Re: Beware of Sysinternals Process Explorer
I use Process Hacker.
I am not aware that it phones home. It works flawlessly, however.
19127 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I don't care if it's clear or not, it should not be done, period.
Good on Borkzilla for reacting on this and pulling the driver. Now Trend is going to have to submit another one, and I'll bet it will get a lot more scrutiny the next time around.
A reputation takes years to build, but only a day to trash. Trend Micro has now trashed its reputation.
Do you think your government is not aware of what you spend your money on online ?
What's different here ? Is it because there's the word "China" is the article ?
I guarantee you, it doesn't matter how democratic you think your country is, if your government takes an interest in you, your expense record will be the first thing they'll get their hands on.
The potential benefits for who ?
Also, is this a pure-Chromium issue, or are other browsers at risk also ?
In any case, I note that this is, once again, a JavaScript issue. And that means, once again, that NoScript saves the day.
NoScript : protecting privacy every day, without fail.
It's the "USA Freedom Act", therefor, given the inverse rule about law titles, this Act is clearly about restricting freedom in the USA, so there's no chance of adding any section that would improve freedom in the USA.
Besides, the NSA doesn't care about the Law or the Constitution. It has a friggin' big 'puter and it's gonna keep using it.
Absolutely. Cheating in a video game ? Happens all the time. There are many people out there who simply cannot stand losing. They're not there to play the game, they're there to win. Ask any company with an online FPS game. Even Minecraft has a server module to prevent cheating. Minecraft.
But the line that really gets me is "it was never meant with any bad intention". No it was meant with the intention of winning, because he obviously just couldn't stand the fact that everyone had observed his lackluster virtual performance and his ego couldn't take it any more.
When you get to that point, it doesn't matter what the goal of the competition is, you just want to show them all, charity be damned.
Well, one thing's for sure, there will be some tensions around the dinner table come next Christmas.
Maybe governments will make an effort to increase blocking of bot traffic or somesuch, I really haven't a clue what they can do though. Spam and phishing is only malware when it reaches the endpoint, when it's on its way there's next to no way to tell.
Yesterday, I received the laptop from my friend the postman. It was sent by a customer so that I can work on a project on their servers in a secure VM configured by them. Coincidentally, I also received a mail telling me that my package was waiting for me and there was a €2 transport charge to pay. With a friendly link, of course.
Out of sheer habit I checked the URL of the link, which immediately made me suspicious because of the strange name that had nothing to do with the company that the mail alleged to represent. Then logic kicked in and I realized that, even if there is a transport charge to pay, it's my customer that should pay it, not me. Finally I trashed the mail and thought nothing more of it.
But I am certain that such a mail would make many a person click on the link and just follow instructions blindly. Especially these days where Amazon is becoming king of the hill. Now transport that kind of attack to a hospital environment, with a nurse that has a thousand other things to do and just wants this mail out of the way. It's easy to hack hospitals, they are trying to save people, not computer hardware. They already have their minds full of medical knowledge, cramming security procedures on top is a nuisance they don't have time for.
I don't know what the solution is. Maybe a filter machine that all email is sent to by default before a human checks that it is legit and lets it continue to its intended recipient ? Put a fancy statistical analysis machine with oh-so-vaunted "machine learning" and maybe something automated could be tuned to be useful.
Absolutely. You want to scan my computer ? You pop up the question and ask me, along with a description of what you are looking for, where you're looking for it and why you think you have the cheek to ask me.
If you do security checks on your side of the intertubes, that's your business and nothing I have the right to wail about, but on my side, you will only do what I bloody well allow you to.
Congratulations, Adobe, on your persistence.
We are in the final stages of getting rid of Flash, so you dump Character Animator on us.
Are you by any chance tired of not being on patch lists ? Spoiler : you are on patch lists. All the time. It would be refreshing to see you take a break from that.
Good question. Why go and put your data on servers that can be looked into by Beijing ?
Except that thousands of non-USA companies are putting their corporate data into offerings that come under White House jurisdiction, so why not ?
Especially if it's cheaper.
The Cloud War will happen.
Database system are designed to be as fast as possible, not to impose delays. You need to understand that there is not just one terminal (aka PC) making requests to the database, there are hundreds, if not thousands. You have the hostesses in the airports, registering luggage, you have travel agents querying the best way for their customer to travel, you have people on the Internet looking it up for themselves, and there is probably a bunch of other possible ways to send demands that I haven't the foggiest idea of.
