He's got a chance
After all, like every other politician he considers us plebs to be dumb fucks.
The only difference is that he cannot pretend he never said that.
19067 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
After all, like every other politician he considers us plebs to be dumb fucks.
The only difference is that he cannot pretend he never said that.
Especially when retraining is not guaranteed to get you the higher-level positions in the first place. Am I supposed to believe that a plumber having successfully studied to become a surgeon is going to find a wealth of positions offered to him ?
Exaggerated example, for sure, but I doubt very much that retrained ex-low-skilled workers are going to have a chance at getting jobs that younger, fresh-from-Uni candidates are being refused for lack of experience.
Nor particularly mandatory given that there is no way to control that said user actually bothered to go see it.
Given the glasshole's propensity to do whatever he wants with his toys and other people be damned, I do think that laws are the only thing that will keep the issue at bay.
Strike that, enforcing laws are the only thing that will keep the issue at bay.
Initially it was for weight loss. Now it's because I'm not hungry before 11 A.M. and my wife refuses to let me leave without a breakfast of some sort. But there's also the better feeling thing.
When I started using this food substitute, I was at a point where my weight was as much a problem as my sleep apneia. I was tired all day, and it was especially hard after lunch. Head dropping on keyboard was a real risk. Sure, I needed exercise, and I have been moving more since then, but I needed something to help me lose weight faster than that.
Before starting on this substitute, I took the flyer to my docter to have her opinion on it. She looked at the flyer for over a minute, then looked at me and asked me if I could get more flyers for some of her patients that could use it. That decided me.
KrissLaure makes a product that they market as a properly-balanced meal replacement you can take without medical supervision. There are two main categories (breakfast and dinner), and a half-dozen flavors in each category. They maintain that breakfast and supper are the meals to be replaced, leaving lunch to your entire discretion. Nothing is forbidden, you're just asked to not pig out and eat reasonable proportions.
As far as taste is concened, I'm fine with the product. What interests me even more, though, is the total disparition of head-dropping-on-keyboard. I'm now awake all day without trouble, even when I did not sleep enough the night before.
So, even when I do reach my target weight (which is in progress), I will keep taking the breakfast variety because it suits me perfectly.
YMMV, of course.
Just checked out the MongoDB site. Everything about it says "for the basic user". It is specifically noted "Leave the Ops to Us" in one of the text boxes.
Based on this, I am not surprised that so many instances were not properly configured. The subscribing customers left the Ops to them, and the Ops failed to do their job thoroughly.
Seems like we're going to have to slog through another decade of ignoring security until it bites back before people generally get the notion that security IS NOT an afterthought.
Agree with you on principle, but honestly I don't know if there is any down-time at major airports anywhere in the world, so one day is technically probably just as bad as any other.
For me, if I were one of those developers, I would have postponed the upgrade to after XMas on the basis that I would have wanted to avoid a chance of being called in during my own vacation.
Well gosh, who could have guessed that ? I'm certain that ab-so-lutely nobody had the slightest inkling of a notion that these newfangled government-imposed thingamabobs hadn't been entirely reviewed with the utmost stringent security measures in mind.
After all, it's a government project, not a third-party, private company, snouts-in-the-trough revenue exercise. Government is responsible. Government knows about vulnerabilities. Government has years of experience with all its IT projects.
Oh, wait . . .
(Yeah, I know it's EU-mandated. It's still the UK Government imposing it, and you can bet that Brexit won't stop that project)
Science is truly astounding. I applaud any progress in our understanding of the Universe we live in, and this is indeed progress.
Now, since we seem to be getting insights on the activity of Earth's core, would it be possible that this tech improve our understanding of earthquakes and, therefore, their prediction ?
I hope so.
Instead, it has been replaced with modern inflation, which means that the price varies daily by so much that a fiat currency would be declared bankrupt in comparison.
We're just going to have to wait until this thing either boils over or is folded into international trade with proper rules and regulations. Until that time, it's just a risk.
Effin' A to that. The younguns have no idea what "powered off" means these days. I had to unplug my previous Media Box when not in use - powering it down had no influence on its temperature, clearly indicating that it was still functioning full tilt.
Since common sense has gone the way of the dodo, there should be a law : powered OFF means NO CURRENT APPLIED.
Agreed. If DonorsChoose can't supply basics, ask for twelve ChromeBooks and sell off two or three, then buy said supplies.
It's a shame that so many "charity" companies seem to be based on taking a fat cut of things under the guise of helping out. I remember not so long ago being told in these very pages about a web site that took donations for earthquake victims in the last tragedy to hit Indonesia. Yeah, they were taking donations all right, and also taking $10 bucks off for "processing fees". Even my bank doesn't take that much for a transaction.
