"Musk promised"
Is that news ?
Musk has promised so much that, if he actually had delivered 10% of what he promised, we'd be having Jetson cars now.
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
"Theoretically and given a court order, Apple can figure out the randomly generated ID of the user in question. If we were to hand out the data associated with the randomly generated ID, it would only be the bandwidth usage of that user in the current month, and two months in the past. Older data is automatically deleted. "
So I understand that this so-called privacy enhancement won't keep Apple from tracing a user for up to at least three months - because sure you say you delete older data, but why should I believe you ?
I'm supposed to pay $100 (let's not quibble) per year to have my privacy depend on yet another company actually repecting its word ?
Somehow that does not inspire much confidence to me.
Plus, I note that this is only for Apple users. Non-Apple users are apparently not worth the effort.
And there is no tech that hasn't been at least tested to see how it can be used on the battlefield.
Ever since the first pre-hominid who picked up a branch and found that he could use it to club an opponent, we humans have nearly always found a way to use new tech to help us kill or defend (which is just killing preventively) more efficiently.
Is that what defines intelligence ?
Then you cite two years.
Looks to me like China is doing fine for a country that Trump has decided to block at every turn.
So they're two years behind ? They're catching up is the point. Plus China doesn't need the US market (or Europe, for that matter). China has plenty to do at home, and time to get it done.
That is one advantage of government the Chinese way : it doesn't change direction every four to eight years.
And ?
Competition is good. It weeds out the incompetent, leaves only the strong.
But I can understand that a member of the Trump administration is worried about the possibility that a country that has spent the last century making practically every bit of tat the USA cosnumes daily is finally spreading its own wings.
After having been copiously shat upon by a certain orange baboon.
Far be it from me to question scientific observation, but how is it that a disparate cloud of gas in the middle of the nothingness of space can retain such a temperature ?
That's a bloody high level of activity for electrons that haven't been doing anything for eons.
Given a few more eons, I'm guessing they'll cool down enough to coalesce into stars and solar systems, maybe even whole galaxies, but still I have to wonder : what was their initial temperature ?
I take that to mean that Borkzilla is mirroring your PC 100% of the time, instantly.
You had better not be on an ADSL link for this service. I'm guessing GB fiber is mandatory.
Just another excuse for Redmond to have control over all your data, but this one will really cost you.
But all that aside, I'm just wondering : if this is an instant copy of your PC environment, what happens when you get pwned by malware ?
What are the use cases for this tech ? Is Redmond promising that its Reserve Cloud PC will be immune to malware (it can't) ? What happens if you've lost your connection and only notice half an hour later ? A PC is, after all, made for working locally.
And when you do recover the use of your PC, what synchronization options are there ? And why should you trust them ?
As a Tolkien fan, I know exactly what that refers to. No, no link. Look it up.
As a European, it amuses me immensly to see just how successful the orange baboon is in isolating his country from the rest of the world.
A wall for Mexico ? My good sir (I'm being polite here), you're making a much greater wall of indifference and distrust and its cost will be the matter of debate for decades to come.
I know there are people who absolutely have to have infinite life and whatever. I knew one of those guys (yeah, he was a guy, somehow I don't think girls are that much into cheating in games - so sue me), and was tremendously amused at his rage with Half Life 2. You see, there was a life cheat, but the developers had found an extremely clever way to block it : at one point, you had to die to continue playing.
Cue said cheater bitterly complaining that the game was blocking his progress. Cue me laughing my head off.
But cheating at Minecraft ? What's the point ?
You can create a Build world where you have access to everything and mobs (enemy monsters) ignore you.
Oh, you're part of the scum that just have to have every advantage you can whatever game you play. On a public server, of course. Actually learning something does not interest you, even when you're playing a game that allows you all the time in the world to learn the mechanics and get used to how it plays.
I pity you. Poor Neanderthal.
Congratulations Redmond, you've just found another justification in having revoked your QA department : you have your entire customer base doing it for you !
Isn't that the ultimate savings ?
Because none of them are going to leave, now are they ? Of course not. They stay tied hands and feet to your benevolence, and totally ignore how much money it costs them to remain under your control instead of hiring some competent network specialists and going to Linux, which would condemn you to the dustbin that you deserve.
