a second.
is dead.
An optical disk properly stored away from sunlight in a room with a low level of humidity should logically outlast tape and HDD, probably by a few decades.
My first DVD backup disk was done in 2005, it is still perfectly readable. I don't actually have the date of my first CD backup, but I'm pretty sure it was done around 2000-ish, and it is also perfectly readable. Music CDs I bought in the 90s are also still perfectly readable.
Optical storage is the best thing for personal use. Obviously, I've migrated to BluRay discs now, 25GB size. I'm confident that they'll all be good until the day I die, and then some.
Of course, to be of any use, you have to make the backups first. Joe Public has some issues with that.
Thanks for the info, I'm happy to have learned something more. I'll remember that the next time I need to do something "in anger".
Obviously, my post is therefor rather over-the-top as a response. Sorry about that everyone, but since there are a few British customs I am aware of, let's have pint ! This round is on me.
In anger ?
Because you think that, when President Truman ordered the bombs to be dropped, he did so while shouting on the phone and cussing the Japs ?
I take it you missed the part where the UK and Canada had a part in the decision ?
All those meetings, draft reports, report approvals and after-meeting cocktails took a bit of time, I think. Enough so that no one can say the decision was taken in anger and be taken seriously.
No, it was coldly, rationally, decided as the best course.
Whether or not that is true is another matter entirely.
I thought this was an email list sort of thing, but no, you need to have a registered ASN to sign up to this service.
Understandable, I guess, but I am disappointed that Google has not seen fit to share threat information with everyone.
Still, every step against malware is a good one.
Not only in Germany, although it is understandable that Germany is somewhat more of a focal point on that subject.
So I applaud the motion, even though I still think it's about 50 years too late. Hitler has been tried by the court of Public Opinion and, despite the Holocaust deniers, has been declared guilty, and the Nazis with him.
So it is not a matter of "rewriting" History, it is most certainly a matter of trying, at all costs, to not repeat it.
Because we're damn capable of doing much, much worse now.
By the time you're done rounding up 10 cats, you'll be almost retired. Despite indications to the contrary, they don't come in herds.
So yeah, all will be well.
I will remember the "kilocat mission". I like that.
I can understand that an uneducated individual cannot keep track of a few credit cards. Some people's intelligence is more limited than others, and you can't blame them for it.
A Congressman, however, is supposed to be able to decide the laws of the Nation. If he can't keep track of what credit card he is using for what purchase, or if he can't ensure that his payment methods are secure, he's got no business being in Congress.
Time to start raising pigs, Hunter. At least that way, you'll know why you're wading in shit.
I don't know if you're wrong, per se, but I viewed a marketing spiel from IBM about its Watson not long ago and I have to admit it scared me somewhat. Was it the capabilities narrated by the casually attractive female voice ? Was it the impact of the vision of the future that it generated in my mind ? Or was it the idea of a computer capable of "discerning intent" ? Probably a bit of everything.
See if you get scared here.
Are we really supposed to be surprised ?
These are people who have financial counsel at their beck and call. And we can all guess that the money makers are not going to miss a chance at converting a new recruit.
The current French President excepted, of course. Nobody in the know would trust him with that kind of secret.
I disagree. People who are still running XP have obviously stopped caring about the UI some time in the previous millenium.
I think that XP remains used for essentially 2 cases : people who couldn't care less and "it's good enough for what I do", or PCs that run mission-critical software that won't run on any other platform.
There is a surprising number of the latter, I'm sure.
And the revamp of the interface.
And the Store, which is next to empty and all but useless, but forced on you.
And the Cloud which, despite every marketing department's best efforts, still isn't accepted as the Universal Unicorn - plus there are more and more stories about how people have actually lost their data in the fluffy future of today.
Don't worry, that's not the reason you're being called to vote for.
The reason you're being called to vote for is that some influential group thinks they will benefit and they have the clout to get it done. Whatever "reasons" are being pushed forward are just pennants in the wind for the clueless to be distracted by while the powerful manoeuver to pocket a few more billion here and there.
Whatever the result of the vote is, the same issue will crop up again under a different name in a few years to reverse the result of this vote for exactly the same reasons : some group expects to profit from it. It may even be the same group as today.
Well we've been murdering each other since the dawn of Mankind, but I do believe that public opinion on that is pretty much Not Good.
The fact that we have been doing something in the past has no bearing on whether or not we should continue doing so. At some point, a decision must be made concerning "cleaning up" the political landscape, and if we just shrug and say "well that's how it's always been", then nothing will ever change.