"Physical damage do[es] not happen if there is no external force"
Right, so the customer is holding it wrong then ?
It's always nice when customer support basically tells you to your face that you're a lying twat, isn't it ?
19000 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Could someone please explain to me how capturing the MAC and IP addresses of the stuff I use in the privacy of my own house is going to overcome any issues whatsoever ?
I am well aware that any service provider likely has this capability - after all you're paying it to provide you with connectivity, so it obviously has the means to manage that connectivity. And that includes knowing what you connect to its service. Fine.
Except that, I can have a WiFi printer that the rest of computers can use. That printer is not going on the Internet, cannot be used from the Internet, and my computers using it do not send anything over the Internet to get to it to print. So why should my provider grab that address and what can it do with said address to "overcome these issues" ?
Apart from being able to tell me what I have connected to my network, I don't see how any provider can optimize anything at all with that information. And I'm not saying my provider is selling that info, I don't think so, honestly.
So what good it is to have that info ?
I don't think of the high seas as a place where you'd lug a powerful aerial on a boat to hack passing cargo container wifi. The open ocean is not exactly a comfortable place to be, unless you're in a very big ship.
And even then, things can get rough.
Poor infosec in the middle of the Pacific ? I think the cargo companies can live with that.
They will pay $20 million to be cooped up in what looks like a large-ish Gemini capsule for five whole days ?
If you can splurge that amount of money, you are a person that has the habit of doing whatever you want, going wherever you want, whenever you want. You're also used to spacious, luxurious environments and people whose only job is to ensure that you're happy. Being locked up in a large telephone booth for five days is not your habitual environment, and doing that with four other people who are just as uppity as you are is going to drive someone crazy without a shred of doubt.
Plus, you'll not only not have caviar and champagne on demand, you'll also be defecating in full view of four total strangers. You'll have to get along with them, and that's not something you're used to either.
Paying that amount of money sure will bring you bragging rights back home - if you live to brag about it - but the experience is going to be unique in more ways than one, that's for sure.
And in what world does the US think it can impose on a Taiwanese company who it can deal with ?
If TSMC gets notice that it cannot sell to Huawei, it should shrug and say "sure", and continue right on dealing with Huawei. America's problems are not Taiwan's problems, Taiwan has bigger fish to fry.
And if the US starts getting uppity and saying thing like unless you do as we say we will stop dealing with you, well, let's just say I'd like to see Trump try that. The US can't live a day without the chips TSMC makes for it. Apple would have an aneurysm, Intel would have an attack, IBM would lie helpless on a gurney and HPE would be agonizing.
A measure like that would last all of 24 hours before the entire IT industry would scream for its reversal with its dying breath.
The shit stains you leave everywhere will provide a mountain of work for historians to pontificate on for decades to come.
Your mere existence in the White House is a demonstration of how broken Democracy is in the USA. And you're breaking it a bit more every day, this time by whitewashing your scummy pals.
I would say shame on you, but you don't know the meaning of the word.
Bzzzt ! Wrong attitude, Ring. You should have created your "privacy vault" to not allow for sharing personal information unless the user opts in on that.
For Pete's sake you don't need to have a PhD to understand that. You do, however, need a company that is not obviously built on sharing personal information with advertisers instead of being built on providing a service to its customers.
Ring is just another company that caters to the ad market, using its IoT tat to farm the information from its stable of clueless users.
Sure it does; the ICANN way. You know it exists, so bow down and grovel.
Congratulations, ICANN, in demonstrating a thorough disdain for everyone else's opinion, and the complete ignorance of the spirit of your own rules. You have shown the way for other groups to do the same, and now ISOC is emulating your despicable behavior.
Line them up behind the chemical shed and shoot them all, I say.
It's not that difficult.
1) You go into the voting booth where no one is supposed to see what you're doing
2) you insert the ballot of your choice into an envelope and close it
3) you bring your ballot to the box where you insert it and your vote is counted
4) nobody looks at your envelope before it is time to count who won - by then your envelope is one of many and, therefor, anonymous
Well yes, it will, because the virus is actually affecting China, whereas the tariffs are being paid by US companies and - by direct consequence - US citizens.