If you create a system where only one request can be served at a time, you are basically choking the whole system beyond usability and the whole thing collapses.
It's a nice idea, but if everyone in a household might be able to have a PC, not many households can have an office per person.
There are many people living in apartments that are already small, they simply don't have a room to serve as an office, so they repurpose the dinner table or something. In those conditions, I doubt they appreciate working from home.
So either they continue going to the office, with all the hassle of getting there and back, or, in addition to the probable massive shift in commercial property value, there will be increased pressure on acquiring a house with enough rooms for people to not only live, but work alongside their living space.
That is going to put additional strain on people's budgets, and we just might see companies creating a WFH incentive package, including a financial package comprised of some sort of company investment and a small interest rate loan, in order to have its employees in the best possible working conditions.
Having the company pay a part of the Internet bill would not be a stretch either.
They're not paranoid, they're just using that as an excuse to try and keep Huawei from dominating the market.
You see, the US is all for capitalism as long as it is holding they keys. As soon as an actual competitor rises above its abilities, it's no holes barred to undermining said competitor by any means necessary.
But I agree that Huawei, as a Chinese company, could very well be pressured by Beijing to reveal some sort of information at some point or another.
However, we all know that Washington does pressure US companies and has even made a law allowing it to do so.
So what I would like is a European initiative creating 5G infrastructure components that are not beholden either to the US or to China.
Because if you want to be paranoid, you have to go all the way.
Jupiter is a billion kilometers from the Sun, and that's close enough to start vaporizing ice ?
I thought comets had to at least in the asteroid field before being impacted by the Sun's energy.
An open fusion reactor is apparently more powerful than I thought.
Edit : my bad, Jupiter is only almost 780 million km from the Sun. Still far, though.
Your face is PII. That's why we have all those failed attempts at facial recognition going around in public places.
So, "if all PII was removed", including blurring the face, then yes, I'm guessing it would pass GDPR provisions.
Now the question is : does Grandma know how to edit the photo and blur the face ?
I'm guessing no.
"some posts were made by staff who recently completed certifications on major cloud platforms but were still let go"
So, you go through the effort of improving your skills on your own time, likely paying for the privilege, and you still not only get no recognition for it, but get the chop.
That is one massive fuck you right there.
Never trust a conglomerate. You're nothing but a number there.
On what planet does he live again ?
Data has never been a luxury. The only thing the entire IT industry has ever done is improve how we handle data. The speed and efficiency with which we deal with and transmit data today is because we have had to find ways to do that. Then the Internet came along and it was not long before we adapted to its unique abilities and now we are milking them for all their worth.
The Cloud may be a luxury, but at the rate companies are stuffing data into it, it will soon become a necessity.
Okay, so you decided to launch your drone on a bridge, likely made of metal but not specified in the article, and next to an electrified train line.
Instead of launching from a field in the middle of nowhere.
Were you specifically testing the drone's ability to navigate in complicated electromagnetic environments ? Because even without a metal bridge, an electrified train line is going to have an impact on compasses, as you found out the hard way.
A "correction" that changes the interface language.
Could someone please explain how that is possible ?
How can you write a bugfix that touches on the interface language ?
I get that connection issues can be a trifle complicated to deal with, but how do you spill over on interface settings ?
It's an age-old tradition at Borkzilla, followed by massive investments and purchasing of small companies to catch up, followed by unsatisfactory product and ending in cancellation of the whole fiasco.
And all of this is made possible by Windows and Office licenses which are the two things that Microsoft has done reasonably well and the only things that have ever really brought in the money.
Okay, there's Azure that's not doing bad now either, granted. But frankly, everything else Borkzilla has ever attempted ended in failure. Might be time to draw some conclusions, don't you think ?
So, the Noodle (sorry, that's how I write it) will need 128GB of SD storage to manage its blockchain - that it will have to synchronize somehow - it has bloody LED lights that you don't see because it's clipped on your shirt pocket, and it will be available when the pandemic is over. Or restarting, we'll see.
Now tell me, who is managing this blockchain thing, what server is it going to call for updates and what security measures are included ?
Frankly, I have the feeling that the company making this is going to fold if that's the only product they have.
It is only fitting to have her name in the stars.
