It would seem that this time the problem did not warrant a full-blown volcanic eruption.
Pity, I always enjoy the colors (from a safe distance).
19014 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Probably because of physical reality, such as position on screen and trivial difference in amount of current needed to draw one character instead of another.
For example, it is quite logical that drawing a T will light up more pixels than an I, and a W will require even more pixels, thus more power. A trifling more, granted, but measurable nontheless.
That must have been a harrowing experience indeed - especially given all the terrible things Hollywood has taught us can happen on a flight (engine fire, hydraulic system failure, etc).
I guess you cannot help but imagining all the possible horrors and wondering which one it is. Getting the call was probably the greatest relief, learning it was "just" the A/C was the cherry on top.
Nope.
I have no compassion for a marketing guy who invites a technical journal to an interview without bringing any functional items, instead bringing mock-ups, not being able to answer technical questions and then pretending to be hurt when the ensuing article is not written like a Vogue-magazine fanpiece.
Flaming idiot. And now he's Streisanded himself.
No sympathy.
A bit reassuring, really, what with the Republicans still blindly pretending to support Trump and the Democrats totally incapable of any action whatsoever, it is reassuring to see that there are still some people in high places who are actually interested in pretending to work for US interests and not for their own.
Caveat : I do not know those senators and have no idea whose campaign funds they are defending.
A Technical Manager says they're done rewriting Office 365 in Javascript.
A Spokesperson says they're not rewriting office 365 in Javascript.
Given that the spokesperson is spouting the bullshit he's told to, my vote goes to the rewriting of Office 365 in Javascript.
Now the question is : is that supposed to be a good thing ?
There will be a brand new company soon available to replace Capita's dismal record. It will be named Atipac, and will offer true professionals and brand new management*, but all people will have at least 20 years of experience in government contracts.
Atipac : your new guarantee of success.
* any resemblance to Capita employees is purely coincidentail
Managers who have people working more than 60 hours per week are not doing their job.
A manager's job is to manage resources, not exhaust them. If your employees are working overtime all the time, it is on you to realize that you need more resources - else you will find yourself with a global revolt at some point and some, or most, of your resources will walk to other pastures.
And recreating a group is always an impossible task.
Somehow, that is not part of the MBA curriculum.
Pity.
I propose this scenario :
An internal IT jockey has a project and needs to test some functionaity. He goes to his boss and gets approval for a bucket. He loads demo data on it, nothing important or critical, no customer data. Security is not important, testing functionality is, so he keeps his life simple and doesn't lock anything down.
He does his tests, bugs out and leaves the bucket for another round of testing later on.
Meanwhile, pentesters happen upon the bucket, alert the meadia, articles screaming bloody murder are written, and the IT guy quietly activates security on the bucket thinking "bloody hell, what a lot of hot air for nothing".
At this point, I think whatever it is it has been integrated into the atmospheric control of the building. The vast majority of the employees are inhaling it without even knowing - or have forgotten that they are.
There is only one who is responsible for all this : the one who keeps pouring it into the A/C vats. Marby, is that you ?
People don't like because it pretty much destroyed their acquired keyboard shortcuts habit which allowed them to breeze through complex operations that they were used to doing.
Especially in Excel and probably Word as well.
The main issue with the Ribbon is that MS didn't bother providing it as an option and keeping the menu interface (and proper kb shortcuts) for those who were used to it. No, you had to change your ways.
For professionals who actually want to work with the products, it was quite frustrating and painful.
Here's a novel idea : put the name of the candidates each on a piece of paper. Have the voters go into a privacy stall to put the paper of their choice into an envelope. Then have them go to a box, controlled by a voting committee member, and under the watch of the controller, place their envelope in the box.
They will have voted, the votes can be tallied, there is a paper trail, and fucking with the system is way, way harder than a stupid half-witted computer litterally made to be hacked.
But why make it simple when you can complexify things ?
A very interesting remark that puts things in perspective in a useful manner.
Space is very often awesome and mind-boggling given the size of the objects we look at and their distance. It's something that, I think, tends to numb the mind a bit.
So yeah, a reading on a magnetic field that is 50k times less powerful than a fridge magnet, from this distance ? That's hardly shabby, that's simply incredible and a wonderful indication of Humanity's technological level.
Now, where's my flying car again ? <ducks>
Same here. I've set up a special account for that kind of situation : spam@mydomain.net
I use that in response to any question and for online subscriptions that I do not intend to follow but have to sign up to get what I'm looking for.
Needless to say : all mail going into that account is immediately trashed.
I simply cannot fathom what kind of Neanderthal-level moron thinks it's a good idea to send a pic of the ugliest part of his anatomy to a woman he has never met (and will doubtless never meet after that). I'm as fond of my little sergeant as anyone else is fond of theirs, but that's the last thing you want to introduce yourself with to any woman.
I can very well imagine a woman's reaction to getting such a pic : burn it with fire and ban the offending sender from ever contacting her again.
Sure, there are certainly a portion of dating site subscribers that are there only to find a one-night stand, but even then, if your only game is grunting, you won't be scoring much I would think.
Oooh what a threat that is. How's he gonna do that ? A website called IsHeHotOrNot ? With article links so people can go read (ha!) and then judge ?
Sorry buddy, if it's not a 5 minute YouTube clip, you have no chance.
Besides, even if that does happen, the obvious response is a website called IsMuskHotOrNot, with every singe Tesla failure called for vote.
You don't look on stable terrain there, Elon.
The fact that they are all women should not be enough to validate a class action.
Besides, more than 8,000 checks sounds like a lot of payout hassle for a poor lawyer. Methinks a "cy pres" is in order here, no ? I'm there's at least two Universities that would gladly devote their bank accounts to holding that money in the "rare" case someone actually comes to claim it.
Right ?
Well, in all honesty, there may be no more IPv4 addresses to give out, but the ones that ISPs already have are not going to wear out, now are they ?
I think that, the troubles that IPv6 impose, plus the simple rule of if it's not broken, don't fix it, explain why IPv6 uptake is not the star-studded cakewalk some engineers thought it would be.
Really ? FB cannot afford further doubt ?
Because I'm still waiting for news of the mass exodus and shutting down of accounts that has been promised everywhere and, as long as that hasn't happened, I fail to see what FB is mortally in danger of.
This is just more of the same ; FB cocks up, nobody moves, the world keeps turning, El Zuck keeps raking in the dough.
If other business meetings are not an entrapment attempt, it may just be because other business meetings are between normally dishonest business people doing normally dishonest business and not between some shady person in search of scum to do even more shady stuff.
Coming from the guy who vouched to provide prostitutes to ruin people's reputations, I find this remark particularly rich.
What about routing around failures ? The Internet is supposed to remain flexible, there is no single path from source to destination because if there were, a connection failure along the line would mean packets don't arrive any more at all.
How do they take that into account ?
There's already a solution to that, it's called a movement detector. Place it near your light looking down and the overgrowth will not keep it from detecting you and turning on the light.
Why people absolutely have to go with the least secure bit of shiny instead of using proven tech that is safe is beyond me.