Patreon ?
So that's SciShow users that are impacted also, as well as PBS Eons.
Congratulations on undermining confidence in some of the rare YouTube channels that educate people about science.
19435 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
What I gather from this article is that massive service providers (aka consulting companies) are being subject to a sea change in their very livelyhood. Big customers are less inclined to sign big contracts, and smaller customers are going to the fluffy failures of The Cloud.
This can only be temporary, though. The Cloud is far from perfect in itself, and people are starting to wake up (albeit slowly) to the fact that their data is no safer there and they need measures in place when the fluff grows a hole and their data disappears.
It will certainly take a long time before people (and companies) learn how to manage their cloud data properly, but until they do, there is room for consultants and service providers to help them get there.
It's just that the service providers need to adapt to that landscape as well.
Apparently, that adaptation is going to be painful.
I was working on client site about 15 years ago, one of a multinational's many branches. I had access to the server room, although I didn't really need it because I'm a developer, not a sysadmin. When the summer was hot, I did sneak in from time to time, to cool off, but I digress.
I knew the product I worked with didn't much like having the client opened locally on the server. I knew it. One day, for some reason I can't even recall, my workstation was doing something time-consuming and I was in a hurry to get another thing done. Those among you with experience will recognize right there a recipe for disaster.
I decided that it was a small thing and I could do it quickly on the server. I knew where it was, so I badged myself into the server room, walked over to the dedicated Solaris server I needed and double-clicked the icon for the client. The client's loader flashed a screen, and the server went down then and there. I was left to facepalm myself while watching nervously the server come back online.
Of course, when a production server goes down in a site that employs over a thousand people, there will be people to notice. I could only go to the head of IT and report my actions. As penance, I asked my access to the server room to be revoked, which the IT manager graciously accepted.
I never did try that again, anywhere.
Could companies please refrain from using URL shorteners ? It keeps people from checking that the URL should indeed go to where it is supposed to given the supposed source.
It's hard enough to ensure that spam and malware are avoided, but if you go and obfuscate the URL well that's the end of it. I never click on those things, whenever I see one my paranoia flares up something fierce.
Completely agree. I nearly jumped out of my chair when I read that phrase, and I had to force myself to finish reading the entire article (a very interesting read, BTW) before coming here to say the same thing, but in slightly more profane terms.
In any case, it is refreshing to see that, for once, political machinations can be used for good. Hats off to the people who got this law pushed through.
Well of course you are, to the letter of the law.
And the law doesn't say that you have to be objective and present all the arguments for/against, now does it ?
So they are committed to being compliant, but they will continue to cajole and harass you to get your consent in any legal way they can.
You can pass whatever laws you want about encryption in your country, other countries won't see things the same way and all you need is one competent programmer capable of creating a proper, robust encryption scheme and posting it on the Net and your laws are rendered obsolete.
I do think the most effective argument that the IEEE listed is the one saying that backdoored encryption would render companies less competitive.
We're already seeing that kind of result with the Cloud. Thanks to the NSA's shenanigans and the very public cases of judges ruling that data in another country should be made available to the US courts, we now see companies scrambling to make local centers for countries that are passing laws demanding it.
I cannot imagine that encryption will be different.
Given that there has not been a massive exodus and shutdown of FB accounts, I'll wager that the people you know that were using FB still are.
Because FB still has that half billion accounts - even if 80% of that is cats, dogs, hamsters and assimilated.
One of the basic tenets of capitalism viewed by right-wing Republicans is that the market is self-regulating and thus, should not be regulated.
As far as IoT is concerned, that means that they view millions of people spending money on products that are not secure, are eminently hackable and can cause major disruption of private life as a perfectly acceptable consequence because the market will just "adjust accordingly".
IoT is the "Unsafe at Any Speed" of the IT industry.
It needs regulation, and it needs a global body to evaluate and approve stuff for selling.
If we don't do that now, untold millions of people will suffer needlessly while crap-sellers stuff their pockets in what is surely a most immoral way.
But it's legal, so Republicans don't care.
"Schools keen to grab the freebie will need to offer GitHub to all technical departments, allow GitHub to use their logo on its website, receive GitHub announcements and finally place one person per department on GitHub's teacher-training programme."
In other words : it's free for you if you sell us your soul, give us your firstborn and allow us to spam you into oblivion. Oh, and we'll "monetize" all the data you give us, as per standard corporate procedure.
How typical of Microsoft. Acquire something good that works, and turn it into yet another waiting room to Satan's realm.
Thanks, I'll pass.
The only "job" Uber is doing is keeping itself as far away from an actual job as possible, whilst raking in the dough and driving competition into the dust.
The obvious end game is Uber being a monopoly and suddenly prices are going to hitch a ride on the Saturn V.
I think you'd have to be pretty stupid to steal tech when moving to a competitor and not bother to rename everything along the way to muddy the waters. Don't talk about F32, talk about Skeletor. Don't mention F32S, mention Chakram.
Be inventive, for Pete's sake. Word processors have had Find/Replace for more than 3 decades now.
I do believe there will be one point where humans will have next to nothing to do anymore, because we will have made robots capable of doing it all.
At that point, we're going to have to get to grips with what kind of economy we'll have, because nobody working means no salaries on company budgets, but it also means no money to buy goods.
While I will admit that our current money-for-work economy is screwy and biased and must be controlled, it is still something that provides for the majority in one way or the other.