And it is a good thing that will remind people that, at every step of our advancement in knowledge since at least Ancient Greece (and probably before that), there has always been a woman somewhere developing ideas that no man had thought of before.
There has been Hypatia in Alexandrian times, of course Marie Curie, and there have been others but those are the two names that come to my mind right now.
I now know that Nancy Grace Roman is part of this pantheon without which Science would simply not be the same.
So exactly like targeted ads. They take what you've already ordered and suggest more of the same. What's the use ?
I already know that when I go for KFC, I want the spicy crust, not the normal one. I don't need some damn piece of glorified plastic to remind me of that.
Does that mean that the good people abord the ISS will soon have a video-recording-enabled robot trundling around and watching them ? With the entire world able to see what they are doing ?
It must be an idea from marketing. I'm sure that the control software will keep the robot away from private quarters and the space toilet, but still, there is a good risk that thing will get nicknamed The Eye Of Sauron before long.
Um, the location is prison. At the next call, the location is still prison.
What's the point of selling that ? Are prison wardens that interested in knowing when a prisoner is in the gym ?
I am baffled at this. Prisoners are in prison. What possible use can their precise location in prison be ?
Now that I can understand. And we have a magnificent example, don't we, NHS ?
I do prefer that the two major players get their teams on this issue and iron out a common solution. I like that they say that no data goes back either of them, but I'll wait until the experts demonstrate that that is true.
In any case, I do believe that Google & Apple (Googapple ?) are less of a risk than some local company who got the job because the CEO goes golfing with the minister's brother.
Plus, at least the techs in both companies know exactly what their platform can do and how to call on it most efficiently. Knowing how to program an app for a mobile platform does not mean you know how to do the job using the least amount of power possible.
So good on Googapple. Let's just keep in mind the age-old adage : trust, but verify.
Really ?
Are these guys new to the concept of capitalism or what ?
When a supermarket chain eyes a spot of land it wants it not only gets the local authorities to exempt it from taxes for ten years, but also gets roads and infrastructure made on its behalf then takes off after nine and a half because, all of a sudden, it remembers that it won't be making money soon.
And now these senators are wondering about a $12 billion plant ? Were they born yesterday ?
Of course there were incentives. Of course there were promises to not tax them on the basis of surface usage, or headcount, or anything that ensures that TSMC will build the damn thing and employ local people to make it run.
And even if that means that the only locals are janitors, it still means that there will be an influx of housing improvements, as a whole lot of people will be flying in from Taiwan to be part of the plant.
Because the USA no longer has that expertise. So shut the fuck up and take what you can get. And smile while you're at it.
And I am absolutely certain that Apple did a thorough review as promised.
Except that Apple never promised to change anything. Apple just promised to review the situation.
People are going to have to learn to read what is said, and act accordingly. Words are words, and actions speak volumes more, but you cannot expect one of the richest companies in the world to have the same interpretation of "review" as you do.
If you have any questions, ask yourself why you are not managing billions in the bank, and Apple is.
Yeah, but he could have made that choice six months ago and not taken the job at all.
It's not like the situation was unknown in November.
And besides, his departure does not exonerate him from responsibility for what happened during his (short) tenure. If, Heaven forbid, there is an explosion on the launch pad, he'll still be questioned for the decisions he took.
Of course you do. So please provide an official explanation for why that code was included.
This is not a bug, nor a mistake, nor a case of rogue engineer. The code was written specifically to check on Borkzilla's driver certification. There is no reason why the guy should have alerted you beforehand so you could silence him with spurious excuses while you renamed MysteriousCheck to PerfectlyNormalCheck and pretended everything was ok.
It is not ok, and I hope you'll get raked over the coals for it.
I'm sorry, where's the problem ? I thought audits were a consensual kind of thing. It's a "I'm here to chek on your licensing landscape", "Please come in" type of thing.
Because if some guy thinks he can barge in and check my kit without my consent, I'll have him know that he needs cops and a warrant to do so.
And if he thinks he can just send me an invoice if I do not comply, well that does not mean I'll pay it.
Is it really indeed. The USA has a bunch of laws that protect individual privacy, but the NSA routinely runs roughshod over all that, and the FBI gleefully follows suit.
Laws are worth nothing if you don't have people in the right positions that know and do their job to protect citizens.
And there appears to be a dearth of that kind of human being these days.