Well, good for him
He just took everything he'd ever worked on and made a giant JPG out of it.
Which he sold for almost $70 million, the bastard.
I wonder how long it'll take him to spend all that money ?
19014 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I know some will howl with dispair, but don't forget that Domino 12 allows you to use a browser to access Notes databases. No more thick client with the funky shortcuts.
Domino is much easier to manage than Exchange, and can accept way more clients. Clustering Domino mail servers is robust and responsive, and Domino is not easily hacked.
There are some arguments in its favor now.
Well, yes, and no.
Microsoft's Windows Virtual Desktop is free, tied to your existing 365 license (that's what it's website says). Of course, Microsoft then goes and contradicts itself on its pricing page, but hey, nobody ever said Borkzilla's right hand knew what its left hand was doing.
This Alibaba Cloud offering is obviously a good idea. People have had to scramble in the past year to get their hands on anything with a screen, so local CPU power and RAM is likely not in the high range. Offering a remote PC which your wheezing lump of plastic and toxic metals can just look at while the remote does the job is not a bad idea.
I'd like a realistic pricing on Borkzilla's offering though, for comparison.
"freezing management's wages and domain renewal prices, increasing the amount of money paid to good causes, and creating new ways to communicate with members "
Not enough. Management wages should not be frozen, they should be brought back to level they were before the unjustified augmentations. Do not increase the amount of money paid to good causes, set it to the amount it was before you slashed it so unjustly.
And you need no "new" ways to communicate with members, you only need to reactivate the forum you already had before you decided that you didn't like the comments.
I sincerely hope you crash and burn.
Um, I think it presents a much more exciting opportunity for Atos, which will be milking NEST for two decades and maybe more if things don't go IBM.
Of course, the £1.5bn will have been spent in 10 years instead of 18, because of all the stuff that will be added, but hey, it's a UK Gov IT project, so nobody will be surprised.
Whether it's a single person, a Board, a Council or however else you want to call it, some entity has to be calling the shots.
You want to take a dig at Torvalds ? He can take it.
But, functionally, your method is no different. A decision is made from On High, and it is enforced in the community.
I'm glad you found a method that suits you, but don't go feeling all smug about it. Nominet used to be managed by its community, now look where it's at.
"In the eight per cent of simulations as a responding driver that Waymo's code couldn't improve on, each was the result of a rear-end collision – which human drivers also have a hard time avoiding. "
It is well-neigh impossible for a person waiting at a red light to avoid being rear-ended, but I'd argue that it should be entirely possible for an automated vehicle to avoid rear-ending a stopped car. I fail to see how Waymo finds this inevitable.
Also, I'd like to ask if they simulated the weather conditions at the time of the accident (of course not), or the state of the road signage (wear and tear - obviously not), or the position of the sun (nope). These are things a human driver has to cope with, and an automated vehicle will have to learn to cope with as well.
In short, their simulation simulated what would happen in an ideal world with ideal driving conditions.
So 10 out of 10 when everything's perfect. Great news.
Now try it again in the real world.
If we wait on those to solve our connectivity problems, we might as well unplug everything.
I don't know what the final solution is, but a good start is to stop using other people's code with blind trust. Oh sure, take a module from GitHub, by all means, but don't link to it. Bring it in on your dev server, check the code, test it to see if it works. If it is suitable, then port that to your production environment.
If there's an update on GitHub, start over.
Yes, it is tedious and time-consuming. The alternative is SolarWinds123.
Your choice.
The future of quantum computing apparently relies on the discovery of a theoretical particle that is its own antiparticle. That seems to be quite the barrier to entry.
On the other hand, "they were unable to replicate their study’s results " means that the study was clearly not conducted in a scientific manner. When you're a scientist, you're supposed to check, double check and, in a case like this, triple check your data and your results. When you can reliably replicate your results, then you can publish.
So this was not a proper scientific study. It was, however, a perfectly valid Microsoft study : throw something on the wall, see if sticks, publish.
Way to go.
Indeed.
Since Office 2010 I have seen many companies imposing restrictions on the Reply All button in Outlook (as a freelance consultant I see many different companies).
I have also heard of some people getting called to the CEOs office - and it wasn't for a promotion. I'll bet those ones didn't repeat the blunder any time soon.
As far as I can see, the notion of Windows in space is stillborn. DOA.
Windows is an OS that cannot function properly without a regular connection to the mothership (pun intended). On top of that, if ever have to reinstall a PC on the other side of the Moon, Windows Activation is going to be a right nightmare.
Don't go telling me that you can install a Windows Activation Server or other such nonsense. It is not a solution, it is nothing but a Band-Aid.
Linux is the only OS that deserves going to space. It's modularity and frugality are legendary, and it does not phone home.
