"trying to get money out of its dying businesses and into emerging areas"
Wait, IBM has emerging areas ?
19505 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
You do not have production servers depend on unknown code.
Known code is code you have evaluated, reviewed and tested, and should be stored on a server you control.
When you are notified of an update, you evaluate the necessity of the update, review the new code if the update is necessary for you, and apply it to your test server only if you do intend to use it. There, you test it thoroughly and validate its merging with production code on servers you control.
This form of attack only works because everyone is abandoning their duty of care and just blindly trusting dozens of people they don't know to do things right. That's like hiring a cleaning lady and getting ten people shuffling around your house, doing things that are not necessarily related to cleaning. You'd have to be mad to accept that, but when it's code, you just can't be bothered (I know, might not have the time either - doesn't mean it's a good situation).
You can find that situation every day in the business world. As soon as you have a marketing guy overhearing a conversation at lunch or dinner and thinking of a way to benefit from it, there you go.
If that were illegal, there would be no business.
Besides, insider trading exclusively concerns the buying or selling of shares before some important news which will make the share price change in an important way. So it's only a Stock Market thing.
I suppose it's another brilliant MBA scheme. I'd love to see the discussion on that.
"Hey, we have all this power doing nothing, we could monetize it by supporting the power grid."
"Great idea, what happens if the grid goes down though ?"
"That virtually never happens, the grid has its own securities."
"Then why did we buy all those batteries in the first place ?"
From my point of view, those batteries are not just sitting there, they are poised to be available if the power grid goes down for any reason. That is their only job.
To give them another job is to ignore why they are in place and, in doing so, diminish their ability to respond to their primary duty.
But hey, I don't get a bonus either way, so have fun.
Good luck with that. For me and, I'm sure, a lot of other people, the situation is very clear : Trump wants to dominate China in every way he can, whatever the cost.
That Bloomberg went and destroyed its reputation to give Trump an excuse is shameful, but it has never been about National Security, that we all know because the allegations have never been proven. it would have been easy to post a picture of modified boards, but no, nothing has ever come to light. No picture, no expert testimony, no corroboration from international bodies, nothing. A big, fat nothing.
And that nothing proves that the "intelligence risks" of Huawei equipment are just about the same as the risks with Cisco equipment, so basically choose your poison and pray. The NSA will get access if it wants it anyway.
I get that microplastics are in the air - I just need to take a look at the sire of the road to know why. I get microplastics in seafood, that's also obvious. In fact, I'm comfortable with just about everything cited, except one : alcohol. How do microplastics get in there ?
I may be mistaken, but as far as I can see making alcohol involves metal (or wooden) vats, glass bottles and copper tubing. There is no plastic in any of that, so where does the microplastics in alcohol come from ?
Then you are incompetent. Either as an IT manager, or as a board member.
I cannot imagine any situation where business-critical data cannot be backed up. There are mirror servers, one-way synchronization, hell, I can't even begin to think of all the ways data can be put somewhere to be stored on tape or disk arrays.
I am sure of one thing : a proper IT administrator will have a backup of business-critical data, and know how to restore it. The only real issue is ensuring that the backup is not infected.
Although I do not like anything HP since last millennium and, as CEO Whitman is partly responsible for that, I have to admit that she does appear to keep her cool and stay in control in a courtroom.It may be that she's already had quite enough boardroom struggles to not get fazed by a court lawyer.
In any case, as a person, points to her.
"Your comment," said Miles to Whitman, "was 'happy to throw Leo under the bus in a tit-for-tat'."
Am I to understand that, since Whitman said something not very nice, Lynch is supposed to go free ? I cannot get how a court case cannot stay centered on facts relevant to the case, the case being Lynch falsifying Autonomy's figures.
That Whitman would be happy to throw Apotheker under a bus is perfectly normal. She shouldn't apologize about that, it is a normal human reaction.
And quite understandable as well. I'm not part of the board and I would happily throw that guy under a bus.
To me, it seems that the entire system was specifically created to be gamed - but only by those in charge.
Isn't it time that Nominet's status as a non-profit be put into question ? If you have a non-profit that hires an acquisition officer, then I think that non-profit has too much money for its own good.
