So, Oracle is getting desperate ?
Finally.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I don't know about other French alarms, but mine also has a battery backup.
And, given that the phone and internet connection are on a UPS, any burglar thinking of cutting the power would be well advised to wait half an hour at least before attempting entry, which means that the police will have largely enough to mosey on down to my place and cull the miscreant red-handed.
Because in the event of a power failure I get a notification, and will act accordingly.
Even though science has already simulated this a number of times, it is obvious that more data can only yield better understanding and more precise simulations.
So go for it, boffins !
Twenty years in and Microsoft still hasn't been able to reign in that abomination of an excuse to put DRM into the OS. For that matter, it hasn't even included any tool to search for orphaned keys and list them for deletion. You still have to use 3rd-party tools to clean up your Registry efficiently.
For shame, Microsoft. For shame.
Did they factor in the fact that current hardware is used for much longer these days ? My current rig was last updated in 2015, and I have no urge or need to update it now. Laptops are a different story, they cannot be upgraded in any meaningful way aside, perhaps, memory, but they can last a good many years as well, especially the more powerful ones.
I doubt that a change in chip availability has that much of an impact.
Last week I bought a replacement UPS on Amazon, because the 10 year-old one I had had died. Guess what I have in my mailbox twice this week ? Of course, an email from Amazon suggesting that I might be interested in a UPS.
I just bought one, you morons. Come back in ten years and you might be relevant.
Of course it can, but when it's the cloud provider, it's all of that provider's customers that have the problem. When it's your on-premises server that has a problem, it's only your customers that are impacted.
Let's try avoiding humongous single points of failure, shall we ?
I always thought those types of services were only in countries that were not interested in proper law enforcement. Poor places that have other priorities than worrying about a bunch of bytes only affecting people far away.
Seems to me that local crime in Europe (or at least, in the Netherlands) would do better to choose a bulletproof server in a country that will leave the hosting provider alone. It's on the Internet anyway, who cares about the location of the server ?
In any case, good on those cops. Hopefully they will get data from those servers that will serve to bust other operations as well.
Typical of billion-dollar behemoths, Google has a good thing going with Kubernetes and its stance is to make all the money, so get people hooked on the product and reserve the means to develop on it to only paying customers, thereby adding yet another revenue stream to fill its coffers.
It's an excellent decision - for Google.
So, if I understand correctly, right now large hospitals employ people to run around carrying stuff that is needed ? Funny, I've been to a few hospitals in my lifetime and I don't remember seeing employees running around carrying something.
Um, so how many "final" written warnings before something actually final happens ?
Because if they already got a final warning last year, and another one this year, what's to keep them from getting another one next year ?
Or is it just final in the sense that they won't be getting another one in that year ?
However, I cannot understand that someone agrees to move product without being able to inspect it in any way and not know that they are part of something shady. If it's legal, it is transparent, and I have the duty to ensure that the product is in good shape and has not degraded in any way, or does not risk degrading.
To do my duty, I am responsible for the product while it is in my care and I must be able to have eyes on it. If that is not part of the deal, then I am not going to take part.
The mathematical consequence of that is that Roku is now an ad agency that uses players as an excuse to get revenue. You never pay attention to your excuses, you only pay attention to what matters, and for Roku, what matters is the ad agencies.
Roku is now off of my list of acceptable purchases.
Well duh, they're encrypted.
I think that law enforcement should totally be able to obtain messages exchanged between suspects, especially in cases like poor little Lucy, but if those messages are encrypted then the law will just have to find the means to decrypt them.
No backdoors.
Allow me disagree, I do not feel that this is overboard. He 'hacked' the accounts to get to pics of scantily-clad women, that is clearly sexual in nature.
It is also tremendously stupid because the Internet is chock full of pics of women in undies that he could have accessed for free and very legally.
That said, I do have to agree that storing your pics on FaceBook and setting them to Private is very wrong. No one should consider FaceBook, of all things, to be a backup of any kind although, now that I think about it, I never have heard about FaceBook losing data. Hmm.
I don't think so. Using a gun is impersonal, using a knife is very much up close and personal. Plus you might get blood on yourself.
But I do agree that the societal guardrails we have thanks to welfare and social care are certainly what keeps the pot from boiling over.
Yep, but no guns.
600 armed officers seems a tad much for invading an ISP's premises, even if said ISP is located in a bunker. I mean come on, there's 450 of those guys who must have spent four hours just standing around.
Yes, it was a WWII bunker. That does not mean that it was defended like a WWII bunker. If it had been, I'm pretty sure that 600 cops might not have been enough, and the death toll would have been, as they say, catastrophic.
A much better option would have been to send a squad of 20 men, and keep a hundred as backup. If shots got actually fired, then bring in the army.
They made a pseudo-military operation out of a perfectly civilian one.
"it is not legally obliged to tell consumers if it has included the code that would allow it to cheat"
That is at Apple levels of "Your Honor, nobody in their right mind would believe a commercial".
Congratulations, Samsung, you have just readjusted your level of confidence to Sleazy. Well done. Carry on.
As opposed to shutting the screen down and then looking for the source of the problem.
Really. I do believe that, had I been responsible, I would have much preferred passersby seeing a black screen rather than that.
I might have made a copy of the stream though, for "evidence", of course.
Fuck that. Microsoft, you can't even keep language settings correctly for your failed browser, you think I'm going to be stupid enough to entrust my entire desktop to your effing cloud ?
Do you remember what PC used to mean ? Personal Computer. Emphasis on Personal.
ODFO.
Oh, right. We fucked up so you just reset your settings to the proper thing. Of course. It's not like you're the maker of the #1 OS used in the world, how could you possibly have the means of correcting your own mistakes ?
Ah, Microsoft. Where would we be without you ?
On a stable system, apparently.