Something stinks in Charity Valley.
I have also been bleating to deaf ears on backup precautions, though not on a professional basis. I have even offered to drop in and do it myself in some cases (for the hairdresser, and other acquaintances I know and who know me and what I do).
Every single time, the answer is something along the line of "yeah, I know I'll have to get around to it".
Year. After. Year.
I have dropped the inquiries. If ever they come and complain about losing their data to some disaster or another, I think the look on my face will pretty quickly quell that line of conversation.
Funny, that's not how I've been hearing it described since, oh since it's inception. In fact, in these very hallowed pages, there is a report on how boffins "managed" to thwart that.
I specifically remember begin told in innumerable posts how BitCoin was indeed anonymous, on top of being the Next Best Thing. Heck, listen to the apologists for long enough and you'll get the impression that BitCoin could impregnate a sterile woman; it is just that good.
Personally I have a hard time buying that anyone can be anonymous for long on the Internet. What really gets me, though, is all the criminal activity taking place with that currency that, apparently, no police force on Earth can trace. Yet, the NSA is supposedly recording all my calls, wherever in the world I am, and I'm willing to believe they know it's ME.
I'm not a criminal, much less a terrorist, but I am under surveillance. Millions upon millions of dollars in illicit transactions are happening all the time, damaging the lives of innocent people around the world, but the ones who benefit are more anonymous than I am.
For me, that sucks more than government control of the value of my money.
"We know we want people to be running Windows 10 from a security perspective, but finding the right balance where you're not stepping over the line of being too aggressive is something we tried and for a lot of the year I think we got it right, but there was one particular moment in particular where, you know, the red X in the dialog box which typically means you cancel didn't mean cancel," Capossela said.
"Within a couple of hours of that hitting the world, with the listening systems we have, we knew that we had gone too far and then, of course, it takes some time to roll out the update that changes that behavior. Those two weeks were pretty painful and clearly a lowlight for us. We learned a lot from it obviously."
Everything in that declaration describes an organization that specifically decided to push things to the hilt, and detect when the hilt was reached. Nothing in those words tell me that they were trying anything else, or had the slightest twinge of conscience about doing it. It was not a "Oh God what have we done" moment, it was a "Right, that's it, they won't take any more" moment.
Remorse ? He showed none, like a good corporate drone he just mentioned having a hard fortnight. Please wait while I dab my eyes (yeah, right). Then he went on to put ads into the OS. Effing ADS. If you ever wanted a sign that MS no longer gives a flying one, that's it.
And for me, that's it for MS as well. In the week before New Year, my server is going Mint. My other PCs will follow in due course. I intend to keep the Personal in Personal Computer.
That is a very interesting comment that brings up a few questions.
Taking your statement at face value, could it be that diverting means landing in an unfamiliar airport and there is added risk ? Is it really that important to have experience landing at an airport ? I've heard that Hong Kong flights are captained exclusively by pilots that have already landed there, but at the same time Hong Kong is considered to be an exception, if I'm not mistaken.
I would have trouble imagining that a seasoned pilot would have trouble landing at an airport for the first time. Methinks that if that were the case we'd be seeing way more incidents. Add to that that landing is the second most dangerous time to be in an aircraft (the first being taking off, of course), and I really can't guess as to why a diversion would be riskier than going to the initial destination.
I really would like to know, though.
The RCC has next to no influence on that issue where people have the means to purchase sexbots.
In poor countries, however, it does have that kind of influence but they wouldn't be able to purchase the bots anyway. You could probably find some "massage parlors" offering them though, if there's one thing Catholics are good at it's openly hating something while secretly using that very thing.
You know that won't happen. However good sexbots may become, there will always be a market for "natural" interaction.
That's the thing with porn and the sex industry, nothing replaces anything, anything new is just added to ever-growing list of things we do to satisfy our compulsions.
Have you seen the smoking performance of Liv Tyler in One Night at McCool's ?
The point is : America can want its encryption with backdoors, even though it is finally admitting that strong encryption is A Good Thing (TM), but that does not mean that everyone else will follow.
Actually, you need only one proper, non-backdoored encryption scheme to be available to totally jeopardize every backdoored one, every company connected to the Internet will be under pressure to use that one, because security.
There are largely enough people on the Internet that are intelligent enough to create a proper encryption scheme and make it available, so that is where we are going whether US Congress likes it or not.
Yup, it's a crash & burn, and it feels richly deserved.
This billion-account breach occurred in 2012. Instead of communicating on that issue, Marissa spent the next year with other priorities, such as redesigning the logo, and not securing an email backdoor.
