Posts by Pascal Monett 18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I hope not.
Zero-Gee science is indispensible for furthering our knowledge of metals and biotechnology. At least, I'm convinced it is. So we need to have a permanent base in orbit, so as to do Science (yes, with a capital S), as well as serve as a launchpad for missions that go beyond low orbit - which we need for our knowledge of the Universe.
So I do hope that there will be a successor to the ISS - one not managed and owned by China, for example.
But I can only hope.
I really don't care about what corporate does in its own space. Corporate has money, and it is responsible for its own decisions.
The US education market is a joke anyway.
For the rest, intelligent, knowledgeable users will know how to manage Chrome in a suitable way. And that includes Firefox users, however much you seem to look down on 3% of the market.
Personally, I don't mind being part of the 3%. NoScript is a blessing.
There are, IMO, very few pseudo-AI projects that actually bring benefit to the user.
There are many pseudo-AI projects that can easily harm people. Deepfakes started the landslide, and we now have the means of faking not only image, but sound as well.
And you don't have to be a rocket scientist to use these "tools".
So yes, go ahead and stifle innovation before lives are destroyed by this monstrosity.
"Microsoft has in the past been criticized for releasing software with artificially inflated requirements "
That may be true of its applications, but as far as Windows is concerned, Redmond has systematically deflated the requirements.
Windows 7 on 8 GB of RAM ? No. You need 16GB to function, 32GB to be comfortable.
Unless, of course, you haven't got the faintest idea of how a computer works and are content with a snail's pace and massive disk swapping.
Agreed.
And, for the times I really can't remember where I stored a file, Everything(*) has me covered.
Don't need no pseudo-AI bullshit.
* : no, I don't have any shares - I just like how it works instantly the way Windows Search never has and still doesn't
Of course they are. PC hardware has hit a wall - it does its job fine now for basic tasks, and only the rare people who need to do more than check their mail, type a letter or two and watch YouTube are going to want more power.
Those who want more power are not going to appreciate that power being gobbled up by some artificial stupidity that only serves to rape their private lives even further.
But what vendors see is that the pixel/MHz/CPU cores/DRAM speed/etc are all arguments that the public doesn't give a shit about any more. We have enough power for our daily lives.
So the magical pixie dust is now called AI, and it has to be spread over everything.
Let's not mention that Cortana has actually been abandoned by Redmond . . . it would spoil the dream.
I remember the page-feed printers from way back when I was a wee operator. When someone launched a rather intensive print, they could end up visibly shaking from side to side as the print head moved along and swung violently back.
No wonder they were so heavy. If HP were making them today, they would literally shake themselves apart.
If they have something that is actually working, then why not apply it to another domain where it could be useful ?
It's not because it's called AI that it is automatically useless, after all. I'm sure Nippon scientists are going to make it work and, when they do, it will certainly be beneficial for all satellites. Corporate secrets (or National Security) aside, I'm sure every satellite managing company would like to have advanced warning of when things might go wrong.
Is it really impossible for Chinese scientists to have made a breakthrough ? No.
To be fair, given the number of high-profile scientific breakthroughs announced by China that have proven to be nothing but damp squib, there is a good chance that this be another one but still, they just might have made a genuine discovery.
Or this is just another round of playground "mine is bigger than yours" politics.
Time will tell.
"Together, we are setting the foundation for a future where AI deeply respects, enhances, and upholds the standards of world-class journalism"
Love the idea. Now all we need is to find some world-class journalism.
News outlets today are owned by billionnaires who shape the news and the way it is broadcast. Gone are the days when the news was actual news, with facts and nothing but. Today it's all about shaping the message. Facts are carefully selected. Not everything is said, and some things are said without proper sourcing (which doesn't keep those things from being repeated).
Sometime in the far future, the human stellar empire will have entire specially-formatted agricultural planets run on JohnDeer automated machines, providing pesticide-free crops to all of Humanity.
But that ain't today. Today, we only have Earth, and it has not yet been terraformed for John Deer.
I'm not sure this is the future we're looking for.
Just did a test on my laptop. Screen is 1920 x 1080. JPG compression is set to 75%. Resulting file size is 250KB (using Paint.net).
My home PC has two screens, both which are much larger in pixel weight. I'm guessing that that GB limit would be reached way before noon.
Don't want it. Period.
Nice to know that in one specific case it is working well. I'm happy for your father.
The engineer has to concern himself with global usefulness, not just specific cases, and I find his remarks insightful, although I am definitely not in any way associated with the industry.
So, we have activist investors, and now we have anchor investors.
An anchor is a heavy metal object destined to keep a ship from moving, so I guess an anchor investor is a deep pockets kind with plenty of cash. Except that, it only needs cash to buy shares. Is Atos expecting an investor to lend money as well ?
No matter. Why aren't there any activist investors lining up ?
Oh, I forgot. Atos is already on the brink of bankruptcy. There's not much left for activists to plunder.
Silly me.
Okay, pitch, no problem. That is purely mathematical and easy to determine.
Speaking rate, no problem there either.
Energy ? How is that qualified ? Someone screaming at the top of their lungs makes a lot of noise, to be sure, but someone looking you in the eye at less than a meter from you with a gun in their hand pointed towards you can softly say "DON'T. MOVE.", and there will be a heck of lot of energy in there that I don't see a computer detecting . . .
You're using a power-guzzling, GPU-enhanced platform to make emoji recommendations ?
Please shut that shit down forthwith and bend over while I administer a sound Oxford-prefect beating to your lilly-white behind to educate you in what is acceptable as far as ML is concerned.
I beg to differ.
I am not at all convinced that people are "keenly aware" of the violation of their privacy. I will barely acknowledge that people are aware of it at all.
Because, if people were so keenly aware, they would stop with Facebook, block Google at every turn and campaign for their rights to be respected at the legal level.
I'm not seeing that happening.
Yes, there are people who are aware. For starters, all of those who, like me, do not have social media account. I can phone or mail my firneds, I don't need a life-raping platform to help me stay in touch.
But those are far from the majority, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about Facebook, Tik-Tok, Instagram et al.
So no. People are certianly not "keenly aware".
i agree completely with hard prison sentences for this kind of scum.
I'm just not convinced that any Russian national is going to give up one of his compatriots to the country that has been Russia's enemy since the Cold War.
Would you give up some hacker you knew to Xi Ping ?
Plus : a reward in dollars isn't going to be much of an incentive to a Russian, these days . . .
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