Because that would mean making their management learn something, instead of going for the tried and true Excel charts and Powerpoint presentations.
Dear God forgive me, but sometimes I wish our entire economical world would collapse so that we could migrate to something that is actually functional.
Unfortunately, that would mean something like this, and the cost in innocent lives would be more than I could bear.
So we'll just have to slog it through and wait for the current generation of useless manglement to die out before maybe having a chance at getting true performance and professionals back into the enterprise arena.
I'll be dead by then anyway, so good luck, kids.
But there's fuck all I can do about it. Somebody has to answer my request to connect to El Reg, and the first in line is my Internet provider, or my phone company if I'm using my "smart"phone. I have no choice about that, and what they do with that data vs what they say they do is beyond my control.
Google has its sticky fingers everywhere, thanks to its "free" libraries every web developer is using these days, and it's kind of difficult to block that 100% of the time (but I try my best with NoScript and uBlock Origin - obviously my default browser is not Chrome). Facebook is easier to block, but only because I don't have an account, so I don't care and no website will refuse to work if I do. As for Apple, I don't have an iPhone or anything Cupertino-based, so that is also blocked by default (thank God for NoScript).
Xi is not my problem. As mentioned before, he doesn't give a gnat's fart about me and there's nothing he can do to me. If he gets my browsing info from my VPN provider, so be it.
But there is one thing that gets my hackles up every time :
"Chinese law can force any China-based company to assist national intelligence agencies and share customer data with Beijing "
That kind of declaration should automatically be followed by "just like the USA can do to any American-based company with its National Security letters".
Enough of this gratuitious China bashing. NSA letters have existed since 1978, so I think it is safe to say that Beijing is just following Washington's lead on this subject.
And therein lies the rub. It's inefficient, it hallucinates, but we promise you it'll make you save money (on salaries) and might even make you money (maybe even more than us).
Yeah. Looks like we're getting closer to the peak of inflated expectations, though.
Um, sorry but I don't see the use an attack method that can be "reversed". Does that mean it can be bounced back to the attacker ?
I've tried to search for this, but the best reference I get is this one, and they don't mention that kind of attack.
Could someone enlighten me ?
But, but . . we've been told for nearly two decades now that The Cloud<supTM</sup> is the best-performing and most cost-effective computing environment there is ! That businesses should all move massively to cloudy platforms because their costs will become negligeable !
Was that all, <gasp>, a lie ?!?
Recruitment offer that demands you to be young and highly qualified and experienced at the same time ? What a surprise.
This has been going on for decades already. Companies want to put you to work and pay you peanuts for the priviledge. Everybody knows the stupidity of this, but somehow it keeps on happening.
May I remind you that China has it's own version of Linux (that it uses) ?
That, thanks to Trump and his crass ignorance of the slightest notion of diplomacy, China is now gearing up its own, homegrown semiconductor industry ?
That China has its own automobile industry, its own smartphone industry, and is going to be the first country in the world with a functional Thorium power plant ?
If there is one country on this planet that will have no problem kicking out Microsoft, it's China.
I seriously doubt that Bejing is using OneDrive to store its administrative papers.
Ask Munich. If I recall correctly, it made a lot of noise about going full Open Source twice, and failed miserably.
My understanding, at the time, is that it was just a move to get Redmond to lower license costs.
You are definitely right though, times have indeed changed and the blind trust the world has given to the USA for decades is now pretty much gone.
I will be very interested in seeing what happens with the Danish.
They're not particularly known for making bold statements without following them with acts.
Simple : never.
Canva is apparently in the business of making pretty pictures. I have tried Leonardo. While it is honestly rather impressive, Leonardo apparently doesn't know what an Imperial Star Destroyer looks like and cannot reproduce anything closer than a triangular blob. One would think that, since 1977, the image of an ISD is basically public domain but, apparently, George Lucas' lawyers are much more efficient than the lawyes of all the authors whose books have been scraped as fodder to "teach" LLMs.
Of course it is.
It's not like a few burning automated vehicles is going to keep Silicon Valley startups from getting more venture capital and setting themselves up for going public, right ?