Well the problems are finally coming home to roost. Looks like you still can't avoid a problem by ignoring it.
No evidence that the data included passwords. That, to me, means that they have no evidence of the contrary either.
How can a company have absolutely no clue as to when a password is read ? Shouldn't that be something that is monitored ? I'm not talking about hashing & salting, or encrypting or whatever else (that should be done as well), I'm just talking about monitoring when the password is accessed.
Apparently, in the business world, the word "security" is just a collection of letters that the marketing department uses. The rest of the company doesn't have the time to take it into account.
Well, not to throw the stone, but when it comes to keys and locks, somehow they understand the importance and manage.
Of course, this begs to consider whether or not users would use the same key everywhere if they could configure the locks. I'm guessing they likely would.
There is no good solution right now, but I try to explain the password/lock similitude to get the message across. Of course, I have no control over how long my words may influence their behavior.
Sanctuary was in Logan's Run.
You'll find that in the Sci-Fi aisle of your local movie store (maybe).
Meanwhile, IRL, he's been arrested, so he ain't goin' anywhere on his own anymore.
If I take a look at a project and see that the only use case they imagined for a tech demo is a cursor particle spray, I'm not very impressed with the project.
Oh, they can also open URLs you say ? Wow, Lynx has been able to do that since 1997.
Nope, still not impressed.
Based on HTML and JavaScript ? Now that's impressive. You've created a platform that replicates every other browser in existence. Here, have a lollipop.
It obviously does.
First, replace the app with a simple pilot app and create a proper PC-based control station that the camera connects to via WiFi. The PC should be the gateway to the camera, it can have a firewall properly configured.
Put all the parametering and complicated stuff (with the easy-to-use online help guide, right ?) on the PC app, as well as robust phone-to-PC and PC-to-camera connection authentication (because you forgot that part, didn't you ?). A phone is just good to pan & tilt, zoom and view the images, it does not have the technical ability to do anything else in an easy way.
That way, the PC is the copy station for the data, not an easily-removable SD card. Give it an optional cloudy thingy if you want, with a properly-secured and encrypted connection (does Samsung have the tech expertise to do that ?) and time-stamped data for police forensics.
In short, do a proper job this time.
Are the same thing we've been hearing for the 20 past years, is one of the first questions of every call center drone ever, and has been transferred into public conscience under the moniker "the 3-fingered salute".
Come back when you have something useful to say, Microsoft.
It's interesting that just about everyone here answered my post with variations concerning NAS and/or company backup procedures.
Funny, I clearly indicated that I was talking about Joe User.
Joe User does not have a NAS and wouldn't know how to set it up if you gift-wrapped it and installed it for him and, if you did do that for him, it would do eff all for his data when he gets infected with an encryption virus as is such the rage right now.
And please stop going on about how optical discs "are not forever". Nothing is forever and it is hilarious to think that optical discs without any moving parts are more at risk than spinning rust. Your optical drive can fail, it has no bearing on the data on the disk. The same cannot be said about hard disks.
Optical discs can fade (or so I've heard as well), but I take my data seriously enough to not buy the cheapest sort and, for the moment, I have indeed been lucky - if you call "luck" the staged multi-copy process I go through.
Once again, optical discs are the best bet for Joe User. When/if he gets around to it, he'll have a valid copy that will be stable and reliable long enough for him to completely forget what was on it in the first place.
You guys are experienced enough to choose your own path and take your own risks.
And can someone please explain how all of sudden management decides that they need to hire FIVE HUNDRED more people to staff the call centers ? I seriously doubt that call center staff is 50,000 and these 500 more are just a 1% increase.
Even if, and I think that is a big "if", even if the call center staff currently number 5,000, it's a 10% increase, and that means that manglement knew bloody well that the call center was seriously understaffed in the first place and, that being the case, it is manglement that is entirely responsible for minimizing the call center and ensuring customer dissatisfaction.
On top of that, they publicly declare that, with 500 more call center staff, they expect to only answer 90% of calls. Sorry, you're supposed to answer ALL THE CALLS.
Of course, to minimize the number of calls, you could hire and properly train another 500 technicians who would then go out and actually SOLVE THE PROBLEMS people are calling about - but yeah, that's silly talk.
I am very pleased to learn that there is some kind of intelligent discussion on the matter. Whatever the results and however long it takes, a proper solution starts there.
Good to know that participation was of apparently good level, that means that the results will hold up to scrutiny and "startup-level" bollocks will have a harder time inserting itself into the scheme.
The road to public security is long and hard, and we've just set foot on the path. I look forward to the progress reports on this crucial matter.