"Micron can [PR bull] maximiz[ing] the benefits for [..] shareholders"
That there is the real reason, as usual : money, profit and shareholder ROI.
Customers are just the inconvenience that companies put up with to get money.
18239 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Yeah, case in point : where am I going to go to replace my NAS drives now ?
I don't have the money to put 4 3TB SSD drives in there, not at current prices.
I guess I'll just have to advance my plans to replace the 3TB drives I have now with 8TB drives sooner than later, and hope that they'll last until SSDs become a dime a dozen.
A pdf also requires a computer/device, the knowledge to install a PDF reader and the ability to use it.
If you're talking about printing then I don't care if you printed from a web page, a Word document or a PDf - it's printed and that's the end of the problem.
As long as the exams are done by sitting in front of a computer and divining which option is the least infeasable, certs are really only an excuse for the existence of an entire industry.
A real cert would be a panel of three experts grilling the candidate for twenty minutes, or, for more practical things, a misconfigured server to correct and put in working order. Or sit the programmer in front of a computer and give him two hours to pound out the code to solve a given problem, then review the code. Bonus points if the program compiles and actually works.
Obviously, that would rather limit the number of certified people and would kill the certification industry as it stands today. But the certification would actually mean something.
Notes haters gotta hate.
As a developer, I love the Notes environment. I can do everything ; use LScript, JavaScript, make webservices, design web-enabled applications... I even made an approval process for the Boss's iPhone which worked without processing anything on the phone side - all server-side processing. No add-ons needed !
I've written code to FTP data to mainframes, reformet CSV files for JIT server treatment, send webservice requests to the proper server for data processing - all without using anything other than the Notes Designer.
It is one hell of a powerful tool.
But the client ? Even I must admit that that thing is a dinosaur that the metor missed. It needs not a redesign, it needs to die in fire and be entirely replaced with something else.
But for development ? I can do anything.
I hope IBM will finally put some marketing muscle behind the next version.
It tells me two things :
1) the company is not using a CRM, does not have client/supplier account numbers on file and
2) nobody bats an eye when getting a mail telling them to wire money to account 0123456789, instead of "wire this amount to client/supplier XXXX using the already recorded IBAN we have"
They deserve everything they get.
That means that "incident response" is the headless chicken phase of the IT department panicking amongst calls from upper management to know what the hell is going on, preventing anything from actually being done.
Brilliant example of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.
Now maybe would the time to analyse proper network surveillance options and revise the security procedures ? Nah, just make noise about how security is at the heart of everything you do and lessons will be learned to prevent this from ever happening again until next time.
Tomorrow it'll be business as usual anyway, so why spend money that could go to CxO bonuses ?
"machine-learning technology could be used to suggest levels of classification, as well as automatically monitor and log records of who accessed files, where they were accessed, which systems were used to access the materials, if any changes were made, and whether that person really had a need to know the contents"
If I can accept that data analysis could suggest classification levels, you don't need pseudo-AI to log activity records, detect changes and flag inappropriate access. Those are things that we have been doing for decades already with normal code.
This is just more "AI" bullshit to make people think things are going to work better.
Why on Earth would I need an app for that ?
If I get a call and a machine is on the other side, I'm not waiting for a "do you need help with that ?" popup, I'm cutting the call as fast as I can get to the bloody button (when the fuck are we ever going to regain the satisfaction of slamming a receiver down ?).
Can "The Future" (TM) please stop with the diapers and the nannying ?
God am I looking forward to retirement and sending this whole technological shit to the toilet where it belongs. Give me a fiber connection, a house in the mountains surrounded by a bear pit (fully stocked with bears, of course) and paintball Gatlings on the first-story walkway with LAN target acquisition and remote firing and I will be in Heaven before my time.
The lack of them ? The lack ??
Because you think that Apple, Google, Microsoft and Uber are paying their fair share of tax ?
Get those four to pay proper taxes and you could practically double the salary of every teacher in the States. And give them proper equipement. And probably refurbish their schools.
Yep, the gentlemen's agreement of "we give you a prestigious email address for nothing and forward anything that comes in to whatever you want" is now coming to an end.
Just like the good old days of nobles riding into the Church on their horses is long gone.
Sorry guys, you had it good for a such a long time that you thought the rules were set in stone, but the truth is you used someone else's service, based your life around it and now that service is being yanked.
Great idea too, creating your website logins on a forwarded email. Like the website cared what your email was in the first place.
Despite all the IoT bullshit about managing your house from your phone (using someone else's server), the future looks squarely set to "you manage your own shit and if not, you takes your chances".
In this case, the chips are now down and the house is closing shop. I think the global message is clear : don't trust someone else's server.
I wonder how that could happen. I'm thinking insiders got them out and sold them off in each case. Or maybe a targeted phishing expedition got lucky.
In either case, big fail on certificate security on the part of the companies involved. Given we don't hear of this too often, I guess once in a while is somewhat unavoidable.
It's called the free market. You can't shout its virtues from the rooftops when they are in your favor only to complain and grumble when they are not.
That said, I'm all for competition but, realistically, given the sheer amount of money involved in that industry, you seriously cannot expect a large number of players to survive for very long.
We're not talking pizza parlors here.
