Re: Oh, come on now!
And there was a mirror. No harm done.
Instead of a virtual private server, I really would prefer that he have it hosted with a proper provider. One that has redundancy and guarantees on uptime. But yeah, that costs money.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That's interesting. Now tell me exactly how is it that "staff" not thinking it needs approval equates to "Accounting" actually paying money.
Are we talking Government here, or are we talking the corner coffee shop ? Isn't there supposed to be some fucking officer in charge of authorizing spending ?
Yeah. I especially like this one :
Q. How much money will VMware save through this activity?
A. This decision will help to streamline business processes, advance innovation, and deliver better results for the company.
Note how the answer absolutely does not answer the question.
Translation : we're all fucked for the duration. Microsoft is going to have years of faulty patch releases due to this, and everyone else is going to have to submit to regular panic attacks every now and then following just how well the media is going to do its follow-up on this subject.
I really would like to think that retirement would get me out of the panic zone, but it seems that even a bear pit won't be enough now.
Sorry, but i disagree. We're talking corporate user, meaning someone who has the backing of an IT department which is supposed to have done its job learning what kind of kit it purchased.
This has nothing to do with Joe User who doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hell of understanding what is going on. This is corporate stuff, and corporations are not supposed to be stupid enough to leave admin passwords unchanged.
Sounds a bit bitter, but realistic.
Especially in a world where all the marketing hype surfs on an undercurrent of slurping every detail they can find out about you and selling it off to any bidder.
That said, we're all adults here (allegedly), so could we please stop with the auto-censoring ? If you want to say shit, say it.
Ah, share price, that's your fall-back argument ? The disappearance of Windows Phone means nothing to you, then ? Cortana shutting down is of no consequence ? Sure.
As for server share, you obviously haven't got a clue.
Keep drinking the Kool-Aid. A numb mind is a pleasant thing.
"That idea’s fuelled by Redmond’s belief that in a hybrid cloud world there’s every chance you’ll wrangle Windows or Linux servers from a Mac or penguin-powered machines. Or even a Windows PC."
I remember a time when Microsoft refused to even consider that there was anything but Windows. A time when it actively tried to thwart Linux from booting. A time when it crippled it's own Office if it wasn't running on a Windows platform. It was the Microsoft Way, or the highway.
It seems that the continuous string of investment failures has finally bowed the head. Yes Microsoft, you're right ; there is every chance that cloud servers will be administered from something other than a Windows PC and, as time goes by, there is more and more chance that the server won't be Windows either.
Agreed on most counts, except for one thing : it's white males that are at the origin of treating people like shit.
So I'm really sorry, but I just can't drum up sympathy for white males who today feel discriminated against in the whitest industry on the planet.
It's all about simplifying The Message. What you're actually doing is irrelevant because the clueless will never check anyway and, even if they are told, will either refuse to believe or not care anyway.
That is why we now live in a civilization where what someone says is more important than what someone does.
What seems ridiculous to me is that the Feds have seized 8000 phones and have no other clue as to the culpability of the suspects.
Do your job : gather suspicions, follow the suspects, inquire about their lives, and THEN swoop in with reasonable cause and gather all the rest.
If you have nothing but the phones to go on, you're not doing your job and you have no right to complain about it.
No backdoor access for the lazy.
Managing a country where corruption is rampant is a very messy and frustrating job. Those officials who profited by selling access are holding their country back from proper progress in the name of personal gain - while their situation is likely far from being worthy of pity.
I wish the Indians the best of luck in clearing that up and creating a generation of officials who actually abide by the rules and understand that they are the guardians of their country's progress.
And here we go again. This brave new world in the making obviously considers that everyone wants to sync everything and show it to everyone by default and, to do so, Microsoft is one more in the long line of application writers that wants to store all your data "to better serve your interests".
Timeline. Hmm, where did I already hear about that ? Oh, right, Facebook. That thing that is platform-independent. And not everyone was happy with it at the time.
