A limit to peoples' folly ?
Nah, it's just that the worm was being too picky, so it did not get exposure to enough idiots.
18911 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Apparently not, because all this ad stuff is going to happen when you create a new tab, not when you start FF.
I can't say I'm very bothered by it all. If I start a new tab it's because I'm going to type a URL to get somewhere, so I'll likely not pay any attention to any clutter below the URL bar.
The scientists have concluded, okay fine. But 780 thousand years since last reversal remains a long time, and a "preparation time" of 250 years means we could be at the start and have no way of knowing it.
Science is pretty good at determining what happened after the fact, but it sucks at forecasting anything outside orbital mechanics.
I'm glad that the scientific view is that a field reversal is not happening now, but I can't help thinking of volcano scientists who say that the mountain is fine, it won't blow tomorrow.
Yeah, well we'll see tomorrow, won't we ?
You're obviously not watching TV on the same bandwidth.
I've had an SFR line at almost 11Mbps for the past decade. No complaints on downloading or gaming, but as soon as TV was on, everything was hopeless. Not only did TV not work perfectly (image freezing for a second now and then), but downloads were hobbled and gaming was a nuisance.
it was such a nuisance that I reinstated our satellite dishes so I could keep my bandwidth for gaming.
Best idea I've ever had.
So true.
We do not have AI at this point in time. I grow tired of repeating that, but I will endure.
You want to know what AI is today ? Check out Google's own learning course.
You have statistical mathematics galore, but nowhere do you have Artificial Intelligence.
Nowhere is there a silicon mind ready to learn. There's just electronic transistors with calculation rules, and you make up the rules.
That is not AI.
Not by a long shot.
It is, however, largely enough to enslave us all in a world of targeted adverts every minute of the day..
"Not likely - that's why there is still 10% of traffic remaining after doing this - all catalogues, packages and signatures are still checked with Microsoft - its only the binary blobs that are cached."
Your faith in Microsoft is touching. Let me tell what is not likely : discovering a side-channel attack in a CPU caching process allowing to grab RAM data that should not have been available. It took 10 years, but the weakness was found.
That was not likely.
A Microsoft process distributing code to local network computers ? And you honestly think none of the computer wizards out there will find a way to subvert it ?
Excuse me if I do not share your enthusiasm for the security of Redmond code.
There's nothing Redmond won't do to help hackers take over its OS.
Now waiting for news that blackhats have found a 0-day and are plonking malware into the update system that gets distributed far and wide and auto-installed, courtesy of Microsoft's "bandwidth saving" measures.
Only when their fairy-tale comes back and smacks them in the teeth, which doesn't happen nearly often enough to ICANN.
In fact, I do believe that this is the very first time ICANN has taken anything in the teeth. So to see it happen so very publicly and without any of the usual "don't care, we decide it doesn't apply to us" attitude is indeed very satisfying.
Yeah, because having the most reliable and most powerful space launcher technology, which demonstrates a wide swath of technological and industrial expertise, counts for peanuts.
Go back to your Fox News now, everything will be all right.
Uh, tell that to the poor creatures it sucks into its beak with its horned tentacles.
It's not the loud that is the problem, apparently, it's the whistling.
I'd suggest adding another nozzle size, say 1.43 linguine, or 7.9 inches. Compared to the 0.9, 0.13, 0.18 and 0.27 linguine sizes, that should allow for rapid gas egress without whistling, I would hope.
Right. A company creates jobs in the US and Wall Street's first reaction is : punish it.
I don't like FaceBook either (far from), but you really should get your ducks in a line. You cannot complain about the level of unemployement and lack of jobs and simultaneously call for selling stock of US companies that create jobs.
Schizophrenic idiots.
Oh, so that explains why you're not churning out the chips, then ? You're not a chip-maker anymore, you're a data center. Is there any area of computing that is not turning into a vast excuse to slurp MY data ?
Oh well, there's AMD that's still a chip-maker. At least somebody is still doing what it is they're supposed to be doing.
Um, how can something be deployed if it isn't even set up ? Deploying does not just mean "copy to production server". It means configuring, testing that the config works in production, and activating in production.
"Big Cable is fiercely opposed but claiming it will follow net neutrality rules regardless and so there is no need for a new law"
Because Big Cable can be trusted to follow rules it doesn't like. Yeah. Bridge, anyone ?
If they're ready to follow the rules, they should welcome a law that states explicitely how they should follow it.
Pleading against a new law is simply saying "please leave us wiggle room to screw you without you being able to retaliate".
Glad to see AMD raking it in and provisioning for the future.
We all need a strong competitor to Intel, so as to keep everyone on their toes and prices fair.
And we need AMD to be able to push out a new architecture every now and then, to keep innovation from being dicatated by a single company.
AMD was first to have a Ghz processor, and that pushed Intel hard at the time. We need AMD to renew the experience in some way.
So good on AMD. Keep going.
Let's not jump to conclusions already.
Space is big. The Universe is complicated.
Yes, there is a new theory about how to explain the matter discrepancy and yes, I have myself a lot of misgivings about a form of matter that does not interact with anything yet still exerts a gravitational effect - not to mention that I would dearly prefer our Universe to not expand endlessly because I like seeing other galaxies.
But let's let the scientists hash it out before taking sides, shall we ?
go and create a proper encryption system.
You seriously think that ISO is going to accept a 2nd-rate anything simply because they refused a potential 1st-rate one ? You're thinking bureaucrat.
Think engineer. They're going to go and make another 1st-rate one, because Standards.
Really. Like trolls on Slashdot, then ?
First they get all their shiny toys stolen from under their noses, now they reveal themselves as the fucking trolls they are.
Well I do hope that this will long be remembered. Nothing proposed by the US should be approved for a very long time.
Don't forget : it takes time to build trust, but only an instant to lose it.
And you just lost, NSA.
Big time.
You can mix and change titles as much as you wish, the function of DBA and the function of Dev (Ops or not) are not going to change.
As either one of these functions is quite complex and requires specialization, it is a very rare person who can reliably pretend to be both, therefor each should listen to the other.
"The techies claim to have experienced a greater rate of accuracy using the game data to train their AI than relying entirely on the real-world stuff from CamVid."
Game data is obviously great for AI training. You have a virtual world created by a computer used as training grounds for another computer. Advantages ? No clutter, no useless noise, and faces are polygons with textures stretched on. No pimples, no puffiness under the eyes, no 5-o'clock beard. The only things shown are the things that have been calculated. No wonder it's easier for a statistical analysis machine (what we currently call AI) to recognize and classify.
Unfortunately, Real Life (TM) is messier than that. Granted, it may be advantageous to train a not-AI on such data before turning it loose on actual, real images, but there's also a chance that we are just fooling ourselves into thinking that we are making this work. It's the Hall of Mirrors effects for the Mentats of Dune.
Yet.
There is always a grace period after a purchase during which the buyer pretends to not want to touch anything, to reassure the paying customers - and give themselves time to find out how everything actually works.
Then, one day, out of the blue (once they have properly mapped the existing functionality) they will suddenly have a blinding flash of a brainstorm, and changes will be announced.
Always for good, obviously.
That right there is one of the hardest things to do. If you look at the history of humans, I'm sure that you will find many, many more instances of people covering up their goofs rather than admitting them and working on fixing the issue.
I think it is a case of misplaced pride. We act as if we are perfect, we strive to impose that image on people around us, and anything that might tar that image must be suppressed.
Before the Internet, you could maintain the illusion because nobody who didn't know you had any way of finding out. That time is over now. Maybe our species is going to learn ?