Re: can somebody inform parliament that trees grow
I'm sure their gardner must have mentioned that, but because he's just a gardner it went in one ear and out the other.
19429 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
What HTML magickry enabled ou dearest Verity to do that reversed-inversed type ?
When I saw that I thought my eyes would pop out.
I obviously need a refresher course on HTML5.
As for Dank Mono, that seems like a lot of work just to make a copy of Arial with different spacing.
So, Verizon admits that it's tech is proprietary, and chooses to ridicule AT&T instead of describing why it's tech is not going to be a drag on users connections between networks.
I wonder if we are ever going to get adult-level discussion instead of these wannabe prom queen tactics.
Probably not.
Given that the neutron star's surface has a variance of just a few micrometers, and that if you drop something from just 1m high it will hit the surface at 1,400 km/s, I think you'll find that you're never getting to build a mountain on a neutron star.
You go on like that, Pai, and Make America Great Again, which apparently includes pushing it down on the list of connection speeds per country. Looking at that list, the USA is in 10th position.
Now, from that list I have to admit that 25Mbps is a good reference because only South Korea actually has it. Norway is quite close, Sweden is getting there, but the rest of the top 10 are closer to 20Mbps than anything else.
And then you have the US, which is at 18.7Mbps. And the FCC is argueing that that is good enough.
Well fine, don't put any effort there. Especially since a number of countries have Internet connection plans, such as my own country of France. Yeah, we're at position 51 in that list, at around 10Mbps. Not brilliant, to be sure, but I'm supposed to get FTTP by the end of the year, and then I'll have the option of subscribing to a 100Mbps connection - or a 200Mbps if I really want to go to town.
Other countries are working at it as well. That means that the list is going to change. To be sure, France is not going to go from 51st to 10th any time soon, but the US is going to find itself wedged around countries like Bulgaria, Thailand and Romania, ie countries that have less than 3% of USA's GDP.
America ain't gonna look all that great there, now will it ?
Does that include your yearly tithe structure, aka license fees ?
I don't know about SAP, don't recall much noise on that subject, but I do know that if ever Oracle publishes something like that, I'll have to buy the popcorn by the truckload, because fur will be flying.
An adequacy decision ? Frankly I think UK Gov is dreaming there. With the current rise of heckles around privacy, and Europe already forcing Microsoft and others to have data centers on EU territory not under MS hold in order to block any overzealous (aka the usual) US judge from having immediate access, I highly doubt that the UK, with its privileged ties to the US (and to the NSA) will get a buddy treatment on that point.
Just like I highly doubt that the UK will get preferential treatment on any point. You're leaving and that's it. Once you're gone, you don't get to keep a set of keys.
A file that everyone has to have to be able to use the functionality, file which grows ever larger until you need a fiber conection and a multi-terabyte disk if you're a latecomer. No to mention transaction delays and, in the case of Bitcoin, insane transaction fees.
Frankly, I'd think a central database would be a much more simple affair. You have to be connected anyway, in order to upload your addition to the blockchain, so what's the difference ?
Typical of these multinationals to take something useful and kill it because they think they have something better, or with more bells & whistles.
That will give the opportunity for some startup to create a new Skype, with the functionality we need, not the stuff Microsoft wants. Of course, if it works, the startup will become a success, will get noticed by a multinational, and get bought, the product will get changed and bloated, and the cycle will start over again.
But doing a VoIP app is not difficult, so losing Skype will only be a temporary inconvenience.
So basically this is optical storage in The Cloud (TM).
I'm guessing there's a business case here, but I'll be damned if I can think of one.
If you cannot update the data, then you're archiving. Even on The Cloud (TM), archiving is not new. If you're making procedures available, then not updating is nonsense.
Nope. Can't think of any use. Oh well.
There is indeed. In this case, it is the difference between making a rocket and module that will reliably and safely chuck a number of human beings around the moon and back, or making a rocket that will chuck a module that has a lander that will reliably get to the moon, enter into orbit around it, get the lander on the surface, get it back to the orbiter, and get the orbiter back to Earth - and keep everybody alive all the way.
Personally, on a first try (for SpaceX), I prefer the basic round-trip option, thank you.
Which data center is going to house this newfangled thingamabob, and what happens when it goes down due to lightning, water, or squirrels (never forget ROTS) ?
Because if it has the redundancy of the last one that failed miserably, I don't see how this will make things any better.
I really would like an explanation for that. It seems to me (not a network guy) that all you had to do was tack on a specific IP to all 32-bit addresses and that would make them 64-bit by default. Hit a 32-bit router, get rid of the excess. Receive a 32-bit IP, tack the default on again.
Let's say 10.10.10.10 is that default. Imagine that my IP address is currently 214.31.49.16. So, I click a URL and TCP-IP carries out its task. The packets hit an IPv6 router and my address becomes 10.10.10.10.214.31.49.16 - yep, that's rather long to type. The packets mosey along and hit a 32-bit router, and my IP returns to 214.31.49.16. You can continue this example at your leisure.
Where's the problem with that ?
Apart from having to update all the routers, that is.
I would suggest that, the next time Microsoft decides to plonk down a data center, they do a review of weather history on the locations they are looking into ?
Maybe avoid a place that has violent thunderstorms ? Or at least factor that into the requirements ?
Do any of the cloud providers have data centers in Tornado Alley ? No ? I wonder why . . .
I'm not an admin, but it seems curious to me that something had been monitored while the cert was good, and when the cert expired nothing special happened, it just stopped monitoring that equipment. Feels like a monitoring tool should notice that it can no longer monitor something and complain.
On the other hand, I am most impressed by the level of competence of the scumbag(s) that found the flaw and exploited it. It seems to me that there is a highly qualified someone out there who would be a 1st class BOFH. Shame he chose the dark side.
