The irony is strong in this one
Endpoint Protection Client. Yeah.
This kind of situation is always hilarious - when you're not among the ones affected, that is.
19191 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
If only there was some sort of technology that would allow creating a copy of production data in a known good state. Something using a different medium than the one hosting production information, allowing the copy to be kept safely. Maybe even on some outdated technology like magnetic tape.
If only.
Congratulations on transforming an article about a YouTube guy into your personal political ranting playground.
Carry on.
Oh, and Obama asked a foreign country to look into Trump ? Citation please. I have not particularly appreciated any of the recent American presidents, but I'm pretty sure that Trump is the only president in the world who has ever asked a foreign country to investigate a political opponent.
"increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders and general negative wellbeing in general on humans"
With a list like that, you'd think that the government would have a FEMA-style lockdown on the things.
Thank goodness that none of those disorders could possibly be linked to the pesticide-covered, genetically-modified food we have been ingesting for the past thirty years. No, its the microwaves.
Has to be.
It's a fridge. It goes in the kitchen, not in the middle of the living room. Anything that makes noise other than my TV or stereo gets shut down pretty damn quick.
The whole concept is ludicrous and I will not have that in my house.
Ever.
Teams is the symptom of a Microsoft that is all over the radar and desperately trying to stay relevant in a world where PCs are heading towards oblivion. Microsoft has failed all of its attempts to enter the portable hardware market (with the sole exception of the latest version of Surface, and that isn't exactly flying off the shelves), has lost control of the browser market and pathetically failed to regain it, and went straight into the wall with its phone attempt.
That is why Microsoft is plugging everything it can into Azure, because that is the only long-term life buoy it has left. Cue the Frankenstein monster that is Teams, a patchwork of anything Microsoft can stitch together and pretend that they had planned it that way.
Most importantly, 5G is apparently going to transform our phone and comms network into the same security nightmare that is the Internet. I can't help but feel that this push to software-defined everything is simply the Pandora's box of fun.
On the other hand, while US officials and politicians descend into even more depths of blind political hatred and spout things that are clearly becoming more and more biased and unfounded, I am getting the feeling that Huawei is actually a good thing to have around.
Not to mention the popcorn festival it is watching them squirm without being able to do anything.
I should think so. Launching a new satellite means building it, then risking losing it during the launch.
This MEV tech means you can contract someone to repair, and if the MEV is lost its no skin off your back. Or is it that you buy a MEV and risk losing that ?
Probably.
So the question then is : which is less expensive to lose, a MEV or a new satellite.
Space is a risky business.
Okay, Plusnet will obviously not forget what they are owed, especially since they kept the service alive even though they could not bill for it.
Still, it is entirely their fault, so recovering four months' worth in one go seems a bit exaggerated. Plusnet should spread it out over eight months billing 150% per month.
But hey, that would be a correct thing to do, so beancounters won't think of it.
Clearly this lady has not given training courses. I do, regularly, and out of a pool of 6 to 8 people, I can tell on the first day which ones will never get past basic concepts, such as passing parameters and declaring subs or functions.
I'm absolutely not saying that they are all idiots, I'm saying that programming is a rather particular state of mind, and not everybody can adapt to it.
In any case, I do hope this will be an opportunity to get more stability into Windows 1 0.
God knows it needs it.
. . how proud Apple is of standing up to unreasonable requests by the authorities.
Of course, any request made by China is reasonable, eh ?
When they have you by the balls, your heart and mind follows.
At first I was going to reply with scorn, but now that I think of it, he may actually have hit the nail on the head.
The Industrial Revolution, by completely ignoring human rights and placing profit before everything else, engendered syndicates, protest marches and the very concept of strikes until corporate magnates got a (feeble) grasp that employees have rights.
The IoT, as of now, runs roughshod over things like security and privacy, not to mention simple things like reliability. This is already starting to get a backlash, so maybe we can envision a future where IoT will actually be comprised of secure, easy-to-use elements that bring an actual improvement to our lives instead of just wirelessly adding a toothbrush to our IPv6 environment.
Who knows, maybe IoT has a bright future after all ?
What the hell is a combat helicopter doing with wireless receivers ? Even if I can accept that they may have a use when on base, shouldn't they be shut down when in flight ? Isn't that something that could enable their detection ?
Even if not, I highly doubt that a combat helicopter is broadcasting anything that a wireless receiver could have a use for. There is undoubtedly a (shielded) wired data bus between all elements that need it. Any wireless receiver should be shut down when in flight, that would end the problem.
Of course there will be no fear of "running afoul of restrictions on disclosure", those restrictions are being removed.
I'm quite sure that this "agreement" is just a tool to simplify things for the US to go on fishing expeditions abroad. I'm also pretty certain that Australia is in for a rude surprise when they ask for data on a US citizen - they won't get it and will instead get a lot of bla bla about how their request is not relevant, badly formulated, not within the proper time frame, etc.
The US is expert on making everyone else kiss their ass, but avoiding doing any ass-kissing themselves.
It's starting to look like a demolition derby is taking place near Saturn. We know that the rings already contain the remains of one or more bodies, and with these 20 newly discovered lumps racing around in various groups and completely different ways, there will be more collisions for sure.
Maybe that will lengthen the life span of Saturn's rings for a few more millennia.
I'm guessing that the tech isn't perfect and fakes can be rather easily detected. A shadow that falls wrong, lighting that is not changed, etc. Today's deepfakes are just the draft versions, it's tomorrow's deepfakes that will be frighteningly realistic.
So I'm going to do what you cannot count on Joe Public to do : if I see a video on the web with a prominent politician doing unspeakable acts, I'm going to wait for journalists to confirm that it is not a fake and the video is real. Until then, by default everything concerning political figures or celebrities is something I will file in Deepfake until otherwise notified.
It's about time somebody slammed the door on those stupid backdoor arguments once and for all.
Law enforcement has everything it needs to obtain data on someone ; it's called a subpoena and it just has to be signed by a judge who agrees with it.
You have no right to transform every petty police officer into a member of the NSA, capable of delving into people's private lives on a whim.
And, talking about the NSA, the violation of people's private lives simply because you can is disgusting.
I agree completely. There is absolutely no reason that an .eu site should be shut down on the very day Brexit happens. After all, every .eu site had an authentic EU address when applying for the domain name, so it is entirely unjustified to not leave a bit of time to those businesses to adapt.
On the other hand, those businesses have had well nigh two years to adapt now, so it seems also a tad excessive to be running around like headless chickens simply because - gasp - there may only be a few weeks left !
In any case, it seems that UK businesses are capable of just as much foresight as UK government.
Not a good sign.
Yes, and you always were and you knew it when you signed up.
It's only that now, you are feeling just how small you are and how Goliath Google is, and that feeling is not comfortable at all.
A wise man once said : do not put all your eggs in the same basket. You should have diversified, that would have lessened the blow.
In any case, you have little choice now but to educate your users in how to accept the security warning.
I can understand the obvious importance of that, but for science it is imperative to able to consult the actual data, not just the result of the processing. So data will still have to be re-transmitted in some form or another.
It might however be feasible to use a backup SSD and bring the data back "manually", rotating a new backup with the next flight.
Because you are not required by law to use FaceBook, Google or Amazon. They are private companies and you can avoid using them if you so wish.
You cannot avoid the police if they decide to set their sights on you, and resisting them will, in the best case, land you in jail, and could land you in the morgue.