So, Microsoft, with Meltdown and co on the loose, you want to implement a server-held repository of everything a user does and push it out on whatever thing the user is using at the moment. Brilliant. No security concern there, for sure. No privacy concern either, right ? But, it's nothing important, you say ?
Then why do it ?
You are going to include a shutoff key for that, right ? And not make it on by default ? Yeah, right. And I'm winning the lottery tonight.
It is perfectly reasonable for Facebook to want to keep mum about what it learned and why it is shutting M down. I do think that Facebook did indeed learn quite a lot from the experience and will leverage that in some way in the future.
Probably for yet another privacy-invading functionality that will unfortunately work a lot better than if they hadn't had this trial run.
But Facebook is under no obligation to answer all the questions and go public on anything. For a company dedicated to dragging everyone's life out into the open, Facebook sure knows the importance of keeping its own secrets.
I don't care who it is, this is simply not acceptable, ever.
Computer security is hard enough. We just discovered a vulnerability in a raft of CPUs that dates back more than a decade and nobody had a clue.
So we definitely don't need people putting in barn doors that can't be closed.
Agreed, they do have one. It is fully booked and not ready for another design at this point. They would be daft to stop what they are currently producing there just to try piss off Intel, not to mention the contractual obligations that almost certainly prevent that.
That's why I said they need to have made another one.
It really is fascinating to realize that we have people intelligent enough to not only describe mathematically what happens when black holes collide, but set up instrumentation to detect it.
That said, sooner or later this grav wave detection unit is going to detect something they didn't expect. Given that it concerns black holes, how are they going to pinpoint the location of the event since, by definition, they didn't see that a collision was going to take place ?
It seems to me the government is doing a fine job on that by itself.
Congratulations for finding yet another way to remove the responsibility of education from the parents. That will not in any way come back to bite you later, oh no.
The nanny society forges boldly ahead . . .
I mean, it has Security right in the name, right ?
Seems like the Paranoid Department isn't paranoid enough. Of course, it's tiring to be paranoid all the time, especially when it's your 9 to 5 day job. Seems that some of these guys are just in it for the paycheck now.
From the article you linked, there is a reference to the heads that indicates that read/write heads are 0.3 mm wide.
That's already damn small.
Logically speaking, you might be able to get the read/write portion of the head down to a tenth of that size, but you still have the arm that carries it - and that thing will remain a lot bigger because of the physical constraints.
Looking at the linked list, I remark that it took Valencia, Spain a mere year to migrate 120000 PCs from Windows to Linux. Munich strolled into a full 10 years for their paltry number, and now we learn that their IT can't cope and they want to go back ?
German efficiency isn't looking good in this picture. If they can't cope on one platform, I don't see how it will be better on another. Changing cars is useless if you can't drive.
But I'm guessing that's not the real problem. It's influence. There's obviously a strong pro-Windows faction in Munich and they've been real busy making a nuisance of themselves since the beginning of the migration. Looks like they've worn down the resistance and are going to get their revenge. All that at the citizen's cost, of course. With all the other administrations and entities that have successfully made the switch to Linux, Munich can hardly pretend that Linux is not suitable for them.
Maybe they hired a person with integrity when they needed a scumbag who would cover the lies ?
Really, that much movement at the top seems to indicate that there is a major issue at hand that the founder is intent on covering up. What that issue could be, I have no idea.
But something stinks.
Here I was, all happy with my i7 6700 that has served me well for the past two years, and now I learn that I'm basically going to have to replace the hardware if I want to stay secure and have good performance. What a nuisance.
Another round of Windows reinstall, with another fracking call to Redmond to justify that I am indeed the owner of this shit. I hate the idea already.
Ah, the day games are made for Linux first . . .
While I'm overjoyed at the idea, I believe that, all too soon, we'll see things like : "if you want this laptop, agree to this".
Either that or your express consent will be engineered around a popup with OK/Cancel buttons only. We all know users are trained to click on OK.