What will be the rules in an economy where all manufacturing is done by robots ? Al all repairs and maintenance as well ? You cannot put a price on goods nobody has any money to buy them with. And is there any sense to put a price on stuff made by robots anyway ? Oh, of course, today's billionaires will obviously say yes to that, but today's economy is not based on robots, it's based on men with families to support.
The robot economy will be a world where you work if you want to, but you'll still need to eat, drink and be appropriately dressed for the weather. Today, money is what gives us the ability to do all that, money in exchange for our work.
But tomorrow, when robots do everything, we're going to need an entirely different set of rules. What they will be, I have no idea.
Probably because of physical reality, such as position on screen and trivial difference in amount of current needed to draw one character instead of another.
For example, it is quite logical that drawing a T will light up more pixels than an I, and a W will require even more pixels, thus more power. A trifling more, granted, but measurable nontheless.
That must have been a harrowing experience indeed - especially given all the terrible things Hollywood has taught us can happen on a flight (engine fire, hydraulic system failure, etc).
I guess you cannot help but imagining all the possible horrors and wondering which one it is. Getting the call was probably the greatest relief, learning it was "just" the A/C was the cherry on top.
Nope.
I have no compassion for a marketing guy who invites a technical journal to an interview without bringing any functional items, instead bringing mock-ups, not being able to answer technical questions and then pretending to be hurt when the ensuing article is not written like a Vogue-magazine fanpiece.
Flaming idiot. And now he's Streisanded himself.
No sympathy.
A bit reassuring, really, what with the Republicans still blindly pretending to support Trump and the Democrats totally incapable of any action whatsoever, it is reassuring to see that there are still some people in high places who are actually interested in pretending to work for US interests and not for their own.
Caveat : I do not know those senators and have no idea whose campaign funds they are defending.
A Technical Manager says they're done rewriting Office 365 in Javascript.
A Spokesperson says they're not rewriting office 365 in Javascript.
Given that the spokesperson is spouting the bullshit he's told to, my vote goes to the rewriting of Office 365 in Javascript.
Now the question is : is that supposed to be a good thing ?
There will be a brand new company soon available to replace Capita's dismal record. It will be named Atipac, and will offer true professionals and brand new management*, but all people will have at least 20 years of experience in government contracts.
Atipac : your new guarantee of success.
* any resemblance to Capita employees is purely coincidentail
Managers who have people working more than 60 hours per week are not doing their job.
A manager's job is to manage resources, not exhaust them. If your employees are working overtime all the time, it is on you to realize that you need more resources - else you will find yourself with a global revolt at some point and some, or most, of your resources will walk to other pastures.
And recreating a group is always an impossible task.
Somehow, that is not part of the MBA curriculum.
Pity.
I propose this scenario :
An internal IT jockey has a project and needs to test some functionaity. He goes to his boss and gets approval for a bucket. He loads demo data on it, nothing important or critical, no customer data. Security is not important, testing functionality is, so he keeps his life simple and doesn't lock anything down.
He does his tests, bugs out and leaves the bucket for another round of testing later on.
Meanwhile, pentesters happen upon the bucket, alert the meadia, articles screaming bloody murder are written, and the IT guy quietly activates security on the bucket thinking "bloody hell, what a lot of hot air for nothing".
At this point, I think whatever it is it has been integrated into the atmospheric control of the building. The vast majority of the employees are inhaling it without even knowing - or have forgotten that they are.
There is only one who is responsible for all this : the one who keeps pouring it into the A/C vats. Marby, is that you ?
People don't like because it pretty much destroyed their acquired keyboard shortcuts habit which allowed them to breeze through complex operations that they were used to doing.
Especially in Excel and probably Word as well.
The main issue with the Ribbon is that MS didn't bother providing it as an option and keeping the menu interface (and proper kb shortcuts) for those who were used to it. No, you had to change your ways.
For professionals who actually want to work with the products, it was quite frustrating and painful.
Here's a novel idea : put the name of the candidates each on a piece of paper. Have the voters go into a privacy stall to put the paper of their choice into an envelope. Then have them go to a box, controlled by a voting committee member, and under the watch of the controller, place their envelope in the box.
They will have voted, the votes can be tallied, there is a paper trail, and fucking with the system is way, way harder than a stupid half-witted computer litterally made to be hacked.
But why make it simple when you can complexify things ?
A very interesting remark that puts things in perspective in a useful manner.
Space is very often awesome and mind-boggling given the size of the objects we look at and their distance. It's something that, I think, tends to numb the mind a bit.
So yeah, a reading on a magnetic field that is 50k times less powerful than a fridge magnet, from this distance ? That's hardly shabby, that's simply incredible and a wonderful indication of Humanity's technological level.
Now, where's my flying car again ? <ducks>
Same here. I've set up a special account for that kind of situation : spam@mydomain.net
I use that in response to any question and for online subscriptions that I do not intend to follow but have to sign up to get what I'm looking for.
Needless to say : all mail going into that account is immediately trashed.
I simply cannot fathom what kind of Neanderthal-level moron thinks it's a good idea to send a pic of the ugliest part of his anatomy to a woman he has never met (and will doubtless never meet after that). I'm as fond of my little sergeant as anyone else is fond of theirs, but that's the last thing you want to introduce yourself with to any woman.
I can very well imagine a woman's reaction to getting such a pic : burn it with fire and ban the offending sender from ever contacting her again.
Sure, there are certainly a portion of dating site subscribers that are there only to find a one-night stand, but even then, if your only game is grunting, you won't be scoring much I would think.