The numbers don't matter. What is significant is that she was the top performer.
And, as far as loose change is concerned, without people like her Oracle will soon be desperately looking for such loose change just to stay out of the red.
19252 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
She was the best-performing salesperson and she's the one they sacked.
That in itself demonstrates how wrong Oracle manglement is about handling situations correctly.
I just don't get it. If I had a problem with sales, I'd be asking the best performers to coach the other guys, not antagonizing them. That's probably why I am not head of a multi-billion dollar company : I'm not enough of an asshole.
Nothing to do with the internet, it's on mobile phones.
I do not need to wade through Siri/Alexa/Google shit to get to the internet on my computer. As for my phone, it's a model that does not support any of that shit either, so I'm good.
That said, there is a definite tendency for multi-billion dollar companies to act as if the internet existed only to support their marketing whims, I do agree.
If any other vendor in history demonstrated such incompetence in coding, they would file for Chapter 11 in less than two years.
MS, coasting on a literal mountain of cash, just keeps fucking up and cannot fix things any more.
I wonder how much worse the situation will get, because let's face it, nobody's going to switch to Linux because of this.
Absolutely agree. This situation has been enabled by the total lack of oversight from government management. In any proper company, whether you outsource or not, you have a list of your sytems, who has access to them and IT must have a list of all servers and the admin credentials to them.
Not having that list is just complete and utter incompetence.
And what happens to those who post those images ? Doesn't Twitter have a duty to report that to the FBI, so that Agent Smith can go and have a nice little chat with the bottom-scum pond-dweller who thought it was a good idea ?
Bah, kids these days. They never know how to finish a job.
Um, maybe you guys should have studied the specifications better before implementing such a shitty idea ? Since when do you give access-level granting abilities to people who are not at least moderator ?
Try as I may, I cannot remember a single forum I have ever visited where anyone but the forum owner could grant access to anyone. They might have tried looking into that before deciding that anyone could change anyone's access.
That is the most brain-dead decision I have ever read about in managing access to something.
And now they're redefining the notion of ethics.
Well, here's the thing : the public at large doesn't care about how the word AI is bandied about, it makes no difference to them. That public will, however, care about how their personal data is (ab)used, especially when those who know are educating the rest about the risks.
Not to mention the banking sector which has done a fine job in 2018 to educate its customers on the risks of surrendering too much data to people who are not worthy of having it.
Privacy is theft ? That's where they want us to go ? Well then call me Lupin. Arsène Lupin.
Easy to use, free for low usage levels (like mine), and it has published a security audit from an independant company.
It's good enough for me.
I propose that El Reg officially names Office 3xx for the number of days it can still remain online. So, on January 1st, it is Office 365. If it falls over for a day somewhere during February, it becomes Office 364.
Feel free to dole out decimals for hour outages, but where it falls over doesn't matter (ie if it is only the European users that cannot access, it still counts in the global number).
Legislation always has a point - for those who are subject to it.
Before the Internet, this kind of thing would not happen but now, legislation stops at the borders while access is world-wide.
So you need to have agreements with the countries so that they implement something similar to your legislation - except it's another country, so it's their decision.
That is what is making the current situation very complicated and frustrating. It remains to be seen how long this will remain acceptable to the public before a global push to stop tracking starts up.
I'm guessing I won't see it in my lifetime.
If you click the link, you are at risk of being hacked because you have no idea what server you're being directed to or what code the miscreants have prepared for your visit.
If you click the link, you've failed to protect yourself and others on your network.
If you just open the mail, you should be good if your client does not auto-execute code willy-nilly (meaning if you use Outlook you're likely screwed), but if you go and click the link, your machine is good for a reinstall.
"And predicting a world class chess player’s next move definitely is at least as difficult as predicting a cybercriminal’s next move"
Even if you consider the world's most awesome chess player, he still only has an 8 x 8 board and 16 pieces, most of which only have one kind of movement.
Equating that with predicting what a cybercriminal might think of, when Windows 1 0 can't even get its own patches right, is just bullshit of the most blatant level.
Predicting what a cybercriminal might do can only happen if you know all the stuff he might try. And given that the blackhats are continually educating multi-billion dollar companies on what their vulnerabilities are, your predictions are about as useful as yesterday's horoscope.
We have set aside 6 imperfect measurement units and now rely on 5 very expensive locations for a perfectly precise result.
We may have gained in precision, but we've lost in numbers. I don't know how expensive one of those balances are, but I'm pretty sure we're not going to be building a whole lot more in any case. What else can a Kibble balance be good for ?
We have facial recognition ? That is 100% reliable ? I think not. They are endlessly trying to make it work in airports, but we're not there yet.
Eye evaluation ? Do you work in a Level 4 bio lab ? Has anyone ever seen those outside of Hollywood films ? In theory they're great. In practice, they're nowhere.
Multiple other biometric mechanisms ? Really ? Which ones are actually used in your fictional universe ?
Please do realize that you are taking your documentation from the Science-Fiction section of the library.
I found that that movie was a gripping tale, relentlessly holding my attention from start to (not really feasible) end.
As far as demonstrating the threat of debris, it was a resounding success.
As far as demonstrating the reality of getting from the ISS to whatever that other place was, yeah, that was pure Hollywood drivel.
But the debris storm ? Perfectly realistic.
Um, they're observing them.
So : ZERO.
Your mistrust of the US government, I applaud. Do not extend it to the scientists. They don't give a fuck about what drivel comes out of the White House, and I'm willing to bet that there's only a infinitesimal fraction (that's the scientific way of saying NOBODY) who would jeopardize their credibility to toe the Orange Carrot's line.
The men and women who are tracking these orbital threats have the safety of the ISS astronauts as first and only priority. All other priorities are rescinded. They will not sell their souls for White House-imposed views.
Why on God's green Earth do you need ANY detail about the person wearing the tracker ?
The only thing you need is the ID of the device. The people who bought the device are the only ones who need to know who is wearing it.
If the kid gets lost, they can give the ID of the device to the cops. There is ZERO need to have ANY personal details associated with the device.
Please excuse the caps but my GOD that is making me angry.
Well, yes, and no.
Let me be clear : I hate FaceBook.
That said, I do remember UseNet as a rather motely collection of trolls. Slashdot is still online and oh my God is it full of shit. It is nothing new, it's in human nature.
So, objectively speaking, The Zuck is (yech) right. This is not a problem that has an easy solution. Certainly not a technical one.
The only proper solution is constant vigilance. That costs money and requires long-term focus. If The Zuck is honestly committed to this long-term effort, then I don't think we can ask for more.
I'm still waiting to see that commitment have any effect.
Won't be holding my breath.
Wow, them's fightin' words. The Zuck must be tremblin' in his boots.
Guys, how much are you worth already ? Put together ? Right.
And what can you do against him, exactly ? Right.
Let me spell it out for you : until you make refusing or evading an international committee "invitation" illegal and place it under the purview of an international warrant, he's got zero incentive to waste his time with you.
Why ? This is space, there is no aether to decelerate the probe. The probe will continue at its speed, and the sail, being pushed by the laser, will accelerate further and go faster than the probe.
But the probe has no reason to slow down simply because it detached from its sail.
The only way for the probe to slow down is to have a mass drive of some sort that exerts the necessary pressure in the right direction to slow it down.