Posts by Pascal Monett 18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Thanks to the threatening actions of one, I now consider all makers to be suspect and will not be buying any security camera at all until you guys come forward with objectively-assessed proof that your equipment is secure.
Given that one of them doesn't even know what to do, I won't hold my breath.
Given that 99.9% of all malware exists because of Javascript, I'm on board with that.
But kill HTML ? Where's the technical justification for that ? HTML doesn't make page loads longer, HTML loads in a jiffy.
No, the things that make pages load slowly is always the additional cruft from anywhere but the site you're loading. Meaning, of course, ads.
And Google is not going to kill its revenue stream.
So this is just another useless announcement for everyone but Google.
You want fast-loading pages ? Block ads. Problem solved.
This "software-defined" tech only works if there are multiple batteries.
I can see that working for cars. I'm sure there are lots of places to slot in a battery in a car, and the amount of space will likely define what tech can be used, so the system does need to be able to work with various battery types.
But frankly, I'm not convinced with wearables, and even less with computing in general. Extending a watches battery life ? Great. Instead of buying a battery every year, I'll buy it every other year. Big deal. And if I have to lug around anything with enough juice to power my laptop for six hours more, well it'll be another battery anyway, so what use is the software ? Smartphones have the same problem in worse : they're a lot lighter. Any additional battery worth a damn is going to weigh them down and make them awkward to use.
Oh well, we'll just have to wait 25 years and find out what they actually did with it.
Indeed it is, and when that happens, said inventor will be backed by said investor and they will be selling product, therefor will be entitled to damages.
Also, I never said that damages should be limited to sales, I said they should be linked to them. I am quite aware that trolls have vast lawyering coffers, so I will not venture to provide any rule more specific than the one I indicated : you produce nothing, you get nothing. Anything more complicated than that will likely have to be hashed out by lawyers in order to protect true innovators.
I have been repeating for years now that the only surefire way to prevent patent trolling from even starting is to tie the amount claimable to the revenue of the company.
Because the only entities harmed by patent abuse are the ones selling product. You don't sell product, you are not harmed if someone else is doing the selling.
That way, patent trolls will know that unless they make and sell what they have patents on, the judge will only grant them whatever they claim times the amount of goods they sell, which is zero.
If you know you're getting zero, you're not going to start the lawsuits.
And that nips the issue in the bud, and frees the Courts from dealing with them in the first place.
No, set them up and run all the updates now, before MS includes W10 telemetry into the kernel, like IE, and you can't get rid of it anymore. Then disable WU and put in storage if you want.
If you wait two more years, you might as well write them off for Windows and install some other OS. I'm sure plenty of people can give you an idea or six.
Um, no.
Government's role is to ensure that its citizens are safe from attack (and unjust prejudice), are adequately educated, do not drop of hunger or rampant disease, and have access to infrastructure that is adequate for the load it is subject to.
Anything else is mostly a justification that Government has too much money to play with, and should pare down the taxes to leave research institutes and corporations to care for technological advances. Those entities are more engaged in advancing things since they intend to profit from it, profit that Government will skim the top off of in order to ensure funding for the required infrastructure.
Government's work is already cut out for it, no need to go adding more things which will only serve as troughs for the few to put their snouts in.
Who never give you a link to the file you wish to download, but link to a wrapper that has to install on your PC and launch in order to download.
I know how to download. You know I know how to download. You putting a wrapper in there has sod all to do with "enhancing the user experience" and everything to do with sucking private data from me.
I never download from any site that forces a wrapper on me. There is literally no good reason for that behavior.
Besides, I've been using 7zip for years now. That's not going to change.
Yeah sure, at this point, why not ? It's not like they would have tested the thing before putting it into production, right ?
ICANN can say whatever they want anyway, it's not like anyone is going to trust their words.
I see only one solution : not voting. If they don't have the votes, they can't pretend everyone agrees.
Well, there is another solution, but it involves a hit man and a contract, and I think that, for us law-abiding citizens, it's rather frowned upon.
Pity.
I know next to nothing about network management, but it seems to me that this bug mostly impacts the server, not the client.
As such, it will be fixed, because generally admins are vastly more consciencious of how their servers work than plain old desktop users.
So this is good news.
"I'll sell you my Skoda for 80,001 euros and it's not even a V8"
So you agree that V8s are in high-end cars. Given that we agree that you'll never find a V8 in a €25,000 car, Skoda does not make high-end cars.
That does not mean to say Skoda does not make reliable cars, nor does it mean that Skoda does not have a high-end tier.
It does, however, mean that high-end at Skoda is below anything at Porsche. Porsche is high-end. Skoda is not.
If I can bring myself to accept that that statement might be true (and I'm having a bloody hard time of it), then that would mean that he did not decide or approve its creation, installation or use. Which would appear to imply that the Board had no knowledge of it either, since the CEO reports to the Board.
So I am supposed to believe that strategic decisions with, as we have seen, major shareholder impact are being decided under the radar and without even the knowledge of the CEO, much less his approval ? And that is happening on the engine, which is by far the car component that undergoes the most scrutiny and is shrouded in the greatest protection ?
