"if exploited by highly skilled attackers"
Well you can bet that they're looking at how to exploit that now.
And since there's no lack of highly skilled attackers, something is going to show up sooner rather than later.
19006 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I am thrilled to learn that Science has so much time on its hands to tackle the really important problems that have plagued cooks since time immemorial.
Now all we need is a procedure to ensure that dropped eggs always land on their sides.
Maybe a dash of butter might help ?
I'm sorry, but you voted to put a crminal in the White House and now you're complaining that he's not respecting the law ?
What exactly did you expect, that he would magically change from his first tour in the Oval Office ?
He's doing nothing new, he's just doing it more boldly since he's learned that he is nigh untouchable from behind that desk.
Sure. This time it was a letter purporting to be from the NSA demanding the list of server logins and passwords to ensure that no server had been unduly accessed.
Information that was sent by Reply To to an address of the type "honestNSAemployee@truensa.com.ru.
There's also an obscure scientist by the name Richard Feyman who made some lectures in his time, one of which was explaining the Scientific Method where he said pretty much the same thing.
However, I have to admit that sending money to Afghanistan so that they can grow poppy which will undoubtedly be used to make opium which will be sold back to the USA at a vastly inflated price is something that must have the Taliban in stitches.
I've heard the the EU wants to replace the US in USAID funding. Have they had a look at that line ? Because I don't want to fund opium production in Afghanistan. I do not approve of that.
This thing about recovering US scientists also has me wondering. I doubt very much that US scientists wotking for the military or the nuclear industry are in any way concerned by this decision. They will not be the minds leaving and we won't be recovering them.
Because I'm guessing that there's going to be a nice bonus for this guy saving so much money for the company.
One question : the guy that convinced the Board/CEO that The CloudTM was a good idea in the first place, is he still withthe company, or has he moved on to get another fat bonus check from another company ?
I'm guessing this type of story is not going to help AWS's revenue stream . . .
I have a cat that, in winter, has a curious propensity to find the exact moment when I'm out of my home office (filling my glass of water, or going to the toilet or whatever) to hop on the desk and lay down on the keyboard.
Which has already caused me so many problems that I now have the reflex of puling the lid down just far enough that the cat can't get in under (it hasn't yet figured out that all it has to do is push it up with its head) and yet not far enough to trigger sleep mode.
Fire the people with experience and replace them hith a hallucinating statistical anaysis machine.
I think that's what you call digging your own grave.
In any case, we'll see just how much this pseudo-AI is going to help you reach $10 billion in revenue.
If I were one of your remaining customers, you have just signed the definitive death knell of our relationship and I would be looking for another security supplier.
And I'm happy to find out that it severely limits the data it slurps (because, these days, I fully expect there will be slurping).
I'm even happier that it cuts out ads, and that me a ton of bandwidth on my smartphone.
I never miss a chance to tell people around me about Brave if ever phone browsers come up in the conversation. I have converted a few people already.
He actually said that ?
Does he remember the televised ceremony when he had one of his pudgy little paws on the Bible and the other raised swearing to do just that, or is it just a thing he learned by heart to pass the test and get back to his position of ultra power where he thinks he can do whatever he wants (and facts are rather thin on the ground to oppose him at this point in time) ?
At last the semblance of respecting rules and democracy has been dropped.
DOGE exists for one thing : to ensure the companies of the billionnairs who have taken part in this sham are allowed to ensure that their profits are secure.
We've known for years that those with money will always have the means to bend things in their favor. Relations, dinners, galas, all those occasions where the cigar-smoking elite agree that the peons are not concerned by their "little" arrangements.
Now, there is a government agency that is specifically meant to enshrine those little arrangements with the force of law.
How convenient.
The mentality is simple : if they haven't spent their yearly budget, they are rewarded with a smaller budget the following year.
Since increasing the size of the budget for any "special" project is months of discussions and, quite possibly, all of that ending in a refusal, you spend the effing budget.
Kind of like the fighter jets who, at the end of the fiscal year, spend some time taxiing to and from the runway (without taking off, because that would become "flying time" and treated differently) just so that the yearly fuel budget was spent (obviously, CO2 emissions are not a military concern).
What it is does not concern me. What it isn't does.
What it isn't is him in handcuffs going in front of a judge explaining why a National Security Advisor, a prominent figure in the US government directly responsible for the nation's security, is using an unsecure, unvetted app and, from what I've read elsewhere, a direct connection to the Internet that does not go through the secure firewall.
This group of clown led by the orange baboon is a mockery of government, of democracy and of just plain decency.
Hmm. Isn't a heat shield just a slab of metal ?
I know that being bombarded by the Sun's full radiative fury is certainly not a good thing, but isn't that probe still inside the Earth's magnetosphere ? That should protect a slab of metal from the worst of the Sun's fury, no ?
If the heat shield has failed, shouldn't the rest of the probe be a lump of molten stuff as well ?
Could someone please explain this remark ?
You won't have the chance to go to court.
You'll get a National Security Letter telling you what you need to do to, that you are forced to comply and that you are forbidden from telling anyone about it.
A tool specifically made to avoid syscalls, which just happen to be what AV tools are actively watching, is hijacked by miscreants for their own nefarious purposes.
I can't help but think that the guy who thought this up must be a serious expert on OSes in general, and on kernels in particular. You have to know the ins and outs of the inner workings of the entire OS stack and the particulars of how it all fits together to dream up a scheme like that and make it work for you.
