
Re: some asshole in Iraq
Obviously, were he an American tapping into Russian drones, he'd be a hero instead.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Cyprus-headquartered 000webhost admitted: "A hacker used an exploit in old PHP version to upload some files, gaining access to our systems. Although the whole database has been compromised, we are mostly concerned about the leaked client information.
"We removed all illegally uploaded pages as soon as we became aware of the breach. Next, we changed all the passwords and increased their encryption to avoid such mishaps in the future. A thorough investigation to make sure the breach does not exist anymore is in progress."
What they actually said is that they made their website ages ago and never updated it, so they were thoroughly pwned. Now, they are pretending to do something to cover the issue.
The investigation is simple : an old PHP exploit should not be allowed to exist on an ISP's website. An ISP should be well aware of best practices and apply them rigorously.
When they fail, they actually fail harder then HDDs because recovery is exponentially more difficult, and you have even less warning.
For the moment, I have two SSDs on my desktop that are doing their job properly, so no complaints. But a colleague of mine had an SSD in his laptop that he was very happy about until the day it stopped working. He lost nothing of significance because backups, but the disk basically bricked itself and getting a replacement shipped in cost him two days.
He has stopped ribbing me for preferring my slower, 500GB HDD in my laptop.
If that is true, it still is not the success Microsoft was expecting. Apparently, the Windows share of the market is sliding, and has been for 5 quarters in a row now.
What I would like to know is how many of those installs were pushed to people who didn't actually want them, and got reverted to some prior version of Windows. We know 1 0 is being very aggressively pushed out, the question is : how long does it stay when in place ?
Sorry Robert, but you cannot deny that the USA is the only country in the world where so many people die from gunshot wounds every year. And that in a country that is not even at war.
The simple fact is that having less guns lying around would certainly solve the issue. Another simple fact is that that is never going to happen.
Yes but that is exactly the problem : many computer users are new to the environment and have barely enough knowledge of IT to do their work correctly, let alone prepare and execute contingency plans for things they have never even heard of.
Computers are a great tool, but they are also a world of risk that few users are even aware of. People who just work with them don't even know what they risk until it happens - and most of them don't even bother with the backups people who do know keep telling them about.
I think most people view computers like their car : bring it to the garage when it breaks. Only then do they learn that, unlike a car, repairing can well mean losing everything they stored in it.
My fingerprints are like my privacy : I have nothing to hide and it's nobody's business but mine.
My biometrics on a smartphone ? Those things are already a prime target for malware and now you want to add more interest to the things ?
No thanks, I'll stick to VISA and cash. Pin and chip is way better than fingerprints : if your card is compromised, just ask for another one.
Yup, just like SatNad told us that Windows 10 was a successful launch.
Personally, I think it's going to be an enormous cock-up. Hundreds of thousands of XBones all downloading and installing and updating at more or less the same time, what could possibly go wrong ?
Hint : ask any company how a major launch went on Day 1. There are more examples than I care to list.
Trust of the data requires knowledge of how it is gathered and filtered.
Understanding the data requires knowing what it represents.
You cannot have meaningful data and put it into a form anybody can understand. The "consumers" of the data need to know the significance of what they are looking at.
The only thing this research tells us is that Microsoft is having the same trouble managing data than everyone else does. There is no magic wand to solve data management issues. It requires expertise, knowledge and, most often, experience. No program can replace that.
It will be interesting to see the fallout on that.
On the one hand, goverment wants to be able to check what we are doing with ease (our current situation).
On the other hand, government wants its IT, based on the same tech as ours, to be secure even from state-funded actors.
That is one heck of a clash of interest.
Are we supposed to be impressed ? That's a bit like a driver promising to never drive on the sidewalk.
Of course you wait for a court order, that is the normal thing to do. But if the US Gov has reason to knock on his door, it will be with a court order - or even an NSA security letter. And then you comply, citizen.
What would be impressive is if Hurd promised that regional data centers outside of the US would never hand over data to the US Government even with a court order.
Then I would take my hat off to him. As it stands ? He's just promising to do what he should be doing anyway. My hat stays on.
That must be true, because it certainly isn't ready to continue working the market.
If I were a customer at this point, I would freeze all spending with QLogic and wouldn't be planning anything new with it until the management situation is resolved - one way or another.
Without a CEO there is no telling what the future of a company is. There is no sense in giving money to such a company when there is no guarantee that they will be around to support the sales in six month's time.
Wow, talk about shooting the messenger. No wonder the military network is in such a sorry state. If nobody can raise the issue, it obviously won't ever get fixed.
But having one's career negatively impacted for doing one's job ? That things got to that point is simply incredible. I wonder how the second invasion of Iraq would have gone in the media if the locals had been able to override the tanks' network and stopped them all in their tracks. In front of the media. That would have been one hell of a show.
So let me see. At an average of 200g/day for, let's say 360 days/year starting at (simplify) age 10, now age 49.
39 * 360 * 4 * 18 = 1,010,880 % chance increase of bowel cancer.
And if you consider the equation this way :
39 * 360 * 4 * 0.18 = 10,108.8 %
Something tells me this study is baloney.
"users have no rights under the EULA "
Well thank you for making that official, Mr. FBI Agent.
Now we know that, after having to change our habits to incorporate encryption everwhere, we're also going to have to totally review the bog-standard EULA and change the way we do commerce all over the world.
All that because of the paranoid behavior of a scant few thousands of people in one country.
And they are far, far less likely to try breaking into a house with an alarm system. Especially when all the other houses on the block don't have any.
You're worried about burglars ? Get an alarm system. You'll be secure.
As for controlling my lights with my phone from outside my front door, please. I have no inclination of managing anything in my house with such an insecure platform as a smartphone.