The only part of Trump's tariffs that have any impact on China is where US companies order less stuff, or no more at all following the famous forbidden list that erased 30% off the revenue of a company that needed parts from China.
The Chinese company is just suffering a small loss of revenue, the US company is hit for a third of its activity. Who's suffering the most ?
Wow. I had no idea that the consequences could be so widespread. In retrospect though, yeah, basing a big chunk of your production capacity in the same country is asking for trouble when things like this crop up.
I guess this is going to be a wake-up call for quite a few industries. From now on, companies will need to diversify their production centers and not only implant in countries with cheap labor. From time to time, having a site in a less-cheap country will be useful to pick up the slack when the cheap country has a hiccup like this.
I'll let the MBA's find the right balance for this.
What is Emsisoft trying to do, be reasonable ? That's not how you report virus damage at a country level. You speak of hundreds of billions, not a measly single billion. You're talking computer virus. It's Armageddon time, not beer o'clock. You're supposed to scare the bejeesus out of people, not deliver a school report.
Go back and put some pizzaz on those numbers. I want to feel the fear, you understand ? FEAR.
I am sick of hearing of this scum bothering people that are actually trying to make a product.
You have a patent ? Good for you. Are you making anything with it ? No ? Then shut up and fuck off.
Patent law should be changed to include an article that states that a patent is valid only if the patent holder can justify that product is being made and sold using that patent. Doesn't need to be the holder, who can grant usage to whoever he likes, but product must be made or you have no right to complain.
That would clear out quite a few portfolios that are in zombie mode right now.
A lot of them, apparently. That's why the shoe stores have entire aisles with cheap shit that won't last a year - it ensures that customers will be back next year.
It took my wife a looong time to get the message. She's a self-admitted shoe addict. She used to bring back a new pair every two months. I waited, because we had the means and it's her thing so who am I to tell her off and tell her to stop ? My thing is computer equipment and she never complained, so how could I ?
Then one day, she started complaining about how she was fed up with shoes that couldn't last more than a season. She said herself that she had all these nice-looking shoes, but after wearing them more than two times they started to hurt her feet. After six or ten times, they were falling apart. She told me that, from that point on, she would buy less pairs of shoes, but of better quality. Hallelujah.
Since then, and it's been quite a few years now, she occasionally brings back a pair of shoes. She is very happy to show them to me and I'm very happy that she's buying quality that will last, on top of things that look good on her.
But it took time, a lot of time. People will understand, but they have to have the means to do so. If we were minimum wage earners, I don't know that the lesson would have made it through.
Would that mean that MS has finally started looking into having the various functionalities of Windows be separate entities as far as updating is concerned ?
Going further, is MS finally going to start looking at its OS as a kernel that has add-ons bolted to it, and treat the various parts accordingly ?
Might we finally one day have a Windows that can live through a video driver update without needing a reboot ?
I pray that this is the case.
Freedom of speech means that you have the right to your political and religious views and cannot be pursued for them by the government.
It does not mean that you have the right to say anything you want, nor do you have the right to do so anywhere you please.
It seems to me that the primary reason for its demise is the fact that it didn't learn anything from its first mistake. It should have taken stock in the market's reaction, reviewed the issues and built a point-by-point action plan.
Instead, EP management obviously decided to just go and do the same thing again (create an even more "revolutionary" model) but expecting fame and fortune as a result which, as we all know here, is the definition of insanity.
Well, that's one way to call "following who checks out and waiting for the biggest names to cover the fact that we didn't have the balls to take that decision before".
Now that the high-profile names have all declared out, the rest can follow meekly, citing "overabundance of caution" and "our people are our most important asset" as an excuse for what they didn't do last week.
With all the hoopla around 5G for the past months, they are selling a high end foldable without 5G ? Are they setting themselves up for failure ?
I cannot fathom the rationale behind that decision. Samsung is pushing 5G in all of its new models, and now this. Did Samsung marketers deem that the target market for that model was not interested in 5G ? But, if that's the case, then what was the point of all the marketing pushing 5G ?