I lived for four years in Boulder, Colorado for four years and they were the best four years of my childhood.
Right at the feet of the Rockies, you took the car and twenty minutes later you lost in the wilderness.
Gorgeous.
To this day, 40 years later I still love mountains.
And we didn't have no roaches.
I think it's less a case of "when ya gonna learn" and more a case of "when are your managers going to allocate the funds to get you out of that hellhole" - and the answer to some cases is replacing a MRI machine that cost millions with another one that costs millions.
I've got a hunch those bastards that made the nasty are going to make WannaCry look like a walk in the park.
To think that he is apparently a Distinguished Service Scroll Winner and got honors at a law school.
Looks like he was just pond scum looking to gain shark status.
Failure across the board, I say.
Well yeah, getting buried is indeed a "structural change".
Once again pie-in-the-sky manglement ruins a good idea and skips the ship before getting wet, letting all the deck hands drown without even throwing them a lifeline.
I hope the CxOs will find themselves at the short end of a heavy, court-imposed fine to get those ex-employees their due.
Sorry, Mark 85, but you are wrong - although not entirely. As you can see here, the US has signed all four protocols, but only ratified two, the first and the last.
I don't exactly know what impact that has, but it must be significant.
As for China, it has signed and ratified the first three protocols, but not the last.
We might not have a SyFy movie yet, but we have a SciShow clip where Hank explains how it works.
Given the similarities in the information from the clip and this article, seems to me that they likely were based on the same reference material. I don't know who's at El Reg's Science Desk, but that is a job well done.
This article is proof that what is currently called AI is nothing but statistics applied to vast amounts of data.
Yes, I am positively convinced that data mining can and does bring surprising insights into what the data contains.
Nontheless, we're not asking a server "Find me the fraudulent claims". We are fine-tuning a statistical analysis tool to get the result.
A far cry from AI.
I do not see that it should be a regulatory issue that banks have proper procedures and backups in place. If they don't, they pay the costs and if they pay too much, they end up dying.
Sure, there will be a bit of a mess, but in the worst case customers will take their government-guaranteed money elsewhere and that will be that. To Big To Fail is overrated.
What I would like to see is subprimes completely forbidden and no way to recreate them. What I would like to see is a bank that manages my money honestly and doesn't try every single dirty trick to make more money at all costs.
But hey, I'd also like to win the lottery. I know where my chances are better.
They're fiddling the books, storing stuff locally and playing with metadata workarounds.
There's only one true way to stream faster : use a bigger pipe (and make sure the backend can use that increase in bandwidth properly).
Well, the prevailing tradition is that they stop everything in a room by cutting off all electricity that goes in (except for the lights).
Now, if you've found big red buttons marked STOP next to the door of a server room that didn't stop everything but the lights, then indeed you've found some sneaky ones.
As to "very few have been pushed", well <grin>, we've got loads of stories here that prove you wrong ):-D.
So my email user name is associated to my public key. Well my real name is associated to my phone number and that's not something that is going to change, right ?
Let's not get distracted here. There's enough to do to secure our private lives already without going off on wild goose chases like this.
Education is indeed the answer and I do not view that education is relative.
Education is teaching a person that things need to be viewed with a critical mind, that people are not to be feared simply because they do not have the same color or culture that you are used to, that diversity is the richness of the human race and that stupidity and greed have no color.
Education is the incessant treadmill of treacle-like progress toward that goal, with all the insufficient budgets and systemic failures due to political cowardice and expedience. Aside from the fact that we know very well how to teach people to read and write, but we still haven't a procedure to teach people how to think independantly - mainly because every government prefers blind obedience.
Well, as long as you do your work on a phone or tablet, I guess you're right.
But as far as working on company applications are concerned, we're still squarely a Windows PC world. I've been consulting for companies for a quarter of a century and I have never seen a Linux workstation anywhere. I have spotted a few Linux servers, here and there, but zero workstations. I have also seen a few Apple PCs, mainly in web development.
But the bulk of them are Windows PCs.
And that will stay that way until the *Nix generation becomes Head of IT and/or CEO. Only then will we see the possibility of a switch, because these guys and gals will look at licensing fees for Windows and Office, the backlog of Helpdesk issues and the nightmare of legacy crap still being dragged along and they will choke on their coffee before chucking the whole mess out.
But before that ? Not a chance.
Right, because there is a tunnel in the White House that the Secret Service doesn't know about/hasn't bugged and rigged full of detectors nor have a pair of Marines posted at either end.
I'm all for suspension of belief, but it has to be at least plausible. Give me a traffic jam and a sudden, inspired escape, and I'll go along because, even if dubious, it just might happen.
But a secret tunnel, unknown to an organisation who has been in charge of the White House for almost as long as there have been Presidents ? And this one new guy who has only been there for, at best, three to seven years, knows about it ?
Well that just about sums it up : I'll keep on reading Tom Clancy novels. When he pulls a Deus Ex Machina out of thin air, he's good enough to at least dress it up properly.
You'd better not just consider it !
I hope that there will be a massive move against this, to send a strong sign that we the public no longer tolerate this kind of gratuitious data-hoovering, but I doubt it. Tomorrow will likely be business as usual, right Talk Talk ?