So they were hacked
C'mon, guys, just admit it and we can throw you a "Welcome to the Club !" party.
19553 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
It requires a coder. Someone with experience who will understand what you are asking, what the caveats are, and how to implement it on your choice of platform.
In any case, you went from "Wow, this is great ! I'm a coder !" to "Jesus, this thing is shit and I don't trust it" in record time.
And you paid for the privilege.
Yup.
1984, Brazil, and other works (of perfectly valid content and justifiable intentions) were all based on the idea that it is Goverment that is the watchful eye responsible for a dystopian future.
Then along came Facebook and it's been a downhill ride ever since.
I'm rather happy that George Orwell is already dead, because he would certainly have a heart attack if he saw what our "modern" civilization has become.
No. You regret getting caught.
There was no confusion. There was you slipping in a bit of text written by a highly-paid besuited Porsche-driving lawyer to ensure that, in the future, all of your options were open and available.
Unfortunately, it would appear that there are people who actually bother to take the time to read those coma-inducing piles of legalese (no, it's not English, it's its own language) and who have enough knowledge themselves to decrypt and unravel the truth behind the waffling.
And it would appear that, this time, they are not your friends.
Who knew ?
On this you are perfectly right.
Huawei got crucified because it was Chinese. No proof, no demonstration of vulnerability, just chanting over and over again "Huawei must obey Beijing. It's a threat to our security !"
Well, Cisco must obey Washington, but I don't hear anybody complaining. And Cisco is apparently a very real threat to our security.
Unfortunately, business and infrastructure do not learn until something blows up in their face.
Infrastructure has been warned repeatedly and continuously for the past 25 years. It hasn't changed anything, apparently.
As for business, what to say ? I guess it costs less to get hacked than it does to have competent people doing their job. That's a Board-level decision and, if they're happy with the consequences, I don't care more than they do.
Your reply sparked a thought and I tried doing some research.
I found this, and I thought I should share.
People can, and sometimes do, kill. No question there. The circumstances matter, though.
If I find someone raping my daughter or my wife, he had better pray that the police are not far because I will slaughter him with the nearest sharp or blunt object I can get my hands on.
If you attack me with the clear intent of ending my life (for whatever reason), and I have a gun at hand, I will defend myself and shoot you. If I don't have a gun, I will fight for my life and if you die, well, you started it.
If you tell me that thousands of invaders are coming, give me an assault rifle and a handful of mags, and ask me to defend my fellow citizens, I do believe I will try to make every bullet count.
But if you hand me that gun and mags, ship me off to a place I've never been before and might not even have ever heard of, and then order me to go kill some people I don't know and never will for some reason that has nothing to do with me, I'm not convinced that I will become Rambo and go kill everything that moves.
Whether or not this claim is valid, it does indicate that future warfare is not going to content itself with only what is happening on the front lines.
If Napoleon failed to conquer Russia with his Great Army, if Hitler failed to even get to Moscow, if the Japanese failed to hold their conquests in the Pacific during WWII, it all boils down to supply.
I don't remember the exact figures, but I seem to remember that, in WWII, for every US soldier sent into battle, there were 100 people working 24/7 to get him his ammo, food, gear and whatever else he needed.
Napoleon said an army marches with its stomach. That may have been enough back in the day, but today's modern armies need way more than just food.
And successfully hindering any part of that supply line could make quite a difference in the final outcome.
And be a good little boy and play nice. For fuck's sake, I can understand that Marketing believes this bullshit but how in the world can anyone with functioning neurons swallow this and actually believe it ?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
Stop pretending. Wake the fuck up.
Or do I have to drop in the Board meetings with a cluebat ? Because I'm starting to think I do, and I'm starting to kinda want to do it.
Indeed. And the AMD Thunderbird was the first sign that Intel was on its way to the old people's home.
AMD fought tooth and nail to climb and gain recognition, while Intel puttered about. Sure, in the 90s Intel was the king, no question there. But when AMD was first to have a Ghz CPU, Intel should have seen the writing on the wall.
It didn't.
As usual, it's the employees that will pay the big price, while the Board and management will retain their high salaries and bonuses and get hired elsewhere with similar paychecks.
Yet, it is not the employees who failed.
And, pray tell, why is that not happening ?
Does Google not have enough computing power to make its portal secure ? Does it not have enough money for that ?
It doesn't give a flying fuck is the problem.
<old man ranting mode ON>Once upon a time, we didn't have the luxury of downloading updates. We had to wait for the next month's magazine CD to deliver an update to us (if we were lucky). Magazine that we had to pedal uphill to get, and we had to pedal uphill to go back home and install it. That's why our programs worked, because they had to.<old man ranting mode forgotten being ON>.
Mumble, mumble, kids these days . . .
"The FBI covers more ground than the NCA. Unlike its UK cousins, the feds are tasked with investigating crimes such as murders and armed robberies, and it also leads on counter-terrorism, none of which fall under the NCA's remit. "
So, the argument the NCA is advancing is that the FBI has to cover more territory, more types of crime and also follow leads on counter-terrorism, so their numbers are better.
Let's turn that around, shall we ? The NCA has one thing to look at in a comparatively puny part of the world and it is still three times less efficient than the FBI.
I don't see that argument making you look good, NCA.
Ah, don't you just love it when cheaters and criminals drape themselves in the trappings of law while absolutely not respecting the barest of its rules ?
Africa, the Cradle of Humanity, still hasn't got with the program. It's the 3rd Millenium BCE. You don't pretend to use Power of Attorney and have records mysteriously altered.
You Trump it, scream "Fake News !" and then wander the lawn aimlessly in front of the cameras while not answering any questions. Preferably with a helicopter revving up in the background.
Now, ICANN, I'm still waiting to find out what you do about mess, apart from fuming.
Yes, I do believe that that was the best thing he could do.
Betweeen the idiot hiring an ex-convict as company lawyer and the bitch getting her buddy (lover ?) to be paid for a Wordpress website hosting private data, that company was obviously a complete write-off and nothing good could have come from trying to actually make things work correctly.