
"IBM asked to be excused from the story"
On what grounds ? Too difficult to simply state that they are not affected ?
Or too affected to actually be able to formulate a response that won't get them grilled in the tech press again ?
18239 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
This pandemic is a temporary thing. We were globally all caught with our pants down, despite SARS and MERS, but that's because this COVID-19 is much more transmissible, and that much more dangerous.
But we'll get a handle on this, and the vaccine will come, in time. Things will more or less go back to what they were, and life will resume. Conferences will resume, because they are way too useful to not have, for all sorts of reasons.
People are not going to simply stop meeting face-to-face. It can be hoped, however, that people will have learned to properly wash their hands.
The next time a pandemic rolls in, we'll be better prepared and know how to react. We'll switch to online conferencing seamlessly, and ride it out like we are doing now. And, when it's all over, we'll go back to living as before.
One can argue about Google Translate and its relevance back then, or how the previous admin should have been a bit more knowledgeable, but the real problem has nothing to do with the admin name.
The real problem is that this Dirk launched a file operation without checking what he would be transferring. It's that second of inattention that always gets you, and it got him.
When you are the admin, you never initiate a file operation without checking and double-checking what you're doing. With your access, it's way too dangerous not to. He didn't check, and the mayhem lasted a month. I'm guessing that was a learning experience for him.
Translation : it is a point of failure and will be prone to breaking/blocking. Physical complexity is trouble when you're making something that will be put into the bumbling hands of thousands of idiots.
And it weighs 300 grams. Out of curiosity, I just weighed my Galaxy A3 : 135 grams. And after talking on the phone for ten minutes, I change hand because the other one needs a rest. I like the keyboard, but that thing is going to be deforming shirt pockets.
It's all well and good to use science-fiction as a basis for prediction, but the question is how can drones be useful now ? Apparently, the answer is : they can't.
We're not going to redesign our cities to fit drones. Telephone poles are here to stay for a while yet, because small towns do not have the money to bury all wires and get rid of them in one go. It'll take a long before everything gets buried, and that will only happen when burying wires is as cheap as setting up poles.
And cars going up building walls ? Please. Sci-fi is nice, but the energy cost of dragging a car up a wall is insane next to a person in an elevator. Even when we get fusion working and energy becomes "free", there will still be no reason to go and drag tons of mass to elevated places just because we can. The danger of having them drop back down in an uncontrolled manner is just too great.
While your workers are supposed to be at home in social isolation ? I doubt that mounting a new server in a rack can be done by a click of the mouse, so that means you have people that are not isolated doing the job.
I hope that that means you are adding this significant capacity in countries that are not under the pandemic panic at this time.
Freedom of expression does not mean you have the right to spout any old bullshit at any point in time. This is the exact same thing as yelling "Fire !" in a crowded theater.
As such, freedom of expression falls under the same blanket of social responsibility. You don't yell "Fire !" in a crowded place because the ensuing panic can get people injured and even killed. You don't encourage people to spread a pandemic virus because God knows there's gonna be some damn fools that are actually going to find that a hilarious idea and do it.
Your freedom of expression is subject to being responsible for what you say. The thing is, on the Internet, nobody feels responsible for anything and they behave accordingly.
"He insisted that Perens' statement was opinion, rather than settled legal fact, and that OSS has the right to withhold updates from customers exercising their rights under the GPL."
He insisted that he had the right to ignore a clear contract stipulation, and there is nothing to contradict that.
Ah, America. The best justice money can buy has once again proven that it's the money that defines the justice. If you or me tried that bullshit, we'd be in jail, but because it's a company with hundreds of thousands in the bank, it gets to decide what the outcome of the trial actually is.
Contractual stipulations be damned.
Because the kick to the behind that will follow will be much less pleasant.
Honestly, what is IBM thinking ? People may be looking for employment elsewhere, but right now that doesn't mean that they can find a position. We're in self-isolation, that makes things a tad difficult for interviews, doesn't it ?