Does VW have a shadow government or something ?
Sorry, no. I just can't swallow that.
So that's the new biometric, then ?
Meet the new workplace : you can't enter because the fingerprint scanner won't recognize you, and you can't call for help because your phone didn't recognize your fiddling with the badge so it wiped itself.
Then you get fired for being late for the third time that week.
And when exactly did Google start going out of business ?
As far as I can see, it is still the major player in Internet Search, and on mobile phones. The financials don't look bad either, especially for a company that "tanked".
You were already saying that about Vista, weren't you ?
Remember how that turned out ?
Don't forget one thing : us technophiles are the ones the clueless people come to for advice on computing. If we say don't use something, they won't. It's just that we have to wait for them to get around to asking the question.
Good to know. I have been refurbishing an unused box I've had lying around for years with the express intention of installing some flavor of Linux, not knowing which one to try. I regularly try out Ubuntu and some others, but they all require that you know Linux to use them (aka mounting hard disks, etc). Nuisance.
If Mint works similarly to Windows (meaning it can find the bloody partitions by itself and not demand that I be a computer engineer to use it), then I will install that and make it my permanent Linux platform to educate myself about leaving the Windows world with which I am thoroughly fed up now.
It is useless to pursue Internet companies locally, the case of Spain is a brilliant example.
The only solution to the current taxation predicament is to set up an Internet Bureau of Taxation, which has authority in ALL countries. Internet revenue - whatever the amount - must be reported to the IBT, which will coordinate with the country where the revenue was generated to apply the required tax to the transaction. It can happen after the fact - everything is recorded.
Thus, no more upping and outing. You made a billion dollars of revenue from Spanish ad clicks ? You get whatever tax is applicable, whether you are based in Honduras or New York.
It's the Internet, don't tell me it's not technically possible.
But of course, the money lies with the corporations required to make that happen, so not very likely.
The conjunction of those particular adjectives concerning just about anything feels just wrong.
Although, if I were to nitpick, I would say that indiscriminate and non-targeted seem to be two faces of the same coin.
Nevertheless, common sense would dictate that any system that can be described as massive and indiscriminate surely needs a redesign.
But who am I fooling . . .
Seems to me that a lot of people are going to end up quite unhappy with their VWs.
They bought a car with a given level of performance, and they will apparently feel a substantial difference after the patch.
It doesn't matter if you bought a 300hp car or a 120hp car, if you lose 20% of your usual performance, you feel that the car handles like a wet log.
Millions of cars are apparently concerned. Long term, that means millions of people unhappy with their vehicle, and millions more people avoiding second-hand VWs for a long time - which will mean the resale value will take a hit as well.
This is going to mean years of trouble for VW, however fast they patch up the current problem.
The Board will not accept ?
Fine then. REPLACE the Board and IMPOSE the change. End of.
It's like talking with an unreasonable child, You discuss the matter for a minute or two, to give the child a chance to comprehend. If the child still refuses after all reasons have been given, then you just MAKE him obey.
The problem here is that apparently the US Government, on this matter, is just like gutless parents who cannot abide forcing their children to do anything and must wait for them to get around to accepting things on their own. With a child it already doesn't work, and here, we're dealing with grown-up Machiavells who have a very good grasp on just how untouchable they appear to be.
What utterly fails my comprehension is why has this been allowed to go on for so long already ? Is there no one in any position of power that can do an Alexander and just cut this fracking knot already ?
Currently reaching the end of Season 4 in the dead tree version. The TV version is very similar, for a given value of very.
Obviously, a lot of trimming had to happen to fit the series format, but I'm getting on in age now and I understand that they cannot possible keep everything.
There are some shocking suprises though. The biggest one for me was having discovered that the splendid scene where Drogo rocks the yourt swearing that he'll take his khal across the sea and lay waste to all who oppose him in honor of his wife was glorious, moving and quite thrilling on TV. The actor playing Drogo must have had loads of fun doing it, and I look upon that scene as worthy of a Grammy in its own right.
It's not in the book.
But, as usual, the books explain way more than the TV series, and allow understanding the details behind a number of things that the series glossed over. Some things are presented differently in the book, and with a bit of thought, you can understand why they did things a bit different for the series.
That said, I think both are good, in their own ways.
Yes, that.
I bought myself a Synology NAS this year, and since I've had it I've been ripping my DVD collection to it without pause.
The NAS is obviously hooked up to the TV via a media box, and it works great. Now I can watch my films without the hookey commercials or stupid FBI warnings (hey, I live in France, FBI, and I bought the bloody disk, so fuck off).
I will continue buying physical media, and ripping them to my personal local cloud. The Internet can fall down, I will always be able to watch my films. THAT is convenience.
So, whatever you access by being you, is also accessible to the Government. Well that finally kills the "biometric security" platform in one fell swoop.
Kudos there, maybe we'll finally stop hearing about that nonsense.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
