“There is no doubt Russia has used cyber attacks on other nations,”
Well, as far as I know, there is no doubt that the USA has used cyber attacks on other nations either. You gonna get all high and mighty about that ?
Didn't think so.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Looks very much like PR disaster-management to me. Saying such things do not hold water next to declarations such as "I will fly my jet one minute less".
First of all, if one minute of your jet costs less than one glass of Scotch, your jet ain't worth boasting about. Second, you can hardly fly a jet (unless it's a virtual one, in which case I'll take you on any time).
Public opinion is a thing since Vietnam. A crash course seems to be required for the board at FOculous, because they're going to get it in the rear now. And I have to say I am not sorry. I hated the day I read that Facebook, of all things, had got its grubby mitts on what promised to be a great product.
This is just another step into oblivion.
Um, I've heard that 2D porn has one great advantage : you're not shutting yourself off from the world and therefor are not liable to be totally surprised by someone walking in on your, ahem, fun time.
If you remain tuned into the world around you, you have time to recover and set things right when you hear the garage door open (I've been told).
In any case, I'm quite sure that VR has a place, most likely in gaming (obviously). I do not see that VR is going to bring anything to teleconferencing, not does it improve in any way people analyzing floor plans. What does VR bring to a virtual tour of a building that a flat screen does not ? A mouse costs less than a VR headset and likely always will.
This whole VR fad is like 3D cinema. It's nice to see a new tech becoming available, but the hype will have to pass before we see the true, boring applications that actually survive and thrive.
Or rather : "I wonder what it tastes like ?"
Let's face it, we are the most advanced intelligence in our solar system and we can hardly boast of being inquisitive and comprehending. The basic reaction of 99% of Humanity in the face of The Unknown is panic and/or aggression, just like any animal out there.
Actual animals, on the other hand, usually have the intelligence to not hang around when they're out of their depth.
If we do encounter another life form, either we are technologically superior and will be a hell of an effort not to slaughter them all for their Unobtanium, or we are technologically inferior and we had better pray they don't need our Unobtanium. The chances of a draw most are, in my humble opinion, next to nil, so I will not consider that option other than to say : First (Last?) Interstellar War.
I've always wondered how Yahoo! has managed to stay afloat after so many years of bumbling incompetence.
If there is a major class-action lawsuit over this I doubt Yahoo! will be able to continue operating at all.
It's about time a class-action happened anyway. This kind of nonsense has been going on for too long already, especially since it seems to always be for the same basic reasons : improper handling of user credentials.
The book has been written on that. It is high time CEO's get the message : Apply proper security, OR ELSE.
No, what you should apologize for is confusing your game with your right to the user's computer. And for being too stupid to not let the user cheat locally where there is no problem, and not being capable of finding a server-based solution to check server-based multiplayer.
I suggest you meekly go, hat in hand, and beg Blizzard to tell you how they prevent cheating on Diablo III without fucking over people's personal property.
You might even gain some intelligence in the process. God knows you seem to need it.
Here's an idea : how about pushing molten salt reactors that use Thorium ?
That would be responsible in many ways, pushing the economy towards an energy technology that is plentiful and without any of the risks currently associated with nuclear tech.
Plus, given the amount of energy consumed by these data centers, they would be independent from the local grid and thus have a redundant energy source in said grid if anything went wrong.
This tech has been pushed aside from the cold war imperative of creating plutonium for nuclear bombs. We don't need plutonium any more, and nobody wants the hydrogen risks that pressure water reactors can create.
So think outside the box, people, and do something that is truly useful for Humanity and our future.
The only value for money MS still has is the millions of coders that are used to coding for it, and the thousands of programs and applications that it can still run.
Plus : gamers. The PC still has the largest library of games and is still the best gaming platform as far as diversity is concerned.
However, the bell is tolling because the upcoming generation has not been raised on Windows, but on Android or iPhone. When they get to the professional arena, they are going to consider Windows as a boring office platform and, when that generation attains the level of IT Management and sees the pain that is licensing and maintenance, they are going to replace everything they can with some form of Linux.
It is just a question of time, and that probably has a lot to do with why MS is porting some of its key jewels over to the platform that it used to qualify of "cancer".
And that is the problem right there : more importance is given to the appearance of progress rather than to the security of the data.
I wish them all luck, I really do. But I'm also willing to bet that all that empire building is going to look a lot less good for the first manager responsible for getting a hundred million or so customer details leaked because he chose a cloud solution that got hacked. Sure, he can try to deflect the blame on the cloud provider and it might even work, but his career will likely suffer, and deservedly so. Because he won't be able to hide the fact that his IT department did not think the idea was a good one.
So go on and put your data on someone else's server. When enough of that has crashed and burned, the real solution will rise from the ashes.
And then computing will really take off.