What a shame that a mind like that decided to employ his formidable intellect for crime, instead of working with Torvalds or Cupertino or even Redmond and making a better world for everyone.
There's this little niggling little detail called '"work". When you're a self-employed freelancer, you don't work nine-to-five, you work until your customers stop asking you for urgent things to get done.
Then you invoice them and you get paid.
I don't have time to eduate myself on this transition now, but when I'm retired I will have all the time in the world and, by God, I will get it done.
But I'll repeat myself : the only reason I'm on Windows is because all my customers are.
I am around six years away from retirement: On that day, I swear to God I am setting up a Linux Mint machine in my home and I will transition everything I need or want to do to that machine until I can reformat my Windows machine finally get rid of that bloated mess and once again have a Personal Computer.
Emphasis on "Personal".
Ah, PowerPoint.
As lead Notes developer in a company that was actively transiting to Sharepoint, Outlook and MSSQL (at least one good decision), I had been called upon to present the current uses of major Notes applications and the future of Notes in the company.
I dutilfully put together the memorandum of all the Notes applications being slowly decomissioned, but I just couldn't help my self and, on the last page of the page of the presentation entitled "The Future f Notes at <company name>", I used this kind of image as background with, at the bottom of the slide, the words "Any questions ?".
Even the IT director chuckled at that, so I consider it a total success.
Move is not the correct word.
It should be replicated to Europe, just like DNS databases are replicated across the world.
Make continental copies, with multiple governments and/or organizations pledging to ensure funding of the operations.
If one continent abandons the project, the replicas will be there to ensure continuity.
This project is very much an essential resource for computing at every scale.
Once again, despite himself, Trump is doing exactly what is needed to ensure that dependance on a single authority is banished - especially when that authority is held by an orange baboon flinging his shit at random walls.
Looking at that image with the puny human standing practically directly under one of the claws immediately makes me think that the robot is going to go "This thing is in my way".
Down goes the claw, clamps around a screaming human futilely trying to liberate his head from the steel grip, and up goes the claw at (literally) breakneck speed, ejecting the obstacle a hundred meters away so it can work in peace.
I have learned a long time ago the usefulness of an UPS to keep PCs from getting damaged by power surges or cuts.
Funny, because I live not far from a nuclear power station (about 15km, give or take a few). You'd think that the quality of the power line would be reliable so close to the generator, but you'd be mistaken.
All of my electronic equipment is, at minimum, connected to the mains with a surge protector (TV, stereo, fridge, freezer, etc). In my home office I have a 1600 VA UPS to which all my desktops, my NAS, the connection box and the telephone are connected.
If there is a power cut, I power down the computers and leave just the phone and the box connected to ensure that I can still use my laptop's WiFi if required until the power comes back on.
But I am never again going to trust the mains to give proper juice to my computer equipment. Yes, I know that, in the past 20 years, standards have evolved and computers are more resiliant.
I'm still not taking the risk.
I have enough history with Ubisoft to have decided to never buy a game from them again.
From the insane requirement to have to reinstall Battlefield 2 every time there was an update (and I was ADSL at the time - took all evening), to the fact that when wanted to update Battlefield 2142 it asked me for the CD key (hello ? I bought it from your fucking store, remember ?) and when I complained about it, Ubisoft just shut down my account (no, no reimbursement, don't be daft).
I've learned my lesson. Ubisoft can go to hell.
I honestly doubt that there will be a wave of new acquisitions purely to get Windows 11.
Prices are up, Trump is doing his damndest to make international trade a nightmare and people just don't have a spare $5000 lying around to "upgrade" a computer that does its job just fine, thank you very much.
Companies will bear the brunt of the upgrade wave because compliance, but I think Windows 1 0 is going to be around for a long while - maybe even longer than XP was.
Not everyone is a gamer.
This is starting to look like a (very high stakes) game of ping pong.
Russia : take this, we disrupt your nuclear reactors
Ukrains : take this, we obliterate your TikTok soldiers
Russia: oh yeah ? Well now we infiltrate your command structure and steal yiour battle plans
Ukraine : Really ? Well now we know where all of your soldiers are and can prdict their movements
. . . (to be continued)
"an agent can analyze an email and determine "this is a bad return address," Lord said. "This is a fake logo. This is a URL that's hosted in a .parks domain and has only been up for the last 12 hours. This is legitimately bad. Filter it to the security team"
I fail to see how you need pseudo-AI to get such results.
I programmed my own personal spam filter that could easily detect when someone claimed to represent (example) Microsoft(*) but the return address was somewhere.iranistan.com. I was capable of going through all http links and check if they were pointing to legitimate Microsoft domains. I had an extensive subject dictionary where I stored the blatant examples of things that spammers would use (mostly spelling errors and references to orders that needed to be confirmed and such). I also had a keyword database that looked through the mail checking for the most obvious things spammers put in their mails (I need someone to recover the money and send it to me, etc).
It was accurate, evolutive, and stored the offending spam in a reference database with the reason for its removal as keyword.
I'd have to go check the code, but I'm pretty sure I didn't write 10,000 lines to get this result, and there were no calls to any external libraries whatsoever.
This pseudo-AI thing is an industrial crusher looking for a walnut to justify its existence.
*Replace Microsoft by any company, bank or official organization
So let me get this straight : networking is getting so complex that we're going to have to have a 2U server rack with 6 core Xeons and 2 Nvidia H100s just to read El Reg ?
Maybe we could tone down government snooping a bit and get back to regular GB fiber on a 6cm2 box ?