Yes, Huawei is the big bad
Meanwhile, Microsoft and all other US-based tech firms are constantly bombarded with police information requests - which they have to answer.
But Huawei is the danger.
Of course.
19436 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Oh really ?
Show me one bank account that has been hacked.
I'm not talking about credit cards, I'm talking about the account itself.
Go on, show me one case where a bank account was hacked and money transferred without the authorization of its actual owner.
Good on them.
All this data sharing shenanigans is just driving me nuts. Finally some people are taking a stand and thank God it's the doctors.
They took the Hippocratic Oath, not the Hypocratic Oath, and they're doing their job.
It may very well be that there can be a legitimate use and benefit from a centralized national health database, but the UK Government is not exactly in the best of positions when it comes to providing any sort of guarantee on how that data will be protected and managed.
Especially not if any US private company is involved.
The obligatory conclusion from that statement is that there has been "legal" use of the Pegasus spyware.
Logic is extremely simple. If India didn't use the software, the Minister would have been boasting about it.
He's not, so they're using it.
Yes. Of course. The usual bullshit.
You're committed to, of course. You take very seriously, obviously.
And you took five fucking months to reveal the problem.
That is a brilliant demonstration of your actual commitment.
Five months, during which your responsability to protect data left your customers exposed.
Burning at the stake is too good for you.
True words.
But it is also true that you can be influenced by people you have respect for, and those people do not necessarily have enlightened views.
I am, obviously, referring primarily to your parents and elders, because that's where all this nonsense starts.
The one thing to hope for is that it ends with you.
That comes as a surprise to me.
Okay, I'm just a programmer and I have zero qualifications when it comes to physics, but I would have thought that if the size of the wave is smaller, you'd need a larger antenna to properly capture it. The rules of physics have spoken, and I bow before them.
But what is this love affair with 802.11 ? Instead of suffixing with an endless array of letters, couldn't they finally pass on to 802.12 ?
Let it go, guys. There are more numbers available.
I agree with you. The sentiment is most assuredly well-placed, but plain HTML would have been a much more valid demonstration.
What is killing the Web's usefulness is JavaScript. The over-reliance on this demonstrably dangerous technology is not just a nuisance, it is responsible for 99% of all malware infestations and, at the best of times, just transforms a web site into something you can't even bookmark properly.
Long live NoScript !
Short is not equal to young. We don't let five year olds drive because they're not mature enough to handle driving, not because they can't reach the pedals. Short adults are very capable of driving.
Additionally, short people have eyes that generally work. He could very well have controlled that the pin was placed in the right socket.
He didn't.
P.S. : why is Danny 2's post no longer open to votes ? What is the reason of this special treatment ?
That's rich coming from a country with National Security letters and more than 10 official requests per day to Microsoft - that we know of.
A collision of three robots. Two I can understand, but three ?
And how exactly did they catch fire ? Were they carrying flammable cargo, or did their batteries overload and if so, how is it that they have batteries that can do that ? Shouldn't there be some temperature monitoring ?
So many questions . . .
I work in Luxembourg.
Check it out on the world map. It's a very small country. You can cross it in an hour on the highway.
It's even smaller in the workplace. I learned that very early on in my career.
If you want to chew someone out, you had better be damn sure you're right, because your reputation can be trash quicker than you can blink.
Does it matter, seeing as Bourdain did express those sentiments albeit in an email and not into a microphone?
Yes it matters.
We most definitely should not get into the habit of bending the ghosts of dead people whichever we choose simply because we can.
The only case where I would accept recreating a specific person's voice is when the actual recording of said person has bad audio quality. That, for me, would be acceptable, especially in the case of a documentary or such, but I would still prefer that there be a banner or some notification that the portion had been recreated.
If we are already faking people's voices to make them say things they never actually pronounced in public when we are the very beginning of this technology, just how far are we going to go with it ?
Knowing the basic (absence of) principle of the Human race, we'll go too far.
So let's reign it in now.
I think we've already seen some real damage.
Go ask the hospitals that have been hacked if the damage wasn't real.
As for an online ID ? Pie-in-the-sky. Won't ever happen until the Internet is managed by a single entity, and that's not happening for the forseeable future if only because China ain't going to let anyone else manage its local part of the Internet.
Am I supposed to believe that there were 5000 engineers lying around waiting to be hired ?
Okay, it's China, but even in China I would think that an engineer is not exactly the kind of person that waits for a job.
So that would mean that he hired 5000 newly-minted engineers from China's universities ?
Hmm. So they'll be getting their experience on the job, then. Good for them, maybe not so good for Xiaomi.
That's interesting. I thought there were standards on that point in my country.
In every house or appartment I have ever owned, the meter to my property was either in a cabinet labelled as such, or in the garage.
As it is in the house we live in since November 2017. I have the meter and the cutoff lever in the garage, just like I had it in the house we lived in before for 20 years.
On the other hand, in this house I have no idea where the public water mains is if ever my water meter needs replacing.
Interesting, isn't it ? There are some bits of technology that simply don't fail. How come we can't do that with light bulbs or garage doors ?
"How can we all be satisfied that drivers of vehicles fitted with ALKS know how and when to take back control of their vehicle? "
For me, the answer is simple : we can't.
As long as there are bloody Tesla idiots who put themselves in the back seat of their car, I am not going to put an ounce of trust in any technology that purports allowing the driver to not pay attention to the road.
Give me a true autonomous vehicle, or get lost.
Yes, let's absolutely merge together all anti-virus companies.
After all, they all use the same principle : compare binary code against signatures, which has proved time and time again to not be enough.
Then we can start talks about monopoly, and how we need to break them up again.
The world goes round and round . . .