I suspect you've never heard the term "money mule", nor ever gotten spam offering an easy, stay-at-home job that will make you thousands per week ?
And you certainly missed this article as well.
As in your street cred, you mean ?
Come on, if nobody was getting hurt you had no pressure to publish, now did you ?
Responsible disclosure means you give the company a chance to react. If there is no hurt, you can give them even more time to react.
False argument. The US Constitution, if it were still respected, is that point.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
This Amendment does not care if unreasonable searches are conducted via electronic surveillance or by goose-stepping through the house. Neither are permitted. The Constitution says you need a warrant to invade a suspect's privacy, period.
Why this point is not driven home with a bat sledgehammer is beyond me.
How is it that such financial volume is not tracked down and under surveillance ?
We're not talking about cash changing hands in a dark alley, this is online financial transactions. The police have all the tools they need to track this, so how do scammers not get caught ?
Is there only one cop on duty at any given time ?
Sorry, but if you have a "big bank of money" and you don't manage to "do things" then you are a waste of time.
That simple sentence is everything wrong with out civilization today. Hey, I've got mountains of cash ! Maybe I'll get lucky and accomplish something !
Scarcity is what prompts true greatness. Let's see you get along on 1% of your bank. It will be harder, but your efforts will actually bring something to the table.
having patches means the software is maintained, which is a Good Thing (TM), because the threat landscape evolves constantly. It is ridiculous to imagine that any group of developers, however smart they may be, could preconceive every single possible threat scenario that will crop up.
Given the complexity required of today's software, that must interface almost with everything under the Sun, some bugs obviously slip through as well. It is nice to have those bugs squashed in a timely manner.
The issue is not with the patching. The issue is with the fuckups that insufficient whiteboarding and testing introduce into patches that pretend to solve something and either don't, or fuck something else up along the way.
I am prepared to accept that a patch does not wholly solve a problem. Writing software is difficult and I know by experience that edge cases are a maddening nuisance to deal with.
I cannot accept that a patch bricks a computer, or otherwise trashes an entire environment. That can only happen when next to no testing was ever done, in a case of "oh that problem ? Just flip the bit to 0 and we're done with it". Seems obvious, but even when it is, test, test and test again, especially when your customer base numbers in the millions.
And I accept that, even when you do test against every single scenario your PC catalogue has, there's always some extreme case that slips through. PCs are the ultimate hardware platform, they can modified in uncountable ways.
But if you fuck up a console, you deserve to be fired, if not shot.
Social inertia is holding up this kind of thing and will likely do so until people start getting annoyed by it in massive numbers. From the enthusiastic gushing I hear around me concerning phone abilities, Cortana and Siri, and "how practical it is", I don't think we will reach that stage anytime soon.
But something, someday, will cause a massive change of perception, and then Google will have to dial back, which it will because Google is not full of idiots. Google employs very intelligent people and they are measured against the ultimate benchmark : ad revenue. Anything that makes that go down is anathema, and what was declared the month before in PR speak doesn't count.
So, one day, people will get fed up with this, just like one day, people will vote intelligently.
In other words, not during this century.
Funny that, YouTube has absolutely no qualms in citing that very act when its automated infringement tool decides your "user-generated content" is a copy of something a bunch of lawyers decided was copied.
And in that case, you have zero recourse, because the choice is accept and keep at least your account, or contest and then, if decided against you (by whom, already ? Ah right, some guy at Youtube you didn't vote for), your entire account is cancelled.
Talk about balanced.
It works for way too many people, which is why these "apps" continue to request - and obtain - access to elements that have nothing to do with their stated purpose or requirements.
Since when does an app retain the passwords it needs ? It hands the request to the OS, which hands the answer back : fail or pass. Then the app deals with the result. That is called managing security.
This is just the consequence of the phone-app environment where everything accesses everything and the clueless masses bleat in unison while accepting the situation.
It may be that they won't function as Google intended, but they will function as I intend them to, meaning not at all.
Google Play is not something I have use for. It is never called on and I have disabled updates on it.
Turning on GPS, WiFi and mobile data are things I do when I need them, not when the phone goes on.
It's a fucking phone, not an extension of my life.
Sorry, but no. It was the drivers' failure to stay alert and in control that caused this regrettable accident.
Blaming the car, the software or anything else is just trying to justify his unacceptable behavior.
Until truly self-driving cars exist on the market, it is the driver who is responsible for what his car does, nothing else.
The current system is innocent until suspected of guilt.
Proving guilt is becoming less and less mandatory. I'm reminded of police procedures in the late 1800s, where you had inspectors gathering a fourth of a proof, a half proof, and a few eighths of proof, and hey ! that adds up to a full proof ! Guilty as charged !
"Justice" is going the same way now, with the terrism charge demonstrably used as go-to-jail card. Once there, they gather just four quarter proofs and you're never getting out again.
Ain't progress wonderful ?