Re: Why aren't there a gazillion class actions being filed every day over this crapshoot?
Because the lawyers are the only ones who benefit ?
19006 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That is not an excuse. If there is not enough time to check, then that point should not be authorized to show up, period.
Next, you start Google Earth in the morning and use it to check the coordinates coming in. That should take about five seconds.
Oh, the data coming in does not mention GPS coordinates ? Your fault for sucking at defining locations.
No new point should go active before being checked. End of.
How is it that the Board of a company gets to decide if a class-action lawsuit against itself should proceed ?
Isn't that something for a judge to decide ?
Or has the justice system in the USA just got fed up and handed itself over to corporations because they finally decided that that is how it works anyway ?
They may own the equipment and make the rules, but apparently everyone has missed one little detail : the law says that no employer can order employees to refrain from discussing any specific subject at all.
On top of that, Google has so many fingers in so many pies that just about anything is work-related.
Including discussions about censorship.
That's not the point. What we have here is a new trough for the snouts of those in the know.
And, as for creating yet another multinational behemoth intent on harvesting all my details to make money on ads, I'm not sure it is an advantage to have a European one.
I'm already saturated with ads, don't need yet another source.
Well one thing is sure, that thing is not running Windows in any way, shape or form.
I'm guessing some variety of Linux, it's the only thing that could work in such a space. Anyone know more ? I've tried finding out, but I didn't get anything other than gushing articles about how good it is, and lighter it is (by a few grams), and how it connects to Azure all by itself.
Oh yeah, that last bit - makes it off my buyers list.
Well it's simple then : publish the content of the exchange and show everyone what happened. Because there's a good chance that somebody started to be insulting and the other someone didn't appreciate and shot back. So publishing the exchange will settle the matter.
Then Twitter can get outraged again and we'll know if we need to bang on Valve to reverse the decision or not.
But of course, that won't happen, because it would be a breach of confidentiality or something. Too bad.
Yes, like inserting malware into the guidance system, sabotaging experiments, covering the solar panels with a special fluid that gradually turns opaque in the sunlight . . . you know, menial tasks.
On a side note, anybody wonder why absolutely nothing was said about this launch before it was successful ? Nobody was talking about this a week before launch, and it would have been a great attention-grabber, don't you think ?
Maybe the Soviet Union still lies in the shadows, ensuring that only good news gets out. It the rocket had failed, we might never have heard about this.
The USA is of course going to spring billions to help create a replica of something it already has simply because the UK was stupid enough to leave a political entity that was creating it and now the UK wants its own.
I don't think that's going to happen, guys. You wanted out, you've got out.
Of everything.
It is not acceptable to me that a supplier artificially limits updating hardware to less than the hardware's expected lifespan.
If I call a plumber for a kitchen sink, he won't tell me that he can't do anything about it because the sink is more than 6 years old. Only in IT do you have companies arbitrarily decide to stop supporting something they sold. And here, it's even worse, because the expiry date is not tied to the sell date.
That is disgusting.
I have a setting in my brain that makes it easy : don't click on dodgy links.
I never click on a bit.ly link or any other shortened link. I distrust those by default. I always check where the link goes and if it doesn't go to somewhere logical or reasonable, I don't click.
Of course, all that means that I'm not part of those people who just blindly click, then belatedly wonder how their computer got hacked.
Once upon a time the Internet was a paltry hundred million web sites. Deface one and it would be noticed. Today the Internet is billions of websites, the most consulted being the ones who are the hardest to hack, and if you hack a less-consulted one it will hardly be worthy a mention on Twitter.
Criminals, on the other hand, are making hay out of infiltrating and encrypting company data for ransom, and they're doing it by the bucketload apparently, because they have incentive to be better. Beats hacktivists by a country mile apparently.
What is the point of getting a log on people's use of a given command ? If you're going to log command usage, why limit logging to a subset ?
I can't even begin to fathom the reasons for Microsoft's telemetry. It is useless to prevent botched patches, so what is MS doing with it ?