The stupidities they can spout in order to make us think that their ten-minute brainstorming actually produced something meaningful.
Mathematically exact ? Really ? What maths did you use to get that conclusion ?
The only thing I see is a name entirely in lower case written with letters that aren't finished. Not impressed.
Um, given an $8.8 billion writedown, I would think that that is pretty much official already.
This is where we are going to be witness to the ugly side of upper management - the way they really are when not parading for PR or trying to impress.
Don't forget to bring the popcorn, but you might want to take an umbrella as well so as to avoid most of the stuff that will undoubtedly be flying in all directions.
I have a Philips WatchLine with Pixel Plus. To this day people who see the image on that screen still marvel at how good it looks. Yes, it is a beast that needs two grown men to move it, but I don't care as it doesn't move. It is getting old, though, and I am starting to think about looking around to see what my options are.
Cloud will not be one of them, and I am dead set on keeping "smart" out of my house as well. A TV is a dumb screen, anything with intelligence should be what is sending it the image to show. The only thing that irks me is the fact that all TVs with the best screens also drag in that effing "smart" stuff.
I guess I'll just have to make do with a truly dumb terminal screen, and forego all the bells and whistles.
Yeah, but that didn't actually work now did it ?
I don't know what it is you upgraded, and to what you upgraded to, but it seems to me that a redesign of your network is in order.
Like, putting a firewall between your network and all that juicy data you are hoarding for no good reason. Maybe add a proxy server and another firewall behind that, to ensure that only the proper computers - which have no Internet access - can access that data.
One more thing : maybe a decade after someone has left your University, you could consider not having that data accessible via the network ? In other words, archive it ?
If indeed the future is filled with wankers, then that means less 1st-worlders using much too many resources and polluting the world.
It also means that I look forward to seeing how that works when I'm 80 and so full of arthritis I can hardly move. Unless I'm still spry and agile, in which case it's the nurse who's going to wish I was full of arthritis.
Let's pity the nurse and hope I'll be full of arthritis.
No, what you have to explain is how is it that you have Fortune 500 clients and yet you have no copy of your data in another place than your hosting service.
I would hope that this will be a lesson to not put all your eggs in the same basket, always have a backup plan, etc, but I'm guessing that you'll stay just as stupid and leave your entire company in the hands of people you don't know until everything crashes on you a second time.
Then you'll be whinging that life is unfair. It will still be, ultimately, your fault.
Nah. What is more likely is that the USA is going to be replaced by another entity, say, the EU, who will guarantee academic freedom and foster intellectual endeavors.
As the US is stripping itself of all credibility in more and more domains, it will be shunned and ignored until nothing of importance happens behind its borders walls any more except school shootings.
When all international standards are managed in a proper international environment, the world will be a better place.
And at that point, if the USA doesn't want to comply with international standards, it can go twiddle its inbred sister in the trailer.
Well that's starting on a good foot. Ain't it a bummer to not be able to comb over those pesky financial details and just bang on about how you're spending money you don't have on acquiring things in other countries ?
You're in the army stock market now, you're Wall Street's bitch. If you're not sweating yet, you will be.
You will be.
Indeed, such impunity demonstrates a shameful lack of professionalism from the security team. You should have been set upon by dogs and a fully-armored SWAT team for having had the gumption to dig and bury things around such a National Security thing as an airport.
<sigh> What is the world coming to ?
I applaud and appreciate this new adventure on El Reg. Don't forget to bite, though.
I found your take on Kenshi interesting, and it sparked my interest. I went and checked my Steam account and found that I had classed it under Ignored at the time. Reading the game's summary in Steam, I see why : I'm already playing 7 Days to Die and nothing in the game's description told me that it was that much different from what I'm doing already.
But now I look at the game in a new light and I'm wondering. The fact that the game is not an MMO (you could have specified that, but it's okay) is a big plus in my book - I am sick of sharing my game time with griefers and other nuisances. I will pay more attention to this title now.
I disagree on one point : any acceptable solution must include a warrant approved by a judge whose decision will be recorded and subject to FOI requests.
It is useless to try and limit the amount of interceptions allowed - how can you ensure they will respect that ? They're already respecting nothing. Put a judge in charge and jail him if he gets too cosy with the spooks. With a public record of intercept warrants, we regain some control of the situation.
