
'Do you need anyone in your QA department?'
No, thank you. We've fired all of them.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
As long as Beijing accepts our presence and can continue pilfering our IP with impunity.
You have engineering done in China ? Consider yourself lucky that there is not a Chinese company producing near-exact replicas of your stuff for the local market.
China is actively stealing every secret it can, and you are actually counting on Chinese engineers in China to create your stuff ? Talk about having the chicken pen guarded by the fox . . .
That sweetheart deal is going to be a lot less interesting if Boeing tanks, like it should.
Of course, if that is the case, there will be a "too big to fail" bailout, but the public effect of that would be disastrous - which doesn't mean it wouldn't work. After all, the White House can hardly imagine buying an Airbus 320 for its next Air Force One, now can it ?
Oh come now, imagine your heads-up display being the Pipe Screensaver.
Wouldn't that be . . . very distracting ?
Honestly, the more I read about all the bullshit they're trying to stuff into cars these days, the more I intend to keep my good ol' diesel running for as long as possible.
At least my car does what I want it to do.
And it doesn't talk back.
I thought the White House had banned China from getting the best goodies. So that must mean that Meteor Lake silicon is not considered high-tech enough to ban China from getting it.
Interesting. One would think that anything AI would be considered too sensitive to be given to China these days.
"we are actively and vigorously implementing an improvement plan to return to full browser acceptance"
Well all you need to do is follow the CA guidelines. If that has been so difficult for you in the past, then you need to actively and vigorously get your finger out and start working properly.
Why is it that compliance with recognized international stardards are so difficult for some companies ? Are they in league with criminal elements that prevent them from doing the job properly ?
Because, apart from sheer incompetence, what other excuse is there ?
I realize that this is way easier than coding an analysis into the Outlook client that measures what already exists and pops up a non-hackable alert when a new email address is discovered.
Now tell me why Redmond decided not to do that.
I mean, I'm an average developer and I'm pretty sure I could do that, so ?
"asked that the next payment made to it was sent to a new account"
In a word, no. Not until we have a written letter signed by the CEO defining the new account, and then only when we have made a test transfer and validated that it worked.
What is it with these new account scams ? I will transfer the money to the account I know. You can transfer it to another account if you so wish.
Honestly, by now accountants should know that, if the transfer is urgent and the account is unknown, it's a scam. Period.
Shareholders can easily also have shares in AMD, thus playing the two big (only?) horses.
Not to mention that, said shareholders are that cash flush, they should have shares in TSMC as well, giving them revenue across the board.
That's all ?
And they expect Redmond to act on that pitifully small amount of user pressure ?
Gosh, with the millions upon millions of people who use Outlook, not to mention the tens of millions in a business environment, you'd think that, if there were a problem all those users were all uppity about, there'd be a smidgen more than 100 votes to make a change.
No wonder nothing changes . . .
Not to mention that no country has the power generation required to replace all ICE cars with EVs.
But hey, not to worry, we'll all do like Germany and build new coal-powered energy stations to power all those wonderful climate-respecting EVs, right ?
Anyone ?
Anyone who minds their privacy, you mean.
Firefox + NoScript + uBlock Origin is absolutely my trifecta when it comes to surfing the web on my home PC.
I would accept nothing less.
Chrome ?
I use that only to access my professional GMail, Google Maps or Google Translate. Anything else means Google can go forth and multiply.
No. They received a wake-up call to reality.
It is high time that funny money got the comeuppance it deserves : world-wide banishment.
There are no crypto exchanges that are reliable. None of them respect anything near banking charters, and all of them are staffed with incompetent idiots who are either waiting for a chance to skip with the money or are waiting for some hacker (or even a normal user) to empty their so-called "vaults" and leave them high and dry.
Funny money is an immense waste of resources and time, and everyone taking part in it is just a potential luser.
But people still can't replace their faces or their fingertips when those biometrics go wrong.
I am now at the stage of seriously hoping that one of those biometric databases gets hacked and sold on the dark web so that politicians can no longer avoid dealing with the consequences of individual privacy.
Given that, when I retire in around a decade, I won't be needing my Gmail connection, maybe this kind of thing could fit my personal bill.
Not to mention : a week on a single battery charge ? That sounds like music to my ears.
By then, I suppose the kinks will have been ironed out . . .
Okay, I know Jira is crapware, but it's crapware that's selling.
How is it that Atlassian is losing money selling software ? How bad do you have to manage things to lose money when you're selling the same code over and over again ?
I would disagree. ID cards are useful and are not necessarily a sign that your government is veering Big Brother (it is, but not for that reason).
The problem in Japan, as I see it, is that the team drawing up the specifications apparently didn't bother to check with countries that already had ID cards to find out what problems those countries had found and think about how their scheme might be impacted. On top of the other problem that is this is the first time anyone has tried to implement a digital ID scheme based on numbers.
No, wait, Social Security has been based on numbers since forever. Maybe they should have looked into that.
Oh well, I'm sure the Agile team is on it. After all, move fast and break things, right ?
Oh, right. It's already broken.
Boilerplate response. Of course you do. Unfortunately for you, just about everybody else probably thinks is has merit, and I'm guessing the judge will too.
That said, I think there should be a law stopping shareholders from sueing their own company. You're not happy with the company's performance ? Then sell your shares, take the loss and go invest in a better company.
But are, apparently, valid in Germany.
So basically, patents are a nightmare everywhere. Until there is one, international patent court, that is. But then, given the farce that is the United Nations, it's pretty clear that we humans are totally incapable of managing anything on a large scale that cannot be corrupted or influenced outside the established rules.
In other words, as a species, we need a benevolent dictator to ruthlessly enforce the rules we have ourselves chosen, because we can't be arsed to do that in the long run.
Um, why ? You're the certificate authority, are you not ? It seems to me that you have the ability to do whatever with your certs, including having a bit of patience while thousands of admins and thousands more IT staff have their schedule thrown into the blender to satisfy you.