I wouldn't have chosen better myself. The bastard that pulled that heist must have been present and waiting for an opportunity. He saw it, and took it without hesitation.
The fact that nobody moved to stop a thief is a sad indication of the morals of our society today. That only one guy stood up after and offered help is good on him, but it would have been better if someone had tripped the thief.
Then again, with someone so obviously determined, it might have gotten ugly. Better off the police deal with that bastard.
So job offers in IT are weakest ever but fear not, IT will grow by 4% in the next five years.
Yeah, maybe, we'll see, but it's hard to believe since Brexit has put a damper on everything and the outlook is neither certain nor looking good.
There may be good times ahead, but they don't seem to be coming any time soon.
Every single problem is linked to JavaScript. Okay, in-domain JS is pretty much inevitable these days, but simply don't accept running JS from another domain and the problem should stop there.
Of course, Google is not interested in locking that down because of the number of sites that use its code, so it'll never happen from there.
Thank God for NoScript. Again.
Well that is kind of inevitable, isn't it ? Given the level of understanding of 99% of users, they'd be complaining that the error was incomprehensible.
Something went wrong is something they can understand.
That said, adding another line saying "Error #0068410B" wouldn't kill the devs either, and then we'd have something to Google and evaluate our situation better.
I'm glad you're happy about your success, but from where I sit, you've lost $90 million, you're banned from doing what you did and you're not getting any money back.
In short, you're lucky Oracle did lose those 23 claims, because if it hadn't, you'd be buried by now.
"In almost every ransomware attack we've looked at, the company was been compromised six to nine months before the attack was launched," he said, noting that allows the attacker to conduct reconnaissance.
When I read that line about how attackers start by deleting accessible backups I wondered how they could get to them. If, however, you infiltrate an organization and lay low for months while gathering data on the network, then you have all the time you need to discover network storage and passwords to access it.
Given that cities are not known for having bank-level network protection, I'm guessing that once in, there won't be much of a warning to IT admins that an enemy process is worming through their systems.
Interesting. So Apple should be all over that code to see what it's using and patch the holes. Apparently, Apple does not do that.
Now the question is : why on God's green Earth did Apple unfix a fix and re-allow jailbreaking ?
Another question : how long before a patch is published that re-applies the fix, thus locking the phone down again ?
Because Apple is aware of this, and they had the fix, so I really don't see that it is interesting to go and use the unfix to jailbreak the phone since it's likely going to be locked down again at the next patch release.
Oh, I'm sure you can get that - if you throttle the CPU to 20% of its capacity and turn the screen brightness down to minimum, set the disk to sleep after one minute of inactivity and the screen to go blank likewise.
In other words, you'll get 17.6 hours of use if you make the i7 function like an anemic i3. Yay.
I'd like to see battery life expressed in real-life, pedal-to-the-metal situations. If you're a programmer, you're going to be taxing those 16GB of RAM and probably the disk as well. I want to know how long I will be able to work, not just look at a dimmed screen.
But that'll never happen. Nobody will like to publish those numbers, they're too weak.
Simple answer : it is not.
Use paper. That won't cost you £9M this time, and it won't cost you more next time. Better functionality ? It counted the votes last time, didn't it ? So what better functionality is worth double the price ? Is it more secure ? Somehow I doubt that that is what they have improved.
I want the code to be public and open, so that we can get eyeballs on it and ensure that it does what it says on the tin in the proper way. Until that happens, I won't trust it and neither should anyone else.
Um, just a thought : how come those protocols are available on The Cloud (TM) at all ?
Or did they create The Cloud (TM) by including every protocol that has been created in the past twenty-five years, regardless of whether or not it was secure ?
Yeah, Brexit is going to make it so much easier to capture all those European company conferences, isn't it ?
And the Japanese, Chinese, Indians and South Americans are just clamoring for the privilege of spending a day in a plane to get to the UK to chatter and feast on stale fish.
Another success story in the making.
Um, from what I've read, the UK is just as surveillance-camera bent as China, if not more so.
So the dark irony is that there still are people in the UK who consider that China is worse then them as far as camera surveillance is considered.