Now please paste it on a baseball bat and bash the management on the head with it until the message goes through.
The problem with IoT, apart from its stupendous lack of security and tendancy to phone home everything it can (whether or not it should), is not the peons, it's the management.
They want the shiny, they have the clout, and your list of worries is not their problem because when - not if - the breach happens, it'll be your fault, not theirs.
It would seem you have some trouble with an enterprise-grade IT installation. Our Microsoft Opportunity Department will shortly dispatch two representatives to explain the advantages of our brand new Business Support Initiative and the low, low price at which you can get this incredible offer (only one newborn to sacrifice per month!).
When your handlers arrive, be sure to be happy to see them.
Or else.
Sure, if you can write web page code you're obviously capable of writing everything else, obviously.
Come on, comparing kernel updates to javascript web apps is literally childish. Go tell Torvalds that his code is a wretched hive of scum and villainy, while you're at it.
Let's not confuse the issue, shall we ? We're talking about a humongous security hole that is without any control or oversight.
OSes have their issues, web hosting as well, but they are much more scrutinized than web apps and it is the total lack of oversight that is the problem.
I do see one advantage, from the politician's point of view. Given the general chaos of IT spending in the UK goverment, you will spend the next few decades hearing completely contradictory stories about how much Brexit actually cost, ensuring a fine revenue stream for the various rags that pretend to report on it.
El Reg excepted, of course.
Let's be coherent here a moment. If you're talking about competitive gaming, you're talking about guys who lug their high-end gear to the places where the competition is taking place. These are not people who are going to accept some server farm somewhere be responsible for what they see on screen and have to react to. These guys (and gals, I think) want everything to be as fast as possible because they want to be as fast as possible. And spending milliseconds waiting for a server somewhere is not going to be acceptable in their mindset. It will be a possible point of failure, and they want to WIN.
So remove competitive gaming from the equation and what do you have left ? A promise to make Joe Nobody's anemic laptop perform like an Alienware.
I'll believe it when I see it, but I don't think hardware sellers have anything to worry about.
For a politician it certainly is. Lots of bluster and thunder at the pulpit, much moral high ground and easy brownie points to gather, and no worry about consequences because Porn Will Find A Way.
Besides, it beats worrying about what to say concerning Brexit or any other actual, serious issue that has no real solution.
Then, once out of the limelight, it's back to PornHub for a relaxing quickie.
Oh, and concerning equal pay, in a world where every other job type available sees women paid less, I'm happy to leave them the high ground on this one.
We've been doing that forever. Intel would trot out a new CPU that was blazingly fast, then Microsoft would trot out a new Windows that ate all that performance and then some.
Every time a new, much more powerful video card came out, you could be sure that there was a game that would bring it to its knees gasping.
Let's face it : we've only just arrived at a time when low-end models are good enough for everyday, home office stuff. That in itself is quite something, and handily explains why people are not buying so many laptops and PCs any more - they don't feel the need, what they've got works well enough.
Even though hardware is nowhere near as expensive as it used to be, a hardware upgrade is nowhere near bringing the same impression of increased power we used to have either. It used to be a thrill to put €850 in a new video card because wow, look at how much better my games run. These days I see new €1000 cards or CPUs and think : why bother ? For the 5% increase I'll get in performance, it's just not worth it.
"by 2030, NOBODY in developed world markets (and some more advanced "emerging markets") will be buying petrol or diesel cars"
That the UK government announces plans is hardly significant. They plan to have a working border system in time for Brexit, but there isn't a soul who thinks that's actually going to happen.
I concur that ICE vehicles are on the outgoing path, but 2030 is way to early to replace all the gas stations with electric chargers, not to mention have the electrical power production in place to ensure that the rolling guzzlers will all be recharged without fuss or incident.
I would think 2080 a more realistic tipover point.
And I still haven't read about how ecological all those batteries will be.
Downplayed ? The very title uses "nuked", "phoned" and "China". That feels pretty in-the-face to me and not downplayed at all.
It also clearly states that the app was the 4th highest grossing, which makes the whole thing rather on the important side. I agree that the number of downloads is indeed missing, but if your app is in the top ten money-makers, we're not talking thousands, that's for sure.
“Further, internet voting should not be used in the future until and unless very robust guarantees of security and verifiability are developed and in place, as no known technology guarantees the secrecy, security, and verifiability of a marked ballot transmitted over the internet.”
Finally an official voice of reason. I have been watching US elections with complete disbelief ever since the Diebold fiasco. It is high time a very big broom clears out all the cobwebs in that area, and this just might be the herald of its arrival. Maybe.
Now to see how interested parties will organize the resistance.
Seems it also cuts accuracy by 90%.
Also, don't you just love when government-level info is sent abroad without any control or authorization ?
With all the talk about encryption backdoors and NSA surveillance, you'd think they'd at least keep the data within their own borders.
If a certain kind of company is most likely to produce bad behavior, why does the administration not spend more attention to the people behind the application ?
A company does not just fold, there's a director with a name and an address. Should that name show up again, an alert should show up. I don't know how the system works, but reading this article I'm under the impression that there's a group of miscreants who regularly fold a company to make another one further away. It's almost certainly more complicated than that, but how is it that all those computers we have these days cannot weed out the chaff and signal when a given name is once again applying to set up the same kind of company ?
Surely there's a limit to the number of brothers, cousins and uncles that can be used as patsies ?
For those who don't know, it's right here.
And, if you're still interested after that, please view the greatest, all-time best Muppet sketch here.
Ah, the Muppets. Good times.
P.S. : This one is a pretty good runner-up to the title of all-time greatest.