Re: The reason we use it so much is that is is better than man
Apparently, it isn't.
But it is trendy.
For the moment.
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That must be a purely Japanese problem. I have enough rooms in my house, I don't need to buy a mobile one.
That being said, the day we do get 100% fully secure self-driving vehicles, I would probably not mind one where I can watch something during the trip, since I won't have to pay attention to the road.
Oh, and I don't mean watch ads, Ford.
Why ? What have the problems been ? How many pilots have there been ?
I'd like a bit more info on that. Until we get actual fusion, I am convinced that nuclear (preferably Thorium) is the way to go. So what are these SMRs based on and why is it apparently so hard to get them working on land when they are working fine in nuclear submarines ?
That is the question.
Two weeks means regular maintenance has not been performed. It means competent people have left, and documentation has not been recorded. It means that corporate knowledge has been lost. Or it means that you never paid attention beyond "now it's working".
Now, you have to play catch up.
Good luck with that.
It is disturbing to see that governments the world over are now prone to attacking the validity of a claim instead of proving any wrong (or justifying their position).
A government states that it wants to block DNS. Citizens claim that that is a bad idea.
That is not a false claim. It is a perfectly legitmate claim and, if the idea had any actual justification, you would not have backtracked a mere day after making the claim.
It most definitely does. I believe that Humans, as a species, need to stop just doing whatever because of immediate satisfaction.
We have a responsibility, due to our absolute ability to get stuff done. Bears shit in the woods ? We can remove the forest if we feel like it. We're doing that in some places on this planet. We need to better understand the consequences of our actions.
We're supposed to be intelligent. When I see someone throwing a cigarette butt out of a car window, I wonder if that is really true. We act like none of our actions have any consequence. A cigarette butt ? It's nothing. Out the window it goes. But it is something, we just don't realize exactly what the consequences are.
We need to learn the consequences of our everyday lives, and adapt to the better side of those consequences.
It's for our own good. Because reading that 75% of Italian mothers have microplastics in their breast milk is something that really does not sound good to me.
It is, however, the consequence of our own ignorance.
So stop being ignorant and do something about it.
Of course it is, it wants the subsidies and the fat contract.
On the other hand, it acts like a spoiled brat. Boeing didn't attend the briefing ? What pathetic man-child decided that that was a professional attitude to have ?
If it was up to me, Boeing would be stricken from the list of partners of NASA in general, period.
The entire notion of copyright needs a massive overhaul to enter the digital age we are living in.
I don't have a solution. I have no idea what the solution is. I absolutely believe that the creator of an original work should be adequately compensated if said work garners public attention, but things like Disney should no longer happen. A work is created by a person. When that person dies, so should his/her copyright. If said person worked for a company and produced said work for the company, the person should still be the holder of the copyright, not the company. And rights should only be transferable to living, breathing people, not to a company.
But that is just my opinion . . .
And there's the problem right there : people will apparently accept anything that hoovers up their personal data as long as they see a smidgen of benefit.
Funnily enough, I don't think there are many people who would agree to get beaten every morning if it meant they would be paid 10% more, but as soon as computer is involved, people lose all sense of measure and can only think "oh, if I give up all my data I can get a voucher for free ice cream ? Deal !".
Pfff.
I have trouble finding out if Verizon is a reliable, trustworthy company. I found this article that states that, in 2008, Verizon was ranked #1 for wireless service, but when I google "Verizon reputation", I find scores of posts and web pages citing unhappy people and issues with either their connection or the help they (do not) get from Verizon.
Apart from the shenanigans of buying back what they got rid of years ago, I'm just wondering if this is a move that will actually make things easier for people in the long run (I couldn't care less about if it makes things better for the Board).
Well I have to agree that, for a company supposedly doing network monitoring, if it takes you more than 3 days to "update" your own network, you're doing it wrong.
Your network should be updated constantly and seamlessly, with a reboot of one server being handled by a failover server.
I mean, when you know how to properly design your tools and network, that is.
What is that title ?
Isn't an advocate for something supposed to be independant from said something ?
Okay, I know, in these times when anything PR is supported by a budget from the interested party (unless we're talking about publicity, which can be generated in myriad ways), an "advocate" is very likely to have a financial interest in advocating (ahem, "influencers" . . .), but honestly, can't you just give the title it deserves : Public Relations Manager ?
Well, now we know just how far Broadcom is willing to go to honor the obligations of the company it bought . . . aka no farther than you can throw it.
This is indeed going to be interesting. A Board who thinks it has all the rights vs a Fortune 500 company that holds part of the security interests of the nation at stake. And all of this based on legal contract.
Methinks Broadcom is going to be eating humble pie pretty soon . . .
Conflicting data access ? How is it that salaries are stored in an LLM in the first place ?
Oh, silly me, it's because CoPilot hoovers up everything it can, then serves it back to whoever asks. Security ? Controlled access ? Ha ha. We're talking about Windows here. Even the US Government is starting to complain about Windows snafus.
With what manpower ? Will they be hiring additional agents to support the increased workload ?
I applaud the initiative, to be sure, but is sharing the data going to be enough to improve oversight ?
Because in the end, somebody is going to have to review that additional data, collate it and analyze it, and that for each agency involved.
Or there might be a joint task force for every case, to make the data sharing more productive.
In any case, it won't be simple, but it is a good idea.
Of course the CFO of a company hyping AI is going to say that. He's got investors to think of. He's the chief bookkeeper, he doesn't know the technology, he just sees the revenue.
The truth will happen soon enough, and then we'll see him bail with a golden parachute, leaving the company, and the hype, in the dust.
In any case, they look a perfect fit for roles in the next Lock, Stock & Barrel film.