People are still blindly buying whatever is in the shops. And blindly clicking on whatever popup says "install this!". And then turning to us to get themselves out of the shithole they put themselves in.
The only good thing is that the PC is indeed dying - and Windows with it. The vast majority of tablets and phones being sold and used do not run Windows and, hopefully, never will.
But people are not making the choice, the vendors are doing that for them.
Whatever senses they have, they will still not be able to detect electromagnetic energy that is not reaching them.
That is why these scientists are having a heartache about the poor, poor civilizations that will attain sentience after the expansion rate of the Universe exceeds the speed at which information reaches them.
Absolutely. Every single major advance of human civilization is directly tied to the amount of energy available to the average human being.
Before agriculture, we were hunter-gatherers. Not much time to build when everyone is following herds of wild animals to be able to eat.
Agriculture came along, and that made us sedentary, but agriculture only really took off when we domesticated animals, allowing one man and a pair of oxen to do in one day what many would take several days to do. This freed some people to pursue other activities, notably construction.
Things pretty much stayed the same until steam came about, which launched the Industrial Revolution. Followed closely by electricity, and that was really the thing that set the ball rolling.
With electricity and the internal combustion engine, the average person in our civilization acquired the ability to till entire fields with a tractor in a day, or cover hundreds of miles in a car. This expansion of available energy is why one farmer today can feed thousands of people, who are free to go do all the rest of things our society needs.
Most importantly, our society needs to research other energetic sources. The greatest challenge we face today is energy storage. We still cannot reliably store the excess energy produced by our power plants, which is why they have to be able to vary their power output.
The other issue is, of course, escaping our planetary gravity well. I'm convinced that some form of fusion will, in the future, allow humanity to build ships that can, like in Star Wars or any other sci-fi universe, take off from a planetary surface and reach orbit without losing any significant amount of mass.
When we have achieved that, the colonization of our solar system will be a given, and we will embark upon that path until we find a way to span the unimaginable distances between stars in a hyperspace-like time frame.
So let's get cracking on that fusion thing !
Okay, I get your point.
Nonetheless, floppies disappeared in software boxes and were replaced by CDs due to the practical side of Windows on 1 CD instead of 48 floppies.
And the industry liked the idea of locking content on CD, which they did more or less successfully, and which was all but impossible on floppy disks.
USB keys, ultimately, replaced the floppy in everyday data transfers, I agree. But the CD set the floppy disk on the path to oblivion.
Objectively of course, you are right. There is no way of telling how long the optical disk format will last.
However, there is good reason to believe that CDs will be around for quite a long time. The medium is cheap and reliable, and stores enough data for an album. Nobody is going to want to put more than 80 minutes of music in one album. I'm guessing that many albums are in the 40 minutes mark or thereabouts. So the CD is good enough.
The CD came into existence as an extension of the floppy disk and pretty much obliterated it in a rather short time. When more data needed to be stored, we got the DVD. Now, the DVD has been extended to BluRay. I'm sure that, if need be, we'll get another extension that will take us into terabyte optical storage territory.
But I really don't see what tech could replace optical storage as cheaply and reliably. It can't be magnetic, because that is not a reliable long-term storage medium. Holographic is an eventuality, but labs are still tinkering with that and nothing is in view yet. Even if holographic tech does appear, it will most likely look like another DVD format.
So I don't think we have to worry about CD tech disappearing any time soon. But yes, who knows what we'll have in a hundred years ? Even so, if it looks like a DVD, there's a good chance the reader will still know about that old CD format from the previous millenium.
He should already be able to request asylum in Europe (Russia is not part of Europe). He is not a criminal by any European law, so there shouldn't be an issue there.
What is blocking any move in that direction is much more likely to be the extradition agreements Euro countries have with the US. In Russia, the US cannot ask for extradition as there is no agreement in place. If Snowden were to apply for asylum in Europe, then the US would be at the door the next day with an extradition request, accompanied by a certain amount of heavy arguments hinting very, very hard that the request would best be granted.
There are not many Euro countries that currently have the balls to stand up to the US on anything, so I think Snowden is not at all interested in trying that.
Dangers ? What dangers ?
I see no problem in Euro TCP-IP traffic staying in Europe instead of being routed through California (or wherever) and coming back. Nor do I have any issue with Euro citizen data being stored in Europe and not being sent anywhere without consent.
Of course, today the situation is that everything is sent to the US and the US is taking advantage of that to liberally peruse anything they want. So yeah, the US is in danger of not having such easy access to other people's private lives, but that ship actually sailed with Snowden and won't be coming back, so it's no use complaining about it now.
I see no danger to people with a "balkanized" Internet security scheme. I do understand that the US government doesn't like the idea, but I couldn't care less about that. As far as I'm concerned, the White House has no right to look at me when I'm not on American soil or declaring my intention to go there.
One question : is that point when sales have hit the floor because nobody trusts the product any more, or some time before that ?
The ability to mod the numbers or something is amusing (for us anyway, for companies paying out based on false numbers, not so much), this is not a critical piece of equipment after all. But the ability to root a computer with it is not amusing at all. Technically, even people that don't have a FitBit could be at risk. That is not good.
Uh, am I supposed to understand that it isn't ? Funny that, when you run the installer it says that it is being used on billions of PCs - and now it's even on phones.
Java use may be decreasing, but I do believe it's usage can still be qualified as "widespread".
It's in the pic titled "SC8000 and SC9000 comparison points".
The CPU cores are noted 2 x 5GHz 6 core and 8 core x86.
So yeah, that's wierd. I thought 4GHz was the current max CPU frequency.
Edit : Ok, AMD has some 5GHz enthusiast models with 8 cores. I doubt anybody would put that in a blade server, though.