Posts by Pascal Monett 18239 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Because without a cloudy server, there is no way some mere human could possibly be charged of supervising the floor and noticing such problems. Funny that, when I got to a supermarket and arrive at checkout with long queues and half the checkout lanes closed down, pretty soon somebody shows up to open a lane. I'm pretty sure that they don't have no Microsoft Cloud Supervisor available.
I wonder how supermarket chains have managed for the past century.
"There is £6bn backlog of repairs across the NHS & the underinvestment in physical & IT infrastructure has led to repeated safety failures & delays"
A £6bn lack of funding is not a mistake. This is not somebody who forgot to sign an expense. This is willful negligence and someone should pay.
More likely an entire committee. The last five years of top-level decision-makers are all collectively responsible for this complete and utter failure of management.
Probably were, and they had the official version. The reality of IT is that any rule is only a generality, a guideline, rather than hard fact. That is because it is IT's job to make sure everyone else can work, and nobody is interested in hearing IT say that they can't because rules.
When a manager wants something, he doesn't care about the rules, he just wants the result. So IT bends the rules because, in the end, it's always IT's fault when something doesn't work.
Um, sorry but the decline in share price is a fact, and that decline is clearly due to publication of news that the shareholders did not like.
I don't like Wall Street, but one clear benefit is the ability to counter run-of-the-mill PR bullshit with cold, hard numbers.
I totally agree. Amazon is surviving because is has vast central storage with high turnover. Turn that into many local storage points where 70% of the stock is just going to sit there and you are bleeding money.
I can't see that this will work either on the drone side, or on the storage side.
I have to wonder how many file issues there were when everyone had their server locally on the network.
Cloud is just someone else's server, and that also means subject to someone else's problems.
I can't help but think that this cloud mania is going to die down and recenter itself on things that people really need Cloud for : sharing data (securely, I hope) between distant locations.
Using Cloud when everyone works in the same building every day is just asinine, you win nothing and you set yourself up for this kind of problem.
Indeed, but they're not starting now. They're not even talking about starting. They're talking about planning and the need to finish before 2028.
Lots of talk about planning, fair competition, lots of heads nodding in agreement, and lots of knives being sharpened behind backs.
And if the government plans this like they planned Brexit, it won't be done this century.
When the Internet started, the biggest threat was spam mail.
Then the Internet got the ability to manage transactions, so getting user credentials became important.
Now, state-level confidential information is stored on cloud servers or otherwise internet-accessible data repositories, so well-funded actors are looking for ways to infiltrate and monetize that information.
The more complexity we add to our Internet experience, the more attractive that will become to well-heeled blackhats.
And you're happy with that ?
Real companies strive for 100% customer satisfaction.
What SAP really is is an excuse to give work to hundreds of consultants, placing them for years in companies to suck the teat as long as possible without actually delivering on the marketing promises.
SAP lives on the fallacy of throwing good money after bad. Once you've spent tens of millions to get something working, you'll agree to spend a million more per year to ensure some sort of performance.
That hasn't always been the case, and it only happened after a lot of conflict and maybe even bloodshed, but the EU laid down the law on that point and thank God for that.
In any case, I cannot forget Les Guignols and our national PPDA in one episode where he proudly announced : " France-Telecom has lowered prices to over 120 countries - too bad France is not included".
Pure. Comedy. Gold.
I'm sorry, headquarters is not actually plural. You can't have two, or more, headquarters.
You have one headquarters, and one or more delegated station(s) that handle specific zones, but there can be only one Big Boss, and He is at Headquarters.
Is that really any different from the NSA consultant working with a cracked version of Office and transporting countless secret documents on the same computer ? That idiot couldn't even be arsed to pay for Office, no wonder he got pwned. Yes, Office is not cheap, but if you're your own business, it's tax deductible.
If you want security and professionalism, you have to be ready to pay for it. A proper, professional server structure costs money, so stop taking the cheapest offers you find.
You get what you pay for.
And he's still working there ?
This whole thing sounds like a personal issue between Mendez and Broome. Mendez obviously had it out for Broome and wanted to take him down.
As a manager, Mendez is not fit for purpose and should be fired. Either an employee is performant or he is to be trained, humiliation is not part of managerial functions.
My God, it seems that Fitbit owners are learning the hard way that you never auto-update your software until you've read about if it works or not for the rest of the population.
Microsoft has educated us about that for decades now, you'd think the lesson would have been understood by now.
During the course of my existence, I have crossed the Atlantic a mere twenty times, and you can add a number of Europe-to-Africa and intra-Europe flights to that number.
I have never been subject to such a situation. As far as I'm concerned, everyone farts on a flight, and the air system takes care of it.
Maybe I've just been lucky.
As usual, the hypothetical idea has good ground but, in a world where encryption attacks are run-of-the-mill, companies that are big enough to have big storage and backup solutions are also going to be targets for data encryption.
So a single version of truth means a single target to encrypt to cripple the company and potentially extort millions.
