Re: the backlash on that revelation was what ended the Ballmer era
That probably didn't help, but I think the fiasco that was Vista followed by the utter failure that was Windows 8 was what did him in.
And it was about effing time.
19423 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I'm glad that there are people out there who are intelligent enough to tackle these kinds of issues and do so for the sake of my protection.
That said, I kinda doubt that "most people" encrypt their laptop drives. Most of the people I know who do have laptops have work laptops, and even they are not always using disk encryption, although their IT department should be pushing that.
As for private users, try and talk them into encryption and watch their eyes glaze over in real time.
No, sorry, I don't see it happening any time soon.
"Data privacy and security are Steer's absolute priority"
Yes, now it is, because you realize just how much your reputation is fucked. That said, you apparently only had the realization after El Reg had to shove it up your nose.
There is no excuse for hard-coding credentials in an application and I don't care that the account has been disabled. Those credentials should never had been coded in the first place.
I will STEER well away from your applications in the future.
Okay, let me imagine a world where that is acceptable. Now I have one question : what kind of twisted sexual pervert takes pics of himself while trying to reach sexual release ?
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if I'm choking the one-eyed snake, I am paying attention to a video, a slideshow or a bunch of pictures, i am most definitely not fiddling around trying to make a fucking selfie.
Thus ends one of the most exhilarating and bold chapters of the history of our species, bogged down by beancounters and politicians with no balls.
But everything must end some day, so enter Musk and Bezos and capitalism and corporate profits, which will be the basis of actual space expansion.
Sad, but inevitable.
and I will say it again : the only way to neuter patent trolls is to tie the amount of damages to the amount of money the patent troll is making with his patent.
In other words : if you're just sitting on your patent and not producing anything of value with it, then you get no money for someone else actually producing goods with it (or something similar).
That will sort the wheat from the chaff.
Google is nothing if not persistent. I have Chrome on my work laptop and I installed Google Earth as well. Thinking it would be useful on my home computer, I installed Google Earth there as well. To my surprise, at next boot I found out my home computer had Chrome installed as well.
I didn't want Chrome, so I removed it. The following boot I found it there again. I'll spare you the details (rummaging around the Registry, checking startup options, controlling services, etc) but suffice it to say that after four days of these shenanigans, I gave up and removed anything Google from my home computers and Google is blacklisted on my personal hardware.
Oh really ?
I use Dropbox for non-critical, non-PII storage only. Anything important goes on Sync if I need it there because Sync has encryption and, if you trust their blurb, only I have the key and that means that I am indeed the only one to be able to access that data.
So you'll excuse me if I believe that Sync has the better storage service.
No it is not, since you specify in the title of your post a "successful businessman", meaning one who has made a lot of money.
And that is still not true, since the notion of oligarchy implies a small group of people who are thus called oligarchs.
Elon Musk is a very successful businessman, but he is not an oligarch. He rules alone.
The problem is not how many you catch, the issue here is the fact that you monetize those you don't catch.
And frankly, a photo no older than a week and connecting with 5 people per week in order to "qualify" for a refund ? Do we have permission to work, or are we supposed to just spend all our time on your site ?
Dating sites are just a huge scam IMO.
I can't even begin to fathom how a black hole merger happens inside. The singularity that crosses the event horizon first (I'm guessing the smaller one because smaller event horizon) is attracted to the bigger singularity just like anything else dropping in. What happens then ? Does the singularity start orbiting the other one for a short while ? Does it go straight for collision ? And what is the energy release of such an event forever contained behind the ultimate shroud ?
Mind-boggling stuff.
So, China has its fingers in Huawei, hmm ? And nobody mentions that the NSA has access to Cisco equipment ? If you're beating the security drum, beat it all the way.
The main hacking threat comes from China ? Really ? So Russian hackers are not that much of a threat, then ? All the data encryption and ransomware we have heard about this year came from China ? I don't think so. And let's not forget North Korea. I seem to recall a lot of fuss centered around a state-sponsored Nork team, but that is not important anymore now, right ? Riiight.
Strand Consulting is obviously just another Trump muppet, spouting the bull and spreading the FUD. He's toeing the line, dumping on China and waving unicorns. The US has achieved nothing in 5G. Show me the market using it before telling me how good you are.
Get away clean ? I think they've already blown that as well. Atari fans will never forget this shambles of a botched project, nor the names of the people attached to it. The head architect may have gone to another startup, but that will not diminish the furor of the people who paid good money on a promise made of empty.
And frankly, said architect managed to go for over a year with nothing to show for in the end. I would not want to have anything to do with his new startup after such dismal results.
Given that the rover's job was to study the regolith in the South Pole region, and that the results were highly anticipated by just about every space agency on the planet, I think that measuring success by the distance covered is wrong.
You do not pass an exam by showing up at the school door.
That the orbiter be credited with a 100% succes rate is fine, it is doing its job. But the mission had two components and one is DOA.
The success rate for the mission is 50% at best.
Meaningful connectivity means you have a connection that brings you the information you need in less than a minute. 4G should basically cover that, so why faff about it ?
It's all very nice to heartache over populations that cannot afford a mobile phone, but I think they probably have more pressing problems - like how to get something to eat for lunch, or (in some cases) how to not get shot before dinner.
Hardly. IE isn't even mentioned on StatCounter any more.
At ease, everyone. Carry on with your normal lives.
I do not see the current members of the committee putting in £6bn to correct the situation, so they are guilty.
Unless they can demonstrate that they are scraping every farthing they can find to correct the situation, they are guilty.
"There is £6bn backlog of repairs across the NHS & the underinvestment in physical & IT infrastructure has led to repeated safety failures & delays"
A £6bn lack of funding is not a mistake. This is not somebody who forgot to sign an expense. This is willful negligence and someone should pay.
More likely an entire committee. The last five years of top-level decision-makers are all collectively responsible for this complete and utter failure of management.
Probably were, and they had the official version. The reality of IT is that any rule is only a generality, a guideline, rather than hard fact. That is because it is IT's job to make sure everyone else can work, and nobody is interested in hearing IT say that they can't because rules.
When a manager wants something, he doesn't care about the rules, he just wants the result. So IT bends the rules because, in the end, it's always IT's fault when something doesn't work.
Because without a cloudy server, there is no way some mere human could possibly be charged of supervising the floor and noticing such problems. Funny that, when I got to a supermarket and arrive at checkout with long queues and half the checkout lanes closed down, pretty soon somebody shows up to open a lane. I'm pretty sure that they don't have no Microsoft Cloud Supervisor available.
I wonder how supermarket chains have managed for the past century.
Um, sorry but the decline in share price is a fact, and that decline is clearly due to publication of news that the shareholders did not like.
I don't like Wall Street, but one clear benefit is the ability to counter run-of-the-mill PR bullshit with cold, hard numbers.
I totally agree. Amazon is surviving because is has vast central storage with high turnover. Turn that into many local storage points where 70% of the stock is just going to sit there and you are bleeding money.
I can't see that this will work either on the drone side, or on the storage side.
I have to wonder how many file issues there were when everyone had their server locally on the network.
Cloud is just someone else's server, and that also means subject to someone else's problems.
I can't help but think that this cloud mania is going to die down and recenter itself on things that people really need Cloud for : sharing data (securely, I hope) between distant locations.
Using Cloud when everyone works in the same building every day is just asinine, you win nothing and you set yourself up for this kind of problem.