It is extremely telling that such a phrase seems totally normal these days.
Dual screens. We've spent over four decades using IT stuff more and more because prices have, globally, always been falling. For what seems like forever I've only used one screen per computer, like everybody else. But, since between five and ten years, I've been seeing more and more developers use two screens at work, and I've personally been on two screens at home for nine years now. About a third of my career.
I know some people who have three screens. My graphics card has four ports for connecting screens. It is currently managing exactly 10 512 000 pixels.
Technology is awesome.
Great idea, genius. That way AMD has the perfect reason to sue you.
Admit it, you never had the intention of doing The Right Thing, you just wanted to brag about what you'd found. And what's with the four copies ? Did you think that you needed to make extra copies in case the main one was taken down ? That's how lazy scum think.
Stress and panic may explain why the guy didn't find his spreadsheet, but that does not explain why he didn't try and learn from the situation.
When you find yourself in a bind and someone comes along to dig you out, you're supposed to gain experience and learn how not to get yourself in such a situation again.
I guess that, since apparently he didn't call back the next day, he at least learned to pay attention to the recent file list, but most probably he just went back to his habit of clicking on the first thing in the list. Oh well, maybe after a decade he finally learned how files work.
In other words, pie-in-the-sky, Ai-is-wonderful, please-continue-funding-me papers that apparently have a diametrically opposite view from papers based on actual data.
Why am I not surprised ?
These are the kinds of papers that proclaim that facial recognition works almost perfectly, when actual trials come back with a success rate of less than 13%.
Look, I understand that theoretical physics is just as important as actual physics, but the difference is that theoretical physicists do not try to pass their musings as actual science. They ask science engineers to create the experiments that justify or invalidate their theories. Once a result is obtained, they review their theories and progress in their musings.
It seems that, as far as "AI" is concerned, there are no such updates. That means that actual AI is nowhere near being created because the pie-in-the-sky musing are not bothering to ground themselves in reality.
Oh well, it's for the better I guess. The longer we take to build an actual Skynet, the better.
The one going to jail, of course. I do feel sorry for the person who was just walking around, minding their own business, and found themselves before the pearly gates.
Accidents do happen, of course, and I understand that this was not a case of cold-blooded murder or a joyride that ended badly. But still, someone died. A price must be paid.
And, when he gets out in 18 months, he can remember that the other person is not getting out of their grave.
Sadness all around.
A Pi has crashed. In a standalone game thingy. I'm supposing it doesn't get updates, so it doesn't change. What can possibly have brought it to its knees ?
Given that each CPU failed to launch (apparently it has two), the problem shouldn't have anything to do with associated hardware (like spinning rust that failed to respond). Looking at the messages, each CPU has a stack exception, and then fails to complete startup.
So the question is : what threw a stack exception ?
Another possibility is that companies are going to want that project completed double-time, since they've had to wait for it to get done.
I'm not convinced project cancellations are going to be all that legion. Sure, there will undoubtedly be some, but I think there will be more that will request urgent finishing, or undertaking.
We'll see.
Well, they're working very well, are they ?
At the same time, this is Ebay we're talking about. I think it's a bit unfair to single out the guy who posted an offer at 0.01 and the offer reached 210. It's not the sellers' fault if people are nuts, even if it is rather obvious that he fully intended to take advantage of the nuts.
It seems obvious to me that, given the period, a judge will not rule in favor of a client complaining that the job wasn't done on time.
It should be useless to even try. Nobody is going to be on time for a few months at least. This lockdown is going to throw plenty of schedules into the shredder.
Sounds like paradise. And, made faster and easier means making more with the same resources means each unit costs less, so it's a win-win-win.
Except that they're going to want to recoup the costs of putting it in place, so we're not going to see price drops any time soon. And the gaming crowd won't care because it'd DDR5, man, look at those framerates !