I have to say, I take my hat off to all you admins who worked your asses off and did miracles to ensure that your company would continue to function in an environment nobody had ever envisioned before.
It is also a testament to the general resiliance of the Internet that this flurry of activity went by practically without a hiccup.
Hardware improvements probably did a lot as well. If this pandemic had hit in the '90s, it would have been a world of hurt in IT departments I think.
Of course it does. Google is going to believe anything that allows it to keep flinging targetted ads.
Except that the problem is, it is the targetting that violates privacy. Doesn't matter how it's done, as Mike 137 says quite rightly.
Get rid of targetted ads.
Why is there any surprise about this report ? It's Google, idiots, of course it's not in line with GDPR.
And a government wanting to use a document management system managed by a US company ? Are they out of their minds ?
You're a European government, set up your own servers and handle your own documents.
You can use LibreOffice, it's good enough for government work.
That pace is slowing down, and its type is evolving.
Back in the days of the first IBM PC, it took less than a year to get a more powerful processor. Intel was running full tilt on new CPU designs, and the frequency was always climbing. Every year the new model was visibly much more powerful than the last.
Then we hit the 4Ghz barrier, and there was no more easy way to wring more power out of a CPU core. So, Intel went lateral and started thowing more cores into the die. On top of that, hard disks got their own channel, instead of IDE sharing with another.
Then we got PCI express and SATA connections, making disc access a breeze.
And here we are now, with machines that are multitasking every part of their functions and control being delegated to in the most efficient way we can think of. The consequence ? This year's model is barely faster than last year's.
I used to upgrade my PC's components every year. I haven't touch my main PC in six years now. It still works fine for what I do.
That said, now I am oogling the latest CPUs and graphics cards, and sketching out my dream configuration. Hey, it's been six years, right ? ;)
They obviously haven't the faintest idea what it is, but it's trending, so we'll ask for that.
Um, guys, low-code means you don't need a coder to write it up. You can do it yourselves. THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR.
Tendering for a low-code "specialist" is like hiring someone to eat your food for you. You can eat it yourself.
The shape of the battlefield of the future is changing. What will we end up with ? One human pilot and three drones for wingmen ? Will the squadron be counting human assets and dozens more drone assets ?
And what of communication security ? All of this has to be encrypted, otherwise the enemy could hack into the drone's comm channel and give it orders. I'm sure they have given that thought.
So the real question is : when will they remove the human element entirely ?
I wouldn't mind taking a stroll on the regolith, but we're talking an entire different kettle of frozen fish and the amount of possible issues are likely an order of magnitude greater than by just flying over it.
I think that, for a first try, a successful flyby and safe return will already be a major achievement.
If you don't see what you like, then you can make it happen yourself.
Of course, at this level that's going to mean a lot of meetings and discussions, but in the end, Apple and Google just might find their influence diminished somewhat.
Obviously, if that is a risk, both of them will flock to the MNF and ensure that they have their say as well.
On the other hand, I have a bit of a problem understanding what the state has to do with the naming of an industrial location. For the state, what is important is the address and the size. Musk can rename it every day if he wants, I don't see that that has any impact on the state.
Of course they are.
Until you decide that they aren't any more.
Anyway, this whole thing just demonstrates once again that you should actually read the EULA for products that deal with backing up your data. Nothing is more important than that.
That said, Spanning is definitely guilty of false advertising. I checked out their website and it is clearly stated : "With no limit on storage capacity or number of backups ". To put that on your website and then bury limits in the EULA is really bad form. Spanning is clearly spinning a lie to bring in victims customers, no doubt betting on the fact that most people don't have all that much to backup.
Sneaky and dishonest.
Yeah, except that Huawei has a 1+ billion population to rely on.
I'm guessing you can build some pretty big software houses on that basis.
China may not yet have a Borkzilla, but it will. And that day, you can be sure that China's Borkzilla is going to dwarf every other multinational corporation there is.
"All sides understood that Perl.com belonged to Tom and it was a simple matter of work to resolve it "
If all sides understood, then how come somebody got conned into changing the records ?
I know nothing about how DNS records are managed, but if someone can get a hold of something that doesn't belong to them with a simple phone call or email, then security needs to be tightened up somewhere. My website is insignificant, but if someone managed to take it away from me, I'd be pretty pissed.
That is not a legal team. That is Goebble's PR team hard at work.
There is no legal reason to replace the 'concerns' with the word 'considerations'. Legally, that has no justification.
Propaganda-wise, though, it is a very good decision.
Except that, irony, the propaganda department is working against some of the best engineers in the field, who have chosen their words with utmost care.
Team Goebbel doesn't stand a chance.