So many questions . .
What is that abomination ? Is there something blockchain has suddenly been found useful for, apart from stealing money from the clueless, that we now have an infrastructure to supply it ?
I went and did a little search and I found this document (PDF) which contains, right in the introduction, this gem of a declaration :
"It is as yet unclear what business needs, if any, the blockchain will truly resolve, and some question whether this technology is “looking for a solution.” "
The document then goes on to serve a hefty coating of reassuring technical terms about hybrid and decentralization but, honestly, it just looks like the whole thing is simply companies trying to get their share of the clueless-skimming pie in a legal manner.
I think it is time to educate yourself : watch this and learn.
Always a sign that what you're doing is perfectly above board and not at all a stab in the back, no siree.
Step by step, little by little, even Microsoft learns that the Customer Is Always Right. Who knows ? Maybe another thousand years and we'll get there.
Look, guys, I am very well placed to know that writing good code is not easy, but when you go out of your way to help hackers insert malware, it's kinda on you. Loading a DLL from a non-admin folder ? Who thought that that was a good thing ? In what kind of meeting was that approach approved and for what reason ?
Or is this another case of rogue engineer ?
Oh well, at least they found it and patched it.
So, success then !
And, obviously, it is a "different company" with a "different owner, different management and a different strategy" and found the reports very "distressing"
Yeah, I'll bet. Their yearly result is likely going to find things "distressing" as well.
If it's running on a PC, it won't be detecting wireless anything unless the PC has a wireless networking card. I don't think that is so common. Possible, yes, there are PCs who do connect via wireless, but I would think most PCs have an Ethernet cable because when people bought PCs wireless was not a thing.
Now if you're talking laptops or tablets, then definitely yes, there will be wireless available to explore.
PCs not so much.
Possibly one of the worst examples you could have chosen. Washing machines did not replace anyone's job. There was no army of laundry ladies going house to house to do the laundry, it was the housewife doing the laundry.
Washing machines gave the housewife a bit more time to do the other chores, such as cleaning and cooking. No jobs were lost, and jobs were created because you had the people repairing the things that didn't exist before.
Where ? The ones that were laid off because they had the experience and a salary to match ? They're gone.
What's left has either been hired from the bottom of the salary pit or stayed in HP simply because not good enough to command a high salary.
There is no more best-of-class at HP. There's just couldn't-find-another-job.
The boffins can obviously take some credit for that, of course, but some credit is due to the engineers and technicians who built the things in a such a sturdy way.
Who knows ? Maybe it's just the fact that building things to survive long exposure to space radiation also makes them inherently more durable than the specifications call for. In any case, I do believe that there is no case of an orbiter, satellite or probe that failed before planned mission end as long as it was put on the right orbit / landed safely.
Long may we continue that tradition.
Indeed.
"did not explain why the Chinese state is mounting a multi-nation diplomatic effort to back said private company"
Sorry ? The US has been doing that for decades, promoting Boeing everywhere the POTUS could. France has been doing that as well, defending Airbus while doing "diplomatic" stuff.
Presidents these days are just high-class salespeople. It's hardly new.
Yeah, like we used to have. Once upon a time a fridge was repairable, a dishwasher was serviceable, the TV repairman was a household guest.
Today ? Nothing electronic is repairable any more, it's all made to just be thrown out and replaced. That's a bloody foolish waste of resources, and it's the companies that have forced this upon us because, up to now, hardware was always progressing at a rapid pace.
But that pace has slowed to a crawl. Today, a 5-year-old laptop works just fine and almost as well as a brand new one. This year's new phone model has literally nothing over last year's, and may even have something less (headphone jack, anyone ?). But companies still chuck out a new version every year, even if the hardware is practically on a 2-year cycle now, because marketing has to have something new.
Never mind. We are on the path to a world when a new model only comes out when it genuinely has something new over the previous model. We will, soonish, begin to live in a world where a new phone model will be about as common as a new model of fridge, and we'll be replacing them about as often.
I'm looking forward to that.