As far as manipulating the masses is concerned, I think they already have that part down pat. The people who control the media know exactly what to say and what not to say and when to maximize the effect.
That is why, whenever something really important happens that they have to talk about but would prefer avoiding, you get some really important sports event to talk about endlessly.
That is why they spouted sooo much nonsense about WMDs months before invading Iraq.
It's an endless game of manipulation, and the Internet is the only true counter-balance that we have. Which is ironic when you see just how much the Internet is used to manipulate as well.
In other words : we're fucked any way we turn.
I blame Hollywood, who has for the past decades made it look easy in every sci-fi flick they have made. From the impossible gestures in Minority Report to the abusively simple way voice commands are given in practically any film that uses them (thinking of the original Blade Runner right now - great scene, but still technically wrong), people have latched on to the idea that not using a keyboard/mouse interface is a good idea.
Well, we'll see how that pans out in the long run, but you'll take my mouse out of my cold, dead hands before I give it up.
A proper radio tuned to BBC Radio 4 would work a lot better, you never have to yell at it, and you can turn it on and off with a button. Oh, and it will never change functionality behind your back.
But why use something simple when you can go cutting-edge and make your life even madder than it already is ?
Agreed, but still : the checkout till does not mean you disrobe and get rogered in front of strangers and cameras.
You may be getting rogered, but it's not physical.
And I can smile and be polite and least try and take the edge off of her plight.
Finally, come on. You know that, when sex is involved, everything is different.
Not that I will proclaim being a fan, but I do believe that cartoon porn has one obvious advantage : no real women are abused to make it.
I've heard that there are pornstars that actually like their jobs. That's fine, to be sure, and better them than someone who hates herself for doing it, but my problem is that I have no clear indication of which ones hate themselves and which ones don't.
Sure, some of them smile more convincingly, but so does Melania.
"Another thing that Trump and his entourage doesn't get is that in the US the government has to obey the law, it is not the law"
I am absolutely thrilled to learn that. Now could you please explain why the law doesn't seem to be lifting the slightest little finger to bitch slap the orange monkey and force him to learn that ?
Because, up to now, it would seem that the waste of air that is occupying the Oval Office is the law, since the law is not slapping every one of his unlawful acts down. Some of them, when a judge can be bothered, but not all of them.
Fret not. Walmart is bringing in the heavy guns - this Kumar is solid gold (from a golden parachute point of view). He obviously has the high-level view that Fortune 100 CEOs adore so much.
Which obviously means that he has never been a boots-on-the-ground, hands-in-the-mud grunt, oh no, my dear chap. What we have here is the golden-braided horse captain coming in adorned with the glory of many previous campaigns who will, by his mere presence, solve all the issues.
At least, that's what he'll put on his CV when he leaves Walmart for some other high-profile, highly-paid situation. I'm sure he's also 100% buzzword-compliant.
"Google has said it will comply with the order by pulling access to Play Store and other services from future Huawei mobile hardware"
Um, aren't you forgetting something ? Like, the fact that it may be Huawei hardware, but the people who bought it are not necessarily in China, or even Chinese for that matter ?
Somehow I feel a lawsuit coming up for Google, based on the fact that US citizens had and have, right up to that August deadline, every right to buy Huawei, and Google has no right to refuse service to US citizens, if I am not mistaken, and I'm pretty sure that Google is going to catch some major flak if it tries that outside of the US.
I'm sure it's all nice and fuzzy to have a whipping boy, but you can't extend that whip to everyone who happens to be in the same room.
Yeah, about that : I used to set my location to France, and keep the US English language for the interface, because I prefer doing my computing in the language it was invented in.
The interesting side-effect of that is that all browsers today pay attention to my location and don't give a fig about my language choice : in other words when I go to IBM, Amazon or even on Google, and search for something - the results I get are in French, and that pisses me off.
Um, guys, my language is English. Get with the program.
And that will last right up to the second Microsoft decides to not tolerate that any more.
You have been bought. Microsoft owns you now. Do not make the mistake of believing that you are in control.
A decade ago, there was a bank director in Luxembourg that treated the majority shareholder like any other partner. Curiously, that person is no longer the director of that bank. Gee, I wonder why ?