God bless the Dutch
And blessed be the GDPR, which is really starting to look like the thing that is going to give us back our Internet experience.
19002 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
So happy that all those financial rebels have such a secure and reliable solution, well away from the prying eyes and overbearing regulation of pesky government.
Funny, but I'm not all that bothered about government oversight when it comes to ensuring that my money remains in my possession.
Congratulations on how the guy is dealing with the issue : openly, honestly and calmly.
It is high time the rabid prudes step down a notch and let other people live their lives. Purple is not the colour of prostitution either - it seems to me that it is seen every Easter in Christian churches and catholic cardinals have been seen wearing that color - so zip it, prudes, you're just revealing your shameful desires as usual.
If my PC gets hijacked I think that the data on it is very much more interesting to the miscreant then trying to find out what I'm saying, which is frankly of no interest to most people.
If we're talking about espionage, a good directional microphone or a bug are time-honored procedures with a very good success rate.
And you can even hear whispers with those.
Biometric trials that fail, facial recog that fails miserably, government IT projects that don't stop failing and, for some unfathomable reason, are never stopped - does anyone else have the impression that, in general and broadly speaking, Benny Hill is in charge and has been for the past decade ?
So now I learn that we emit potentially noxious gases simply by wanting to stay clean and smell nice. Terrific. What other doomsday mechanism will our consumer society dump on our ignorant hides ?
It might be time to slow things down a bit and not rush to production with every half-baked idea simply because we can.
Well, in defense of the company responsible, the board is still on life support after having been told that their most precious asset needs to be changed. Oh, not the game, of course, that's just the money-maker. No, it's the anti-cheat, that has been lovingly crafted by Northern Trolls in specially-made dank caverns with WiFi access and an endless supply of chocolate frogs. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to gather all those chocolate frogs ?
And they're going to have to - gasp - do it again ? Pity the stock price, for Pete's sake.
Okay, seriously now, it's a game company. Most of them don't have a stellar track record for keeping talent. Most of them do have a reputation for crunch time that lasts months, if not the whole development time. Then you have to find a team smart enough to not only understand the existing anti-cheat model, but also grep the required changes and implement them correctly - a rather demanding task, eh, Microsoft ?
All of this hoopla and most games I play have no anti-cheating issues. Minecraft ? You can whitelist the participants and, if you don't, there's a plethora of add-ons specifically tailored for tracking cheaters. None of that has anything to do with the OS. 7 Days To Die ? There's an entire anti-cheating system included in Steam apparently, and I haven't heard a peep about issues on Windows 1 0.
So I'm thinking that this is likely an issue for some other kinds of entities, the likes of EA Games or Origin, who are pretty crappy at how they handle players in the first place. I have banned their stores from my PCs due to the shoddy experience they have imposed on me. If that is indeed the case, then I can only rejoice that Microsoft is leaving those PCs in the dust.
Um, the fact that YT is blocking comments now doesn't give you a clue ?
The BBC might be right about the future, but comment blocking is happening now.
I myself never look at comments elsewhere than on El Reg - this is the only place it is worth it. But I do find curious that YT hasn't made comments an option in the hands of the channel owner. With parental guidance options.
I would say that children have no business posting on YT, but education is outrated these days.
And that argument falls flat when your disc breaks because they do not send you a new disc.
If I had a license, then the disc is irrelevant and breaking one should ensure you get another free. But no, you have to pay for a new disc, meaning you pay a second license.
So that means that that disc is mine, and licensing terms can stuff it where the sun don't shine.
Of course, that only mattered when games were actually sold on discs. With rampant multiplayer everywhere, all they need to do now is control your access to the server. They don't care about discs any more.
You do not want to ask Huawei to send you items for inspection - that will obviously turn up nothing since, if Huawei was indeed guilty of the accusations, it would hardly be stupid enough to send actual evidence.
You need to stop a container at the border and confiscate some stuff for inspection. That is the only way you have a chance to find evidence - if there is any actual evidence to be found.
I do not agree about "when to not". It was his idea, so he should have taken responsibility for it. On the other hand, he should also have been told about the data-skimming, so taking responsilibility and pointing that out could have saved him.
Not that there was much fallout on the whole affair anyway, it seems.
The issue is that the highest levels of government are held by people with the morals of drug cartels - but in more stupid. They say incredibly stupid things that are regularly proven wrong, but they think that, because of their position, their words have a special weight. They don't understand that respect is something that is earned, it is not a given. And it must be accompanied by acts that are on par.
When you declare a National Emergency, you do not go and play golf the very next day. The act is not on par with the words.
And here comes the USA again, pretending that it is the sole arbiter of what is right.
I get that it wants to be first but, just like that annoying bully in college, wanting it does not make it so. Especially when nobody is depending on you to reach a decision.
The CTIA has nothing on the GSM Association, no influence, no leverage. Basically the only thing it has achieved is to very publicly describe how it is going to be screwed.
I'm counting on the GSM Association to just ignore that kid in the back row and get on with the project.
Is an "an enraged Hewlett-Packard" going to pursue and prosecute the idiot who agreed on the deal at HP without proper discovery as well ?
Because okay, they cooked the books, but you were too incompetent to see the $8 billion hole you threw yourself into. That is a magnitude of incompetence that is striking in itself.
If the private sector was intent on acting with fairness we wouldn't need GDPR.
As far as companies are concerned, if it isn't explicitely against the law, it's fair game to try whether it's moral or not. And that is not something that is exclusively reserved to US companies either.
The self-regulating market is a pipe dream served by selfish people intent on preserving their situation - the rest can be damned.
So regulate. Make laws and enforce them. That is the only thing that will protect the people and keep things fair.
Holy shit man, how stupid do you have to be to go and say things like that on a prison line ?
Haven't you seen any one of the innumerable Columbo, CSI ad nauseam to remember the "Anything you say can and will be used against you" line ?
Well you're going to remember that now, I'd wager. Too bad it's too late.
He exaggerated the value of his company, okay that's bad, but where was HP's due diligence ? What band of incompetent interns audited Autonomy and contented themselves with rubber-stamping the whole thing ?
If I buy a house without checking it out, I don't think I can sue the previous owner if all the nice pictures I saw were just wallpaper and cleverly painted plywood. Why should a multi-billion dollar company get that privilege ?
. . how an external hacker without any contact (accomplice) in the company could totally wipe all production servers and all backup servers in one go, without ever being detected ?
Okay, forget the detection part - the IT admins could be clueless - but that does not go with the fact that they had different credentials for different servers. They were at least doing something right.
And why go and nuke everything if you're just a hacker ? That's not going to make you any money.
This smells very strongly of an inside job. Done by a state-level actor or not, this is not some group out of Sevastopol just having some fun.
It's all well and good to cite security concerns, but if you're up to government-level declarations of punishment, it would be nice to see some proof that those concerns are valid.
And, for the moment, all we have is bluster and rhetoric, which is a bit thin to base state-level menaces on.
But hey, it's the Trump era. Who needs reason ?
Weird just how much that actually sounds like pirating them.
In any case, I rather agree with Intel on this one : know whose code you're running. Don't run code from just anywhere, just like you don't click on a link in a mail from someone you've never met before.
So not only is he selling a piece of shit GPS, he's also selling one that is not secure ? And it's not a problem because you can't have 100% security ?
I'd really like to ask him if he has a lock on his door and, if so, why.
Not going up in my esteem is the least I can say.