How does this pie-in-the-sky thinking cope with that threat ?
I find it incredible that, in this day and age, there are still Neanderthals walking about, treating women like objects.
Hey, I will readily admit that I like seeing a nice ass walk by, but when I'm talking with a woman I am first and foremost talking to a person, with a brain, and most of them use it quite well.
That is what I keep in mind, even when that brain is under a set of absolutely beautiful eyes and lips that smile a very charming smile. I will nonetheless keep my wits about me and treat her with the same respect I give all my conversation partners. I find that business relationships are a lot easier like that.
Indeed. I got so fed up I splurged for a laser printer. It's a Samsung. I've had it now for about six times as long as any inkjet I've ever had. Toner is so much more practical, and no company has even tried to DRM it.
On the other hand, color laser is not yet in my budget.
Great. So, for one cup of coffee not placed in its proper cupholder (for some asinine excuse), a control panel or two will have to be replaced, electrical components will have to be replaced, and tens of thousands of dollars in fuel have been wasted.
That is a shoe-in for the Most Expensive Coffee Ever award.
Although I generally agree with your post, one thing caught my eye :
"[Mozilla] will not sell, license, sublicense, or grant any rights to your [data]... without Mozilla's explicit written permission"
They're not saying they won't sell my data without my written permission, they're saying they won't sell my data without their written permission.
That may be a misinterpretation on my part, but that's how I read it.
I live in a rural town and had just gotten my FTTH connection for a month when the local farmer managed to knock it down - but without breaking it.
So my connection was fine, but the line was all over the road. Obviously, I phoned Orange Support - and, after getting through the inevitable anger-inducing first few questions, I managed to indicate that I was calling for a technical problem.The robot cheerfully announced it was going to launch a test of my connection, and of course, a few minutes later, announced that all was well, thank you for calling.
Um, I thought while staring at my phone that was broadcasting the end call beep, no, all is NOT well. MY LINE IS ON THE GROUND !
So, I went to the website, and got to the Support page. There is no chat link for a helldesk drone until you jump through ten hoops, turn around three times and clap your hands saying "there's no place like Orange". Kidding, even that doesn't work. I spent over 45 minutes on that support section and all I could do was test my connection - which, of course, was fine.
After bouncing off the walls for a total of about 90 minutes, I resigned myself to phoning the support line again. To my eternal surprise, instead of going through all the motions for nothing again, this time the robot remarked that I had already called, was it the same problem, I'll direct you to a technician. YES ! Oh heavenly bliss ! Finally, a human being !
I finally got to tell the story, and, after repeating myself twice (apparently it is hard to understand that the line is down but the connection works - must've been a city boy), he finally acknowledged the issue and typed some stuff into the computer. He told me I would be contacted shortly to get an intervention date.
A month later, I called again because nobody had called me. Yes, that is 31 days later, I had to call again. Knowing the procedure this time, I did the two calls and got a technician. I asked what was going on. He had no clue. I had to explain myself all over again. Twice. Again. Cue the typing on the keyboard, and the we'll call you soon. I asked yeah, but how soon ? Because last time you didn't call. I cannot do more, sir. I have escalated the issue. Yeah right. Well I'll see.
Next week came along, nothing. The week after that, nothing. It was now 45 days since my fiber was lying on the ground. I was about to call back when the inevitable finally happened : some car went by and ripped the fiber line from the lamppost. Now my connection was well and truly down all the way.
So I set up my mobe with its 4G sharing connection, fired up my laptop and went to the website, where I had it diagnose a connection problem. The next day, I got a call from a technician asking when he could come by and check it out. He dropped by, checked the situation, and we agreed to an intervention the following week. That happened as programmed and I am now reconnected and fully functional.
Moral of the story ? Orange doesn't give a damn about your line until it's broken, whether or not you talk to a human being.
Agreed. I cannot fathom how supposed professional pen testers failed to be explicit about what their action included.
As usual, lack of communication creates a misunderstanding which transforms into full-blown disagreement.
One would think that experienced pen testers would have already encountered this kind of situation and amended their proposal procedures accordingly. Am I supposed to understand that these guys have never, ever had a customer argue about what was authorized in the test protocol ?
Besides, I would think it is good marketing and a show of professionalism to list to the customer all the things the test will include. On top of that, had they done that they could shove the contract in the court's face and say : hey, you signed on this.
Look, I appreciate the imagery as much as any other guy, but a black hole is no less or more hungry than its gravitational attraction. When something stumbles close enough, it is not because the black hole reached out in any special way, it's just gravity doing its thing.
I'm not sure that describing black holes as monstrous space trolls is good for the public perception of the phenomenon.
On the other hand, it does make for a more entertaining read.
The "movers" and "shakers" are there to offer their great insights and then clear the area well before the grunts come in to try and apply the nebulous bullshit to the actual world.
That way it is clear that, if the project does not succeed, it is purely because the grunts were incapable of sufficient insight to make things happen. It is in no case because the project was defined by hot air and horse dung.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
